The Man Who Killed Hitler and Then the Bigfoot

Regardless of what the title may imply, 'The Man Who Killed Hitler And Then The Bigfoot (2018)' isn't a campy, perhaps 'Nazi experimentation' based, B-movie. Instead, it's primarily a character study, a mediation on murder that, refreshingly, paints the experience as negative regardless of who received the bullet. Yet the piece is never quite sure what it is or what it truly wants to be. The two almost totally separate things I've just mentioned (schlocky B-movie and serious character study) seem to be fighting for screen-time. This, of course, creates an inconsistent experience. Sometimes it's great, sometimes it isn't. The quieter, more contemplative stuff is the most successful; it's an interesting take on an oft-wondered 'what if?'. Sam Elliot is generally fantastic in the lead role, delivering on the surprising nuance of his character with his typically 'all American' charm. Aidan Turner does a good job as his younger counterpart, too - although, he really can't pull off the moustache. The rest of the cast are typically decent but a few key players don't quite pull off what they need to. The design of the eponymous 'Bigfoot' is also bizarrely squirrel-like and evidently low-budget. Indeed, the action-based segments featuring it are the worst in the entire affair, even if they do connect thematically to the much better drama stuff. It's almost a shame that 'Bigfoot' is even involved, as the flick could've been a subversive look at war-time violence and a man who almost regrets doing what most people seemingly dream of. If a steadier hand where on its wheel, the film could've been a cult classic. As it is, though, it's just fine. It's good enough but nothing more, bogged down by a strange structure and an uneven tone. It mightn't be what most people expect, but I'm glad that it isn't. 5/10

In Empire Strikes Back, Luke is about to enter a cave, he asks Yoda what is in there. The answer, "Only what you bring with you." This is really at the heart of The Man Who Killed Hitler and Then The Bigfoot. The tale follows Calvin Barr, played in youth by Aiden Turner and in age by Sam Elliott, both of whom give outstanding performances. As a young man he is tasked with hunting down and killing Hitler, as an old man he's drawn into hunting down and killing The Bigfoot. But is that really what this film is about? I saw it as an allegory on aging, vulnerability and Alzheimer's but reading other reviews it clearly means different things to different people. From an allegory on America's fight against Fascism and then Communism, through a man rewriting his past, a weak man trying to give the mistakes in his life meaning, to a story about a man who genuinely killed Hitler and then Bigfoot. There are many other reviews that offer different readings on this film. This movie seems to hold up a mirror to the audience and you put your own meaning on it. What isn't up for debate are the fantastic performances of the cast, from Elliott and Turner, through to Larry Miller as Calvin's brother and Caitlin Fitzgerald as Maxine, Calvin's lost love. It's a mesmerising film and you'll debate what it's trying to say for a long time afterwards. It's definitely worth a viewing or two.

Calvin Barr (Sam Elliott) is an old man living quietly in retirement. Well, he tries. When he gets robbed by three thugs, he has to beat them up to get back his car. He is a man with a mysterious past. He killed Hitler and he's recruited to hunt down Bigfoot in Canada to prevent the spread of a plague to the world.

Sam Elliott is a cinematic treasure. He is incapable of delivering less than a fascinating performance. As for the fantastical title, the story has some of that element but the filmmaking is not quite up to the outlandish promise. There are some great little scenes but they're not really linked together. I love some of the flashbacks like killing Hitler and proposal in restaurant. This movie needs something and I'm not sure what.

When you see the title of the movie you think, what the hell is that going to be?, or that can't be a good movie with a title like that. But the truth is that it isn't a bad movie at all. I'm just not a big fan of movies that goes back and forth all the time. I just find that confusing and confusion is the last thing I need when I want to relax and enjoy a movie. So for me that would be the only negative thing to write about The Man Who Killed Hitler And Then The Bigfoot. For the rest it's an entertaining story with a Sam Elliott as we know him, an old grumpy bad boy with a cheeky smile every now and then. The filming is good, you never get bored either, so worth a watch to me.

This is not the movie you might reasonably have expected from the title - while both killings are part of the movie, they play second fiddle to the story of a man who has sacrified everything for what he believes is in service of the greater good.

Really took me by surprise, Sam Elliot really delivers a superb performance, which is pretty much what the movie hangs on.

Yes, it's a bit bizarre to have a movie where the assassination of Hitler and killing of Bigfoot - by the main character - are mere sidenotes in a slow-burn character study....

But it worked for me, I can see why it wouldn't for others, but it's genuinely a good movie and not the b-movie schlock-fest the title implies.