IMDb RATING
4.8/10
3.7K
YOUR RATING
Four friends on a bachelor party exit a subway after an altercation. Trapped in a deserted station, they're hunted by cannibalistic dwellers living underground. A fight for survival ensues t... Read allFour friends on a bachelor party exit a subway after an altercation. Trapped in a deserted station, they're hunted by cannibalistic dwellers living underground. A fight for survival ensues to make it out alive.Four friends on a bachelor party exit a subway after an altercation. Trapped in a deserted station, they're hunted by cannibalistic dwellers living underground. A fight for survival ensues to make it out alive.
Karl Geary
- Joe
- (as Carl Geary)
Genadiy Ganchev
- Tunnel Rat #2
- (as Genadii Ganchev)
Itai Diakov
- Kid Tunnel Rat
- (as Ithai Daikov)
Stoyanov Vencislav
- Cop
- (as Vencislav Stojanov)
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
4.83.6K
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Featured reviews
Under Achiever
There are some lines at the beginning of the movie (after the "initial" shock scene that is), that try to convince that this movie has a real background. Of course as with many other horror movies, this does not stay in our reality and has quite some major flaws in it's story telling. You just get enough background information on some of the guys (their relationship to each other), to know who is who. Beyond that there is nothing to really distinguish them (apart from the character that Breckin Meyers portrays, but never really achieves anything with, except from his first scenes).
Actually, if you didn't know Breckin Meyer (which could be the case), you might be excused to not even really notice him and be completely irritated by his action(s) later as the movie progresses.
Storytelling and character aren't really the backbones of this movie, but it has some nice/decent horror moments and some pretty good gore effects. Unfortunately some scenes are edited/shot as if the cameraman/editor had been under "influence". I'm not a big fan of the "shake the camera" and it will look frightening theory. Others might be, not me though.
Decent, but nothing you really need to watch, unless you are into this sort of genre pictures (and even then there are so many other movies out there)
Actually, if you didn't know Breckin Meyer (which could be the case), you might be excused to not even really notice him and be completely irritated by his action(s) later as the movie progresses.
Storytelling and character aren't really the backbones of this movie, but it has some nice/decent horror moments and some pretty good gore effects. Unfortunately some scenes are edited/shot as if the cameraman/editor had been under "influence". I'm not a big fan of the "shake the camera" and it will look frightening theory. Others might be, not me though.
Decent, but nothing you really need to watch, unless you are into this sort of genre pictures (and even then there are so many other movies out there)
No Way Out
In New York, on the bachelor party of Mike (Kip Parude), he goes with his troublemaker brother Tony (Breckin Meyer) and his friends Carl (Scott Adkins) and Joe (Karl Geary) to a strip club; however Tony gets in a fight with other costumers and the group is expelled by the bouncers. Tony convinces Mike and his friends to take the subway and go to another bar; in the wagon, they see the striper Michelle (Sarah Barrand) and her friend Brita (Vinessa Shaw), and Carl makes a corresponded move to Michelle. When Tony flirts with Brita, she becomes upset and uses a spray against him. The train stops in a traffic light in an abandoned station, and Brita forces the door and leaves the wagon to breath, followed by the others. However the signal opens and they are left behind in the station, Mike, Tony, Joe and Brita decide to walk through the tunnel to the next station and seek help for Carl and Michelle that prefer to stay alone dating in the station. When they reach the next station, they witness a trio of brutal homeless men killing a guard and they run through the tunnel trying to escape from the deranged murderers in the beginning of their nightmarish night.
The gore "Stag Night" is a rip-off of "Creep" with Franka Potente, i.e., a claustrophobic plot with people trapped in the subway tunnels. The acting and make-up are excellent, but the camera work is terrible in the action scenes. The flawed screenplay uses many clichés of the genre and Brita is indeed the only character that takes reasonable attitudes in a distressed situation of panic. This movie is not totally bad and entertains, but could be better and better. My vote is five.
Title (Brazil): "Fuga Sobre Trilhos" ("Run on the Rails")
The gore "Stag Night" is a rip-off of "Creep" with Franka Potente, i.e., a claustrophobic plot with people trapped in the subway tunnels. The acting and make-up are excellent, but the camera work is terrible in the action scenes. The flawed screenplay uses many clichés of the genre and Brita is indeed the only character that takes reasonable attitudes in a distressed situation of panic. This movie is not totally bad and entertains, but could be better and better. My vote is five.
Title (Brazil): "Fuga Sobre Trilhos" ("Run on the Rails")
Watchable, but generic...
