23 reviews
- joesoundman
- Dec 21, 2022
- Permalink
It's obvious that this episode is based on various terrorist organizations of the day--such as the IRA and PLO. This isn't surprising, as all the Star Trek franchises have a history of making episodes with contemporary parallels.
In this episode, the Enterprise is visiting the Ruthian planet--a place which has been plagued with terrorist attacks for many, many years. It seems that the Ensatan separatists want their own homeland and they seem willing to do just about anything to bring about this change--including kidnapping Dr. Crusher. But there is another reason for taking her prisoner, as the Ensatans are experiencing serious genetic damage due to their use of dimensional shifting--a practice long abandoned by the Federation since it will eventually kill those who use it.
Naturally the Enterprise want the Doctor back but they also don't want to be picking sides or get pulled into the conflict. Unfortunately, the Ensatans don't see it that way and soon are targeting the Enterprise and its crew.
Overall this is a decent episode, though some might be offended at the moral relativity. In other words, terrorists and those fighting them in this one are basically the same. This is sometimes true...sometimes not in real life. But its message is compelling nevertheless.
In this episode, the Enterprise is visiting the Ruthian planet--a place which has been plagued with terrorist attacks for many, many years. It seems that the Ensatan separatists want their own homeland and they seem willing to do just about anything to bring about this change--including kidnapping Dr. Crusher. But there is another reason for taking her prisoner, as the Ensatans are experiencing serious genetic damage due to their use of dimensional shifting--a practice long abandoned by the Federation since it will eventually kill those who use it.
Naturally the Enterprise want the Doctor back but they also don't want to be picking sides or get pulled into the conflict. Unfortunately, the Ensatans don't see it that way and soon are targeting the Enterprise and its crew.
Overall this is a decent episode, though some might be offended at the moral relativity. In other words, terrorists and those fighting them in this one are basically the same. This is sometimes true...sometimes not in real life. But its message is compelling nevertheless.
- planktonrules
- Nov 15, 2014
- Permalink
The Enterprise crew get caught up in the internal politics of a planet suffering from terrorist activities.
This is a reasonably good episode that tackles a relevant subject in a fairly simplistic way. There are however a number of decent moments for the regular characters, particularly Dr Crusher.
The plot is quite simple with Crusher being kidnapped whilst Picard and the crew work to rescue her and battle terrorists. It starts off with a relatively unremarkable first half, but it gets more compelling later on as they direct their hostilities towards the Enterprise. There is nothing particularly memorable in what is presented on the subject or terrorism, other than that it's bad and this is underpinned by what becomes of Finn. Saying that the Northern Ireland reference does stand out, but more for the fact that it was controversial at the time of production and now because it's looking to be an inaccurate prediction.
Speaking of Finn and the guest characters, they are not particularly memorable for me. I do not think he is written particularly well and feels like a caricature. Devos is slightly better and she has a decent chemistry with Riker.
The main characters have a number of good moments. Dr Crusher holds firm on her ethical beliefs throughout the episode and has plenty of solid screen time. The likes of Data, Geordie, Wesley, Worf, Picard and Riker also make their own contributions to the resolution of the story.
The visuals are fairly good, particularly the action sequences. The sets are okay, but largely forgettable.
Performances of the regular cast members are all good, with Gates McFadden standing out with what I think is her best performance so far. As for the guest stars, Richard Cox does not convince me as a terrorist leader at all, but Kerrie Keane is fairly solid.
For me this one is a 6.5/10 but I round upwards.
This is a reasonably good episode that tackles a relevant subject in a fairly simplistic way. There are however a number of decent moments for the regular characters, particularly Dr Crusher.
The plot is quite simple with Crusher being kidnapped whilst Picard and the crew work to rescue her and battle terrorists. It starts off with a relatively unremarkable first half, but it gets more compelling later on as they direct their hostilities towards the Enterprise. There is nothing particularly memorable in what is presented on the subject or terrorism, other than that it's bad and this is underpinned by what becomes of Finn. Saying that the Northern Ireland reference does stand out, but more for the fact that it was controversial at the time of production and now because it's looking to be an inaccurate prediction.
