Cambridge, England, 1921 - or so it seems. A brilliant young scientist becomes obsessed with finding a way back to his past - no matter what the cost.Cambridge, England, 1921 - or so it seems. A brilliant young scientist becomes obsessed with finding a way back to his past - no matter what the cost.Cambridge, England, 1921 - or so it seems. A brilliant young scientist becomes obsessed with finding a way back to his past - no matter what the cost.
- Awards
- 4 wins & 3 nominations total
Photos
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
Displayed as Dimensions (2014)
Really Dimensions (2011)
AKA Dimensions: A-Line, a Loop, a Tangle of Threads
Henry Lloyd-Hughes, Born: August 1985 in London, England, UK
I accidentally stumbled onto this critter. It is one of the most fun-sounding least plausible stories.
Cambridge, England, 1921 Three young friends frolic around the countryside. Even at this early age attachments and rivalries are created. Whoops, someone threw a jump rope into the well which sets off a series of events in these lives and friendships.
Years later Stephen and Conrad each blame themselves for not retrieving the jump rope which inadvertently causes the demise of their friend Jane.
Stephen, the son of the scientist, is inspired to create a Time Machine and as his main target intends to correct the past.
Will he succeed?
Or will he mess up time for the rest of us?
Or is this whole Time Machine a concept of his mind?
This is one of those movies that you cannot fast-forward through as the description of how time works, which is displayed in the introductory credits, and elaborated throughout the story is that time is a series of dimensions running parallel with every decision. Or at least he is 99% sure. Therefore, if one goes back into time and changes it, they create a new timestream and not change the stream that they were in originally.
Following the timeline or parallel universe theory will help make the story and even the ending quite clear. There are no loose ends. The original appearance of the professor (Patrick Godfrey) and the subsequent appearance of the professor even though similar are two different timelines.
Do not waste your time with plausibility. Do spend your time with the intertwining love stories and relationships. Why was he compelled to leave the one he now loves Annie (Olivia Llewellyn) to travel back and make a correction that he cannot be a part of?
Henry Lloyd-Hughes, Born: August 1985 in London, England, UK
I accidentally stumbled onto this critter. It is one of the most fun-sounding least plausible stories.
Cambridge, England, 1921 Three young friends frolic around the countryside. Even at this early age attachments and rivalries are created. Whoops, someone threw a jump rope into the well which sets off a series of events in these lives and friendships.
Years later Stephen and Conrad each blame themselves for not retrieving the jump rope which inadvertently causes the demise of their friend Jane.
Stephen, the son of the scientist, is inspired to create a Time Machine and as his main target intends to correct the past.
Will he succeed?
Or will he mess up time for the rest of us?
Or is this whole Time Machine a concept of his mind?
This is one of those movies that you cannot fast-forward through as the description of how time works, which is displayed in the introductory credits, and elaborated throughout the story is that time is a series of dimensions running parallel with every decision. Or at least he is 99% sure. Therefore, if one goes back into time and changes it, they create a new timestream and not change the stream that they were in originally.
Following the timeline or parallel universe theory will help make the story and even the ending quite clear. There are no loose ends. The original appearance of the professor (Patrick Godfrey) and the subsequent appearance of the professor even though similar are two different timelines.
Do not waste your time with plausibility. Do spend your time with the intertwining love stories and relationships. Why was he compelled to leave the one he now loves Annie (Olivia Llewellyn) to travel back and make a correction that he cannot be a part of?
It's a Time Travel Story. And it's listed as Science Fiction, thereby.
But Be Advised: It's NOT 'The Time Machine'. Nor is it your standard Hollywood Special Effects wagon-train.
No Splashy special Effects. No Journeys to the end of Time. No Monsters. No Weird Paradoxes. No Dinosaurs either.
It DOES has an element of Time Travel...but that's all. The rest of the Movie is a distillation of a very nice work of emotional Fiction. It's a Love story about Three Childhood friends in 1920's era England. Once you settle into the measured, dialogue driven pace of the story. I found it elegant, touching and memorable.
Totally Girlfriend Friendly, BTW.
But Be Advised: It's NOT 'The Time Machine'. Nor is it your standard Hollywood Special Effects wagon-train.
No Splashy special Effects. No Journeys to the end of Time. No Monsters. No Weird Paradoxes. No Dinosaurs either.
It DOES has an element of Time Travel...but that's all. The rest of the Movie is a distillation of a very nice work of emotional Fiction. It's a Love story about Three Childhood friends in 1920's era England. Once you settle into the measured, dialogue driven pace of the story. I found it elegant, touching and memorable.
Totally Girlfriend Friendly, BTW.
Another example of me being happy I ignored a rather low overall IMDB score and trusted in the more generous reviews. Beautifully shot movie with beautiful music. Natural performances all round. I am interested in movies to do with time/ universe travel - Back to the Future, Time Traveller's Wife (book not movie though) Somewhere in Time with Jane Seymour and Christopher Reeve, Groundhog Day, Everything Everywhere All at Once. I try not to live in the past anymore but my heart breaks for past times and lost love. But things happened as they did and they couldn't have happened any other way. Maybe there are many universes. Maybe we can come into alignment with the one we most desire. Maybe there's some truth in Neville Goddard's imaginal and law of assumption theories. Affirming that it is already done. I have the life and the love of the life I want etc. Maybe it's for the best that such a machine doesn't exist.
