Labyrinth

"Labyrinth" is an entertaining mini-series disclosing two stories, one in 1209 and the other in 2012, in France. Alais Pelletier Du Mas (Jessica Brown Findlay) is followed in the Middle Ages, when the Crusade attack the City of Carcassonne where she lives with her father and her evil stepsister. In the present days (2012), her descendant Alice Tanner (Vanessa Kirby), who is a teacher working with her archeologist friend in a dig, is chased by a mysterious ring that is looking for three ancient books and a ring to achieve power and eternal life through the Holy Grail. The historical event and the fictional present are entwinned and is attractive for a television mini-series. My vote is seven.

Title (Brazil): "Labirinto" ("Labyrinth")

It's quite possible that the low reviews for this series are influenced by its religious themes. Yet the producers must have been aware of the risk. Religion can be a polarizing subject. Any misstep-real or perceived-could lead to backlash.

However, I see the religious elements as metaphors, similar to how the shark in Jaws represented more than just a predator. This series, like Jaws, is ultimately about human experience. Themes of fear, guilt, redemption, and existential questioning resonate on multiple levels. When viewed this way, the characters' struggles feel more real and profound.

I give the series a 6.5 not only for the engaging characters, but also for the courage shown by the series creators.

Somber. Poignant. Thought Provoking. I was thinking about the film and its implications long after it was over. It echoes so many repeated events in history of committing acts of violence, all in the name of religion. The crusading party proclaiming itself morally correct and never guilty. To be honest, I never knew about the Cathars and their fate until I watched this miniseries. It really got me interested in learning more about them.

So much criticism from other people and low ratings because the feature was dark and portrayed a harsh reality of a very dark aspect of Christianity. I felt compelled to chime in with the minority of viewers who liked this feature. The film neither revels nor vilifies the darkness and violence of the antagonists. Instead it gives a realistic portrayal of historical events as much as we can know them. This is especially true during the Medieval ages. It was a time rife with examples of religions committing heinous and cruel acts of violence against "non-believers", all in the name of God and Christianity. There are plenty of examples from history where many were converted to Christianity under duress through acts of violence, at a sword point, hanging, beheading, etc. The film takes great care not to go overboard with either the victims or villains portrayal and paints a very haunting picture of medieval France and the Crusades and the Cathar massacres.

The acting was very good across the board for the Medieval portion of the story (with some minor exceptions). Tom Felton as Viscount Trencavel delivered an especially passionate and spirited performance as a noble and charismatic leader of Carcassonne. Jessica Brown Findlay as medieval Alaïs Pelletier du Mas and Emun Elliott as her husband, Guilhem Du Mas brought a very evocative performance as well, making the ending of the story that much more powerful and tragic.

The beautiful soundtrack, scenery and landscapes, believable settings, good costuming along with strong performances all contributed to an engrossing story. Though occasionally slow, the thick as tar tension, atmosphere and believable acting keep the story moving forward and viewers invested in the events and characters.

Perhaps my only one but big complaint was the back and forth switching between medieval and modern times. It was distracting at times, and I did not feel the 2012 events connected well with the past. Some plot points felt contrite and forced to fit the events of 1209 Carcassonne. The whole modern time arch felt just thrown together, not nearly as interesting, and realistic as the past. As if instinctively sensing that the 2012 events really didn't belong in the series, the scriptwriter's and actors' performances and the characters' stories were uninspiring and not nearly as compelling and believable. The modern part of the story did not connect well with the medieval part and was too disjointed to be its own separate story. I just found it too hard to care for its characters. I wish they had focused exclusively on Cathars of medieval Carcassonne. It was a fascinating story, albeit a tragic one, that deserves more coverage.

If you have an interest in history in general or consider yourself a history savant, then grab a cup of soothing chamomile tea and watch the miniseries. I am giving this film a high rating solely based on the strength of the medieval story.

My wife had read the book and while she said it wasn't one of the author's best, it was good enough, so I gave this a go. I've found that sometimes weaker books from an author make better films than stronger ones, and while I was a little dubious of the subject matter, I thought I'd give it a go anyway.

What I got was a heap of fairly risible trash, with phoned in performances, some remarkably passionless bonking, a retread of the familiar "It's all a Catholic plot!" Grail stuff, and a curiously strong desire to persecute Cathars. Not on religious grounds, mind you, just for being annoying. It's a pain when you're several hundred years too late to join in the fun :(. I'm just rather disappointed, overall. It's full of actors that I like, so I disregarded the rather uncomplimentary heads-up from the Radio Times and plowed on with it, only to come out at the end with, well, nothing.

A TV miniseries adaptation of the Kate Mosse novel LABYRINTH. I made a point of reading the book before watching this, and I found out that I didn't think very much of it at all. The miniseries would be an improvement, right? Well, it is, but it's certainly not a "great" piece of entertainment, saddled as it is with various flaws and contradictions.

The good news is that although it follows the same basic plotting as the novel, pretty much every scene and sequence is changed slightly, enhanced to be more entertaining for TV audiences. Thus it's also a lot more explicit, with some bloodshed and nudity thrown in for adult viewers.

It's better than the book because it doesn't drag so much, preferring to get on with the narrative instead of throwing in the three-pages of travelogue stuff that lets Mosse's writing down. The enhanced levels of violence make this hard-hitting in places, but the calibre of the acting is a disappointment. Some of the established supporting actors are okay - John Hurt, Tom Curran, even Tom Felton in a Orlando-Bloom-in-Kingdom-of-Heaven type role, but the leads are weak, particularly Vanessa Kirby. Who ever thought she'd be experienced enough to carry the central role?

There are still problems with the story, namely the sub-DA VINCI CODE antics of the modern-day tale (which could have been removed completely), although the historical stuff is more interesting. Some of the direction is also a little cheesy, especially when it descends into sub-Shakespeare melodrama at the climax. Still, I suspect those unfamiliar with the story will enjoy it more than I did...