A Villain’s Narrative


When the weekly mail arrived yesterday from Blogchatter’s Suchita, my imagination was tickled. Below is the prompt for the week’s blog hop which was what caught my fancy. I wrote back to clarify whether a story was required or a narrative about the intended story. Suchita responded promptly: “You can interpret the prompt any way you like….” So I take this liberty because a villain of this sort cannot be confined to a short story.


The most frightening villains are not the ones who scream hatred from balconies. They are the ones who speak rhetorically and emotively on peace, order, unity, discipline, dharma, patriotism… They do not think they are destroying freedom; they believe freedom itself is the disease.

My epic would have a villain as the King of a big nation, the largest democracy in the world maybe. He is an apparently benign villain. A king who is intelligent and crafty. The roots of his villainy lie in his traumatic childhood which was marked by poverty and hardships. The low caste into which he was born inflicted wounds on his ego which wasn’t small. Every villain has a massive ego which also carries many a scar.

My King was blessed with Himalayan ambition which pushed him up the ladder of politics. With magnanimous assistance from his religion which masqueraded itself as nationalism.

In short, my King looks like a hero for all practical purposes. More than a rags-to-riches story, it is a sweeper-to-architect epic. He knew how to use his and the nation’s gods strategically.

King genuinely believes he is building a utopia. A Rama Rajya, if you prefer. Crime has fallen in statistics. Streets are cleaner in promos. Citizens speak in one voice. Dissent has disappeared. In King’s mind, history will remember him as the architect of harmony.

There is a tragic aside to this story: this harmony is achieved by silencing every human difference. The country is a beautifully decorated prison with uniformity everywhere. But very few citizens realise that they are in a prison. And those who realise are silent. They have been silenced.

King is great in his own narrative. His dreams are great. He dreams of perfect unity, moral purity, national glory. The materialisation of that dream requires strategies such as simplifying people into categories: loyal/disloyal; pure/corrupt; useful/dangerous… us/them.

Atrocities will be committed. Without atrocities no great ruler ever created history. “History will misunderstand me now but thank me later,” King tells his subjects whenever an atrocity is perpetrated.

King never says: “I am removing freedom.” He says: “I am protecting the country’s glorious, ancient civilisation.”

He never says: “I fear criticism.” He says: “Falsehood must not weaken national unity.”

Villainy appears as heroism in this narrative. Vices arrive draped in the vocabulary of virtues. A villain’s greatest weapon is not violence but euphemism. Say “Minimum government, maximum governance” to mean anything from privatisation to centralisation of executive authority. This narrative will elevate all human suffering to heroic sacrifice for the sake of the nation. Those who are not ready to sacrifice will be labelled ‘antinational’ or ‘urban Naxals’ or ‘tukde-tukde gang’ or whatever.

Wars become surgical operations, civilian deaths become collateral damage, surveillance becomes security, and censorship becomes responsible regulation.

Citizens love all this. Not because they are all foolish. Fear, exhaustion, insecurity, economic uncertainty, desire for belonging, longing for certainty… People are driven by such simple motives. King succeeds because he offers people something intoxicating: relief from ambiguity.

King believes silence is peace. He mistakes obedience for love and stillness for harmony. He sincerely believes that he is making a great nation. That is what makes him dangerous: not his ruthlessness alone, but his sincerity.

Since King himself is writing this narrative, he will emerge as a great hero in it. As a Messiah, in fact. He even comes to believe that he is not born biologically like other smaller entities of the species. He gives himself a divine halo.

You may think this is going to be satire. No. This is an epic. Like Divine Comedy. Oppression is salvation here. 

Illustration by ChatGPT

 

 

Comments

  1. 'Not his ruthlessness, but his sincerity,' says it all.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hari OM
    Hmmmm... for once I must tell you I predicted your words even as I saw the prompt! A valid villain, for sure, but not a new one... let loose, my friend, and allow yourself to reach into your more creative side...

