Strawberry Flavored Plastic

I forced myself to sit through an hour of this before giving up. 90% of what I saw was people sitting around talking in stilted sentences that sounded like someone wrote them. People don't talk this way.

It drags and it lags. There's an aura of hubris around this film, the kind one might expect from a naïve beginning director. Despite claims, there's nothing sensational about this snoozer.

If you're going to do a documentary / reality style type of movie, make sure it's really convincing and your character, in this case, a serial killer, make sure he has personality, the guy who plays the serial killer isn't believable for me, his actions are not genuine in my opinion, and so it's flat.

I am sorry because I did not even bother to watch the ending, that's how it sucked for me. I agree with the one reviewer who gave it a 1/10.

I gave it a 3 because the idea is fascinating +2 for that actually

Once the opening sequence began, I was hooked. Slowly and surely, as the film progresses, the story gathers its concept that is unique and highly refreshing.

The found-footage/mockumentary concept can either pull you right in or push you out. It's not an easy approach but it is cleverly done in order for the audience to go along the journey finding out the twists, shocks, and momentary reliefs (before it comes back to shock you again).

Noel's journey as a highly intelligent and articulated serial killer, one have to ask themselves, is this person insane for the sake of it or just plain insane. The film unravels these questions carefully to learn his motives. Additionally, Errol and Ellis' filmmaking motives is just as dangerous as Noel. Willing to learn and discover the hidden secrets as they collect Noel's footage. The attempts of doing so can result with serious consequences.

Colin Bemis' creative take with a ultra low budget with a small crew is surprisingly feasible with great effort. The choices of camera footage from Skype videos to GoPro cameras add a particular modern touch. It was not supposed to look at its finest high quality but rather a conceptual one. Aiden Bristow carried a tremendous weight to make the role exceptional and uncomfortably charming. The duo, Nicholas Urda and Andres Montego, equally gave a interesting take of filmmakers who dared to collaborate with a serial killer unknowing the results.

All in all, with certain philosophical discussions between the characters, the shock values of the crime scenes, & the twists and turns of the serial killer's attempt; it felt like a strange ride.

Two filmmakers try to make a documentary about a suburban serial killer and the movie just copies the formula of the infamous serial killer classic MAN BITES DOG (Belgium-1992), but in a very blatant and boring way. Few killings, a lot of unnecessary talking and the film's 107 minutes are just a waste of time and money. Try to find the Belgian film instead...

This was very well made movie. The writting was excellent as the acting and cinematography. I get some people may not like it. It is slow burn...

After watching the clove hitchkiller yesterday. In a way this reminded me of it. You don't have to have gory violence or these over top Special effects to be good .You need a good set of people around that make it work.

Take it for what it worth compared to many Crappy movie's being made these days.

At least i can imagine a real person being like that. And that's the scary part....