In 1887, the powerful vampire Lilith is vanquished by a vampire council and four amulets avoid her return to the world of living. In the present days, the greedy Realtor Russel Bayne is pres... Read allIn 1887, the powerful vampire Lilith is vanquished by a vampire council and four amulets avoid her return to the world of living. In the present days, the greedy Realtor Russel Bayne is pressing Alex Layton to sell her store of esoteric products to him. While driving back home, R... Read allIn 1887, the powerful vampire Lilith is vanquished by a vampire council and four amulets avoid her return to the world of living. In the present days, the greedy Realtor Russel Bayne is pressing Alex Layton to sell her store of esoteric products to him. While driving back home, Russel stops his Ferrari to help a young woman that has troubles with her Volkswagen Beetle... Read all
- Alex Layton
- (as Christy Romano)
- Zafira
- (as Stephanie Honore)
- Konstantinos
- (as Marcus Brown)
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
Cardboard characters in unoriginal vampire flick...
The script is a muddled mess, full of full-blooded action scenes with predatory vampires guzzling on blood when they aren't trying to slay each other over the quest for some amulets. Everyone seems intent on overacting which only emphasizes the bad dialog.
In the course of learning how humans fight vampires on their own turf, our hero undergoes a reformation of sorts. He leaves us with the departing words: "There are more important things than making money. I'm off on a higher calling." Most outrageously hammy performance is delivered by YANCY BUTLER as Lilith. Most understated is RHETT GILES as Von Helsing.
As for Jeremy London, I couldn't help think what a strong resemblance he bears to Brendan Fraser. He's okay and even manages to get some humor from his role, but the characters are all cardboard and not really worth caring about.
Big bad doggie to the rescue!
Really needn't waste to much time on pointing out the weak spots in this movie, as almost everything is quite pathetic. This especially goes for nonsensical plot point or characters as well as some very rushed soap-opera style build-up. Some scenes are OKish, but in general a hack-job is in progress trying to mimic and home in on the success of Underworld. To no avail. The characters are not as 'cool' and the action sequences are mostly disappointing. Even Dacascos is severely misused and although he shows his potential in one or two scenes most of his fights are an anticlimax, as he has to cope with ultrabad screen partners.
Any good points? Most actors manage to pull off a decent performance with Dacascos and Butler showing real promise (even though the really clichéd the role). The werewolf transformation was rather good and one vampiress is really sexy...
And that's it folks... Really - if you have any say in the matter pass on this movie.
Confusing
Apart from the thin characters and the very cliché story (no surprises here), there's also the weak FX and the poor production values. While everyone is of course trying to do there best, there is quite a few other films out there, that are worth to be noticed.
Much better than expected...
Well, color me impressed, because the movie certainly turned out to be way better than I had anticipated. So thumbs up to writer Leigh Scott for managing to put together an enjoyable script and storyline. Just a shame that the movie comes wrapped in such an amateurish and low budget appearing cover. I have to admit that I was genuinely adequately entertained throughout the course of the 92 minutes that the movie ran for. Sure, it was not on the same scale as "Underworld", but it definitely was entertaining.
The movie does, surprisingly enough have the likes of Mark Dacascos, Yancy Butler, Rhett Giles and Jeremy London on the cast list, so there are some familiar faces in the movie. The acting performances in the movie were good.
The effects in the movie weren't exactly great, but at least they weren't among the worst of special effects I've seen in similar movies.
If you enjoy vampire and werewolf movies, then this 2009 movie is actually worth checking out.
My rating of director Griff Furst's 2009 movie "Wolvesbayne" lands on a five out of ten stars.
Flawed but Entertaining
"Wolvesbayne" is a flawed but entertaining vampire movie that seems to be the pilot of a TV series. The story has a promising beginning, but suddenly the plot becomes a collection of clichés and special effects. The prosthesis of vampire teeth seems to be bothering Mark Dacascos and his grimaces and Yancy Butler is unrecognizable with a terrible performance. My vote is five.
Title (Brazil): "Anjo das Trevas" ("Angel of the Darkness")
Did you know
- Trivia"Wolvesbayne" is the third film in which Rhett Giles played famed vampire hunter Van Helsing. The other two times were "Way of the Vampire" (2005), and "Dracula's Curse" (2006).
- ConnectionsReferenced in You Might Be the Killer (2018)
Details
Box office
- Budget
- $2,000,000 (estimated)
- Runtime
- 1h 32m(92 min)
- Color
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 1.85 : 1






