Sharks attack a fish rodeo on the Mississippi River, and it is up to a group of locals to stop them.Sharks attack a fish rodeo on the Mississippi River, and it is up to a group of locals to stop them.Sharks attack a fish rodeo on the Mississippi River, and it is up to a group of locals to stop them.
Dean J. West
- Wyatt
- (as Dean West)
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
3.6525
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Featured reviews
Some enjoyment, but still a medicore movie
I found this one to be a medicore killer shark movie that I watched. There barely any story to be found in this movie because its your usual shark attack movie. Even the location isn't anything too extreme or special about it. The movie feels like it's stalling for time due to scenes that drags on too long and most of the human stuff is really boring. It's mostly your usual stuff with relationship between characters, one guy refused to cancel the event, and other stuff that doesn't matter. As for the enjoyment factor, there little enjoyment to be found in it. There are a couple of ridiculous moments like the shark goes through a guy chest and one guy got a shark onto him while he's walking. But the movie is mostly dull for the most part because there's not that much excitement to be found in it. And the movie has a anticlimactic ending to it, but I do like how they kill off the rest of the sharks.
I found the characters to be pretty boring and uninteresting throughout. Most of them plays generic tropes you see in any movies out there and some of them are obnoxious. Also, some of them are extremely pointless like that reporter lady. The acting isn't the worst, but feels stiff in some parts of it.
Just like many of these shark movies, the CGI looks pretty bad. They looks like it came from a Playstation 2 game and it looks like they use stock footage of real sharks in it. There also a serve head that looks really awful on how fake it looks.
Mississippi River Shark is a medicore killer shark movie that has some enjoyment, but is a very dull movie.
I found the characters to be pretty boring and uninteresting throughout. Most of them plays generic tropes you see in any movies out there and some of them are obnoxious. Also, some of them are extremely pointless like that reporter lady. The acting isn't the worst, but feels stiff in some parts of it.
Just like many of these shark movies, the CGI looks pretty bad. They looks like it came from a Playstation 2 game and it looks like they use stock footage of real sharks in it. There also a serve head that looks really awful on how fake it looks.
Mississippi River Shark is a medicore killer shark movie that has some enjoyment, but is a very dull movie.
Old Shark River
Watched 'Mississippi River Sharks' with the hope of a welcome distraction from a period of low moods and some campy guilty pleasure fun. Having seen so many low-budget shark films that were really bad or worse, even when taking it for what they were trying to be, there was apprehension in the air.
Before anybody gets defensive, am well aware that films like 'Mississippi River Sharks' are not ones to be taken seriously, have been well versed enough seeing previous low-budget efforts to not expect that. Have seen my fair share of low-budget shark films, and any other kind of low-budget creature film, and will admit to finding some guilty fun in some of them (i.e. the first two 'Sharknado' films). There are far worse shark films certainly, many seen recently.
'Mississippi River Sharks' at least has occasional splashes of fun and some semi-decent scenery. There is also far worse acting in other low-budget shark films, not that that is saying much, Cassie Steele in particular tries hard.
Due to that the acting largely is pretty poor, with the usual mix of overplaying and blandness. Any few attempts to develop the characters results in padded and pointless scenes, development is at best flimsy and it's all overwrought and does little to make the characters endearing or care or learn enough about them.
The execution of almost everything is severely underwhelming, not just being visually cheap and poorly acted and written even worse but what seemed like a decent, if very generic, idea was executed in fashion typical of too many killer shark films made on a low budget, with no imagination whatsoever and only occasional splashes of fun.
Faring worse are the production values, story and writing. 'Mississippi River Sharks', aside from the scenery, is drably shot and sloppily edited, but it's the truly abysmal special effects that are the worst. As the sharks were made on a low-budget it would have been forgiven a little if it was not great, but when the effects for the sharks look as if no effort was given in making them without looking so goofy and unfinished-looking that is hard to ignore or forgive.
Can say no better about the portrayal of the sharks either. They exude little personality either, no menace, not even any unintentional goofiness. Generally the attack scenes, apart from the odd mild amusement, are sloppily edited, too brief and devoid of suspense or sense of horror, complete with overused cartoonish gore that looks cheap and used gratuitously.
Writing ranges between incredibly bad to appalling. Any comedy is incredibly forced and is so cheesy it is enough to make the eyes roll in disbelief, while the more serious moments are very awkwardly written, melodramatic and as trite as anybody can possibly go. The silliness goes well overboard as the film progresses and it becomes intelligence insulting even when one tries to take it for what it's trying to be. Particularly in the final act which also drags hard and feels longer than it should be
Really wanted to like the story here because the concept was intriguing slightly, but while it starts nicely the further the movie progresses the lazier, cheesier and more formulaic it gets, also making the mistake that most low-budget shark films make of trying so hard to be over the top and stupid but in a painfully predictable and less than fresh way that it becomes tiresome. The stupidity gets stale quickly and the film is lethargic generally in pace as a result of stretching the film out for too long a length for such a slight story.
Altogether, have seen worse but poorly done. 3/10 Bethany Cox
Before anybody gets defensive, am well aware that films like 'Mississippi River Sharks' are not ones to be taken seriously, have been well versed enough seeing previous low-budget efforts to not expect that. Have seen my fair share of low-budget shark films, and any other kind of low-budget creature film, and will admit to finding some guilty fun in some of them (i.e. the first two 'Sharknado' films). There are far worse shark films certainly, many seen recently.
