IMDb RATING
6.8/10
623
YOUR RATING
A profile of Anita Hill, the African-American lawyer who challenged Clarence Thomas' nomination to the US Supreme Court and thus exposed the problem of sexual harassment to the world.A profile of Anita Hill, the African-American lawyer who challenged Clarence Thomas' nomination to the US Supreme Court and thus exposed the problem of sexual harassment to the world.A profile of Anita Hill, the African-American lawyer who challenged Clarence Thomas' nomination to the US Supreme Court and thus exposed the problem of sexual harassment to the world.
- Awards
- 3 wins & 3 nominations total
Orrin Hatch
- Self
- (archive footage)
Ted Kennedy
- Self
- (archive footage)
Patrick Leahy
- Self
- (archive footage)
Alan Simpson
- Self
- (archive footage)
Arlen Specter
- Self
- (archive footage)
Strom Thurmond
- Self
- (archive footage)
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
I watched this documentary about Anita Hill's 1991 testimony before the state judiciary committee against her former boss, U.S. Supreme Court nominee Clarence Thomas, for his repeated sexual harassment to refresh my memory and learn more about circumstances surrounding the events.
It was interesting to learn about Hill's life, see who was supporting her, (her wonderful family, Professor Charles Ogletree, Harvard Law School, and others), and wrenching to rewatch what are to me excruciating details of this terrible, sexist, judgmental, power-system that masquerades as justice.
As I the watched the self-righteous men click their pens and grill Anita, I heard Tom Wolfe's words echo in my head, "They have a way of making the vicim look like the criminal and the criminal the victim." They of course did that quick flip and turned valid charges of sexual harassment into claims of racial harassment against Clarence Thomas.
Joe Biden is responsible for not having called the witnesses who could have corroborated Anita Hill; that's not something I can or want to forget.
Like many women, I've experienced gender based violence and sexual harassment, which is just part of the problem of gender inequality. I've also been a witness in two trials, neither was a picnic, and in both I was attacked for speaking the truth. In one trial, the criminal was put away; in the other, the corruption prevailed and the criminal went on to hurt other women and is still free today. In my experience, American courts and the U.S. government are unflinchingly corrupt.
Near the end of the film, Anita says, "Despite the high cost that is involved, it is worth having the truth emerge." I agree with her, but what a struggle it is. Why don't people come forward more readily? Because they are blamed and skewered when they do.
I believe Anita Hill. Never a question about it. She told her friends and colleagues at the time and well... she's telling the truth.
It saddened me, but I'm glad I watched the movie.
It was interesting to learn about Hill's life, see who was supporting her, (her wonderful family, Professor Charles Ogletree, Harvard Law School, and others), and wrenching to rewatch what are to me excruciating details of this terrible, sexist, judgmental, power-system that masquerades as justice.
As I the watched the self-righteous men click their pens and grill Anita, I heard Tom Wolfe's words echo in my head, "They have a way of making the vicim look like the criminal and the criminal the victim." They of course did that quick flip and turned valid charges of sexual harassment into claims of racial harassment against Clarence Thomas.
Joe Biden is responsible for not having called the witnesses who could have corroborated Anita Hill; that's not something I can or want to forget.
Like many women, I've experienced gender based violence and sexual harassment, which is just part of the problem of gender inequality. I've also been a witness in two trials, neither was a picnic, and in both I was attacked for speaking the truth. In one trial, the criminal was put away; in the other, the corruption prevailed and the criminal went on to hurt other women and is still free today. In my experience, American courts and the U.S. government are unflinchingly corrupt.
Near the end of the film, Anita says, "Despite the high cost that is involved, it is worth having the truth emerge." I agree with her, but what a struggle it is. Why don't people come forward more readily? Because they are blamed and skewered when they do.
I believe Anita Hill. Never a question about it. She told her friends and colleagues at the time and well... she's telling the truth.
It saddened me, but I'm glad I watched the movie.
Anita Hill shares her story about the sexual harassment she suffered from her former boss Clarence Thomas to the US Senators in this documentary. Throughout the whole proceedings, it appeared that the senators had been intimidating Mrs. Hill to repeatedly recount the disgusting details in an effort to humiliate and demoralize her, but she remained calm, patient, and determined to express her point. Her claims was not taken seriously, yet even so, I was delighted to know she had a positive influence on others. She might not have believed that voicing the truth would benefit her much, but in reality, it impacted a lot of others who were or are hesitant to speak out against their boss for fear of losing their jobs, having their reputations tarnished or receiving threats.
If this was a proper documentary it would have both sides of this story, including the dozen women who worked with Thomas and who made it clear that Thomas was being smeared.
