Bergerac
- TV Series
- 2025–
- 45m
Ex-cop Jim Bergerac is forced to confront a troubling past case when a wealthy woman is murdered, pushing him to overcome personal demons and reignite his investigative prowess to navigate f... Read allEx-cop Jim Bergerac is forced to confront a troubling past case when a wealthy woman is murdered, pushing him to overcome personal demons and reignite his investigative prowess to navigate family tensions and law enforcement scrutiny.Ex-cop Jim Bergerac is forced to confront a troubling past case when a wealthy woman is murdered, pushing him to overcome personal demons and reignite his investigative prowess to navigate family tensions and law enforcement scrutiny.
Browse episodes
Summary
Reviewers say 'Bergerac' receives mixed feedback. Damien Molony and Philip Glenister's performances are lauded, yet the show's generic feel and lack of identity are criticized. Writing is faulted for being unrealistic, with procedural errors noted. Jim Bergerac's character is seen as underdeveloped. The Jersey setting is underutilized. Despite some positive aspects, the remake disappoints compared to the original.
Featured reviews
I'm old enough to remember watching the original Bergerac and always enjoyed it. A lot of time has passed since then and the people I watched it with have long since passed away. As a bit of a detective buff I wondered what was that I enjoyed about the original series so I watched a few d episodes ahead of watching the new one. I'm glad I did because there it was straight from the opening credits, the sheer beauty of Jersey itself! The new series could literally have been filmed anywhere and is all the weaker for it. Unfortunately the more I watch the more I realise that Bergerac 2025 is inferior in virtually every aspect. Damien Moloney is a decent actor but lacks the charm of John Nettles, the support cast are all lesser versions of the originals and Zoe Wanamaker is completely wasted here.
The long form story could have been an upgrade but 2 three part episodes or even 3 two parters would have been preferable as the story was fairly basic and stretching it over 6 episodes made for dull viewing at many stages which made the lack of use of the beautiful surroundings even more difficult to understand.
Mention must be made of the excellent Phillip Glenister who stands head and shoulders above all others involved and left me wondering if he wouldn't have been better suited to the titular lead role.
All in all not terrible and probably better for those who have never seen the original but it could have been so much better.
The long form story could have been an upgrade but 2 three part episodes or even 3 two parters would have been preferable as the story was fairly basic and stretching it over 6 episodes made for dull viewing at many stages which made the lack of use of the beautiful surroundings even more difficult to understand.
Mention must be made of the excellent Phillip Glenister who stands head and shoulders above all others involved and left me wondering if he wouldn't have been better suited to the titular lead role.
All in all not terrible and probably better for those who have never seen the original but it could have been so much better.
I'm a fan of Damien Molony.
I'm a fan of the original Bergerac (albeit I was a tiny kid when it was on our TVs).
I love the Channel Islands.
What's not to love?
It was OK.
It just needs to be more succinct.
Faster paced.
Each case could and should be completed in two episodes - just like "Silent Witness" or "Unforgotten".
This dragged on at a snails pace.
It was missing something - I cannot put my finger on "what". Possibly just pace and story arc. I hope it's renewed for a second season taking viewer feedback on board.
I was looking forward to the new Bergerac. I'm left slightly disappointed.
I'm a fan of the original Bergerac (albeit I was a tiny kid when it was on our TVs).
I love the Channel Islands.
What's not to love?
It was OK.
It just needs to be more succinct.
Faster paced.
Each case could and should be completed in two episodes - just like "Silent Witness" or "Unforgotten".
This dragged on at a snails pace.
It was missing something - I cannot put my finger on "what". Possibly just pace and story arc. I hope it's renewed for a second season taking viewer feedback on board.
I was looking forward to the new Bergerac. I'm left slightly disappointed.
With Phillip Glenister as one of the main characters, who is a brilliant actor may I add. His dialogue, his scripting and his acting in this has been totally wooden. Did he just not feel the script and saw it as a payday?!
The 6 episodes, are dire, slow and to be honestly totally mind numbing.
One murder and an abduction attempt. Every episode has just ended with a can I be bothered to find out who did this?!
This is supposed to be a murder mystery, so where is the suspense?! The intrigue?! No where.
Characters who I can't give a s*** about, they are ignorant, condescending, quiet and whispering at times. A DI who makes me wince.
Give me the John Nettles version over this!
The 6 episodes, are dire, slow and to be honestly totally mind numbing.
One murder and an abduction attempt. Every episode has just ended with a can I be bothered to find out who did this?!
This is supposed to be a murder mystery, so where is the suspense?! The intrigue?! No where.
