Camera follow teams of High Court Enforcement Agents, dealing with the execution of High Court Writs.Camera follow teams of High Court Enforcement Agents, dealing with the execution of High Court Writs.Camera follow teams of High Court Enforcement Agents, dealing with the execution of High Court Writs.
Browse episodes
Featured reviews
Refreshing take on repo guys. Seen a couple of this type of programming based in America. These guys seem kind and patient compared to USA versions.
Sorry that people end up in these situations but the guys are doing their jobs as professionally as possible. Over there they try to be civil about it, whereas over here it often gets violent and leads to usually vulgar verbal exchanges.
As usual, a tasteful UK example of an unpleasant topic. People sometimes over extend their financial obligations and companies are entitled to try and recoup their losses if possible. Unlike in America the British repo men seem to emphasize with those they are repossessing items from. Several episodes show them showing extreme patience by allowing hours for their clients to try to rectify the problem.
It's unreasonable to blame these folks for the delinquency of the debtors. Not saying each debtor is equal. Some have fallen on hard times due to health, loss of job etc. But others simply bought too much too fast and thought they'd get away with it.
The episode with the race car comes to mind. Seriously dude, a race car? Pay for it already. Lots of luxury items mixed in with the decent folks who are just struggling. Not every episode is the same. Some of the wealthier people shocked be at what they financed and then had the nerve to be hateful when they were finally caught.
Sorry that people end up in these situations but the guys are doing their jobs as professionally as possible. Over there they try to be civil about it, whereas over here it often gets violent and leads to usually vulgar verbal exchanges.
As usual, a tasteful UK example of an unpleasant topic. People sometimes over extend their financial obligations and companies are entitled to try and recoup their losses if possible. Unlike in America the British repo men seem to emphasize with those they are repossessing items from. Several episodes show them showing extreme patience by allowing hours for their clients to try to rectify the problem.
It's unreasonable to blame these folks for the delinquency of the debtors. Not saying each debtor is equal. Some have fallen on hard times due to health, loss of job etc. But others simply bought too much too fast and thought they'd get away with it.
The episode with the race car comes to mind. Seriously dude, a race car? Pay for it already. Lots of luxury items mixed in with the decent folks who are just struggling. Not every episode is the same. Some of the wealthier people shocked be at what they financed and then had the nerve to be hateful when they were finally caught.
Does this show reflect (of the debtors shown), the correct percentage of debtors who are white with British heritage, and non white?
Do you ever hear anybody from DCBL say that the amount payable will rise by X amount if they have to pick up a TV and take it outside? No, in all the episodes I've watched they do not. £900 added in one instance just because they 'began' removing items, I guess they are told NOT to warn debtors so to make more money and penalise the debtors. The show would be better if they were not so falsely polite.
I don't know what it is about it, but there's just something about this show (which is obviously most likely schadenfreude) that keeps me addicted to see more of it. I know, not something many people agree with, but regardless I just personally have some sort of interest in what can happen when you're in serious debt and need to pay it off.
The one thing I definitely like about this show is that it shows people in various circumstances and seeing how they would be able to pay off their debt. Most of the time they either manage to or put it on a weekly/monthly plan. I myself (thankfully) have never been put in such a situation, although I can be glad that this show warned me of what could happen with bad financial decisions which can lead to so much trouble.
Now obviously there's a very huge breach of privacy for those who actually do make an appearance on this show. That's something I do have a bit of a problem with. If you were to be in a sort of situation this show portrays, obviously you'd not want to publicise it, would you?
Regardless, when it comes to watching (and in some cases binging) this show, it's rather easy to do so and you do kind of get used to the tactics the bailiffs use in order to get situations resolved. Good learning experience.
The one thing I definitely like about this show is that it shows people in various circumstances and seeing how they would be able to pay off their debt. Most of the time they either manage to or put it on a weekly/monthly plan. I myself (thankfully) have never been put in such a situation, although I can be glad that this show warned me of what could happen with bad financial decisions which can lead to so much trouble.
Now obviously there's a very huge breach of privacy for those who actually do make an appearance on this show. That's something I do have a bit of a problem with. If you were to be in a sort of situation this show portrays, obviously you'd not want to publicise it, would you?
Regardless, when it comes to watching (and in some cases binging) this show, it's rather easy to do so and you do kind of get used to the tactics the bailiffs use in order to get situations resolved. Good learning experience.
STAR RATING: ***** Saturday Night **** Friday Night *** Friday Morning ** Sunday Night * Monday Morning
As the cost of living is rising and real terms wage increases are proving non-existent, more people around the country are sliding into debt than ever before, and many debts are being left to escalate to the point where it's referred to the High Court. One such HC enforcement group goes by the name of dcbl, which this programme follows the exploits of, as they travel the country, enforcing writs and encountering hostility from many of the debtors.
