Call of Duty 3

This game is pretty good, but I liked both Call of Duty 2's better. But this was still a good game. The only thing that I think is bad about it is that there only 13 levels. In Call of Duty, there were 27, and in Call of Duty: Big Red One, there were 14. I would have given this a ten, but I took one star off for that. I also took one star off because at first, the levels seem like they are long, but after you play them for a while, you start to get bored and you realize that the levels aren't that long. I took another star off for that. But the rest of the game is pretty good. It has a really good story that follows the campaign that followed D-Day, and the battles through France between the Americans, British, Scottish, French, Polish, and Canadians against the Germans. It's a pretty good game that, I thought, was kind of a sad ending. Another good thing about it is that instead of fighting and finishing one campaign at a time, you switch off between missions between factions. This was a pretty good game. 8/10.

Literally out of All of the Call of Duty's, this one is literally one of the worst and that is saying something properly just as bad if not worse that Call of Duty WWII. The AI is incompetent beyond belief, there are to many glitches, cut scenes are pointless-can't even skip through them; played through it once and never will play it again, I just own it now and let it collect dust on my shelf just to say I own the complete collection of Call of Duty games. Would easily have no problem telling people to take a hard pass on this one, because you are not missing anything if you skip over it, don't waste your time or money.

I've always liked the Call of duty games. But I totally raised my expectations after Call of duty 2. It was realistic in every matter. But the usual way it worked was one game on Pc, one on console. and the one on PC rocked and console was bad to Okay. Then COD 2 came out for Xbox 360 and it became one crappy game for current and one awesome for next gen. But then--then they had to go and release COD 3 for all consoles. The same stupid game. This game is a lot worse than COD 2. Guns aren't realistic and AI is scripted. This game is like a cheap downsize for the COd series. It is still a moderately fun thrill ride with decent current gen graphics and great next gen graphics but my expectations are too high for this cheap add on to the COD series. I believe this was nothing more than a rushed pay off to make some cash. It's fun but not good enough for me. Good: Fun thrill ride story, Great graphic (XB360 & PS3) Bad: Cheap rush, infinity ward didn't make it, activision did.... Same: All the Ps2, Xbox and now current gen call of duties. Stick to The Pc games and the Call of duty 2 for XB360. 5/10 for low upgrade. This is supposed to be a sequel. The only new thing is the interactiveness ingame fighting and etc. Enjoy! I didn't....

Here are my pros and cons for this game

Pros 1. Still fun and enjoyful 2. Music is LIT 3. Strategic and amazing missions based in WW2 4. Better graphics released in PS3 5. Best characters 6. Different armies in this game (american, british, polish and canadian armies) 7. Multiplayer mode it's fun 8. It never gets boring

Cons 1. Gunshot sounds aren't realistic 2. Some guns aren't controllable, poor damage and low accuracy P.S MP40, KAR98K, STG44, etc etc

My conclusion for this game: Still playable and enjoyful, it never gets boring.

With so many installments into the storied Call of Duty franchise, it's easy to overlook older games, perhaps most especially Call of Duty 3. Despite this, it remains one of my personal favorites. The story was very good and took on a major battle of the Second World War that isn't always explored. The diversity in the campaign was the real strength: you play as an American infantryman and also a Canadian one, but also an SAS operative working with the French and a Polish tanker. The story isn't perfect and with four different storylines isn't properly fleshed out, but it's full of memorable characters and so many different things to do while giving you a great historical insight into the Battle of St. Lô. The weakest part of the game is the gameplay - this usually warrants a larger punishment but it's not bad gameplay at all, just clunky and doesn't age well.