3 reviews
The awkward feeling that you have missed something, when you start to watch a new show and it starts in the middle of a case. Feels like somebody forgot to invite me to a party. I get that this is probably a continuation for some other Chicago show, but I don't watch those, therefore I'm at a loss.
I dont know who is a protagonist or a cameo, or what happened, or, or.... I'm thrown in the middle of a case with a bunch of random people talking. No explanation, no recap.
Also everyone feels unlikable. I mean, who is this moustage guy that always wears a snow hat? I guess he is lying because he lost his daughter? Why is everyone supporting him? Do I care? No!
They all complain about things I should care. Everything happens too soon and it's too much and there's no context. 9 minutes in and I can't stand any of it.
I dont know who is a protagonist or a cameo, or what happened, or, or.... I'm thrown in the middle of a case with a bunch of random people talking. No explanation, no recap.
Also everyone feels unlikable. I mean, who is this moustage guy that always wears a snow hat? I guess he is lying because he lost his daughter? Why is everyone supporting him? Do I care? No!
They all complain about things I should care. Everything happens too soon and it's too much and there's no context. 9 minutes in and I can't stand any of it.
This show is like maybe watching a real courtroom, there is nothing other than the case, no drama no fun. The pilot opens, it feels like a middle of the case, and it takes 5 minutes for me to understand what is going on. The show lacks spark, i but Iguess that is how it was made, strictly law. It is interesting to watch and you certainly do not get bored. If the show had better screenwriters and direction, it may work for the better.The show could have been orchestrated better. Carl weathers is a vanilla lawyer, simple and good at his job. full review
- joereporterrsa
- Jul 3, 2017
- Permalink