I have watched the 2008 horror movie "Stag Night" once before, back when it was a relatively new movie. However, I have entirely forgotten about it, and thus opted to watch it again here in 2025, as I stumbled upon it by random luck.
Writer Peter A. Dowling put together a fair enough script, though it was rather generic. That being said, I am not saying that the movie is boring, it just wasn't anything new or innovative that writer Peter A. Dowling brought to the genre. And truth be told, there are far more enjoyable and memorable movies with cannibalistic subterranean dwellers out there.
Of the entire cast ensemble, I was only familiar with Scott Adkins and Breckin Meyer. The acting performances in the movie were good. It was nice to see Scott Adkins in a movie such as this; something different than the standard run-of-the-mill action martial arts movies that he tends to star in.
Watchable, for sure. But I believe that newcomers to the horror genre will enjoy this movie far more than I did as a seasoned horror veteran.
My rating of writer and director Peter A. Dowling's 2008 movie "Stag Night" lands on a five out of ten stars.
Writer Peter A. Dowling put together a fair enough script, though it was rather generic. That being said, I am not saying that the movie is boring, it just wasn't anything new or innovative that writer Peter A. Dowling brought to the genre. And truth be told, there are far more enjoyable and memorable movies with cannibalistic subterranean dwellers out there.
Of the entire cast ensemble, I was only familiar with Scott Adkins and Breckin Meyer. The acting performances in the movie were good. It was nice to see Scott Adkins in a movie such as this; something different than the standard run-of-the-mill action martial arts movies that he tends to star in.
Watchable, for sure. But I believe that newcomers to the horror genre will enjoy this movie far more than I did as a seasoned horror veteran.
My rating of writer and director Peter A. Dowling's 2008 movie "Stag Night" lands on a five out of ten stars.
Decent acting, Bad camera work, Poor script
First off, let me say i love my horror films.
The story is nothing special, 6 people get them selves stuck in an underground train yard, they are confronted by a group of crazy cannibals, Can they survive? Maybe, Can we survive the bad camera work and sub par direction of the movie? maybe...
All around the acting was decent, all the actors held up there own in this movie, i have to say they actually did a good job with the script they had to work with.
Let me get to the camera work, it was bad, really bad for most part of the movie, i think i got a bit of a headache after watching the movie.
This is not a bad movie, but it's not good either, it's watchable (if u can stomach the camera views that the director chooses to use), The death scenes were OK, the actors did well, the only problem is when a movie of any genre takes it self seriously, then i would expect some kind of logic from the script, there was little logic here, but I've seen worst. deducting 3 points for the camera work and 2 for the poor script. 5/10
The story is nothing special, 6 people get them selves stuck in an underground train yard, they are confronted by a group of crazy cannibals, Can they survive? Maybe, Can we survive the bad camera work and sub par direction of the movie? maybe...
All around the acting was decent, all the actors held up there own in this movie, i have to say they actually did a good job with the script they had to work with.
Let me get to the camera work, it was bad, really bad for most part of the movie, i think i got a bit of a headache after watching the movie.
This is not a bad movie, but it's not good either, it's watchable (if u can stomach the camera views that the director chooses to use), The death scenes were OK, the actors did well, the only problem is when a movie of any genre takes it self seriously, then i would expect some kind of logic from the script, there was little logic here, but I've seen worst. deducting 3 points for the camera work and 2 for the poor script. 5/10
Subway Tunnel Cannibals!! (imdb won't let me shout but I want to.)
I never intended to watch Stag night – not this one anyway. I read on IMDb about a British film that was more or less a wannabe Shaun of the Dead entitled 'Stag Night of the Dead'. It was supposed to be reasonably amusing and with the action transpiring on a Stag Night you can't help but guess that a certain number of strippers might've been involved
I wasn't actively hunting SNotD but as things tend to do the title lodged itself in my subconscious. A few weeks later at the video shop I spy the cover for Stag Night and my mind does a quick double-take; was that supposed to be good and if so why?, as it was on the weekly shelf I threw caution to the wind and slapped down the $1 required to borrow Stag Night for an entire 7 day period.
Stag Night has no 'of the dead', no laughs and only a brief moment of nudity But it isn't terrible.
Here's why; Predictably enough the movie is set during a Stag Night. Not a glamorous or large scale affair, just four guys having some beers in the city. When we meet the four guys they are being kicked out of a strip club and discussing whether to call it a night or kick on.
Kicking on wins.
