Foyle is drawn into the world of corrupt Nazi businessmen when a university professor is found brutally murdered in a London park.Foyle is drawn into the world of corrupt Nazi businessmen when a university professor is found brutally murdered in a London park.Foyle is drawn into the world of corrupt Nazi businessmen when a university professor is found brutally murdered in a London park.
John C. Waterhouse
- William Knowles
- (as John Waterhouse)
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
The episode starts in 1942 with two young men trying to siphon off some whiskey from a ship bound for America.
We then move to London in 1946 when a dead man is found with the address of Clayton Del Mar who runs an American oil company. Del Mar has powerful contacts in Britain and elsewhere. He is working with middle eastern governments to get them to reduce being reliant on the Soviet Union and talk up British interests. Foyle is tasked by MI5 to investigate.
The dead man was involved in the Nuremberg trials as a translator. He had travelled from Germany to meet Del Mar. There seems to be some links between Del Mar's companies and helping the Nazis during the war.
Foyle sends Sam undercover to look after Clayton's infirm father who thinks his son may not have what it takes to run a powerful oil corporation. Foyle goes to Germany to find out more about the dead man who was a professor.
There is weakness in the writing of this story which is already overstretched. Sam needs to be a live in carer as she goes undercover. Sam just conveniently walks in on her husband consoling a young lady in the house who has lost her job. This enables to walk out of the house. The whole Soviet agent subplot in London was unnecessary. Some of the acting was a bit iffy. Both Rupert Vansittart as the MI5 Head and Nigel Lindsay as Clayton Del Mar were one dimensional
We then move to London in 1946 when a dead man is found with the address of Clayton Del Mar who runs an American oil company. Del Mar has powerful contacts in Britain and elsewhere. He is working with middle eastern governments to get them to reduce being reliant on the Soviet Union and talk up British interests. Foyle is tasked by MI5 to investigate.
The dead man was involved in the Nuremberg trials as a translator. He had travelled from Germany to meet Del Mar. There seems to be some links between Del Mar's companies and helping the Nazis during the war.
Foyle sends Sam undercover to look after Clayton's infirm father who thinks his son may not have what it takes to run a powerful oil corporation. Foyle goes to Germany to find out more about the dead man who was a professor.
There is weakness in the writing of this story which is already overstretched. Sam needs to be a live in carer as she goes undercover. Sam just conveniently walks in on her husband consoling a young lady in the house who has lost her job. This enables to walk out of the house. The whole Soviet agent subplot in London was unnecessary. Some of the acting was a bit iffy. Both Rupert Vansittart as the MI5 Head and Nigel Lindsay as Clayton Del Mar were one dimensional
Did you ever have a friend from school whose company you really enjoyed but, alas, you eventually had to go your separate ways? Well Foyles War is like that. When Horowitz swore on a stack of Bibles (vintage, wartime Bibles) that he was done with Foyle, we took him at his word.
We shouldn't have. Foyle is back and this reviewer could not believe how much he had been missed.
True, some of the transition episodes (to MI5) in the last (supposedly final) season were not entirely on the mark, but in this opener to S08 Horowitz and Kitchen and Weeks show that they they have lost none of their edge. Or charm. Or skill.
Overall fun. Even the risky trope of the pregnant woman running for her life from the bad man -- risky because it might not have worked -- was a treat.
Entertaining. Fun. And reminds one of how unique this series was, and hopefully will be again.
We shouldn't have. Foyle is back and this reviewer could not believe how much he had been missed.
True, some of the transition episodes (to MI5) in the last (supposedly final) season were not entirely on the mark, but in this opener to S08 Horowitz and Kitchen and Weeks show that they they have lost none of their edge. Or charm. Or skill.
Overall fun. Even the risky trope of the pregnant woman running for her life from the bad man -- risky because it might not have worked -- was a treat.
Entertaining. Fun. And reminds one of how unique this series was, and hopefully will be again.
Loved 'Foyle's War' and was immediately hooked when first getting into it. Love it even more now, on re-watches things that didn't quite make sense at first are clearer and things that were not noticed or appreciated before are and much admired. Everything that came over as brilliant on first viewings still are brilliant on re-watches.
