User talk:Superpes15
Add topicWelcome to Meta!
[edit]Hello, Superpes15. Welcome to the Wikimedia Meta-Wiki! This website is for coordinating and discussing all Wikimedia projects. You may find it useful to read our policy page. If you are interested in doing translations, visit Meta:Babylon. You can also leave a note on Meta:Babel or Wikimedia Forum if you need help with something (please read the instructions at the top of the page before posting there). Happy editing!
--Alexmar983 (talk) 00:49, 25 August 2016 (UTC)
Global renamer
[edit]Welcome! Please make any question you have and we will try to help you :). @Trijnstel: will email you in order to get you added to the global-renamers mailing list. Matiia (talk) 18:28, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Matiia: Thank you very much! Actually she already wrote to me :) I'm also available on IRC (my nick is Superpes if you can add me to the #wikimedia-rename channel). Thanks again :D --Superpes15 (talk) 18:37, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- Ah, very efficient. The channel is public, so you can join like any another channel. Matiia (talk) 18:40, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Matiia: I thought it was private lol I joined the channel! Thank you :D --Superpes15 (talk) 18:44, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
- Ah, very efficient. The channel is public, so you can join like any another channel. Matiia (talk) 18:40, 17 September 2020 (UTC)
Richiesta di supporto
[edit]Ciao, ti scrivo in merito alla mia richiesta di rinomina globale, per la quale risulto non eleggibile a causa del mio blocco su it.wiki. Dato che hai accennato ad una ipotetica soluzione, vorrei spiegarti la mia situazione: Sono su Wikipedia dal 2011, ed ho partecipato a svariati progetti, con un complessivo che supera i 15mila edit.
Fin dalla rinomina del 2014 ho sempre contribuito come Vicipaedianus x (talk · contribs), senza che nessuno mi abbia mai accusato di vandalismo o sockpuppeting.
A metà 2020 è sorta invece una questione inerente la voce "Invasione russa della Crimea" (che avevo proposto di spostare al titolo più neutrale di "Intervento militare russo in Crimea"). L'amministratore Bramfab mi ha bloccato appena ho effettuato lo spostamento, nonostante l'avessi già proposto in talk, senza nemmeno darmi la possibilità di argomentare o replicare in alcun modo. Il blocco era inizialmente di tre mesi, ma è stato poi esteso all'infinito per una presunta evasione del blocco, che però non ho commesso e per la quale ho provato a fare reclamo, chiedendo quali fossero gli edit che mi attribuivano erroneamente, senza che Bramfab si sia degnato però di darmi una risposta. Di conseguenza mi sono rivolto all'amministratore Parma1983, il quale mi ha consigliato di metterci una pietra sopra e contribuire piuttosto da un nuovo account (questo), ma nonostante io avessi chiarito con Parma1983 dopo pochi giorni Bramfab ha bloccato anche questo account, accusandomi stavolta di sockpuppeting. Ho nuovamente chiesto il supporto di Parma1983, il quale mi ha chiesto di attendere il commento di Bramfab, che non è mai arrivato.
Nel frattempo, i miei edit sono stati tutti annullati, per principio preso, nonostante fossero corretti (es. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, etc.).
Di conseguenza, ho perso le speranze in una soluzione trasparente della questione e cambiato progetto (contribuisco principalmente su en.wiki adesso). Pensavo bastasse, ma a quanto pare il blocco su it.wiki continua a penalizzarmi anche sugli altri progetti, per cui ti chiedo: puoi aiutarmi? Sei la mia ultima speranza. Est. 2021 (talk) 03:51, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
- Sì, la creazione di questo account è stata tecnicamente un'evasione dal blocco, ma come avrei potuto chiedere spiegazioni altrimenti? Appena ricevuto il blocco, ho atteso pazientemente per 4/5 mesi, ma quando poi Bramfab mi ha infinitato senza motivo ho dovuto chiedere spiegazioni. Non ho mai nascosto chi fossi. Ho fatto tutto in coordinamento con Parma1983 e nel rispetto dei paletti che lo stesso Bramfab mi aveva indicato prima di sparire, il 30 novembre 2020, ed il risultato è che oltre al blocco degli account mi hanno bloccato anche il range di IP, sicché avere una risposta è diventato impossibile. Perché nessuno mi spiega il motivo del blocco infinito sull'account Vicipaedianus x? Perché mi dite tutti che devo rassegnarmi? Diamine, avevo solo rinominato una voce, mica vandalizzato alcunché; le linee guida di it.wiki non mi pare affatto lo classifichino come un motivo valido per infinitare un collaboratore decennale. Ed ora dovrei ancora attendere altri 6/7 mesi? Non ce la faccio... La situazione sarebbe differente se lasciassi questo account "troppo giovane" e tornassi a quello decennale, reindirizzando là tutte le mie attuali sottopagine e ponendo un avviso come avevo già fatto su en.wiki? Est. 2021 (talk) 13:54, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
- La mia unica evasione è stata la creazione di questo account per chiedere quali fossero le motivazioni del blocco. Est. 2021 (talk) 16:42, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
