Release calendarTop 250 moviesMost popular moviesBrowse movies by genreTop box officeShowtimes & ticketsMovie newsIndia movie spotlight
    What's on TV & streamingTop 250 TV showsMost popular TV showsBrowse TV shows by genreTV news
    What to watchLatest trailersIMDb OriginalsIMDb PicksIMDb SpotlightFamily entertainment guideIMDb Podcasts
    OscarsBest Of 2025Holiday Watch GuideGotham AwardsCelebrity PhotosSTARmeter AwardsAwards CentralFestival CentralAll events
    Born todayMost popular celebsCelebrity news
    Help centerContributor zonePolls
For industry professionals
  • Language
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Watchlist
Sign in
  • Fully supported
  • English (United States)
    Partially supported
  • Français (Canada)
  • Français (France)
  • Deutsch (Deutschland)
  • हिंदी (भारत)
  • Italiano (Italia)
  • Português (Brasil)
  • Español (España)
  • Español (México)
Use app
Back
  • Cast & crew
  • User reviews
  • Trivia
IMDbPro
Mark Harmon, Daniel Gillies, Michael Weatherly, and Cote de Pablo in NCIS (2003)

User reviews

Royals & Loyals

NCIS

8 reviews
9/10

Peter Malloy??

This was a good episode. Interesting to have some interaction with the British Royal Navy. Even MORE interesting to see Daniel Gillies in this one. He's nice to look at, no matter what character he plays. :-p

Anyway, I have to wonder about Gillies' character being named Peter Malloy. I'm hard-pressed to believe it was a complete coincidence, and yet I can't find any mention of it anywhere. Classic-TV fans (in fact, fans of really good TV) will recognize the name Pete Malloy as being a character in the venerable show Adam-12. Malloy was the experienced, wry, and foxy (in more ways than one) senior police officer in that TV show.
  • slackersmom
  • Jun 11, 2013
  • Permalink
7/10

Turn the Page

Well, well... once again, we are reminded of the One Night in Paris, a mystery since 26 January 2010 (Season 7, Episode 13). That is 37 weeks, or 8½ months, earlier. Or 16 weeks, if you live in Finland. In any case, that particular mystery is dragging way too long. So much so, that now that the night and its consequences are given several minutes of screen time instead of a quick aside, it serves only to distract the viewers from the main plot.

All that makes NCIS quality entertainment is present, except for this imbalance. Even with the main plot involving the Brits, which would normally make this episode stand out as fresh, it cannot compete with the "Tiva" relationship issues. This would not be bad if the audience were rewarded with something, anything, but alas, not so. It's likely to frustrate the fans, whose patience the show-runners are now testing to the breaking point. For crying out loud, either stay completely episodic like some relic from the 1980s (remember, the 1990s gave us Babylon 5) or develop the character interaction like a 2010s show should!
  • ttapola
  • Mar 28, 2011
  • Permalink
8/10

eye candy

This is one of the better episodes. What makes it stand out is Daniel Gillies as the British officer Malloy who has to be one of the handsomest creatures ever to walk planet earth. NCIS usually tends to be populated with doltish muscleheads for whom I have zero empathy. In perhaps a year or two Gillies should be playing Bond. He just crackles. I found myself holding my breath while he was on screen.

The fun comes in this episode from jurisdictional disputes with the British Navy, the CIA and ...

The one thing I did not like were the expositions on CSI technology given between experts who obviously should know all this already. The writers should have this exposition directed at a more naive character.
  • roedyg
  • Jun 7, 2011
  • Permalink
6/10

A mixed bag

  • harrykivi
  • Jun 23, 2024
  • Permalink
5/10

It happens much too often

McGee pushes a few keys on his keyboard, and Voila! He's hacked into a (supposedly) super secure data base at another government agency, the CIA no less. Are viewers actually naïve enough to believe it? Okay, so it's just a TV show with a 40 minute time limit (it says an hour but of course 20 minutes of that are for commercials) and things have to happen in overdrive due to time constraints. But making it that easy to hack the CIA was simply laughable. Even more laughable is the fact that McGee has hacked into so many data bases and no one is the wiser. Are our country's data bases that easy to hack in to? And so easy to avoid detection? And of course there is Abby, who also churns out results in overdrive speed. As she said one an episode some years back, "You can't rush science, Gibbs." Yet in episode after episode Abby rushes science to get extra fast solutions.

It was actually a pretty good plot (although a rework of other plots) and the bad guy/girl got caught. But the warp speed deductions/detections/solutions are really getting old.
  • LittleStorpingInTheSwuff
  • May 7, 2018
  • Permalink
1/10

Oh dear oh dear...

I do like this series, but like so many Fox programmes the British Stereotypes are woeful!!! Far too many mistakes to list... Brit Marine Uniform Secret Service Uniform Division Mobile Phone Number Etc etc etc

Only one decent Brit Accent

Really should get a knowledgeable consultant!!!
  • phillipslight
  • May 21, 2020
  • Permalink
5/10

Check google

If it's not American you don't check/care. A simple Google check would confirm uniform of a Royal Marine and Royal Navy Sailor/officer. Also its the Royal Navy, you don't need the prefix 'British'. It's not the first time in the NCIS franchise that you've got simple things wrong, you need to do your due dillegence. That said the US bravdo is easy to understand, but confusing rank, uniform and an appalling making of 'tea' is reprehensible. You're better than that, come on, dig deep and do the research, it will pay dividends in the end. I love the show, but sometimes you've more bull than Texas; and tea isn't something you just throw in a harbour.
  • bootiebloke
  • Nov 9, 2023
  • Permalink
1/10

Hilarious

Or it would be, if this episode wasn't so badly ridiculous.

Much as I like this series, it's impossible to know where to start with this episode; it's so full of stereotypes and impossibilities (Gibbs just walks on to a RN vessel and sabotages it; his team walk around without an escort, etc.).

What actually had me laughing out loud though, was Abby's new electron microscope, which looked suspiciously like an optical microscope with a video camera on top and apparently had a magnification magnitudes greater than any current scanning electron microscope.

Only the monumentally stupid or cloistered could take this episode seriously.
  • finnbarius
  • Mar 2, 2012
  • Permalink

More from this title

More to explore

Recently viewed

Please enable browser cookies to use this feature. Learn more.
Get the IMDb App
Sign in for more accessSign in for more access
Follow IMDb on social
Get the IMDb App
For Android and iOS
Get the IMDb App
  • Help
  • Site Index
  • IMDbPro
  • Box Office Mojo
  • License IMDb Data
  • Press Room
  • Advertising
  • Jobs
  • Conditions of Use
  • Privacy Policy
  • Your Ads Privacy Choices
IMDb, an Amazon company

© 1990-2025 by IMDb.com, Inc.