IMDb RATING
3.7/10
8.9K
YOUR RATING
Lumina follows four friends desperately searching for their abductee friend in a DUMB. Whether they find their friend or not in the deserts of the US to the sands of the Sahara, will change ... Read allLumina follows four friends desperately searching for their abductee friend in a DUMB. Whether they find their friend or not in the deserts of the US to the sands of the Sahara, will change their lives forever.Lumina follows four friends desperately searching for their abductee friend in a DUMB. Whether they find their friend or not in the deserts of the US to the sands of the Sahara, will change their lives forever.
Sidney Nicole Brooks
- Patricia
- (as Sidney Nicole Rogers)
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
3.78.8K
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Featured reviews
Lumina (2024)
Reading many past reviews seems conflicting as one isn't really sure what to think because it's all over the place. However, I'm here to give you a real honest review of this movie. The film quality is good as in the cinematography but here's what makes the movie bad...
There was no marketing for its release. It was very "under the radar". My guess is that even the producers felt this wasn't good enough for any form of marketing and they would be right. In my city, I was surprised to see the film poster for this and a limited release in theaters. Yet, I knew nothing about the film beforehand. The film poster is the only quality of this movie. The storyline is terrible and in some cases, not even believable. The actors are all unknown and their acting performances weren't good either. Even the music played throughout the film is bad, too.
I had hopes for this but was so disappointed in what it is. To me, it's a waste of script, film, and storyline. This didn't do it for me and I rate this 3/10.
There was no marketing for its release. It was very "under the radar". My guess is that even the producers felt this wasn't good enough for any form of marketing and they would be right. In my city, I was surprised to see the film poster for this and a limited release in theaters. Yet, I knew nothing about the film beforehand. The film poster is the only quality of this movie. The storyline is terrible and in some cases, not even believable. The actors are all unknown and their acting performances weren't good either. Even the music played throughout the film is bad, too.
I had hopes for this but was so disappointed in what it is. To me, it's a waste of script, film, and storyline. This didn't do it for me and I rate this 3/10.
Don't bother
Film starts with a lot of potential, but after about 20 mins it really takes a dive. Plot, script, acting, makeup, location, editing, continuity all dive very low and the originally promising elements evaporate and a low low really low budget poorly thought out and painfully lacking flick emerges. I'm currently 1 hour 15 mins in and I am not sure I can watch any more of it.
If you try it, about 20 mins in when you get to the cop by the pool delivering his line , you'll see the film for what it really is. A disappointing cringeworthy effort (or lack of it).
The stuff that gets through selection for Prime is becoming a joke. A bad one at that.
If you try it, about 20 mins in when you get to the cop by the pool delivering his line , you'll see the film for what it really is. A disappointing cringeworthy effort (or lack of it).
The stuff that gets through selection for Prime is becoming a joke. A bad one at that.
A Thought-Provoking Journey into the Sci-Fi Genre
Gino McKoy's Lumina is a shining example of what science fiction can achieve when it's handled with care, creativity, and an eye for detail. From the moment the film begins, it's clear that McKoy has a strong vision, one that combines stunning visuals with a narrative that challenges the viewer to think deeply about the nature of reality and existence. This isn't just another sci-fi movie filled with flashy special effects and shallow plotlines. Instead, Lumina offers something much more substantial and thought-provoking. The story of Lumina revolves around complex themes of consciousness, identity, and the fabric of reality itself. These are heavy topics, but McKoy handles them with a deft touch, weaving them into a narrative that is both engaging and emotionally resonant.
Shockingly poor film making
In the vast cosmos of science fiction cinema, where imaginative storytelling and visual spectacle often collide, "Lumina" attempts to carve out its own niche. However, it tragically falls short, earning its place in the annals of film history as one of the worst sci-fi movies ever made.
At its core, "Lumina" revolves around a dystopian future where humanity has harnessed a mysterious energy source known as Lumina, which promises to solve the world's energy crisis. Unfortunately, the film's premise is one of its few redeeming qualities. The narrative quickly devolves into a muddled mess, with plot holes so vast they could swallow entire planets. Characters are introduced with little to no development, leaving audiences struggling to connect with their motivations or stakes. The protagonist, a lackluster hero named Zara, played by an uninspired actress, is a prime example of this failure. Her journey from a disillusioned scientist to a reluctant savior feels more like a series of obligatory tropes than a coherent arc.
Visually, "Lumina" is a mixed bag. The film boasts some ambitious set designs and special effects, yet they are undermined by a glaring lack of coherence in execution. The CGI, which could have elevated the film's otherworldly aesthetic, often appears unfinished or poorly integrated. In one particularly egregious scene, a supposed alien landscape looks more like a poorly rendered video game from the early 2000s, pulling viewers out of the narrative and into a realm of unintentional comedy.
