IMDb RATING
6.2/10
1.1K
YOUR RATING
Archaeology Professor Emma Fielding seeks evidence of a 17-century Maine settlement predating Jamestown. But a dead body she uncovers leads her to a present-day investigation into a murder.Archaeology Professor Emma Fielding seeks evidence of a 17-century Maine settlement predating Jamestown. But a dead body she uncovers leads her to a present-day investigation into a murder.Archaeology Professor Emma Fielding seeks evidence of a 17-century Maine settlement predating Jamestown. But a dead body she uncovers leads her to a present-day investigation into a murder.
- Director
- Writers
- Stars
Kimberley Sustad
- Perry
- (as Kimberly Sustad)
Austin Anozie
- Reporter #2
- (as Austin Obiajunwa)
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
A typical Hallmark mystery...sometimes they are interesting but many time they are rather boring. This episode falls into the latter category. IIenjoy mysteries and have given these Hallmark efforts a chance, hoping I will come across a decent effort. Courtney, who appears to have had some facial surgery, has a tight face which usually has a smile/grin in place regardless of the situation. The acting of the supporting cast is mediocre and at times amateurish. As several other reviewers pointed out,there is a lack of realism in the situations..the students digging away at the archeological site with no hint of dirt.
Actors need to look at themselves in the mirror and ask these questions.
1) Am I under thirty-five? 2) Am I handsome? 3) Does my beard fill in completely? 4) Do I have the self-discipline to keep my beard well trimmed? 5) Again, am I handsome?
If the answer to those questions is not a firm yes, that actor must refuse to be shot with the kind of whiskers that make them look like they haven't bathed. The lead actor in this movie may be self-disciplined about shaving but he's a firm no on the remainder. Therefore, he must either cease seeing himself as someone whose looks can be enhanced by the kind of scruff.
This movie would have been more relaxing if the lead actor had asked himself those questions. He should also button another button on his shirt and reconsider the necklace.
1) Am I under thirty-five? 2) Am I handsome? 3) Does my beard fill in completely? 4) Do I have the self-discipline to keep my beard well trimmed? 5) Again, am I handsome?
If the answer to those questions is not a firm yes, that actor must refuse to be shot with the kind of whiskers that make them look like they haven't bathed. The lead actor in this movie may be self-disciplined about shaving but he's a firm no on the remainder. Therefore, he must either cease seeing himself as someone whose looks can be enhanced by the kind of scruff.
This movie would have been more relaxing if the lead actor had asked himself those questions. He should also button another button on his shirt and reconsider the necklace.
I could accept the formulaic script, predictable plot, and two-dimensional characters of this film-I watch this kind of movie to relax and not have to think too hard. But trying to pretend that British Columbia was Maine was more than my imagination could handle! If an east coast location and American actors were too expensive, why couldn't they have tweaked the story to suit a west coast setting? Professor Fielding could just as easily have been searching for artifacts of Spanish expeditions to the Pacific Northwest or Native American burial sites as trying to prove the existence of an early Pilgrim settlement. It was so ridiculously obvious that this was not Maine that I couldn't think of anything else throughout the entire movie.
I knew this was going to be a groaner in the very first scene, when some immaculate archaeology students who'd supposedly just been working a dig stood up with perfectly clean clothes and shoes, neat coiffed hair, and not a trace of dirt under their fingernails. It got worse from there. It's a bit of bubblegum, not even close to the level of even the worst British mysteries. Don't waste your time with this potboiler.
Actually, as far as archaeology is concerned, this movie is a great deal better than many I've seen (from the digg to the students!), and trust me, I am an archaeologist. I mean, everything is there - buckets, wheelbarrows, unmanned aerial vehicles, total stations...The main actress Courtney Thorn-Smith, who plays the archaeologist Emma Fielding, is amazing, and she looks 10 years younger than her real age. The character of Emma Fielding is very convincing, she is a convincing professor of archaeology and her relationship with students is accurately presented. All in all, a nice, easy plot and good actors make this a great film for relaxed weekend afternoons. From me 10 out of 10.
Did you know
- TriviaBody count: 2
- GoofsThe thief uses a crowbar to pry the padlocked hasp off of the storage box. When Emma discovers the ransacked box the next morning, the combination padlock is lying opened on the ground.
Details
- Release date
- Countries of origin
- Official site
- Language
- Also known as
- The Site of Murder: An Emma Fielding Mystery
- Filming locations
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime
- 2h(120 min)
- Color
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content