'Mississippi River Sharks' at least has occasional splashes of fun and some semi-decent scenery. There is also far worse acting in other low-budget shark films, not that that is saying much, Cassie Steele in particular tries hard.
Due to that the acting largely is pretty poor, with the usual mix of overplaying and blandness. Any few attempts to develop the characters results in padded and pointless scenes, development is at best flimsy and it's all overwrought and does little to make the characters endearing or care or learn enough about them.
The execution of almost everything is severely underwhelming, not just being visually cheap and poorly acted and written even worse but what seemed like a decent, if very generic, idea was executed in fashion typical of too many killer shark films made on a low budget, with no imagination whatsoever and only occasional splashes of fun.
Faring worse are the production values, story and writing. 'Mississippi River Sharks', aside from the scenery, is drably shot and sloppily edited, but it's the truly abysmal special effects that are the worst. As the sharks were made on a low-budget it would have been forgiven a little if it was not great, but when the effects for the sharks look as if no effort was given in making them without looking so goofy and unfinished-looking that is hard to ignore or forgive.
Can say no better about the portrayal of the sharks either. They exude little personality either, no menace, not even any unintentional goofiness. Generally the attack scenes, apart from the odd mild amusement, are sloppily edited, too brief and devoid of suspense or sense of horror, complete with overused cartoonish gore that looks cheap and used gratuitously.
Writing ranges between incredibly bad to appalling. Any comedy is incredibly forced and is so cheesy it is enough to make the eyes roll in disbelief, while the more serious moments are very awkwardly written, melodramatic and as trite as anybody can possibly go. The silliness goes well overboard as the film progresses and it becomes intelligence insulting even when one tries to take it for what it's trying to be. Particularly in the final act which also drags hard and feels longer than it should be
Really wanted to like the story here because the concept was intriguing slightly, but while it starts nicely the further the movie progresses the lazier, cheesier and more formulaic it gets, also making the mistake that most low-budget shark films make of trying so hard to be over the top and stupid but in a painfully predictable and less than fresh way that it becomes tiresome. The stupidity gets stale quickly and the film is lethargic generally in pace as a result of stretching the film out for too long a length for such a slight story.
Altogether, have seen worse but poorly done. 3/10 Bethany Cox
Goofy, but kinda likable sharks-in-the-river flick
RELEASED TO TV IN 2017 and directed by Misty Talley, "Mississippi River Sharks" details events in Mississippi when several sharks travel up the river looking for a new food source and threaten people at a fish rodeo.
Some of these TV shark-attack flicks take the serious route (e.g. 2009's "Malibu Shark Attack") while others shoot for campy amusement (e.g. 2012's "Jersey Shore Shark Attack). "Mississippi River Sharks" takes the latter approach. Thankfully, it's not all goofy; there's some serious drama thrown into the mix, like the blossoming romance between Tara (Cassie Steele) and the black dude (Tahj Vaughans), as well as issues with her dad (Miles Doleac). Jason London plays himself as the star of the fictitious B-movie franchise "Shark Bite," although he wasn't in "Shark Bite 3" (lol).
The meshing of silly comedy and cartoony gore with serious drama offers a mixed experience. It's entertaining to a degree, but you can't take it serious. The presence of Cassie Steele and cutie Ashton Leigh (in the prologue & epilogue) are never milked for their potential. The movie's likable, but overlong at only about 87 minutes. The weak final act drags.
THE MOVIE WAS SHOT IN Ocean Springs, Mississippi, with studio work done in New Orleans. WRITER: Marcy Holland. ADDITIONAL CAST: Dean J. West plays one of the three main protagonists while Michelle West appears as a pesky, but perky reporter.
GRADE: C
Some of these TV shark-attack flicks take the serious route (e.g. 2009's "Malibu Shark Attack") while others shoot for campy amusement (e.g. 2012's "Jersey Shore Shark Attack). "Mississippi River Sharks" takes the latter approach. Thankfully, it's not all goofy; there's some serious drama thrown into the mix, like the blossoming romance between Tara (Cassie Steele) and the black dude (Tahj Vaughans), as well as issues with her dad (Miles Doleac). Jason London plays himself as the star of the fictitious B-movie franchise "Shark Bite," although he wasn't in "Shark Bite 3" (lol).
The meshing of silly comedy and cartoony gore with serious drama offers a mixed experience. It's entertaining to a degree, but you can't take it serious. The presence of Cassie Steele and cutie Ashton Leigh (in the prologue & epilogue) are never milked for their potential. The movie's likable, but overlong at only about 87 minutes. The weak final act drags.
THE MOVIE WAS SHOT IN Ocean Springs, Mississippi, with studio work done in New Orleans. WRITER: Marcy Holland. ADDITIONAL CAST: Dean J. West plays one of the three main protagonists while Michelle West appears as a pesky, but perky reporter.
GRADE: C
Horrible
Syfy is known for horrible made for TV CGI junk but this one is crappier than usual. I think a group of middle schoolers with a camcorder could have done better. Total waste of time.
Amazingly bad movie
Not sure what others are seeing, but this move is simply pitiful. Even for the pseudo sci-fi genre, this one is a real stinker.
Did you know
- TriviaThe actors Jason and Jeremy London are twins.
- GoofsHurley's pants are already rolled up and wet when he goes into the water for the body.
- ConnectionsEdited from Shark Island (2015)
- SoundtracksOn the Rocks
by Blayze Viator and Kelli Jones
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official site
- Language
- Also known as
- Peligro en el río Misisipi
- Filming locations
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content


