Dawning

Whether true or not, 'Dawning' quickly gives the impression of being very indie and very low-budget. This is apparent enough just in considering the most prominent names involved in the production - of them all, only two have any significant number of credits. Gratifyingly, I've seen Christine Kellog-Darrin before, and very much enjoyed her work; I'm a bit more familiar still with Najarra Townsed - I like her so much, it was Townsend's involvement that drew me in. The collective lack of renown among cast and crew is the least of the tells here, however. The direction feels unpracticed to the point of weakness, and the writing, too - and the combination of these means a distinct feeling of artifice. Knowing that at least two of the assembled actors are very skilled, I assume it's the latter that coerces all into portrayals that struggle to seem authentic, especially when the uneven pacing languishes in quiet moments.

Notable, unfortunate deficiencies aside, though, I think there are some really great ideas here. 'Dawning' is the story of a direly awkward family reunion of sorts, wherein each passing scene reveals ever greater fractures in the ties that bind. These clefts are deepened as the gathering at a remote cabin is faced with extraordinary circumstances, and the uncertain threat of something dangerous imposing on them. It's a great premise. In addition to that of the overall narrative, I like the core concept of the dialogue, and the scene writing, and even the characterizations. But the actual execution - the construction of detail in writing and direction that would fill out each of these aspects - is pointedly lacking. Whether the flaws can be chalked up to inexperience, lack of ability, forced shortcuts, or something else is up for debate. The definite result, however, is a feature that misses the mark.

With about 16 minutes left we get an instance of overblown delivery that almost spoils the entirety of what value the film has to offer. Moreover, the nature of the goings-on is left terribly amorphous, furthering the overarching notion of ham-handed contrivance. But what's truly disappointing is that it didn't have to be this way. With more thoughtful care in writing and direction, 'Dawning' could have tapped into fantastic potential. Why, unexplained phenomenon underlying the premise, and the somewhat staggered presentation - pacing, delivery, half-hearted sound design, subtle background music - almost give the notion that the screenplay was actually adapted from the draft of an intended stage play, in which lack of special effects would demand much be left to suggestion and imagination. But still the same faults remain.

I'm placing a lot of the onus on director Gregg Holtgrewe and co-writer Matthew Wilkins, it's true. I don't mean to wholly disparage either; I'd like to think that they've grown in their capabilities in the years since, and do more to impress me now. But professional development doesn't come without critique, and once more - I regret to say it's their specific contributions behind the camera and holding the pen that do the most to undercut the possibilities of this movie. I think it's a strong idea, with further strengths folded in, that in 2009 they simply lacked the wherewithal to bring to utmost fruition. With that said - I think 'Dawning,' in total, is perfectly average, stuck in the middle between low and high quality. Yet while I acknowledge bias, I'm inclined to believe Najarra Townsend's acting is of such caliber that her skills peek through the indelicacies of film-making and story-telling to elevate the picture a hair above unmoving neutral ground. It's a small boost, but it's enough.

I don't think I could argue with any viewer offering a more harsh assessment; to be sure, this is a very rough ride. I see the diamond in that rough, though, that at the time it seems no one was able to wholly unearth. There's no reason to go out of your way to watch this, and keep your expectations mild if you do, as 'Dawning' is an unlucky illustration of how flimsy direction and flimsy writing can hamper a production. Still, I like it more than I don't. Take that as you will.

I have been watching movies for a long long time and I'm sorry to say that this is overall the worst movie I have seen. The acting wasn't terrible, the actors who played a brother and sister acted well....the others, so so! The plot was non existent and very drawn out and boring. The music was great! As far as horror scores go, this was good and I think it the only thing that kept me tuned in. The ending did not make any sense, but then again, most of the movie itself didn't. I'm not a professional critic but I am very open minded to different types of movies and if you asked me about this, I would tell not to waste your time!

"Dawning" is a pretty decent psychological thriller that is marred by some uneven acting and a non-great ending. The director does an effective job with the pacing, and I thought the family drama that played out was realistic and well-acted.

However, some of the acting feels as if they could have run through a couple more takes and it probably would have helped to re-shoot a couple of the scenes, something that the budget probably didn't allow for. That said, I thought the film got many things right, from the tight camera work and the believable, relate-able characters that you wind up caring about to the contrast between the brightly-lit cabin and the dark, wind- blowing-through-the-trees creepy forest.

If you're considering watching this film, and are wondering if you'll enjoy it, here's a simple test: you're flipping through channels late one night. On one channel, a couple Twilight Zone episodes are playing. On another, one of the latter Saw sequels is on. If you're the sort of person who'd rather watch the Twilight Zone episode, then you'll probably enjoy this film.

There seems to be 2 favorable reviews of this film which I find very hard to believe. Rest assured that the 2 reviews were given by the same person. The movie tried very hard. The director really gave a go at an artsy type of horror film. Much in the way of films such as AntiChrist or evening The Shining. The problem was that the director didn't have any directions.(Imagine that). The only bonus to the film was I thought the girl in it was pretty hot and could possibly go somewhere with her acting I guess. The score was pretty much stolen from a hundred other movies which bothered me. To the director and writer. Yes it is fine to be vague with who or what your antagonist is. If done correctly you can add suspense to a film. But not so freaking vague that after the people watching and thinking, well that explained nothing and wasted my time.

Based on the trailer, I was concerned that this film would be pretentious and boring; I am happy to be wrong! The story is compelling and the characters are believable, which is crucial to the horror genre. There are no cheap quick scares; instead the film is long on tension and atmosphere. The viewers are spared blood and gore. The acting, across-the-board, is fantastic. I especially liked Christine Kellogg-Darrin, who brings heart to the role of Laura, a woman fighting to keep her marriage intact and bond with her resentful step-daughter. For people who appreciate intelligent horror films, "Dawning" is a must.