User reviews

It is a story about what women want.

The story begins about dating, dating apps, women's safety in apps.

However, the suspicion spreads that the women are involved in a corporate rivalry conspiracy. With the involvement of Velasco, the godmother, the audience is accustomed to this idea. But anger eventually reveals the truth.

All paths of svu standard style are followed. With tough claims, great defenses, and plot twists, court swords are drawn.

It is a gripping episode, although the ending is not surprising. Mr. Wright gave a good performance.

The result is Dating's a minefield.

Soundtrack is a great choice. "I wanna be Mona Lisa"

Just not a strong SVU here. Not the right kind of villain picked and way too basic and poorly written a story.

This is definitely one to skip if you find yourself short on time.

The show continues to believe the judge can tell the jury to disregard and not consider testimony.

It's still a good show and they can take liberties in the court room but some times they go too far. I'd love to see the script be tighter.

Being a lifelong SVU fan in addition to being a hardcore Parks and Rec fan, I never thought that Jon Glaser could play a more disgusting character than Jeremy Jamm. This episode proved me wrong.

However, I do think the story could be better fleshed out. It felt like an episode that had too much filler and not enough circumstance building. Either that or they had to cut out a lot and didn't keep as much continuity as it needed.

I feel like with this story.... I "just got jammed" - IYKYK However, as someone who only briefly experimented with dating apps, the amount of creeps is immense and they aren't just the app creators.