The Operative

This was the first movie which had real scenes of Iran. Streets, people, accents, culture every thing was completely accurate. If you don't know anything about Iran and iranian people, you can trust every thing you watch in this movie. Of course some small details in streets, wasn't quite the same, but it was close. Any way I think it is underrated and I don't understand why. It's not boring and I enjoyed watching it.

Excellent slow boil espionage thriller. Flawless performances, brilliant screenplay and a slap in the face to expected norms.

Good film, YES you have to pay attention. The first half of the film is excellent , it gets choppy and the narrative nearly goes off the rails.

There s a key moment in the film when the handler meets the main character's father, "The liberal Englishman academic", who is horrified of the thought of Israel. This is a position I have never seen said out loud in film or print by WESTERN media. Its tectonic. I was really surprised because Israel is an artifice, (its just no one admits it).

The acting is amazing as usual Martin Freeman steals the movie (he has nearly taken over from Phillip Seymour Hoffman) , and. Diane Kruger is EXCELLENT !

Diane Kruger is a very special beauty. And a very talented actress. A unique personality. This is her movie, she's on screen almost all the time. Martin Freeman is very natural and credible in the role of Thomas. Cas Anvar is just as good in the role of Farhad. But the film could have been much better, there are gaps in the script and in directing. Just 5 stars, all for Diane Kruger and the other actors.

When a person is recruited to be a spy, agent, double agent, undercover to do the espionage job for certain organizations, agencies, or countries, he or she must have something either good or bad spotted by the recruiters. The normal scenario when and how that person was recruited, usually a college graduate, not just city college graduate, but an ivy league graduate with high I.Q. or something. Or, a guy who was working for the enemy country's intelligence organization; a guy either carried a deep resent against his or her own country, or he or she did something that was highly treasonable but was unfortunately discovered by the enemy intelligence organization, so he or she was blackmailed, coerced, threatened to become an spy or agent to collect damaging information and pass them to the recruiter or the handler.

But unfortunately, the woman in this movie seemed to have nothing to do with all of it. Why she agreed to be a spy for the Israelis? She got nothing hateful against Iran, she got no personal agenda against Iran, she did not particularly love Israel either. Neither she did the espionage works for Israel just because she got some financial problems and needed the money. The Israelis didn't pay her. So there's no motive or agenda for her to do a free job for the Israelis. And even ridiculous yet was she did not trained by the Israelis to be a spy. She's not qualified a bit to be a spy.

So what's the leverage the Israeli MOSSAD got on her? What's the collateral means that she'd do anything that the Israeli asked her to do? They actually needed her, so why they were so harsh on this volunteering woman who did free espionage dirty works for them. They should be very humble, very kind, even very grateful to her. But what we saw in this movie, all the Mossad Israelis seemed to be very rude, very vicious, very unkind to her. So why she'd have to take all those craps and still did the jobs for them? "I owe you nothing! So what's in it for me?" Any normal person would have asked the obvious question, but not this woman. She still did all the puppet jobs for the Israelis. It simply not logic enough. How could these viciously, unkindly, ungratefully Israelis took granted of her, and forced her to do the free service? There's no contract between them, unless she was threatened by them to do the job or else. What a bunch of loaded craps in this ridiculous scenario?

If without a tangible motive, reason, belief, faith, hatred, or whatever, there's no way she could do the espionage job for the Israelis. Not possible at all. When the basic motive to be a free lancer spy for the Israelis was missing, there's no incentive or passion or any loyalty needed or required to do such works for the Israelis. She even didn't thought to use condoms when she decided to have sexual relationship with the Iranian guy. Her liking and love to this Iranian guy was more realistic and personal, it's more romantic than the espionage job. She did have feelings toward this guy. I don't know about the original novel that was adapted into this movie, but the author of that book obviously didn't have any basic logic if this movie was faithfully adapted from it.

Both Diane Kruger and Martin Freeman are great actors, but they just followed the lousy script to act out and act along. They were on a one-way street to the end of this movie. What a pathetic way to get involved in this brainless movie.