Follows the journey of John and Colt, gunfighters and sometimes lovers, on parallel but very different journeys through an underground dueling culture.Follows the journey of John and Colt, gunfighters and sometimes lovers, on parallel but very different journeys through an underground dueling culture.Follows the journey of John and Colt, gunfighters and sometimes lovers, on parallel but very different journeys through an underground dueling culture.
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
The concept was wonderful.
A strange combination of Hard Times and Quick and the Dead, with a touch of Mad Max ... hard to mess up.
But mess up they did.
There are two schools of film criticism. The "auteur" school insists that, before taking pen to paper, you understand everything about the director and writer, to better appreciate what was intended.
The second school does not care what was intended, just what shows up on screen.
Using the yardstick from the second school, I see a film that almost goes out of its way to detract from its own power, to minimize its own kick, to alienate the audience at every opportunity.
The dialog is wretched. The direction so bad as to be perverse and peevish. Ironically Ryan Kwantan and the stunning Freida Pinto are well cast, and in the proper circumstances could have delivered the goods. But like sacrificial pawns in a chess game, their efforts are hampered at every turn.
The sound director in particular should be ashamed. The director chose for unknown reasons to have the characters speak softly all the time, possibly to generate "realism." All this generates is a headache, especially since the soundman allowed every possible noise to block out what the characters were actually saying.
This reviewer almost never looks at a film and wonders aloud how much better it would have been if the Hollywood machine had gotten hold of it...? This one is the exception to the rule.
A strange combination of Hard Times and Quick and the Dead, with a touch of Mad Max ... hard to mess up.
But mess up they did.
There are two schools of film criticism. The "auteur" school insists that, before taking pen to paper, you understand everything about the director and writer, to better appreciate what was intended.
The second school does not care what was intended, just what shows up on screen.
Using the yardstick from the second school, I see a film that almost goes out of its way to detract from its own power, to minimize its own kick, to alienate the audience at every opportunity.
The dialog is wretched. The direction so bad as to be perverse and peevish. Ironically Ryan Kwantan and the stunning Freida Pinto are well cast, and in the proper circumstances could have delivered the goods. But like sacrificial pawns in a chess game, their efforts are hampered at every turn.
The sound director in particular should be ashamed. The director chose for unknown reasons to have the characters speak softly all the time, possibly to generate "realism." All this generates is a headache, especially since the soundman allowed every possible noise to block out what the characters were actually saying.
This reviewer almost never looks at a film and wonders aloud how much better it would have been if the Hollywood machine had gotten hold of it...? This one is the exception to the rule.
If you get bruises, it means you felt something. For the longest times in this, it feels like ... nothing. While our main character struggles to explain what can not be explained, we get a second story line with the gorgeous and talented Freida Pinto. The ensuing love story is not the most believable you'll have seen. But it serves its purpose (killing time and establishing another character besides our main man).
Unfortunately not many things work in its favor here. The ending (which seems blurred, but I guess if you look closely enough you might be able to see something and if you still care have an opinion about it) will split the opinion many viewers will have. Rightfully so I think. Watch it if you don't expect much ...
Unfortunately not many things work in its favor here. The ending (which seems blurred, but I guess if you look closely enough you might be able to see something and if you still care have an opinion about it) will split the opinion many viewers will have. Rightfully so I think. Watch it if you don't expect much ...
If you are looking for action, just forget it. There isn't any. Most of the film is uninteresting chatter. It is very slow paced and terribly boring film.
My recommendation: Skip it.
My vote: 1/10.
My recommendation: Skip it.
My vote: 1/10.
When it started I was wondering a bit why it was rated so low, because I thought it was watchable at least.
But when the second half started that became painfully obvious.
The movie starts out as sort of a illegal street-fighting movie but with armored vest shooting at each other instead of boxing and kicking each other.
And it builds itself up to make you think that it's gonna get more and more intense as it goes on, so the second half is so anticlimactic it's not even funny.
It turns into some wannabe philosophical wonderings drama movie instead, and it has one of the most abrupt endings I've seen in a long while which literally made me ask 'seriously?' out loud to the TV-screen.
And in the end I have no idea what the movie was trying to say or why it was even made in the first place.
So yeah definitely not recommended, to the Mickey Rourke fans I'd like to point out that he doesn't show up until the last 9 minutes.
But when the second half started that became painfully obvious.
The movie starts out as sort of a illegal street-fighting movie but with armored vest shooting at each other instead of boxing and kicking each other.
And it builds itself up to make you think that it's gonna get more and more intense as it goes on, so the second half is so anticlimactic it's not even funny.
It turns into some wannabe philosophical wonderings drama movie instead, and it has one of the most abrupt endings I've seen in a long while which literally made me ask 'seriously?' out loud to the TV-screen.
And in the end I have no idea what the movie was trying to say or why it was even made in the first place.
So yeah definitely not recommended, to the Mickey Rourke fans I'd like to point out that he doesn't show up until the last 9 minutes.
No spoilers. Just an old reference.
When I was younger, there was a thing called a "shaggy dog story".
This movie has A LOT going for it. It has good character development, for example.
Good basic plot.
Good (although each mostly simple) complications to the plot.
Some elements of the action were never adequately explained.
But in the long run: too many things were not explained in the context. Many things seemed to happen with no rational motivation behind them.
They all did lead to the end... but not in any logical manner.
So, then comes the climax...
"Shaggy dog story".
When I was younger, there was a thing called a "shaggy dog story".
This movie has A LOT going for it. It has good character development, for example.
Good basic plot.
Good (although each mostly simple) complications to the plot.
Some elements of the action were never adequately explained.
But in the long run: too many things were not explained in the context. Many things seemed to happen with no rational motivation behind them.
They all did lead to the end... but not in any logical manner.
So, then comes the climax...
"Shaggy dog story".
Did you know
- TriviaFreda Pinto and Mickey Rourke appeared together in Immortals
- How long is Blunt Force Trauma?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official site
- Language
- Also known as
- Бої в бронежилетах
- Filming locations
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Budget
- $1,000,000 (estimated)
- Gross worldwide
- $53,752
- Runtime
- 1h 37m(97 min)
- Color
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content