Simon

The acting in this film is cringey, the storyline boring, there is no tension and the camera work is shockingly bad.

It's as though someone was allowed to submit their gcse coursework to Netflix. Avoid.

Bad dubbing, bad acting, bad photography, bad lighting, bad dialogue, and I'm only twenty minutes in. Looks like amateur actors didn't feel sure of themselves or the plot, which had a few holes. Police procedures, medical involvement and journalistic work stepped on each other's toes, and the cod portrayal of an "alternative personality" just grated. It looked like someone watched "Dexter" and thought they could do better. They didn't.

The Plot. An investigative Journalist thinks she's found a killer, and breaks into his place to find the evidence.

Only when he come's back it becomes a game of cat and mouse with deadly consequences.

As of this writing there is only one other review -- from someone who worked on the movie and give it an extraordinarily good review.

It's not a good movie.

It's very cheaply made and not especially well done. I mean if you are in college and you made this movie, OK, but it's just not professional.

Plus it's slow as molasses. And nothing about it is suspenseful.

Move on.

The movie was all but urban, very low quality and clearly made on low budget. Everything seemed to just happen so quickly yet so slowly (get what I mean?). It had an unusually dull mood and was quite predictable at times.

The 'horrific' moments seemed rather unconvincing and quite childish. Very simplistic. It doesn't get the viewer to fully understand and (perhaps) sympathize with the killer's actions.

It wasn't all bad though. In fact, overall the ideas were pretty good. I especially saw the ending quite interesting but still felt like it was one of those endings in which the director of the movie feels he/she failed viewers throughout the movie and decides to make up for it in the end.

It had a great environment and gave a feel of the regular neighborhood in England. However, ask me how I found this movie on a usual day, and the quickest answer I'd give you would probably come with the 'S' word.

Bad acting. Picture and sound issues. Probably because of the low budget. Plot wasn't bad though. Watchable. I didn't stop half the way. Didn;t seem that I spended one and a half hour for nothing.