"High Castle" is the first episode of the sadly last season of this wonderful series and while it is a decent episode it's a long way from being one of the best 'Foyle's War' episodes. To me it's a lesser episode, that it's far from bad is a strong indication of how good 'Foyle's War' is and how fantastic the best episodes are in the series' prime. "High Castle" could have been better. Two of its biggest problems is the over-obviousness too early of the killer, written in such an over-the-top way that one knows that they're involved in some way from the start (the only other 'Foyle's War' episode to have a too obvious denouement is "Bleak Midwinter"), and Nigel Lindsay's hammy and one-dimensional performance (also sporting the single worst accent of the series).
Could care less for the flat underdeveloped character of Adam and there are parts of the story, like agreed the Vera subplot, that feel incomplete.
Still, there is a lot to like about "High Castle". Just had to get that mad clear before one got the impression of me disliking the episode. Which is further from the truth. The quality of the production values are high. with beautiful costumes, the evocative way the characters are made up, the look of the houses and cars, pretty locations and authentic-looking scenery. The music is in keeping with the mood and doesn't overpower the drama while still making an impact.
Writing is intelligent, sophisticated and thought-provoking while the story is suitably complicated (apart from the denouement, which is disappointing because most endings of 'Foyle's War' are very surprising) and intrigues.
One thing that wasn't picked up by me but now is and admired hugely is the tackling of what was seen as truths but some really misconceptions and seeing British during and after the war in a new light. This was a bold move and dealt with a lot of honesty and tact. The character tensions were also handled very well and added a lot of intrigue.
Michael Kitchen is truly superb as Foyle, subtle, intensely determined, commanding and above all human. One of the most interesting television detectives there's ever been and Kitchen has rarely been better. Honeysuckle Weeks is charming and loyal, am really liking that she is becoming more developed and coming into her own even more, and Hilda and Arthur are worthy regular characters, if not yet as interesting as Milner (missed but not enough to wish for his return).
It is a pity that Lindsay is not up to snuff, because the rest of the supporting cast do solidly. In particular John Mahoney who plays his father, he is excellent and like in 'Frasier' one can easily mistake him for an American (he may live in America, but he was actually born in England, that shocked me when first finding out).
To conclude, a decent episode with a lot of good things but considering the high calibre of 'Foyle's War' in general "High Castle" could have been much better. 7/10 Bethany Cox
"High Castle" is the first episode of the sadly last season of this wonderful series and while it is a decent episode it's a long way from being one of the best 'Foyle's War' episodes. To me it's a lesser episode, that it's far from bad is a strong indication of how good 'Foyle's War' is and how fantastic the best episodes are in the series' prime. "High Castle" could have been better. Two of its biggest problems is the over-obviousness too early of the killer, written in such an over-the-top way that one knows that they're involved in some way from the start (the only other 'Foyle's War' episode to have a too obvious denouement is "Bleak Midwinter"), and Nigel Lindsay's hammy and one-dimensional performance (also sporting the single worst accent of the series).
Could care less for the flat underdeveloped character of Adam and there are parts of the story, like agreed the Vera subplot, that feel incomplete.
Still, there is a lot to like about "High Castle". Just had to get that mad clear before one got the impression of me disliking the episode. Which is further from the truth. The quality of the production values are high. with beautiful costumes, the evocative way the characters are made up, the look of the houses and cars, pretty locations and authentic-looking scenery. The music is in keeping with the mood and doesn't overpower the drama while still making an impact.
Writing is intelligent, sophisticated and thought-provoking while the story is suitably complicated (apart from the denouement, which is disappointing because most endings of 'Foyle's War' are very surprising) and intrigues.
One thing that wasn't picked up by me but now is and admired hugely is the tackling of what was seen as truths but some really misconceptions and seeing British during and after the war in a new light. This was a bold move and dealt with a lot of honesty and tact. The character tensions were also handled very well and added a lot of intrigue.
Michael Kitchen is truly superb as Foyle, subtle, intensely determined, commanding and above all human. One of the most interesting television detectives there's ever been and Kitchen has rarely been better. Honeysuckle Weeks is charming and loyal, am really liking that she is becoming more developed and coming into her own even more, and Hilda and Arthur are worthy regular characters, if not yet as interesting as Milner (missed but not enough to wish for his return).
It is a pity that Lindsay is not up to snuff, because the rest of the supporting cast do solidly. In particular John Mahoney who plays his father, he is excellent and like in 'Frasier' one can easily mistake him for an American (he may live in America, but he was actually born in England, that shocked me when first finding out).
To conclude, a decent episode with a lot of good things but considering the high calibre of 'Foyle's War' in general "High Castle" could have been much better. 7/10 Bethany Cox
Review titled Mistake is wrong about name of Iran at the time.
The Imperial State of Iran was established in 1925.
