metalboy_5150
Joined Feb 2007
Welcome to the new profile
Our updates are still in development. While the previous version of the profile is no longer accessible, we're actively working on improvements, and some of the missing features will be returning soon! Stay tuned for their return. In the meantime, the Ratings Analysis is still available on our iOS and Android apps, found on the profile page. To view your Rating Distribution(s) by Year and Genre, please refer to our new Help guide.
Badges2
To learn how to earn badges, go to the badges help page.
Reviews1
metalboy_5150's rating
This episode is just fine, as is the rest of the show. Didn't start out just *wonderfully*, but OK, and has since developed into a show that's definitely worth watching. No, my issue here is with IMDb. James Black's name in this show is NOT Jean-Pierre Dumont, It's Jean-Pierre DUMAN. Now, under normal circumstances, I could understand, as it does rather sound like it could very well be "Dumont." In *this* case, however, there is NO excuse, because the man's name is shown ON SCREEN *no less* than three times, possibly more. Now tell me: as they have built an entire (rather large) website, which is probably one of the (if not THE) most widely trafficked movie sites on the web, I would assume the folks at IMDb know how to read. *This* is why IMDb needs to make it just a *little* bit easier for users to modify stuff. If it was a little easier (and no, I don't mean Wikipedia easy, but still....), then this would be a non-issue. Some would say it still is. Granted, it's a minor thing. IMDb does a lot right, and I appreciate that, and use it ALL the time; if not for IMDb, I'd have gone crazy a long time ago ("CRAP! What else have I seen her in?"). However, accuracy is of paramount importance, I would think, and allowing users at least to review the pages, and maybe send correction suggestions in, would be a step in the right direction.