The Creature Below
- 2016
- 1h 23m
IMDb RATING
3.7/10
1.5K
YOUR RATING
A young scientist discovers a malevolent entity which sets her on a bloody descent into the jaws of insanity.A young scientist discovers a malevolent entity which sets her on a bloody descent into the jaws of insanity.A young scientist discovers a malevolent entity which sets her on a bloody descent into the jaws of insanity.
Daniel Thrace
- Matthew Gardiner
- (as Daniel S. Thrace)
Zacharee Lee
- Dr. Fletcher
- (as Zach Lee)
Cal O'Connell
- Ship's Doctor
- (as Callum O'Connell)
Harry Caspian Lee
- Ship's Crew
- (as Harry Lee)
- …
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
This movie has some bad, but really bad, CG. well, all the CG in this movie are bad, not just some.... and there's not a lot, most of the "creature" parts are made with the old puppet way, seems to be cheaper from using CG.... music is not bad, but sometimes completely different types of music got into the main score, and we just paused the DVD to make sure none of the neighbors is listening to the radio...acting is terrible, OMG it is SO terrible, the lead actress is a disaster, and this is what might turn this garbage into a cult film, the other actress, the sister of the heroine is better, she is actually trying to act, which is not so good, because if she was as bad as her sister - this movie would surely get an Oscar for worst acting.
What kept running through my mind as I watched this movie was "what motivates someone, anyone, to make a movie like this?" I'm not speaking about the genre or subject of the movie, but rather a very legitimate question of what is the driving force to make a movie with the primary actress having no acting ability, the writing being almost non-existent, no real direction, and the lowest production value imaginable. Essentially it seemed like not a single person involved had any desire to make this movie.
My review isn't even regarding whether this movie is good or bad, as it's clearly meant to be a campy movie, as that's perfectly fine and often quite enjoyable. But rather there's something so completely off about this movie that it strikes me as extremely out of place. Like when you see a business in your town that seems to never have any customers, nor even seems to want any, but has been around forever supposedly making plenty of money and you get the idea that there might be something more to their business model. That is this movie. It wasn't made to be watched.
Really I'd give it a 1 but I did make it completely through the film, and there was 1 redeeming line near the end which I won't spoil but I presume was the only tag line planned for this entire film.
My review isn't even regarding whether this movie is good or bad, as it's clearly meant to be a campy movie, as that's perfectly fine and often quite enjoyable. But rather there's something so completely off about this movie that it strikes me as extremely out of place. Like when you see a business in your town that seems to never have any customers, nor even seems to want any, but has been around forever supposedly making plenty of money and you get the idea that there might be something more to their business model. That is this movie. It wasn't made to be watched.
Really I'd give it a 1 but I did make it completely through the film, and there was 1 redeeming line near the end which I won't spoil but I presume was the only tag line planned for this entire film.
Despite the awful acting
Zero budget
Weak story
Uninspired direction
Awful special effects
And did I mention just how terrible the lead 'actress' is?
I somehow made it to the end!
There is nothing to recommend this film and it has few redeeming qualities. But it is watchable (just), and the premise could be interesting if ALL the above faults were fixed. I've not seen a good Lovecraft inspired film for a long time - and this does not change that!
Zero budget
Weak story
Uninspired direction
Awful special effects
And did I mention just how terrible the lead 'actress' is?
I somehow made it to the end!
There is nothing to recommend this film and it has few redeeming qualities. But it is watchable (just), and the premise could be interesting if ALL the above faults were fixed. I've not seen a good Lovecraft inspired film for a long time - and this does not change that!
Don't think Lovecraft:
Think re-do of original Little Shop of Horrors.
You won't get it out of your mind.
Think re-do of original Little Shop of Horrors.
You won't get it out of your mind.
Did you know
- TriviaWhile there is no explicit reference to H. P. Lovecraft neither in the credits nor in the titles, around the minute 16 you can see the protagonist hanging on the wall her title awarded by the Miskatonic University, a fictional place recurrently mentioned in Lovecraft's stories.
- Crazy creditsNo animals or monsters were harmed during the making of this film.
- ConnectionsReferenced in Frightfest 2016: In Conversation With (2016)
- How long is The Creature Below?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official sites
- Language
- Also known as
- Существо из бездны
- Filming locations
- Kingston upon Hull, East Riding of Yorkshire, England, UK(Arctic Corsair)
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Budget
- £12,000 (estimated)
- Runtime
- 1h 23m(83 min)
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 2.39:1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content