Speaking of Finn and the guest characters, they are not particularly memorable for me. I do not think he is written particularly well and feels like a caricature. Devos is slightly better and she has a decent chemistry with Riker.
The main characters have a number of good moments. Dr Crusher holds firm on her ethical beliefs throughout the episode and has plenty of solid screen time. The likes of Data, Geordie, Wesley, Worf, Picard and Riker also make their own contributions to the resolution of the story.
The visuals are fairly good, particularly the action sequences. The sets are okay, but largely forgettable.
Performances of the regular cast members are all good, with Gates McFadden standing out with what I think is her best performance so far. As for the guest stars, Richard Cox does not convince me as a terrorist leader at all, but Kerrie Keane is fairly solid.
For me this one is a 6.5/10 but I round upwards.
- snoozejonc
- Jun 17, 2021
- Permalink
- classicsoncall
- Dec 12, 2023
- Permalink
This episode deals with the repercussions of terrorism. Not on its victims. But on the not inoccent-at-all bystanders: .
The crew of the Enterprise.
It poses the question of whether we should intervene in local affairs. Nowadays it can be seen as a commentary on the Israeli occupation, and annexation of the West bank,
or the Northern Ireland situation.
Hereby SF fullfills it function as social commentary on present day. This can be seen as Sci-Fi function to society. It is a mirror to our present day society.
The crew of the Enterprise.
It poses the question of whether we should intervene in local affairs. Nowadays it can be seen as a commentary on the Israeli occupation, and annexation of the West bank,
or the Northern Ireland situation.
Hereby SF fullfills it function as social commentary on present day. This can be seen as Sci-Fi function to society. It is a mirror to our present day society.
While visiting a planet in the midst of an upsurge in terrorist activity, Dr Crusher is abducted and held hostage. While Wesley assists in trying to combat a unique teleportation device deployed by the terrorists, his mother witnesses the casualties of war first-hand and tries to appeal to their fanatical leader, Kyril Finn.
It may have taken two and a half seasons but Dr Crusher finally gets the spotlight, allowing McFadden to demonstrate her talents as an actress. Unfortunately, the episode is a fairly forgettable effort that asks the question about the difference between being a terrorist and an instigator of political change with some alarming points made. Frankly, none of the supporting cast do well in a number of unlikeable roles and the episode never feels like it gets going. Still, at least Dr Crusher has a personality now - even if it is a dumb one.
It may have taken two and a half seasons but Dr Crusher finally gets the spotlight, allowing McFadden to demonstrate her talents as an actress. Unfortunately, the episode is a fairly forgettable effort that asks the question about the difference between being a terrorist and an instigator of political change with some alarming points made. Frankly, none of the supporting cast do well in a number of unlikeable roles and the episode never feels like it gets going. Still, at least Dr Crusher has a personality now - even if it is a dumb one.
- Benjamin_Cox
- Jun 22, 2024
- Permalink
- gritfrombray-1
- Jun 6, 2007
- Permalink
- RonT_Rockville
- Sep 26, 2024
- Permalink
This is certainly one of the best of "The Next Generation." An away team is enjoying a meal in a restaurant when there is a terrorist attack. An explosion results in several casualties. Unfortunately, Beverly Crusher, who as a doctor feels a moral imperative to help the wounded is captured and brought to the den of the insurgents. This turns into a classic representation of a civil war where there has been murder and mayhem for some time. Beverly is enlisted to attend to the needs of the insurrectionists as they also have casualties. She does her job but will not speak. A young charismatic man named Finn talks to her and tries to convince her to look at the events from two sides. The dominant culture has had a stranglehold on people for as long as he can remember and he is willing to die for his cause. Beverly smugly reminds him that there are other ways to do things and violence is never the way. He reminds her that the universe is scattered with bodies, the result of her own ship's actions, even if they are righteous. Many have compared this to the conflicts in Northern Ireland and it is no coincidence that the leader of the rebel forces is named Finn. A really provocative episode.