    As Fidgerton I could enter any echelon of society. The name was just of that quality that it could not be defined as belonging anywhere, therefore suited my purpose well. It also missed the eyes of all those I-ams and Self-mades and Wish-to-be, more money than conscious types, that my dress always consisted of what could be pinched from the cloakrooms and lockers of their own establishments. The attire, therefore, always suited the occasion I was invading. Gathering all their information was a dawdle, once there. All that measurable, twist-able, juicy stuff that later I could collate... then make demands..........

    Or...

    I rested on Jay's shoulder for a while, where he didn't notice me. I snuck up around his ear and round to his face, but still he ignored me. I moved on. I tried the same with Sara, Manjit, Hu, and ... well most of them. They simply paid no attention to me. I moved on.

    In the next room it was the same. I kept moving and moving and moving...

    Eventually I was exhausted. But I left my mark. They all fell as a result of my visit. They even named me... Covid...


    YAM xx

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks Yam for reminding me that obsession is a villain too. Honestly, I don't want to be obsessed with him. He is not worth it. But then he keeps invading, even like a virus.

      Look at what he - his men, rather - did yesterday. Some Norwegian journo asks him a question that he doesn't like and the journo's social media handles get blocked in no time. That's the kind of man my villain is. Even if I wish to ignore him, he keeps pushing himself into my life, into everybody's life.

      An opinion article in a Norwegian newspaper called him "a sneaky and annoying man." What an apt description. So succinct and precise. The cartoon that accompanied showed him as a snakecharmer. Okay, that was a bit of colonialism. Not needed. But cartoon, after all. Beyond the cartoon lies a very unsettling truth: the man is quite lethal.

      Delete
  3. I am writing the piece late... And for a second time, as I lost what I had been writing on the comment column. What I was trying to tell you is already given words by Harry Om... Certain Predictability is setting in. We know what you are going to say. Like in the Malayalam theatre, as the motion picture begins to unfold, some among the audience would say, " Dileep is going to shoot Mohan Lal, before the Interval." Or the Police is going to find a carcass instead of a corpse in the plantain Grove of the house. " Like in Drishyam Part -1. Instead, you could weave a Plot with a Counter-Hero ora Counter Plot emerging... Like in multi-stages, simultaneously, like in the Modern Dramas of Girish Karnad Or the Stream of Consciousness Technique of Virginia Woolf (?) Or James Joyce? Correct me if my distant memory of my BA Literature Guide is faded.. You should create a Counter-Hero or Counter- Situations like in Kamala Hasan's Dasavataram... Symbolically, building counterpioint to the Hero-Villian..

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It's a misunderstanding, I think.

      First of all, I don't intend to write a story or a novel with the above theme, character, or plot. A novel is entirely out of question because I dared to write a novel (the only one of the kind in my life) and it was an utter flop. The best somebody said about it was that it was an "intellectual novel." I learnt the required lesson after I published it: that I am not born to be a novelist. I vowed not to write a novel anymore - a Bheeshmavrutham that I won't break.

      This post is merely a response to the prompt which has a specific theme and that theme is about a villain's narrative, not an antihero's or anybody else's.

      And Virginia Woolf, James Joyce... Oh my God! Where are they and where is a blogger like me? I don't even dare to call me a writer. I describe myself as a blogger. My intention is to draw the attention of readers to the country's problems that need serious attention. Nothing more. My efforts may be futile, lines drawn on water - or as they used to say in Kerala, driving nails into water. But I'm making an effort. Like Helle Lyng of Norway hurling a question at Modi knowing there would be no answer.

      Delete
  4. May be I am doodling gibberish on your blog Wall or babblling like a babe.. I am trying to convey a hermeneutical texture and mood setting in

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No, you aren't. I understand what you're saying. But I need to clarify and I'm going to do that as a response to your previous comment. [I chose to respond to this first.]

      Delete
  5. The villain never believes they're the villain. They believe they're doing the right thing for the right reasons. They'd be shocked to learn that others don't worship them.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That's so very true. They seem to be living in another world altogether. Like the naked king in the allegory.

      Delete
  6. We have an Villain in the white house.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. There are many more in other countries too. That's a global catastrophe.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Recent Posts

Show more