Strange Evidence

They do try to do their best at figuring out how the things happened, but a lot of the time their conclusions are outlandish or they don't give one at all. In particular, the one with the pack of dogs pulling apart the car - their conclusion was that the dogs were holding a grudge. Really!? My own dog pulled the grill off my own car in my own driveway. Grudge? I don't think so. Squirrel that he chased under the car? Definitely. They never showed the first part of the video. Most likely a varmot or cat ran under the car and up into the engine while trying to get away from the dogs.

Looks interested but for each mystery it just goes on and on and on, it could be aliens, it could be God, could be ghosts, then it's just a reflective light in the sky. Then the next mystery starts and you realise I have other channels.

This could actually be a good show - if they would lay off speculation of the ridiculous. This is Science Channel, not Travel (which specializes in hauntings). They have some capable and frequently prestigious experts. But instead of getting right to valid, sensible explanations we have to go down the rabbit hole into absurdity. I guess they have to please the tinfoil hat club as well.

This show started off quite interesting with deduction to most cases being built correctly (logically). However, the last 2 seasons they've been presenting cases which are obvious from the get-go yet chose to wander endlessy through any unreasonably "possible causes". Yawn. And to top it all off (with a bang) they've started relying more and more on completely unecessary (read: illogical) explosive tests with their stiff, jacked-up old-timer "expert" grinning like a little kid with every ABC explaination he dotes whilst blowing stuff to smithereens. Please diverge from the "mythbusters" gimmick and get back to real-live cases whether they be solvable or not...

This program is insulting to the field of SCIENCE. And by being that it is insulting to the people, viewers, that made the Science Channel a quality network.

It appears that the producer/s of this show are trying to draw a certain type of viewer, while hoping that their existing viewers will remain. Well, this program is not succeeding at keeping existing viewers like me. If this channel, network, keeps inviting fans of baseless, fact-less, and ridiculous "conspiracy theories", then they are going to lose their fan base and current viewers. But then, maybe the Science Channel has calculated that there are more "conspiracy theory" gullibles and that the SC would rather have those types of fans.

The "experts" on this show should consider how this show is ruining their reputations. The producers of this show get these "experts" to make the most ridiculous, nonsensical, and downright STUPID comments about, "What could this be? It looks like it might be aliens or monsters!?"

WTF are you doing Science Channel? You've been showing this stupid program for about 3 years now. And there is another show that insults a viewers intelligence on this network. It's called, 'What on Earth?" This show uses the same ridiculous nonsense and idiocy spewed by "experts" about places on Earth that are spotted by satellite cameras. Just like "Strange Evidence", there are so called "experts". All of these "experts" are obviously told to make the stupidest questions and statements that NO EXPERT in their scientific field would ever consider or make.

The Science Channel is starting to go down the same road of idiocy and stupidity that the History channel and Discovery have gone down. History channel should be renamed to the "Ancient Alien Theorists" channel. And if so, then is it possible that this network has been overtaken by aliens? Ancient alien theorists say, "YES!" Well of course they do.

I, and others who have functioning brains, expect a network called, "Science", to actually provide programs and shows that are based on actual fact based, researched, and reality based information. These types of programs have no redeeming value. The only thing these stupid programs can do is to give conspiracy theorists, and "alternative facts" believers something they can attach to, to make themselves feel that they are "right".