- thevacinstaller
- Mar 15, 2021
- Permalink
Intelligently written, doing what good science fiction always does, and what Star Trek sometimes excelled at. Using the backdrop of fictional situations to illustrate the more contentious issues and aspects of contemporary societal and political life.
And it manages to do this while maintaining the tension within the plot of a good story.
Yes it features the Crushers, but long gone is the somewhat mawkish relationship between mother and son of the first series.
The writer even manages to work in an old fashioned fist fight in the final act.
Sorry, no Buck Rogers stuff here for the space cadets, just a well executed, thoughtful allegorical tale of what happens when a division of a society is marginalised to the point that they are driven to extremism.
It asks questions that are very relevant, especially now, and doesn't attempt to answer them, and nor should it, to do so really would be preaching.
And it manages to do this while maintaining the tension within the plot of a good story.
Yes it features the Crushers, but long gone is the somewhat mawkish relationship between mother and son of the first series.
The writer even manages to work in an old fashioned fist fight in the final act.
Sorry, no Buck Rogers stuff here for the space cadets, just a well executed, thoughtful allegorical tale of what happens when a division of a society is marginalised to the point that they are driven to extremism.
It asks questions that are very relevant, especially now, and doesn't attempt to answer them, and nor should it, to do so really would be preaching.
- rcavictor-16647
- Sep 17, 2024
- Permalink
As of writing this in 2025 this is as topical as ever. The chief freedom fighter was excellently portrayed and the standout of the episode. All of his actions and the development of the plot felt consistent and reasonable to his character.
Prior to now we have always seen the federation be neutral, reasonable and questioning of potential immoralities in civilisations they encounter.
Here, it felt that compared to their usual selves 'our heroes' were too quick to side with the ruling powers, they were not skeptical enough of the ruling powers nor seemed to consider the rebel cause for a moment. Finn getting his request raised to Troi fulfilled would have felt like the happy ending.
However, that wasn't the ending we got, and the position the federation took throughout makes you understand why the Klingons, Ferengi and Romulans view them in the way that they do, making this a great episode.
The negatives, I'm still not convinced by Doctor Crusher as a character. More romantic hints at Picard, more mother scenes with Wesley, illogically disobeying orders with no subsequent discipline. I'd much rather Pulaski back.
Prior to now we have always seen the federation be neutral, reasonable and questioning of potential immoralities in civilisations they encounter.
Here, it felt that compared to their usual selves 'our heroes' were too quick to side with the ruling powers, they were not skeptical enough of the ruling powers nor seemed to consider the rebel cause for a moment. Finn getting his request raised to Troi fulfilled would have felt like the happy ending.
However, that wasn't the ending we got, and the position the federation took throughout makes you understand why the Klingons, Ferengi and Romulans view them in the way that they do, making this a great episode.
The negatives, I'm still not convinced by Doctor Crusher as a character. More romantic hints at Picard, more mother scenes with Wesley, illogically disobeying orders with no subsequent discipline. I'd much rather Pulaski back.
- tristanvmiles
- Apr 28, 2025
- Permalink
- serpwidgets
- Jan 14, 2022
- Permalink
- celineduchain
- Jan 9, 2022
- Permalink
- tautangata
- Mar 24, 2022
- Permalink
- Samuel-Shovel
- Oct 3, 2019
- Permalink
- GravediggerMark
- Oct 15, 2024
- Permalink
- zac-warsteiner
- Aug 17, 2020
- Permalink
Dr crusher would of never passed her entrance exam to star fleet. I wasn't a fan of this episode, it has lots of logical and story goofs and the focus on crusher always makes me snore. Her son is annoying enough.. Somehow he always has answers that work and that the officers and even data never can figure out.. shut up Westley!
- darkdementress
- Mar 27, 2020
- Permalink
This is another annoying, non-sequiteur episode that has nothing to do with the wider conflict within the Federation. The ridiculous capturing of Dr. Crusher was just annoying beyond belief.
I couldn't watch this episode because of the heavy-handed way of preaching and trying to make me swayed to a particular view-point.
I couldn't watch this episode because of the heavy-handed way of preaching and trying to make me swayed to a particular view-point.
- jseph1234-262-617488
- Jul 19, 2022
- Permalink