So, the script is correct to refer to Iran.
Review titled Mistake is wrong about name of Iran at the time.
The Imperial State of Iran was established in 1925.
Repeating my short review as this app demands more words before it allows me to submit the text.
Review titled Mistake is wrong about name of Iran at the time.
The Imperial State of Iran was established in 1925.
So, the script is correct to refer to Iran.
So, the script is correct to refer to Iran.
Review titled Mistake is wrong about name of Iran at the time.
The Imperial State of Iran was established in 1925.
So, the script is correct to refer to Iran.
Review titled Mistake is wrong about name of Iran at the time.
The Imperial State of Iran was established in 1925.
So, the script is correct to refer to Iran.
Review titled Mistake is wrong about name of Iran at the time.
The Imperial State of Iran was established in 1925.
So, the script is correct to refer to Iran.
Review titled Mistake is wrong about name of Iran at the time.
The Imperial State of Iran was established in 1925.
So, the script is correct to refer to Iran.
Review titled Mistake is wrong about name of Iran at the time.
The Imperial State of Iran was established in 1925.
So, the script is correct to refer to Iran.
So, the script is correct to refer to Iran.
Review titled Mistake is wrong about name of Iran at the time.
The Imperial State of Iran was established in 1925.
So, the script is correct to refer to Iran.
Review titled Mistake is wrong about name of Iran at the time.
The Imperial State of Iran was established in 1925.
So, the script is correct to refer to Iran.
Review titled Mistake is wrong about name of Iran at the time.
The Imperial State of Iran was established in 1925.
So, the script is correct to refer to Iran.
Review titled Mistake is wrong about name of Iran at the time.
The Imperial State of Iran was established in 1925.
So, the script is correct to refer to Iran.
The Imperial State of Iran was established in 1925.
So, the script is correct to refer to Iran.
Review titled Mistake is wrong about name of Iran at the time.
The Imperial State of Iran was established in 1925.
Repeating my short review as this app demands more words before it allows me to submit the text.
Review titled Mistake is wrong about name of Iran at the time.
The Imperial State of Iran was established in 1925.
So, the script is correct to refer to Iran.
So, the script is correct to refer to Iran.
Review titled Mistake is wrong about name of Iran at the time.
The Imperial State of Iran was established in 1925.
So, the script is correct to refer to Iran.
Review titled Mistake is wrong about name of Iran at the time.
The Imperial State of Iran was established in 1925.
So, the script is correct to refer to Iran.
Review titled Mistake is wrong about name of Iran at the time.
The Imperial State of Iran was established in 1925.
So, the script is correct to refer to Iran.
Review titled Mistake is wrong about name of Iran at the time.
The Imperial State of Iran was established in 1925.
So, the script is correct to refer to Iran.
Review titled Mistake is wrong about name of Iran at the time.
The Imperial State of Iran was established in 1925.
So, the script is correct to refer to Iran.
So, the script is correct to refer to Iran.
Review titled Mistake is wrong about name of Iran at the time.
The Imperial State of Iran was established in 1925.
So, the script is correct to refer to Iran.
Review titled Mistake is wrong about name of Iran at the time.
The Imperial State of Iran was established in 1925.
So, the script is correct to refer to Iran.
Review titled Mistake is wrong about name of Iran at the time.
The Imperial State of Iran was established in 1925.
So, the script is correct to refer to Iran.
Review titled Mistake is wrong about name of Iran at the time.
The Imperial State of Iran was established in 1925.
So, the script is correct to refer to Iran.
I love Foyle's War and gave it 9 but must point out that whisky barrels would never have been left spaced apart and unsecured on a ship that was set to sail. Must be the fourth time we've watched this one.
Did you know
- TriviaAccording to writer Anthony Horowitz, the real American company that was guilty of cooperating with the Nazis was Standard Oil although he chose to change the name to Global Oil.
- GoofsMrs. Knowles offhandedly says her husband had been at Bletchley during the war, as if everyone would have been aware of the code breaking operations that took place there during the Second World War. However, those operations were classified until the mid-1970s and Professor Knowles would have not been able to disclose what he was doing there to his wife under the Official Secrets Act.
- Quotes
Arthur Valentine: William Knowles, eh? Should be right up your street.
Christopher Foyle: What does that mean?
Arthur Valentine: [tomgue in cheek] Dead body... knife in the back.
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official sites
- Languages
- Filming locations
- Liverpool, Merseyside, England, UK(concentration camp)
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content