Originator1994
Joined May 2013
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges2
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Ratings35
Originator1994's rating
Reviews34
Originator1994's rating
What I thought was going to be a wonderful piece on our first ladies left me bewildered, expressly disappointed and yearning for a return to cable reruns of cop shows.
It wasn't so much the acting but the skipping around of the segments on the ladies. Just when I was engrossed in one ladies story line, it went back in time and to another This concept of moving around so much does not work for me when such a great idea became so confusing .
One ladies story at a time works better, for focus . Maybe someone else will redo this program and do it correctly .
I watched 3 episodes on a free week on cable. Would not have paid for it . These alleged premium channels are not worth it .
It wasn't so much the acting but the skipping around of the segments on the ladies. Just when I was engrossed in one ladies story line, it went back in time and to another This concept of moving around so much does not work for me when such a great idea became so confusing .
One ladies story at a time works better, for focus . Maybe someone else will redo this program and do it correctly .
I watched 3 episodes on a free week on cable. Would not have paid for it . These alleged premium channels are not worth it .
I was looking forward to seeing this, having lived thru it at a young age and this was a total waste of my time .The coarse language is totally off the charts like Ides of March and really comes off as cheap. The acting disappointing, childish and not not worthy of anyone having to pay to watch. Martha Mitchell was louder, brassy and always on her phone .Roberts didn't come close to the real Martha. Those portraying the subordinates like Dean, Haldemann and others was a joke at best.
Having watched the first 3 episodes, wish I had spent the time reading the telephone book instead.
If those streaming like Netflix, and others are losing subscribers, its not a wonder. They over charge for mediocre programming . I"ll take Tubi, YouTube anytime ...free and better choices.
Having watched the first 3 episodes, wish I had spent the time reading the telephone book instead.
If those streaming like Netflix, and others are losing subscribers, its not a wonder. They over charge for mediocre programming . I"ll take Tubi, YouTube anytime ...free and better choices.
Just when you think you have had your full of the female Boyle's/ Regans using their last name to their advantage. Another absurd episode pops up. We know why character Erin went back to using Reagan ( and not even sure she changed it legally) but dippy daughter uses her middle name, Reagan, when its to her advantage, about every other episode, to get ahead since Boyle,won't get her what she doesn't deserve. In this episode, she actually uses her real name but waivers back and forth depending on how she will again gain what she has not earned and even Erin asked why she didn't use Reagan. Duh, Reagan is not her birth last name. Both females use , use,use to gain what they have not earned. Its bad enough the character Nikky adds nothing tomthe mix, comes across as arrogant, spoiled and a know-it- all but lends nothing to any story line . Even into 2022, she is shown as a character when she hasn't been on in months and lets leave it that way...Her character is boring, blah, and unnecessary . Privilege begets privilege . At least Sean now has spunk , moxey, and lends a typical kid growing up , to the mix. He will be the next generation to be a cop in the family and rightfully so .