Characters who I can't give a s*** about, they are ignorant, condescending, quiet and whispering at times. A DI who makes me wince.
Give me the John Nettles version over this!
As others have said this is a lazy adaptation of an old classic. The story arc which goes over six episodes could have been done in two, the misanthropic cop who can't communicate with anybody let alone his daughter who is in desperate need of support is so old and overwritten it is ridiculous. The constant railing against authority which was nuanced and effective in the original is just a blunt hammer in this one. The main actor himself I'm not sure about if it's the script or his delivery but it is so wooden and unsympathetic is a hard watch. I must admit I fast forwarded through most of this as I guess who done it early on, and frankly the male "intuitive " posturing was so bizarre - literally just yelling at his boss in front of the team - let me just... I was like can you not...
Unfortunately, this production chose to treat some common life occurrences as though it's all just a "Slag Him Off!", "Slag Him Off!", "Slag Him Off!" opportunity. It's tiring and depressing.
A man imbibes one evening and all the next day he gets comments about being breathalysed, smelling bad, etc. Does this upright hominid not know how to shower or use a breath mint? WTH with this relentless nonsense? Clearly, there's a writer/team that doesn't understand garden-variety functional alcoholism, or what a true, full-blown drinking problem looks like. Instead, they flip out over practically nothing, and verbally exaggerate incessantly. PATHETIC.
Clichés and poor choices galore: 1) A pushy, wrong-headed, nearly amoral journalist who'd rather listen to a convicted criminal provide nothing but slander and defamation on any day of the week.
2) Idiotic psychiatry/counseling scenes, consisting of repetitive interrogations and hounding, followed by a full medical confidentiality breach with an employer.
3) Family conflict on repeat, where a parent is being barred from contact, but has done little of substance to warrant that.
4) Treating a grieving, depressed person with an emotional crutch like an abnormal pariah.
5) Bad, obvious evidence 'discovery' scenes.
6) Pressuring people while they're on the phone for absolutely no legit reason ('cept fake drama).
7) A totally illogical setup involving a semi-employment scenario (unrealistic in every way), with predictably irrational risk-taking, and then a parade of undermining and backstabbing colleagues (as if they could be called that) always marching around the office right behind to lay on the pointless pressure.
I mean, a guy has a drinking problem, but the counseling he's forced into doesn't address it, then he gets sent home to do nothing but scrut around his house for open bottles to chug? Would his 'superior officer' seriously think that cutting him off would be a way for him to get his head on straight, when being a workaholic is all that's keeping him going? INSANE.
And, no one is spending their full days having to parent teenaged children unless they are disabled dependents. SO DUMB!
A man imbibes one evening and all the next day he gets comments about being breathalysed, smelling bad, etc. Does this upright hominid not know how to shower or use a breath mint? WTH with this relentless nonsense? Clearly, there's a writer/team that doesn't understand garden-variety functional alcoholism, or what a true, full-blown drinking problem looks like. Instead, they flip out over practically nothing, and verbally exaggerate incessantly. PATHETIC.
Clichés and poor choices galore: 1) A pushy, wrong-headed, nearly amoral journalist who'd rather listen to a convicted criminal provide nothing but slander and defamation on any day of the week.
2) Idiotic psychiatry/counseling scenes, consisting of repetitive interrogations and hounding, followed by a full medical confidentiality breach with an employer.
3) Family conflict on repeat, where a parent is being barred from contact, but has done little of substance to warrant that.
4) Treating a grieving, depressed person with an emotional crutch like an abnormal pariah.
5) Bad, obvious evidence 'discovery' scenes.
6) Pressuring people while they're on the phone for absolutely no legit reason ('cept fake drama).
7) A totally illogical setup involving a semi-employment scenario (unrealistic in every way), with predictably irrational risk-taking, and then a parade of undermining and backstabbing colleagues (as if they could be called that) always marching around the office right behind to lay on the pointless pressure.
I mean, a guy has a drinking problem, but the counseling he's forced into doesn't address it, then he gets sent home to do nothing but scrut around his house for open bottles to chug? Would his 'superior officer' seriously think that cutting him off would be a way for him to get his head on straight, when being a workaholic is all that's keeping him going? INSANE.
And, no one is spending their full days having to parent teenaged children unless they are disabled dependents. SO DUMB!
Did you know
- TriviaIn one scene the screen saver on the screen of Bergerac's computer has a picture of some nettles as a nod to John Nettles.
- ConnectionsReferenced in Good Morning Britain: Tuesday 12th February 2019 (2019)
Details
- Runtime
- 45m
- Color
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content