To keep the family home from being sold, the four very modern March sisters tackle home improvements on their own. But their romantic entanglements involving the boy next door, an old flame,... Read allTo keep the family home from being sold, the four very modern March sisters tackle home improvements on their own. But their romantic entanglements involving the boy next door, an old flame, and a new acquaintance become a distraction.To keep the family home from being sold, the four very modern March sisters tackle home improvements on their own. But their romantic entanglements involving the boy next door, an old flame, and a new acquaintance become a distraction.
- Director
- Writers
- Stars
Julie Berman
- Jo March
- (as Julie Marie Berman)
Enoch-Jude Danquah
- Sexy Cowboy
- (as Enoch Danquah)
Kevin G. Cox
- Lone Ranger
- (as Kevin Cox)
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
5.4816
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Featured reviews
Needed some refining
Its hard to screw up a movie when the template is "Little Women" but they sure do come close. Its is a modern adaption and I can see the reasoning for doing this. It has been done several by theatrical films (Clueless was an adaption of Emma) however this TV-movie fails on several fronts.
In this film all these "Little Women" are in their 20's and still live at home. In this adaption all of the "March Women" go bonkers when "Mom Decides to sell the family home". What was strange was the script has them still acting with the maturity of JR HIGH SCHOOL GIRLS instead of 20 something women.
This production should have had Joe a lesbian and her editor a woman.
If you never read "Little Women" shame on you. If you have then you will see how this movie fails.
If you never read or seen "Little Women" then chances are you might like this. Plus chances are you also love "The Kardashians"
In this film all these "Little Women" are in their 20's and still live at home. In this adaption all of the "March Women" go bonkers when "Mom Decides to sell the family home". What was strange was the script has them still acting with the maturity of JR HIGH SCHOOL GIRLS instead of 20 something women.
This production should have had Joe a lesbian and her editor a woman.
If you never read "Little Women" shame on you. If you have then you will see how this movie fails.
If you never read or seen "Little Women" then chances are you might like this. Plus chances are you also love "The Kardashians"
A lot better than I expected!
This was fun and entertaining and the plot centers on Orchard House. A lot of the events portrayed are based on the novel. The sisters' personalities are also well crafted. The casting was good.
The movie was a better than other adaptations I've seen.
The movie was a better than other adaptations I've seen.
What am I watching?
The acting is horrible, for one. Let's start there. At least for 3 out of 4 of our main actresses.
The storyline is chaotic. Which understandably makes sense because that's basically the plot, but it's done super messy. Very rushed. The arguing is literally over petty little things that could very well be spectacular if translated well to the viewers, but since the acting is so bad it just leaves you wondering, "what the hell is going on?" Clocked out at 44:07 just couldn't do more.
The storyline is chaotic. Which understandably makes sense because that's basically the plot, but it's done super messy. Very rushed. The arguing is literally over petty little things that could very well be spectacular if translated well to the viewers, but since the acting is so bad it just leaves you wondering, "what the hell is going on?" Clocked out at 44:07 just couldn't do more.
Cute but just edgy enough
I have seen at least one adaptation of "Little Women" but that was years ago. I don't remember anything about it except that Kirsten Dunst was so cute as the youngest of the girls and that a young Ryan Seacrest, who I had never heard of, was the host for the broadcast. I just know the novel was about four girls and their mother.
I have this memory of watching a movie set in the present day, but when I watched this, I didn't remember anything except that the girls' father was in it toward the end. Maybe I haven't seen this.
Anyway, I liked it. I wouldn't say it was great, but I like a movie with four adorable and pretty girls with the potential for romance. Though this movie isn't really about Christmas until the end.
I immediately liked Julie Berman as Jo. Not only is she quite pretty, with a nice smile, but she has this personality that isn't too sweet along with confidence and intelligence. And even though we are told the house is cold, she is the one sister who in one scene isn't all covered up when she gets out of bed.
Molly Kunz as Amy is somewhat edgy but not really a bad girl and wow, she looks good when she's really trying to.
Kailin Doubleday as Meg is pretty, and intelligent in a different way than Jo, suggesting she will be rich one of these days, and somewhat shallow.
And Melissa Farman as Beth is sweet but apprehensive.