Shortly after they are aboard the subway heading to the next destination with two of the strippers from the club who are done for the night. After some obnoxiousness from one of the quartet leads to mace being released, a door is forced open (somehow) and all 6 exit the train in a dark section of subway tunnel at 4 AM.
Let's fast forward only a few minutes: SUBWAY TUNNEL CANNIBALS!!! Yep it's that kinda film. The ensuing hour has the usual chaos, stupid decisions and unlikely events as the 6 mostly unlikable anti-heroes stumble about in the dark.
There is liberal use of F-Bombs even well before the Rob Zombie looking cannibals show up to slice and dice. The film has one good kill scene that is more entertaining than it is inexplicable – and it is quite inexplicable – and an hour of running from bad guys in a film most aptly described as Mimic Vs Wrong Turn.
I didn't hate Stag Night. It's just too reminiscent of so many other better movies to stand out from the pack. I like the fact that they played it straight and never winked to camera or made things too unbelievable what am I saying? SUBWAY TUNNEL CANNIBALS!!! I'd like that last remark stricken from the record.
Final Rating – 5.5 / 10. If you want lotsa gore and minimal thought all wrapped up in a familiar package Stag Night isn't bad, how good Stag Night of the Dead is remains to be seen.
One last thing: How many movies feature monsters/killers or creatures that have apparently been prying their deadly trade for some time without anyone ever realising. Fine I can believe that they have a 100% kill rate once they target their prey, as unrealistic as that is. But no-one ever seems to ask about the missing or looks too hard into things.
And when cops do they are invariably killed but who looks for them? (I know, I know. Just a movie.)
Stag Night has no 'of the dead', no laughs and only a brief moment of nudity But it isn't terrible.
Here's why; Predictably enough the movie is set during a Stag Night. Not a glamorous or large scale affair, just four guys having some beers in the city. When we meet the four guys they are being kicked out of a strip club and discussing whether to call it a night or kick on.
Kicking on wins.
Shortly after they are aboard the subway heading to the next destination with two of the strippers from the club who are done for the night. After some obnoxiousness from one of the quartet leads to mace being released, a door is forced open (somehow) and all 6 exit the train in a dark section of subway tunnel at 4 AM.
Let's fast forward only a few minutes: SUBWAY TUNNEL CANNIBALS!!! Yep it's that kinda film. The ensuing hour has the usual chaos, stupid decisions and unlikely events as the 6 mostly unlikable anti-heroes stumble about in the dark.
There is liberal use of F-Bombs even well before the Rob Zombie looking cannibals show up to slice and dice. The film has one good kill scene that is more entertaining than it is inexplicable – and it is quite inexplicable – and an hour of running from bad guys in a film most aptly described as Mimic Vs Wrong Turn.
I didn't hate Stag Night. It's just too reminiscent of so many other better movies to stand out from the pack. I like the fact that they played it straight and never winked to camera or made things too unbelievable what am I saying? SUBWAY TUNNEL CANNIBALS!!! I'd like that last remark stricken from the record.
Final Rating – 5.5 / 10. If you want lotsa gore and minimal thought all wrapped up in a familiar package Stag Night isn't bad, how good Stag Night of the Dead is remains to be seen.
One last thing: How many movies feature monsters/killers or creatures that have apparently been prying their deadly trade for some time without anyone ever realising. Fine I can believe that they have a 100% kill rate once they target their prey, as unrealistic as that is. But no-one ever seems to ask about the missing or looks too hard into things.
And when cops do they are invariably killed but who looks for them? (I know, I know. Just a movie.)
Did you know
- TriviaShot in the actual underground subway tunnels of Sofia, Bulgaria.
- GoofsThe only 'abandoned' stations are just abandoned platforms (the subway is 24 hours a day), with a functional platform either above or below (examples are 9th Avenue (Brooklyn), Bergen St Brooklyn), and Jackson Heights(Queens). The 7 train stops at Jackson Heights, but on an elevated platform, nowhere near the very-much bricked over abandoned platform.
- Crazy creditsIn the opening credits it states 'Over 100,000 people are reported missing in New York City every year' The actual number is closer to 13,000
- ConnectionsReferenced in Best Life by Brooke ASMR: My HUGE Movie Collection!!!! (2015)
- How long is Stag Night?Powered by Alexa
Details
Box office
- Budget
- $1,500,000 (estimated)
- Gross worldwide
- $45,927
- Runtime
- 1h 24m(84 min)
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 1.85 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content







