This Emmy® nominated investigation unpacks how climate change interacts with migration, unrest and conflict through the lens of US national security.This Emmy® nominated investigation unpacks how climate change interacts with migration, unrest and conflict through the lens of US national security.This Emmy® nominated investigation unpacks how climate change interacts with migration, unrest and conflict through the lens of US national security.
- Awards
- 3 wins & 8 nominations total
Madeleine Albright
- Self
- (archive footage)
George Shultz
- Self
- (archive footage)
- (as George Schultz)
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
The Age of Consequences makes a strong point about the connection between climate change and global instability
and then belabors it to death.
The documentary begins with a parade of military leaders and civilian defense and diplomatic experts, all reinforcing that connection – as if trying to drown out the politicians who pretend it is open to debate.
The filmmakers list a number of ramifications – land loss, shortages, migration, civil unrest and international conflict, to name a few – but then make the same, or very similar, points for each one.
This documentary examines an important topic, so it's a shame that I was nodding off about three- quarters of the way through. Really, though, you could get the gist of it from viewing the trailer.
###
Stu Robinson practices writing, editing, media relations and social media through his business, Phoenix-based Lightbulb Communications.
The documentary begins with a parade of military leaders and civilian defense and diplomatic experts, all reinforcing that connection – as if trying to drown out the politicians who pretend it is open to debate.
The filmmakers list a number of ramifications – land loss, shortages, migration, civil unrest and international conflict, to name a few – but then make the same, or very similar, points for each one.
This documentary examines an important topic, so it's a shame that I was nodding off about three- quarters of the way through. Really, though, you could get the gist of it from viewing the trailer.
###
Stu Robinson practices writing, editing, media relations and social media through his business, Phoenix-based Lightbulb Communications.
3DrD3
This misrepresentation was aimed at the gullible and easily led. The climate does play a hand at creating famine, natural disasters, etc., which in turn can cause civil unrest and mass migration; but to put all ones eggs in the terror basket as the sole cause of the numerous pockets of global misery......is a real stretch......that even Elastic Man would have difficulty attempting.
This documentary is more of a promo presentation for the American military with transparent attempts at declaring that they alone can combat this global menace.
I gave it a 3 points on the quality of the cinematography. I deducted 7 marks for its outlandish foolishness and overt stupidity.
First and formost, this movie looks great!
There are many drone shot scenes, well set-up interview environments, great shots and clips from the ground and fantastic computer generated simulations. It does add upp to a nice to see documentary. Add an important topic to it such as climate change and its impact on geopolitics, while also pointing out the important fact that climate change is only part of chaos at hand. and it seems difficult to fail, right? Yet it does feel lackluckster. While pointing out the threat of chinese global expansion along with a view other countries it never dares to talk critically about its own, the USA. This slowly meanders into the movie feeling oddly xenophobic, and sadly so. I really liked many parts of this documentary, but i cant let myself fully enjoy what i was seeing as i had this nagging feeling that it also wanted me to feel better about all the US, despite all shortcomings it has on its own.
US don't follow international standards for CO2 emission to prevent global warming. US Military talking about weapons of mass destruction when they were the only genocides to ever drop an atomic bomb on inocents.
I went for the premiere screening at HotDocs festival in Toronto. I loved the beautiful aerial shots of nature and industrialized areas, and cool computer animation sequences connecting visual pieces together. Everything else.. oh, well, the movie felt like a US military propaganda, in which US is declaring a "war on climate change". Limited, one-sided information, presented in a way that was more aimed at instilling fear than explaining the real causes of climate change and empowering the average citizen. Immigration crisis in Europe and Middle East got also superficial treatment - shocking, dramatic pictures, accompanied by one sided opinions favoring US politics (At the same time immigration issues at the US south border were not even mentioned). I understand time constraints of 80 minutes format, but that is not enough of an excuse for presenting this kind of limited perspective... In this extreme situation glorified US govt and US army are entitled to take whatever measures necessary to provide the global stability - all too familiar. There are better documentaries on the topic.
Details
- Release date
- Countries of origin
- Official sites
- Language
- Also known as
- Klimatets våldsamma konsekvenser
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime
- 1h 20m(80 min)
- Color
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content