In this sad, unfortunate world, quality, well written, worthwhile television of the sort that was the norm as recently as two decades ago, has all but evaporated, and the craze for this generation's lazy, easily pleased crowd is the none stop splurge of 'reality TV.' Channel 5 (that, forebodingly, came around two decades ago!) is the main purveyor of this endless stream of cheap, easily made, tackily slapped together pile of programmes that clutter the schedules, and of which Can't Pay? We'll Take It Away (the titles are always similarly lazy and unimaginative!) is one of the more popular examples. But what is even more unsavoury about the existence of these programmes, is the sleazy, voyeuristic thrill we are encouraged to derive from those in desperate, life shattering situations, losing everything and falling into despair, but who are happy to have their personal business broadcast to the public without their faces being blurred, which the generation before would have regarded as nobody else's business, which further shows how far we've fallen as a culture!
While some of the debtors don't have a problem with facing the scorn of society, none of the featured baliffs do, and so we learn of them, their names, and are left to examine the moral ambiguity of them as people, of which some fall far short! A man called Paul Bohill is the most charismatic and surprising of the bunch, still tackling problem debtors and putting himself in potentially volatile situations despite being in his seventies now, but with his age he undoubtedly applies a more calm, reasoned approach to things, along with his frequent partner, the similarly aged Steve Pinner. They are undoubtedly the most shining of the group, but there's also the likes of Brian O' Shaughnessy, who seems to get tangled up with serial killers off screen but, most shockingly of all, the now cancer ridden Delroy Anglin, a former Met police commander who was involved in a scandal involving stolen drugs!
Regardless of whether many of the debtors command sympathy or not, and have only themselves to blame, this is nonetheless still cruel, exploitative television, that invites us to voyeur at people when they're at their lowest and caked in misery, and a shattering indictment of what we as a society now demand as our entertainment. *
As the cost of living is rising and real terms wage increases are proving non-existent, more people around the country are sliding into debt than ever before, and many debts are being left to escalate to the point where it's referred to the High Court. One such HC enforcement group goes by the name of dcbl, which this programme follows the exploits of, as they travel the country, enforcing writs and encountering hostility from many of the debtors.
In this sad, unfortunate world, quality, well written, worthwhile television of the sort that was the norm as recently as two decades ago, has all but evaporated, and the craze for this generation's lazy, easily pleased crowd is the none stop splurge of 'reality TV.' Channel 5 (that, forebodingly, came around two decades ago!) is the main purveyor of this endless stream of cheap, easily made, tackily slapped together pile of programmes that clutter the schedules, and of which Can't Pay? We'll Take It Away (the titles are always similarly lazy and unimaginative!) is one of the more popular examples. But what is even more unsavoury about the existence of these programmes, is the sleazy, voyeuristic thrill we are encouraged to derive from those in desperate, life shattering situations, losing everything and falling into despair, but who are happy to have their personal business broadcast to the public without their faces being blurred, which the generation before would have regarded as nobody else's business, which further shows how far we've fallen as a culture!
While some of the debtors don't have a problem with facing the scorn of society, none of the featured baliffs do, and so we learn of them, their names, and are left to examine the moral ambiguity of them as people, of which some fall far short! A man called Paul Bohill is the most charismatic and surprising of the bunch, still tackling problem debtors and putting himself in potentially volatile situations despite being in his seventies now, but with his age he undoubtedly applies a more calm, reasoned approach to things, along with his frequent partner, the similarly aged Steve Pinner. They are undoubtedly the most shining of the group, but there's also the likes of Brian O' Shaughnessy, who seems to get tangled up with serial killers off screen but, most shockingly of all, the now cancer ridden Delroy Anglin, a former Met police commander who was involved in a scandal involving stolen drugs!
Regardless of whether many of the debtors command sympathy or not, and have only themselves to blame, this is nonetheless still cruel, exploitative television, that invites us to voyeur at people when they're at their lowest and caked in misery, and a shattering indictment of what we as a society now demand as our entertainment. *
10canweroc
It's a show that shows you that you have to be responsible for all of your actions in life. From not paying rent and how your old debt can find you.
Did you know
- TriviaIn late 2017, Delroy Anglin received a bone-marrow transplant to cure an aggressive form of leukemia.
- Quotes
Angry Homeowner: [angrily] You can't be here!
Self - High Court Enforcement Officer: [calmly] Yes, I can.
- ConnectionsReferenced in The Big Can't Pay? Debt Debate: Live (2014)
- How many seasons does Can't Pay? We'll Take It Away! have?Powered by Alexa
Details
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content