Four filmmakers take their cameras into the Montana wilderness to document the mysterious inner workings of a young community with a giant secret.Four filmmakers take their cameras into the Montana wilderness to document the mysterious inner workings of a young community with a giant secret.Four filmmakers take their cameras into the Montana wilderness to document the mysterious inner workings of a young community with a giant secret.
- Awards
- 1 win total
Featured reviews
If nothing else is true about 'The Triangle,' I appreciate that it is largely a collaborative effort among a group of friends; the same names write, direct, produce, star, edit, and handle cinematography in turn. With that said, for a found footage flick, it seems to boast higher or at least more evident production values than many of its brethren. I think this is fairly well made in every regard. It also struggles with the common issue of a major lack of eventfulness for a substantial portion of its length, in this case almost two-thirds the runtime. Once the turn does come 'The Triangle' is duly unsettling, and the value becomes clear. The payoff may be insufficient for some viewers, but for as quietly as the movie comes and goes, I find myself quite liking it.
There's no acute fright here, and no overarching atmosphere until that late turn. Rather, this is the type of film that aims to be slow and steady, subtly digging in its claws when the right moment comes. That may not sound like much, but at least in my book it's all that it needs to be. And the beauty of 'The Triangle' is that for what it achieves, it does so with minimal embellishment: the production design, art direction, and effects are present, but noticeably small so as to fit neatly within a low budget. One might deliberate on how much is truly required of the cast, but it strikes me that they ably and earnestly sell the softly sinister proceedings, and for that matter the eccentricity of the community that precedes it. And much credit also belongs, I think, to Adam Cotton. His original score is bare-bones and kept to the background at all times, yet disquieting as such; just as importantly, his sound design and effects are essential to the viewing experience, and simple as these may be, the result further feeds into the eeriness.
The best way to describe this may in fact be "minimalist found footage." Obviously a lot of hard work went into it, certainly, yet the abnormal manifestations presented to us are few, & the profit therefrom as a viewer is hushed. At no time is 'The Triangle' discretely gripping, but nor does it want or try to be. Though distinctly downplayed, the horror element is strong all the same as it rolls around. I can understand how such a low-key flick may not hold broad appeal, but for those who can appreciate the subdued tone, I think it's swell. There maybe isn't any need to go out of your way for it, but if you have the chance to watch 'The Triangle,' this is a good bit of fun.
There's no acute fright here, and no overarching atmosphere until that late turn. Rather, this is the type of film that aims to be slow and steady, subtly digging in its claws when the right moment comes. That may not sound like much, but at least in my book it's all that it needs to be. And the beauty of 'The Triangle' is that for what it achieves, it does so with minimal embellishment: the production design, art direction, and effects are present, but noticeably small so as to fit neatly within a low budget. One might deliberate on how much is truly required of the cast, but it strikes me that they ably and earnestly sell the softly sinister proceedings, and for that matter the eccentricity of the community that precedes it. And much credit also belongs, I think, to Adam Cotton. His original score is bare-bones and kept to the background at all times, yet disquieting as such; just as importantly, his sound design and effects are essential to the viewing experience, and simple as these may be, the result further feeds into the eeriness.
The best way to describe this may in fact be "minimalist found footage." Obviously a lot of hard work went into it, certainly, yet the abnormal manifestations presented to us are few, & the profit therefrom as a viewer is hushed. At no time is 'The Triangle' discretely gripping, but nor does it want or try to be. Though distinctly downplayed, the horror element is strong all the same as it rolls around. I can understand how such a low-key flick may not hold broad appeal, but for those who can appreciate the subdued tone, I think it's swell. There maybe isn't any need to go out of your way for it, but if you have the chance to watch 'The Triangle,' this is a good bit of fun.
A decent enough piece of Lovecraftian horror, sans blood and gore or expensive special effects, that only hints at the cosmic terror haunting its victims. The Triangle has the look and feel of a fairly low-budget affair, but is filmed in a beautiful, stark location that lends to a suspenseful atmosphere. There are many open questions of character motivation and backstory that some will find unsatisfying. However, I was fine with certain key plot elements being left open to my imagination.
Done right, the filmmakers could have elaborated and put the finishing touches on a masterwork of dread. But, given the ambition of the idea behind The Triangle, they could've more easily gone too far making silly, illogical choices, creating not a modest psychological thriller, but a full-blown farce. In the end, The Triangle is an incomplete, interesting charcoal sketch of a paranoid's half-remembered nightmare, but not a fully rendered, color masterpiece of a seer's infernal vision.
Done right, the filmmakers could have elaborated and put the finishing touches on a masterwork of dread. But, given the ambition of the idea behind The Triangle, they could've more easily gone too far making silly, illogical choices, creating not a modest psychological thriller, but a full-blown farce. In the end, The Triangle is an incomplete, interesting charcoal sketch of a paranoid's half-remembered nightmare, but not a fully rendered, color masterpiece of a seer's infernal vision.
This film does a great job of building atmosphere and giving you characters that feel real-ish.
Then it gives you like a quarter of a plot and some hints and ultimately goes nowhere. It also really drags in pacing as time goes on. Potential squandered.
Then it gives you like a quarter of a plot and some hints and ultimately goes nowhere. It also really drags in pacing as time goes on. Potential squandered.
So - If you don't have the patience for a slow building film or need to have every aspect explained to you....you will not enjoy this film. It will only leave you angry and confused. Aspects of the story are decidedly vague. There is a lot of handheld camerawork and (nicely done) split screens. I went into this film with the lowest of expectations. I'm still surprised at how engaging it turned out to be.
Found footage in rural Montana. That's all you need to know. The acting was solid and convincing. The build-up is slow and keeps you wondering which direction the film would eventually take (you won't likely guess right off). It's not by-the-numbers suspense and the feeling of menace and unease feels more nuanced and genuine than most. If you enjoy a variety of found footage films - this one definitely gives you something different.
Found footage in rural Montana. That's all you need to know. The acting was solid and convincing. The build-up is slow and keeps you wondering which direction the film would eventually take (you won't likely guess right off). It's not by-the-numbers suspense and the feeling of menace and unease feels more nuanced and genuine than most. If you enjoy a variety of found footage films - this one definitely gives you something different.
It was more indie movie slow, but they did not have the blair witch vomit inducing shaky cams.
Did you know
- TriviaThe film took 3 years to edit.
- How long is The Triangle?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Runtime
- 1h 34m(94 min)
- Color
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content