The dialogue is another significant flaw, with cringe-worthy lines that are more likely to elicit laughter than emotional engagement. The attempts at philosophical musings on energy consumption and environmentalism feel forced and preachy, lacking the subtlety that great sci-fi often employs to provoke thought. Instead, they come off as hollow platitudes, further distancing the audience from the film's already flimsy narrative.
Despite its shortcomings, "Lumina" does offer a few moments of unintentional humor and absurdity that may appeal to audiences seeking a so-bad-it's-good experience. However, these fleeting moments are not enough to redeem the overall experience.
In conclusion, "Lumina" serves as a cautionary tale about the pitfalls of sci-fi filmmaking. With a weak script, poor character development, and lackluster visuals, it's a film that squanders its potential. While some might find enjoyment in its flaws, for most viewers, it will remain a forgettable entry in the sci-fi genre-an unfortunate reminder that not all journeys through the stars are worth taking.
At its core, "Lumina" revolves around a dystopian future where humanity has harnessed a mysterious energy source known as Lumina, which promises to solve the world's energy crisis. Unfortunately, the film's premise is one of its few redeeming qualities. The narrative quickly devolves into a muddled mess, with plot holes so vast they could swallow entire planets. Characters are introduced with little to no development, leaving audiences struggling to connect with their motivations or stakes. The protagonist, a lackluster hero named Zara, played by an uninspired actress, is a prime example of this failure. Her journey from a disillusioned scientist to a reluctant savior feels more like a series of obligatory tropes than a coherent arc.
Visually, "Lumina" is a mixed bag. The film boasts some ambitious set designs and special effects, yet they are undermined by a glaring lack of coherence in execution. The CGI, which could have elevated the film's otherworldly aesthetic, often appears unfinished or poorly integrated. In one particularly egregious scene, a supposed alien landscape looks more like a poorly rendered video game from the early 2000s, pulling viewers out of the narrative and into a realm of unintentional comedy.
The dialogue is another significant flaw, with cringe-worthy lines that are more likely to elicit laughter than emotional engagement. The attempts at philosophical musings on energy consumption and environmentalism feel forced and preachy, lacking the subtlety that great sci-fi often employs to provoke thought. Instead, they come off as hollow platitudes, further distancing the audience from the film's already flimsy narrative.
Despite its shortcomings, "Lumina" does offer a few moments of unintentional humor and absurdity that may appeal to audiences seeking a so-bad-it's-good experience. However, these fleeting moments are not enough to redeem the overall experience.
In conclusion, "Lumina" serves as a cautionary tale about the pitfalls of sci-fi filmmaking. With a weak script, poor character development, and lackluster visuals, it's a film that squanders its potential. While some might find enjoyment in its flaws, for most viewers, it will remain a forgettable entry in the sci-fi genre-an unfortunate reminder that not all journeys through the stars are worth taking.
So very bad
Even in a world where sharknado and its ilk are made, I find it difficult to believe that someone would invest in and produce this.
The "plot" simultaneously is all over the place and goes absolutely nowhere. It is truly baffling that someone paid for this script and said, "I HAVE to make this".
You may think, "Well at least there must be some decent acting in it". You would be incorrect. Small town theaters provide more convincing performances than anyone involved in this delivers.
It is so very bad that I'm almost convinced that someone in charge decided early on that they were going to go for a Razzie or something.
The movie does not even have enough substance to be considered for a Golden Raspberry.
I've seen better things made by kids with cheap equipment on YouTube.
The "plot" simultaneously is all over the place and goes absolutely nowhere. It is truly baffling that someone paid for this script and said, "I HAVE to make this".
You may think, "Well at least there must be some decent acting in it". You would be incorrect. Small town theaters provide more convincing performances than anyone involved in this delivers.
It is so very bad that I'm almost convinced that someone in charge decided early on that they were going to go for a Razzie or something.
The movie does not even have enough substance to be considered for a Golden Raspberry.
I've seen better things made by kids with cheap equipment on YouTube.
Did you know
- TriviaThe film underwent a serious period of development hell and the deal for producing the film nearly went up in literal flames. During pre-production, one of the producer's planes crashed due to bad weather into the Colorado mountains and caught on fire upon crashing. Despite receiving severe burns and injuries, the producer miraculously survived and was rescued by firefighters. Among one of the few things to barely survive the crash fire was the producer's paper contract. Following the producer's survival and recovery, production on the film went forward.
- Crazy creditsThere is a scene in the end credits.
- ConnectionsReferences The Wizard of Oz (1939)
- SoundtracksE2ME3
composed by Gino McKoy
- How long is Lumina?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Countries of origin
- Official sites
- Language
- Also known as
- Kummaline juhtum
- Filming locations
- Marrakech, Morocco(Hotel)
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime
- 1h 53m(113 min)
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 2.39:1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content




