Silverhide

Werewolf/Silverhide looks like a rubbery rat mask bought from a dollar store.

The gore was mediocre, you could do more some ketchup or fresh steak from your grocery store.

Acting's terrible.

The pacing was very slow, things only get interesting at the 45 minute mark, but by then it is too late to redeem itself. Watch something else. I do not recommend this film even for die hard werewolf fans.

If you're looking for an American Werewolf in London, then you've come to the wrong place this is definitely a B Movie as many have already made it very clear that it is. I have seen worse I have seen better this is not one of the baddest movies. It does start off slow, story leaves something to be desired but the creature and special effects are fairly good. Worth a one time watch. But for true horror and great creature effects and Gore we all know American Werewolf in London and my favorite the Howling are the to go to for horror fans.

I think this movie had a decent premise. The dialogue (the parts that could be heard) and acting were on par for low-budget werewolf horror. Unfortunately the positive qualities are undone by incompetence in the technical aspects of filmmaking: directing, editing, lighting and sound mixing. A lot of the movie is too dark to discern what's happening; the dialogue is also sometimes indecipherable. There's also a lack of spatial coherence; and the action and practical effects are often randomly-framed and jumpily-edited. The pace on the first half was too slow to sustain much interest, while conversely the final act felt rushed and underdeveloped.

How could it get a 10 as if it was a great representation of being a quality B-genre movie? I am a fan of drive-in theater movies and this is along that line, but too many scenes/shots are just too long and dark that I lose both visual and plot interest. The acting is right there with the best of the bad movies, and what is a cheap horror movie without screams and shouting galore!

I don't know, I had to watch it in fast forward. But if you liked the 60's-70's Dr. Who monsters, those were fun, (funny) but of course low-to-no budget like this one!

Go in with low level expectations, and use fast forward accordingly!

OMG, that was boring. It can cure insomnia. The creature looked so silly, which is most likely the reason they only had the face in it for two frames at a time.

For a low budget indie, the acting was about what I expected. The storyline was boring, boring, boring. Seriously, I think I'm going to sleep when I finish this review. There was nothing thrilling about this.

And what is it with movie makers and the moon? Hello to all of you out there, the moon does NOT act like the sun. It doesn't have moon rays. If you walk outside during the night, the moon can be seen, but it does not illuminate the ground. However, in this movie, it did. It was so annoying.

I don't know what they spent 100,000 on. Maybe it was the insane amount of moonlight :/

I gave this a 3-star rating. Maybe that's too generous. It was boring and a waste of time. Skip it. I do not recommend.