Lake Bodom

So I guess I just didn't "get" LAKE BODOM. Why was it a good idea to go to the isolated site where a group of campers were massacred in the 1960s? To "recreate it"? And if there was an active psycho back then, he'd be in his 70s now...or early 80s? This film just seemed to lurch from one "surprise" to another and instead of show don't tell, the characters sat in the car and explained at great length why they did what they did. I thought the acting was fine, but the character's motivations seemed wildly out of sync with what they were reacting to. And no fault of the filmmakers, but the subtitles (yes, it's subtitled) are pretty bad. What's also interesting is that while the critics love it at RT, with a current score of 100% from 6 critics, audiences only give it a 38%. I'm one of those who is fine with "movie logic" but if you're going to have your psycho appear at the end, he needs some kind of explanation or we're to believe that for no reason whatsoever he hangs out in the woods for 50+ years...just hanging out?

I don't know what to say about this one. It's an original approach which is great, but I felt that the execution didn't really work that well. I think the first plot twist should have been the only one and should have happened much later, like...in the last scene.

Even if the production values and the acting are positive things to mention, I don't think the film did something particularly well (except the existence of the first plot twist). The first act was a bit lame and not that exciting (ok, the build-up on these films is always very similar but this wasn't one of the most exciting), then the suspense and slasher elements of the 2nd act run for no more than 10/15 minutes (the best part of the film) and after that we have the 2nd plot twist that doesn't need to exist and it's not that interesting ending on a low note.

Lake Bodom, a serene and picturesque location in Finland, holds a dark and chilling history, providing the perfect setting for a slasher film that blends brutal violence with a dose of dark humor. 'Bodom' takes inspiration from the infamous unsolved murders that occurred at the lake in 1960, crafting a twisted tale that will satisfy horror enthusiasts seeking a gruesome yet entertaining ride.

Director Taneli Mustonen plunges us into the lives of four teenage friends, who, in a daring act of rebellion, decide to camp out at Lake Bodom, a place shrouded in urban legends. This reckless decision sets the stage for a night of terror as the group becomes entangled in a deadly game of cat and mouse with a deranged killer.

The film's opening act is a slow burn, taking its time to introduce the characters and establish their dynamics. We witness the typical teenage angst and romantic tensions, which, while not groundbreaking, serve to build a sense of familiarity before the chaos ensues. The performances are solid, particularly the portrayal of the unhinged and unpredictable killer, who becomes the driving force of the film's latter half.

As the sun sets, the movie shifts gears, transforming into a relentless and visceral slasher experience. The cinematography excels in these moments, capturing the eerie beauty of the forest and the stark brutality of the murders. The gore is abundant and creatively executed, ensuring that even the most desensitized horror fans will squirm in their seats.

'Bodom' also incorporates a healthy dose of dark comedy, providing some much-needed levity amidst the carnage. The humor, while not always hitting the mark, adds a layer of unpredictability, making the film a wild and twisted journey. The script, however, falters in its attempt to weave in a deeper psychological narrative, often feeling like a distraction from the more effective slasher elements.

One of the film's strengths lies in its practical effects, which are impressively realistic, adding to the overall intensity. The killer's weapon of choice, a hammer, becomes a symbol of sheer brutality, and the sound design ensures every blow resonates with the audience.

Despite its strengths, 'Bodom' struggles to find a consistent tone, oscillating between horror and comedy, often within the same scene. This unevenness may leave some viewers feeling detached from the story, especially during the more emotionally charged moments. The film's pacing also falters towards the end, with the climax feeling rushed and leaving some plot threads unresolved.

In conclusion, 'Bodom' is a flawed yet entertaining slasher flick that embraces its bloody roots. While it may not offer groundbreaking storytelling, it delivers on the promise of a gruesome and twisted adventure. With a unique setting and a willingness to push boundaries, the film will undoubtedly find its audience among those who appreciate a good old-fashioned bloodbath.

It was a good surprise this Finish movie. A group of friends go to lake Bodom trying to make a reconstruction on murders that occurred there some years ago. From there the story has a lot of unexpected twists that keeps your interest in the movie. I understand why the rating is low, it's not spoken in English and it's no an American movie, but for me this is really a good movie,with good acting and with a story full of twists. I recommend this movie.

A film based on a true story that can be told in two sentences, and the plot isn't actually even that much based on it. Basically it's a Finnish "slasher" film that isn't scary in any way.

How can that be possible ? In a horror movie the viewer should identify to at least one "victim" character and hope for hes or her (usually her) survival in some way. This movie makes none of the cast feel innocent or likable and twists the plot in so many so unnecessary ways the characters lose all value and become indifferent for the viewer.

It feels like the script was just brainstormed together in a single sitting without any work and all focus put into the set, cinematography, sound and music which are all state of art. In some scenes the actors do fine job but very bad in few - losing completely the credibility of the ongoing -panic- situation, although international audiences might not get this. When the movie ends one just feels empty and cheated - it meant nothing and it left nothing to ponder on.

These are common faults in modern publicly-funded Finnish cinema where tech, music and cinematography are great but driven with lazy writing and recycled boring cast that appears in about every title. Weren't the soviet days already over ?

For those interested in slightly better Finnish slasher horror, Kuutamosonaatti (1988) is something to check out.