7 reviews
- leankushcloud
- Dec 7, 2014
- Permalink
House Hunting was definitely worth the watch, especially if you enjoy psychological horror indies along the lines of "Triangle" or "The Corridor".
IMDb has it miscategorized as 'Thriller' but rest assured this is straight-up horror, not thriller. There's not much gore to speak of but the supernatural aspects are clear and evident. Get it right IMDb!
Quick, spoiler-free plot summary: Marc Singer (sans eyebrows for some odd reason) leads his family to an isolated bargain property for a real estate viewing. When they get there they are joined by a second family who arrives at the same time to view the house. The second family is headed up by Art LaFleur who puts in a stellar performance as a gruff, over-protective father on the edge of sanity. The two families soon find that they cannot leave the premises, and that every turn just brings them back to the same house. As time wears on, each family member in the house experiences their own unique psychological strains and each is haunted by past tragedies or wrongdoings. The strain inevitably pits them against each other.
The unfortunate weakness of the movie was the unsatisfactory climax that didn't adequately explain the WHY of the phenomenon. Hints are given, messily, but in the end it's never fully resolved. As the credits rolled you get the sense that writer/director Eric Hurt may not have had a fully developed idea in his head after all, and that the vagueness might have come from a place of indecision or poor scriptwriting rather than a more intellectual or intentional origin.
If you can handle those films where you're left saying "It was good, but I just didn't get it", then House Hunting may be a good addition to your viewing list. It's certainly stronger and less clichéd than most of the other indies available on Netflix instant right now.
IMDb has it miscategorized as 'Thriller' but rest assured this is straight-up horror, not thriller. There's not much gore to speak of but the supernatural aspects are clear and evident. Get it right IMDb!
Quick, spoiler-free plot summary: Marc Singer (sans eyebrows for some odd reason) leads his family to an isolated bargain property for a real estate viewing. When they get there they are joined by a second family who arrives at the same time to view the house. The second family is headed up by Art LaFleur who puts in a stellar performance as a gruff, over-protective father on the edge of sanity. The two families soon find that they cannot leave the premises, and that every turn just brings them back to the same house. As time wears on, each family member in the house experiences their own unique psychological strains and each is haunted by past tragedies or wrongdoings. The strain inevitably pits them against each other.
The unfortunate weakness of the movie was the unsatisfactory climax that didn't adequately explain the WHY of the phenomenon. Hints are given, messily, but in the end it's never fully resolved. As the credits rolled you get the sense that writer/director Eric Hurt may not have had a fully developed idea in his head after all, and that the vagueness might have come from a place of indecision or poor scriptwriting rather than a more intellectual or intentional origin.
If you can handle those films where you're left saying "It was good, but I just didn't get it", then House Hunting may be a good addition to your viewing list. It's certainly stronger and less clichéd than most of the other indies available on Netflix instant right now.
- The_Dead_See
- Jun 2, 2013
- Permalink
- Properbowl7
- May 26, 2013
- Permalink
- baunacholi-86159
- Dec 27, 2023
- Permalink
This movie could have been so much better, but it was cursed with the original Twilight Zone (1960-64) format: Riveting beginning (5 minutes), dull exposition about relationships (18 minutes), then an interesting ending (2 minutes). This movie follows the same pattern, but the exposition section is over an hour long.
Exposition slows down a movie, but it has its place. Foreign films-especially from Europe-usually commit a good section of the film to exposition. It works in those films, maybe because when you watch a film by Wim Wenders or Ingmar Bergman, you expect it to rest almost entirely on dialogue and a strong focus on relationships. House Hunting (2013) leans heavily upon exposition, but it's in the wrong genre for that. When people watch horror movies they expect it to be plot-driven with a heavy focus on the problem. This movie establishes a great problem at the beginning, then abandons the problem for most of the rest of the movie. Instead of focusing on a solution to the problem, the actors are given s script which focuses on soap opera relationships.
Maybe if I had understood from the beginning this aspect of the film I would have enjoyed the movie more. Their relationships do help them unfold the problem, but not enough. Nevertheless I do enjoy a good foreign film, so maybe the problem is simply in my expectations.
Exposition slows down a movie, but it has its place. Foreign films-especially from Europe-usually commit a good section of the film to exposition. It works in those films, maybe because when you watch a film by Wim Wenders or Ingmar Bergman, you expect it to rest almost entirely on dialogue and a strong focus on relationships. House Hunting (2013) leans heavily upon exposition, but it's in the wrong genre for that. When people watch horror movies they expect it to be plot-driven with a heavy focus on the problem. This movie establishes a great problem at the beginning, then abandons the problem for most of the rest of the movie. Instead of focusing on a solution to the problem, the actors are given s script which focuses on soap opera relationships.
Maybe if I had understood from the beginning this aspect of the film I would have enjoyed the movie more. Their relationships do help them unfold the problem, but not enough. Nevertheless I do enjoy a good foreign film, so maybe the problem is simply in my expectations.
- wdavidmiller
- Jan 23, 2021
- Permalink
Okay this one, kinda cool. A little scary. But really.....not too much impressive about it. 5/10
- wandernn1-81-683274
- Jan 13, 2021
- Permalink
The lack or budget is apparent from the off: no real special effects, no great sets and no big name actors (unless you remember the eighties sci-fi show 'V' or Beastmaster, in which case you'll recognise the aged Marc Singer).
It centres on two families who both decide to look at the same house on the same day. They're both thinking of buying it. However, once they get there, they find they can't get out.
What follows are the typical revelations about their pasts and motives, plus the odd chopping up of various cast members and the obligatory creepy kid who seems to turn up in every modern horror film.
Based on its budget, it's not that bad. Or at least it could have been much worse. If you're into horror films and aren't looking for anything that's too much of a classic, you could do worse than watch this for an hour and a half. The cast put everything they have into their parts and this is a rare high among the sea of straight-to-DVD B-movies you find out there.
http://thewrongtreemoviereviews.blogspot.co.uk/
It centres on two families who both decide to look at the same house on the same day. They're both thinking of buying it. However, once they get there, they find they can't get out.
What follows are the typical revelations about their pasts and motives, plus the odd chopping up of various cast members and the obligatory creepy kid who seems to turn up in every modern horror film.
Based on its budget, it's not that bad. Or at least it could have been much worse. If you're into horror films and aren't looking for anything that's too much of a classic, you could do worse than watch this for an hour and a half. The cast put everything they have into their parts and this is a rare high among the sea of straight-to-DVD B-movies you find out there.
http://thewrongtreemoviereviews.blogspot.co.uk/
- bowmanblue
- Jun 4, 2014
- Permalink