I like the potential romantic partners but none of them have the strong confidence that one might look for in a movie like this. Mark Famiglietti as Marcus comes closest. But this is a movie about strong women so it doesn't matter really.
The girls don't need men ... well, not that much ... to do the hard work men normally do. It's not shown all that much but it is assumed they do a lot.
There is just enough conflict to keep this from being one of these cute Hallmark movies. And there are a few curse words and just enough suggestions of sexual activity but nothing explicit, though there is a reference to posting nude photos online. This may be a holiday movie (well, several holidays, and Christmas only at the end) about a family. But a family movie? I would say this isn't quite suitable for kids.
I liked it enough. Let's say it's a different kind of holiday movie.
I have this memory of watching a movie set in the present day, but when I watched this, I didn't remember anything except that the girls' father was in it toward the end. Maybe I haven't seen this.
Anyway, I liked it. I wouldn't say it was great, but I like a movie with four adorable and pretty girls with the potential for romance. Though this movie isn't really about Christmas until the end.
I immediately liked Julie Berman as Jo. Not only is she quite pretty, with a nice smile, but she has this personality that isn't too sweet along with confidence and intelligence. And even though we are told the house is cold, she is the one sister who in one scene isn't all covered up when she gets out of bed.
Molly Kunz as Amy is somewhat edgy but not really a bad girl and wow, she looks good when she's really trying to.
Kailin Doubleday as Meg is pretty, and intelligent in a different way than Jo, suggesting she will be rich one of these days, and somewhat shallow.
And Melissa Farman as Beth is sweet but apprehensive.
I like the potential romantic partners but none of them have the strong confidence that one might look for in a movie like this. Mark Famiglietti as Marcus comes closest. But this is a movie about strong women so it doesn't matter really.
The girls don't need men ... well, not that much ... to do the hard work men normally do. It's not shown all that much but it is assumed they do a lot.
There is just enough conflict to keep this from being one of these cute Hallmark movies. And there are a few curse words and just enough suggestions of sexual activity but nothing explicit, though there is a reference to posting nude photos online. This may be a holiday movie (well, several holidays, and Christmas only at the end) about a family. But a family movie? I would say this isn't quite suitable for kids.
I liked it enough. Let's say it's a different kind of holiday movie.
It's about love
Loosely based on Alcott's "Little Women", the March Sister's are of course Jo, Meg, Beth and Amy and in this story they are trying to stop their parents from selling their family home, with all the trouble of boys to contend with at the same time.
I like the fact that there is more than one story going on, even if some outshine the others, but it makes a change for a Christmas film to have a different formula, other than boy meets girl!
As a writer myself, I enjoy that element of the story, but the character of Jo is played as a very mean, quite b*tchy and bossy cow, who's gobby loudness gets a bit much at times. The other three seem to fit the parts well though.
I'm not sure why Lex Luther lives next door, but the handsome Teddy and Marcus help the story if you enjoy some man candy.
Another enjoyable and easy to watch film.
I like the fact that there is more than one story going on, even if some outshine the others, but it makes a change for a Christmas film to have a different formula, other than boy meets girl!
As a writer myself, I enjoy that element of the story, but the character of Jo is played as a very mean, quite b*tchy and bossy cow, who's gobby loudness gets a bit much at times. The other three seem to fit the parts well though.
I'm not sure why Lex Luther lives next door, but the handsome Teddy and Marcus help the story if you enjoy some man candy.
Another enjoyable and easy to watch film.
Did you know
- TriviaIn the beginning of the movie, one of the girls rides her bike past Orchard House - the family home of Louisa May Alcott, the author of "Little Women" on which this movie is loosely based.
- GoofsThe famous music school in Boston is spelled Berklee, not Berkley as it appears on the dream and achievement boards Meg gives to Beth.
- SoundtracksNorton 850
Written by J. Stuart Esty
Performed by The RoadKill Orchestra
Courtesy of The RoadKill Orchestra
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official site
- Language
- Also known as
- El Nadal de les germanes March
- Filming locations
- Worcester, Massachusetts, USA(Worcester Telegram and Gazette)
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime
- 1h 31m(91 min)
- Color
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content

