Mandrake

As far as these syfy movies, which range from adequate to terrible, go this is better than most. It does have an intriguing premise, and starts off very well. And for a syfy movie it actually looks quite good, with the scenery quite nice, the photography not looking completely slip-shod and the monster creepy-looking and giving an adequate sense of menace. As for the attacks, two or three were nail-biting and quite gory, but some of them are quite tame.

Despite the cool premise and twenty-five minutes of genuine atmosphere, Mandrake quickly becomes repetitive and predictable. The dialogue is fairly unimpressive mostly, with a number of cheesy moments that never ring true, and the direction while better than you would expect is patchy particularly towards the end where the film unravels in credibility. The film's pace is uneven, the beginning is very well-paced, but some of the middle drag and the end feels rushed. I didn't find myself connecting to any of Mandrake's characters, and in all honesty I don't think the actors did either.

In conclusion, better than expected but that's not saying very much. 4/10 Bethany Cox

I wanted to like this movie, filmed in Shreveport, La. including a better cast than some of these SyFy movies have, but NO. Andre Stevens of Dallas fame and b-movie star produced this film it has some good special FX, and production values, yet the script never works, the actors never capture their characters. Watch it you sit thru the whole thing thinking wow this looks better than most Saturday Night flicks, even the monster is fairly cool looking, and when its over you'll think what happened to my last two hours. The actor from the Unit isn't bad but you just can't seem to connect to anyone in the film. A few inventive moments nothing more.

Mandrake is one of those films that leaves you more confused than intrigued, trying to figure out if what you just watched was meant to be a horror film, a thriller, or some kind of misplaced woodland fantasy. The problem isn't just the story-it's that the film feels completely disoriented from beginning to end. There's no cohesion, no rhythm, and absolutely no sense of direction. It's as if the filmmakers threw together a collection of eerie visuals and half-written dialogue and hoped it would somehow come across as atmospheric. Instead, it's just frustratingly incoherent.

The screenplay, frankly, is where everything falls apart. A movie can survive weak effects, low budgets, even mediocre acting-but when the script is a mess, there's no saving it. Mandrake never establishes a clear sense of who the characters are, what they're doing, or why the audience should care. Every moment that should feel suspenseful ends up feeling random. It jumps between tones so wildly that you're not sure if you're supposed to be scared, intrigued, or just waiting for it to end.

It's hard not to compare it to Jaws-because Jaws knew exactly how to use atmosphere, tension, and pacing. Spielberg understood how to build suspense without showing everything, allowing the imagination to fill the gaps. Mandrake, on the other hand, throws everything at you but somehow still manages to say nothing. The directing feels unfocused, like the camera itself is wandering through the woods trying to find the story.

Character development? Practically nonexistent. You don't know who these people are, you don't care what happens to them, and the film doesn't give you any reason to invest in their journey. There are glimpses-tiny moments-where you can see what the movie wanted to be: a moody psychological folk horror that gets under your skin. But those moments vanish as quickly as they appear, replaced by confusion and a total lack of narrative payoff.

By the halfway mark, the film already feels like it's going nowhere fast, and by the end, you realize it never really started anywhere, either. It's disorganized, disjointed, and painfully slow for something that's supposed to keep you on edge.

To put it bluntly, Mandrake is a cinematic train wreck. It tries to be haunting but ends up being hollow. It tries to be mysterious but comes off as muddled. If you value your time-or your sanity-skip this one. There's no reward waiting at the end of this film, just confusion and regret.

A really silly little movie that I might have liked more as a teenager I guess. It has the wife of Jigsaw in it, that's a plus, no? Of course it's not, although I really do like her. Another character is pretty neat (imho), but the whole plot is a mess. It doesn't make much sense, the CGI isn't helping either.

But since this is a Syfy production (and you probably know them from their other mostly creature feature ... features), you should know what to expect... and what not to expect! With that in mind, you can enjoy the silliness of it all or just stop watching after the first couple of minutes, because you ain't going to like it any better along the ride.

After have seen a production from The Asylum, The Terminators, it was back again time to see a SyFy production. If you ever have seen a SyFy flick you will never forget it because they are mostly really bad. This one here was an average flick but again the cheap CGI teared it down.

As always the beginning is rather good and I thought, hell, this is going to be something in the Predator genre. But no, once the creature attacks it's just cheap CGI. The whole cocoon scene looked promising but of course they always did the killings off-camera. You do see some blood splattering here and there but it is never that frightening. Overall it looked like a flick to watch with the family on a Saturday night.

But this time they added a big name on the list, Max Martini from The Unit. The second main lead was by Betsy Russell, another big name from the Saw franchise but I was never involved with their characters. I couldn't care less if they were hurt or going to die. Storywise it was also a bit simple and you could see clearly what was going on.

I have seen worse, especially from SyFy but still, not a good movie.

Gore 1/5 Nudity 0/5 Effects 2/5 Story 2/5 Comedy 0/5