9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out

As someone who does believe we are sometimes misled by powerful people I was interested to see this film. I have worked as an architect, though never on high rises. I studied the WTC towers in college for both their design and (at the time) innovative structure. I had extensively read trade publications about 9/11 and the 3 building collapses and thought another perspective was a good thing.

Unfortunately this movie did not use much good evidence in its analysis. It seems to have started from conclusions and worked backwards. Most all the arguments made for how we were misled about the cause of collapse did not ring true to me as a building professional.

Ultimately, I was so disappointed in the quality of the analysis that I researched the experts in the film. I could find no credentials that make anyone quoted in the film particularly credible. My view is that this film is actually MORE inaccurate than anything the main stream media has said about the WTC collapse.

Essential viewing for everyone, especially those in the U.S. and UK.

A&E fort 9/11 Truth bring forth what actually happened, with plenty of solid, irrefutable evidence that the attacks of 9/11 were completely outside of the scope and capabilities of the alleged, nineteen Saudi's in question.

Actually, go to youtube and watch WTC7 collapse, straight down, at near free fall speed, appearing to literally melt into it's base, as though held in place by a form or mold, around the massive skyscraper! We've been told that this incredible sight was accomplished by, "burning debris" on one side of the building. Suuuure, it was!;) Not.

Also, anyone who doesn't already know about William Rodriquez, watch his testimony on youtube. He knew those buildings inside and out and against orders of firemen, repeatedly ran into one of the buildings, pulling people out, over and over again, at great peril to himself. Anybody think Cheney or the rest of the Bush gang would have done that, in the same situation?

Me, neither.

He persisted in pressuring the completely reluctant Bush Administration to hold the 9/11 Commission, which was limited in scope, politically compromised and poorly funded. The one who's chairs state publicly that they were lied to repeatedly, by the Cheney/Bush Administration, the Pentagon, the FBI and the CIA. Lied to, repeatedly about 9/11. He also was in one of the buildings, in an elevator with others and confirms what firemen and others there have stated. There were explosions taking place in the basement of that building, moments before planes hit.

Everyone who cares about their country should see this. At least, people who value their freedom and value the ideal of honest government.

There is an article from the New York Times entitled something like, "Forgotten Voices of 9/11". It reports that the firemen were radioing to the ground, as they climbed the stairs and reached the crash site in one of the buildings, found survivors at the crash site in the building and were calling down for support to help bring the survivors at the crash site in the building where we have been told, over and over again, that there was a giant, superheated inferno, capable of weakening massive steel beams. Survivors would not be found in such an environment and they wouldn't have been able to get to the crash site, if there was. They reported NO raging inferno, obviously. Moments later, the tower disintegrated around them.

We owe it to them, the multitudes that have perished in the wars based on lies and deception in it's name, to look into the unbelievable events that happened that day. Then, investigate and bring the people who did carry it out to justice.

Just watch it, already!

Just a load of guff spouted about a tragedy caused by TERRORISTS (not the US government as this bonkers documentary would have you believe). These crazy conspiracy theorists and so-called 'experts' need to take off their foil hats and emerge from their dank basements to actually enjoy life, not spout nonsense which is insulting both to the survivors of 9/11 and our intelligence.

Oh, I forgot to mention... it's ruddy boring too. AVOID AVOID AVOID. 2/10

Very weak theory, the documentary starts with people saying that the evidence have been destroyed to hide the truth. That's groundwork for conspiracy, you can not prove the truth, therefore you can not prove our truth is wrong ... One of the experts is known to be part of the AIDS denialism movement. I am surprised Alex Jones wasn't part of the experts ...

9/11: Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out (2012)

*** (out of 4)

This documentary originally aired on PBS and apparently became a hit among certain groups, which led to it growing a rather strong cult following. The documentary basically takes a bunch of experts to discuss how it was impossible for the Twin Towers to fall on their attack on 9/11. We're given the "evidence" that the government said caused the two towers (and Building 7) to collapse and then we here from countless high-rise architects and other experts. We learn the scientific reason as to why it was impossible for the buildings to fall in the way that they did and we see their evidence as to why they believe there were explosives inside the building.

Some people look at conspiracy theories as loony nuts who are constantly not believing what they're told and coming up with wild stories. Others see conspiracy theories as people willing to look further to what we're told and discover things that just don't make sense. There are so many awful 9/11 documentaries out there that it's hard to go through a dozen of them and find one good one. Theories are all over the place but I must say that this one here is actually one of the better made ones. I say that because they offer up some pretty good questions as to the official report and show some nice evidence as to why things just don't make sense. As someone who watched the events live that day, I think the most striking stuff is the actual news footage from that day where people discuss hearing explosions.

The documentary is certainly one-sided and there's no doubt that it was produced to push this side. Personally speaking, I would have preferred some "experts" from the "other side" to offer up their reasonings for thinking that the towers could have fallen the way they did. I think if both sides would have had a voice here then it would have been much better. As is, we pretty much get the conspiracy side here and now we have to search out another video from the other side to hear their explanations. Either way, this is still worth viewing for those who enjoy documentaries on the subject.