Rest Stop: Don't Look Back

I wasn't particularly impressed with the 2006 movie "Rest Stop", after having sat down not too long ago to watch it, so I was in no particular hurry to watch the 2008 movie "Rest Stop: Don't Look Back". But I mustered up and sat down to get it over with, you know, like yanking off a bandage from a deep wound.

The storyline in "Rest Stop: Don't Look Back", as written by John Shiban, was a fine mess of a scrambled heap of an inconsistent one if there ever was one. The narrative made little sense, and there were plot holes so big that I am sure the city depart of roads were ready to roll out and cover them up. I especially enjoyed how the brother named Jesse could just manage to disappear from a moving vehicle at a blink of an eye, but even more impressive was the fact that his brother didn't even go looking for him. I could go on with the lazy writing and plot holes here, but it is so bad that you have to watch it yourself to take it all in.

Was it the same actors and actresses from the 2006 movie? I don't know. Nor do I really care. Because both movies were subpar entertainment. But at least I can check them off of my watched-movies-list.

Visually, then "Rest Stop: Don't Look Back" has a little bit of gore and visceral mayhem, but nowhere enough to make up for all the shortcomings of the movie.

This is by no means a movie that will ever grace my screen a second time. Nor is it a movie that I would recommend horror fans to waste their time, money or effort on. But hey, having a sequel as bad as the predecessor must count for something, huh?

My rating of director Shawn Papazian's 2008 movie "Rest Stop: Don't Look Back" lands on a generous four out of ten stars.

Who in their right mind would green light a sequel to Rest Stop? And from a major studio. Ok, I have another question, but I know the answer. How is it possible to make a movie worse than the original Rest Stop? A: You can't. I'm giving this sequel an extra star for a couple things I appreciated: They go back and explain the origin, as well as exactly what was going on in the first movie. Also, seems like they were allowed to use real equipment this time, as this movie looks rather good. So, things make slightly more sense, but are there any good ideas? Absolutely not! Rest Stop: Don't Look Back is full of unintentional laughs, has some embarrassing performances, a silly curse (and resolution to it), plus a comically bad villain ("The Trucker"). Why did they give him a fake moustache? He looked like a dork. Assuming, he's supposed to be menacing. The actor they used is not intimidating to begin with.

So, it's a year after the first film, and the original couple, Jesse and Nicole, were never seen again. Jesse's brother Tom comes back from Iraq, and vows to find them. Along for the ride is his girl, and... Jared. 13 minutes into this thing, and I realize this insanely annoying character is in it for the long haul. At one point, Tom rescues Jesse... and BAILS! Leaving the other two behind to fight for themselves (in a losing battle).

Let's see, they really amp up the torture porn, so be warned. Also, this score blew as much as the first one (same person, who has gone on to a highly successful and prolific career, composes and conducts orchestral scores! Nowhere to be found here). Yeah, scratching on a low E string... real creative.

By far, the best part of this movie is the bible thumping family in the RV, who are given an expanded role, on the road looking to punish all sinners (and in the wife's case, get off as much as possible -- she is ecstatic in proving someone is sinful). I sort of liked the alternate ending better. The ending they used was just a setup for another sequel. The alternate was low key, and anti-climactic, but the idea was there (not even an original idea, but the one they went with was kind of dumb).

First saw this on a dvd which i own in 2008. Revisited it today. This film managed to explain about the happenings from the first part but ruined itself. Both the parts had unnecessary torture scenes. Now what kinda ghost tortures people n communicates with a gas station attendant n asks one person to torture another. The story takes place one year after Jesse and Nicole disappeared in the first part. Jesse's brother returns from Iraq n decides to go looking for his brother with his girlfriend and one of his friend.

Once they get to California, the trio asks direction from a gas station attendant who was never there in the first part. I don't kno how the attendant gets the horseriding badge that belonged to Nicole from the first part. Generous with 5 cos of the desert settings n the initial ten mins explanation.

The plot: Searching for his missing brother, a soldier runs into the killer ghost from Rest Stop, with predictable results for him and his friends.

Rest Stop 2 follows many of the conventions of the first movie, but manages to excise some of the pointless filler, replacing it with extended scenes of gory torture. Also, the origin of the ghostly killer is revealed, along with his connection to the creepy religious family. If you were dying to know these things, then I can understand why you'd want to see Rest Stop 2, but there really isn't much reason to subject yourself to this movie, when you can just read the synopsis on Wikipedia or the IMDb.

One of the saving graces of the original Rest Stop was its atmosphere and judicial use of gore. Unfortunately, the parts without gore tended to be a bit boring. In Rest Stop 2, the gore is pretty much its sole reason for being. As a result, I would recommend this movie only to fans of Rest Stop, gorehounds, and torture porn enthusiasts. Most other people will probably be either bored stupid or too grossed out. It's no masterpiece, but the gore effects are pretty good, for a low budget, direct-to-video sequel. Honestly, I'm a bit tired of horror movies that are nothing but young adults being tortured to death slowly, but I've seen worse ones than this. Some of the scenes were twisted enough to be memorable, but the movie itself really isn't.

One year after the disappearance of Jesse and Nicole, Jesse's brother Tom (a corporal in the Army, fresh on leave from Iraq) and two friends are on the trail. Although the police were unable to do anything, these three quickly stumble on the same path from a year before... encountering the religious family, the driver... and more. Will they meet the same fate? I really enjoyed "Rest Stop" and seeing that the same people -- most of the original cast (Jaime Alexander is noticeably absent), plus John Shiban and Shawn Papazian -- had returned, I figured this one couldn't be too bad. But my feelings are mixed. While some of it was pretty good, other aspects came across as lacking. I'll start with the defects and then go back to the merits.

The casting confused me. Both Tom Hilts (Richard Tillman) and his friend Jared (Graham Norris) weren't overly likable, and they came across as awkward. I had no interest in caring about them. The girlfriend (Jessie Ward) was good as far as being the "sexy chick", but beyond that had little to offer. Was I supposed to care about her? The other big concern was that while the creators had said they wanted to expand the mythology of the first film, almost every scene was covering the same territory all over again. It's true that new details about the driver emerged, and there was some added mythology, but not really enough to make this film seem progressive.

My final concern was the use of torture. I understand torture was used in the first film on the bus, but it seems like it was increased for this flick. For no particular reason. Having one character be turned on another? Excruciatingly painful incidents that do little or nothing in punishing sin, as near as I can tell. If you're going to use torture, use it sparingly. The torture meme has taken over horror and I have been sick of it for some time now... it's not scary, it's just getting played out and boring.

But the film is not without its merits. There's a great bathroom scene... an intense sex scene which could have gone further but goes pretty far as it is... and more of those creepy twins. The use of gritty filming (like in "Devil's Rejects") returns, which I think adds a lot of character (and should be used more, not less). And for those who liked the first film, this fills in some blanks that may have been lingering in the minds of viewers.

Overall, "Rest Stop: Don't Look Back" was not a necessary part of the series and could have gone without being made. I feel that for what was added, it wasn't nearly enough. At the same time, the film sets the stage for a "Rest Stop 3", since now there's bound to be questions needing answers for some people. I'm curious. I don't know if they can adequately answer my concerns about the plot, but they have my endorsement if they are willing to try. Just please... more plot, less torture.