Epidemic

Competent cinematography, editing and sound, but without a proper story, dialogue, acting and direction the end result doesn't matter...

Of course this movie is awful yet another not needed zombie movie.... makes you wonder.

Acting was competent however it was just dull and boring with little explanation. I also love how the woman is covering her breast when her husband( boyfriend? It's really not clear) is giving oral sex. They are the only two in the room. If she wasn't willing to do nudity that scene could have been cut and it wouldn't change the "story" one bit.

This feels like students shot a standard zombie movie and later tried to inject a plot in an attempt to gain distribution. It's that disjointed.

Vapid daughter wants to reconnect with estranged vapid alcoholic father. She logically chooses her birthday party as the ideal setting for the pair to reconnect. Makes sense. The party is in full swing, with vapid actors attempting to fill the void in character development by acting like d-bags. It doesn't work. Eventually one of the vapid characters transforms into a vapid zombie. Various uninteresting things happen. The end.

The budget was obviously extremely low. The actors were bottom of the call sheet. Despite those limitations, they could have produced an interesting, or at least enjoyable, movie. That they failed to entertain is entirely on them. Two stars.

Surely it does not look like a top class movie, but i must confess i have seen worse pictures from hollywood's big productions. it does not give the reason behind the mess, neither does David Lynch. Make up is basic, acting's not hardwork but still, it's a 71 minutes movie.