Just google: clarence thomas witch-hunt
Hill is simply a documented liar, even the cheer-leading mainstream press documented clear untruths by her. This was (another) lynching of a black man by Democrats.
I recommend looking at Hill on meet the press in 1998 where she made her motives clear: Appearing on "Meet the Press" in 1998, Hill was asked to respond to Gloria Steinem's defense of President Clinton following allegations he'd groped a White House volunteer. Steinem had said, "The truth is that even if the allegations are true, the president is not guilty of sexual harassment. He is accused of having made a gross, dumb and reckless pass at a supporter during a low point in her life. Hill AGREED. When "Meet the Press" host Tim Russert asked her if she had a double standard for sexual harassment claims made against Clinton, she said, "There are larger issues, larger issues than just individual behavior." Just google: youtube Anita Hill
This rationalization of it being ook for partisan interests reasons to make up claims of sexual harassment or ignoring those by Democrats because of the "larger issues" (ie PARTISAN interests making lies and smears ok) also accused recently with Kavaugh hearings where after that circus we saw two of the accusers withdraw accusations, one have theirs totally debunked, and the fourth, a Democratic Party activist, not able to recall when where or who committed the assault.
Hill is simply a documented liar, even the cheer-leading mainstream press documented clear untruths by her. This was (another) lynching of a black man by Democrats.
I recommend looking at Hill on meet the press in 1998 where she made her motives clear: Appearing on "Meet the Press" in 1998, Hill was asked to respond to Gloria Steinem's defense of President Clinton following allegations he'd groped a White House volunteer. Steinem had said, "The truth is that even if the allegations are true, the president is not guilty of sexual harassment. He is accused of having made a gross, dumb and reckless pass at a supporter during a low point in her life. Hill AGREED. When "Meet the Press" host Tim Russert asked her if she had a double standard for sexual harassment claims made against Clinton, she said, "There are larger issues, larger issues than just individual behavior." Just google: youtube Anita Hill
This rationalization of it being ook for partisan interests reasons to make up claims of sexual harassment or ignoring those by Democrats because of the "larger issues" (ie PARTISAN interests making lies and smears ok) also accused recently with Kavaugh hearings where after that circus we saw two of the accusers withdraw accusations, one have theirs totally debunked, and the fourth, a Democratic Party activist, not able to recall when where or who committed the assault.
This is a 95-minute documentary directed by Freida Lee Mock. It tells the story of Anita Hill's testimony at the Clarence Thomas confirmation hearings in 1991 and the impact of those hearings on Anita Hill in subsequent years. She had testified for multiple days about the sexual harassment she experienced from Thomas while he was her boss.
The film includes much archival footage from the hearings and elsewhere and commentary by journalists Jill Abramson and Jane Mayer, attorney John Carr, and Harvard law professor Charles Ogletree.
In one sense, this was an embarrassing film to view, watching an all-male Senate committee attacking Anita Hill's credibility and quietly listening to Clarence Thomas forcefully state that he was being lynched (by a black woman no less). The committee declined to hear witnesses that would have corroborated Hill's testimony and the fact that she had complained about Thomas's behavior at the time it happened.
Obviously, the documentary is from Anita Hill's perspective, but one cannot watch it without believing she was telling the truth.
The film includes much archival footage from the hearings and elsewhere and commentary by journalists Jill Abramson and Jane Mayer, attorney John Carr, and Harvard law professor Charles Ogletree.
In one sense, this was an embarrassing film to view, watching an all-male Senate committee attacking Anita Hill's credibility and quietly listening to Clarence Thomas forcefully state that he was being lynched (by a black woman no less). The committee declined to hear witnesses that would have corroborated Hill's testimony and the fact that she had complained about Thomas's behavior at the time it happened.
Obviously, the documentary is from Anita Hill's perspective, but one cannot watch it without believing she was telling the truth.
This woman is SO remarkable. To come forward to tell the truth (when she was asked mind you) in a predominantly male, white congress and the "establishment" backing the perpetrator is simply remarkable. Courageous. Admirable. Had this hearing been held TODAY during/after the MeToo movement, she would have been believed, as she should have been and that "man" would not hold one of the highest jobs in this country. I was disgusted at the way she was treated and dismissed by the people that should be there to listen and protect her and keep a "man" out of a position that would give him power to make decisions he should not be allowed to make.
Random-70778 🙄
Random-70778 🙄
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official site
- Language
- Also known as
- Anita
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Gross US & Canada
- $176,979
- Opening weekend US & Canada
- $44,114
- Mar 23, 2014
- Gross worldwide
- $176,979
- Runtime
- 1h 16m(76 min)
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 1.78 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content