First things first! Do not take the negative reviews of this movie and dodge watching this!! Unless you are a close minded fool who can't use an imagination this movie is great. If you cannot open up to sci-fi fantasies such as this do yourself a favor and quit watching sci-fi.
With that said...
This movie is an excellent thought provoking film that really gets the gears turning. It does a great job of putting theoretical time travel into perspective while doing so in a way that isn't too geeky or brain melting.
It was actually better than I had expected and deserves a better score than it got. Don't expect lots of action scenes or crazy super futuristic technology that blows your mind but rather philosophical theories of time and space and the personal implications that they have on relationships.
This movie is definitely not one where you can anticipate whats coming next and has a few twists that keep it very interesting.
Overall an amazing film that should have received much more attention that it got. Being an avid movie lover that has blazed through netflix and other movie services I was surprised to have not seen or even heard of this one until fall 2014.
With that said...
This movie is an excellent thought provoking film that really gets the gears turning. It does a great job of putting theoretical time travel into perspective while doing so in a way that isn't too geeky or brain melting.
It was actually better than I had expected and deserves a better score than it got. Don't expect lots of action scenes or crazy super futuristic technology that blows your mind but rather philosophical theories of time and space and the personal implications that they have on relationships.
This movie is definitely not one where you can anticipate whats coming next and has a few twists that keep it very interesting.
Overall an amazing film that should have received much more attention that it got. Being an avid movie lover that has blazed through netflix and other movie services I was surprised to have not seen or even heard of this one until fall 2014.
The strong points of the film: Excellent production design, excellent costumes, excellent acting and excellent music. All combine to an esthetic whole which is much better than the sum of its parts.
The storyline is similar to one of the HG Wells novels, especially the Time Machine. But in this particular instance, the Time Machine is only able to bring someone a few years into the past. It is a limitation which encapsulates the entire plot, as there are several limitations put upon the film because of its low budget. Set in a Great Gatsby-like setting in the early 1920's, the film could easily have been one of HG's lesser-known stories.
Fortunately for this reviewer, the Director is savvy enough to understand her limitations, and to keep the film utterly under control for the entire length of time it takes to unravel the mystery that is set up in the opening scene, when an old man arrives in the middle of a garden party and begins the education of the guests in the physics of the 4th Dimension.
As the plot progresses, a young genius named Steven is beside himself with a mission to right a wrong that happened in his childhood, and is obsessed with finding a method to return to the past to do so. We suspend our disbelief at his feeble but well-intentioned attempts, and when one of the experiments backfires, we wonder if Steven will give in to his demons and descend into madness. It almost happens--if it were not for "the love of a good woman".
So that there are no spoilers in this review, I will summarize by saying that there is a final resolution which neither disappoints nor does it fail to engage our deeper intellect. Since I encourage anyone tired of the mall-screen movies of the 2000's, (with their overblown heroes and ridiculously unrealistic plots and absurd bombastic gun combat and fight scenes), to take a breath and let themselves be drawn into a meditative state as they sail down a lazy river and be contented with the calm, thoughtful work of art that was so effectively made into this film.
The storyline is similar to one of the HG Wells novels, especially the Time Machine. But in this particular instance, the Time Machine is only able to bring someone a few years into the past. It is a limitation which encapsulates the entire plot, as there are several limitations put upon the film because of its low budget. Set in a Great Gatsby-like setting in the early 1920's, the film could easily have been one of HG's lesser-known stories.
Fortunately for this reviewer, the Director is savvy enough to understand her limitations, and to keep the film utterly under control for the entire length of time it takes to unravel the mystery that is set up in the opening scene, when an old man arrives in the middle of a garden party and begins the education of the guests in the physics of the 4th Dimension.
As the plot progresses, a young genius named Steven is beside himself with a mission to right a wrong that happened in his childhood, and is obsessed with finding a method to return to the past to do so. We suspend our disbelief at his feeble but well-intentioned attempts, and when one of the experiments backfires, we wonder if Steven will give in to his demons and descend into madness. It almost happens--if it were not for "the love of a good woman".
So that there are no spoilers in this review, I will summarize by saying that there is a final resolution which neither disappoints nor does it fail to engage our deeper intellect. Since I encourage anyone tired of the mall-screen movies of the 2000's, (with their overblown heroes and ridiculously unrealistic plots and absurd bombastic gun combat and fight scenes), to take a breath and let themselves be drawn into a meditative state as they sail down a lazy river and be contented with the calm, thoughtful work of art that was so effectively made into this film.
Did you know
- TriviaAlthough the first and last scenes appear to be identical, there are lots of small differences as they are actually only similar events in two different timelines.
- How long is Dimensions?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official site
- Language
- Also known as
- Dimensions: A Line, a Loop, a Tangle of Threads
- Filming locations
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Budget
- £100,000 (estimated)
- Runtime
- 1h 41m(101 min)
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 2.35 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content