- Sì, la creazione di questo account è stata tecnicamente un'evasione dal blocco, ma come avrei potuto chiedere spiegazioni altrimenti? Appena ricevuto il blocco, ho atteso pazientemente per 4/5 mesi, ma quando poi Bramfab mi ha infinitato senza motivo ho dovuto chiedere spiegazioni. Non ho mai nascosto chi fossi. Ho fatto tutto in coordinamento con Parma1983 e nel rispetto dei paletti che lo stesso Bramfab mi aveva indicato prima di sparire, il 30 novembre 2020, ed il risultato è che oltre al blocco degli account mi hanno bloccato anche il range di IP, sicché avere una risposta è diventato impossibile. Perché nessuno mi spiega il motivo del blocco infinito sull'account Vicipaedianus x? Perché mi dite tutti che devo rassegnarmi? Diamine, avevo solo rinominato una voce, mica vandalizzato alcunché; le linee guida di it.wiki non mi pare affatto lo classifichino come un motivo valido per infinitare un collaboratore decennale. Ed ora dovrei ancora attendere altri 6/7 mesi? Non ce la faccio... La situazione sarebbe differente se lasciassi questo account "troppo giovane" e tornassi a quello decennale, reindirizzando là tutte le mie attuali sottopagine e ponendo un avviso come avevo già fatto su en.wiki? Est. 2021 (talk) 13:54, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
Agosto 2023
[edit]Sono ormai tre anni che uso quest'account (con all'attivo circa 12mila contributi globali, pareggiando il vecchio), ed ancora oggi non ho nemmeno il diritto di rinomina a causa dell'ingiusto blocco su it.wiki. Intanto il mio account e il mio range di IP sono ancora bloccati su it.wiki, per cui non posso fare alcun ricorso lì. Avendo sempre contribuito positivamente all'enciclopedia, mi chiedo perché io debba essere marchiato a vita e trattato peggio di un criminale. Nonostante i miei contributi decennali, sembra una persecuzione, non mi sarà mai riconosciuto alcun merito o diritto? Sono veramente marchiato a vita? Una soluzione deve esistere. Non so più a chi rivolgermi perché mi sia riconosciuta la dignità e la buona fede che ritengo di guadagnarmi ogni giorno, da anni, con i miei contributi. Est. 2021 (talk) 22:48, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
Global Block LTA
[edit]hi Superpes15, I am writing to you because I have to ask you to GLOBALLY block this user. this user is a puppet escaping from an infinite block that had been stuck to him, and recently he is very active on wikimedia commons, here I would like to ask you please to block him globally so to prevent any disaster. his recent globare lock was done on his old commons account. I also apologize for having asked a similar request directly to an administrator, I know that there is also a page for this kind of blocks, but I still can't understand how to make a similar request, SORRY :)--37.182.21.154 01:24, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
- @IP Sorry, I'm not a steward, so I can only report the LTA for you! Regards :) --Superpes15 (talk) 02:01, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
- But it suits me very well, the important thing is that it be blocked globally as soon as possible please--37.182.21.154 10:42, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
Help
[edit]I applied for change of my global name SHEKH to SHEIKH, Which will be completed on 25.03.20. When this is done, I want to rename my second account from SH726 to SHEKH. Do I have to apply separately for this? Or should I mention in the application's comments? SHEIKH (Talk) 11:30, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
- Hello. For convenience and not to confuse with the logs it would be good to make a new request confirming with both accounts the possession of SH726. You can do it now and we will put it on hold until the previous account is renamed :) Regards --Superpes15 (talk) 11:54, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you I applied, request to see... SHEIKH (Talk) 14:19, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
RE: User:<hidden>
[edit]ciao, wikicollega, come stai?? graie 1000 per l'intervento.. buon wiki lavoro!! --SurdusVII 11:28, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
Ombuds com review my ban
[edit]i don't know which policy is violated but farsi checkusers can't ban me without evidence of me abusing my two accounts. i literally never used both the accounts in 1 year.Baratiiman (talk) 02:57, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
- @Baratiiman: Sorry if I can't reply publicly, this type of conversation requires private communication, for example by writing to the Ombuds Commission's mailing list <cu-ombuds-l@lists.wikimedia.org>. Btw, the purpose of the commission is to assess the violations of the global CheckUser, Oversight and Privacy policies or the compliance of local policies with them. Regards --Superpes15 (talk) 12:59, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
Invitation for Functionary consultation 2021
[edit]Greetings SWMT member,
I'm letting you know in advance about a meeting I'd like to invite you to regarding the Universal Code of Conduct and the community's ownership of its future enforcement. I'm still in the process of putting together the details, but I wanted to share the date with you: 10 July, 2021. I do not have a time on this date yet, but I will let you soon. We have created a meta page with basic information. Please take a look at the meta page and sign up your name under the appropriate section.
Thank you for your time.--BAnand (WMF) 03:21, 3 June 2021 (UTC)
Deletion Request
[edit]Hello, delete these pages...
Aishik Rehman (talk) 17:59, 26 January 2022 (UTC)
Question regarding renaming
[edit]Hello! Some time ago in May-August 2021, I used the username "Svartava". I made about a thousand edits with it on en.wiktionary. However, I lost that account and then had to create "Svartava2" (this current one). I would like to be renamed to "Svartava", but it would require the usurpation of the existing "Svartava" (my previous account). Would that be possible? Sincerely, --Svartava2 (talk) 16:59, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
- Hello Svartava2! Svartava is not usurpable (too many edits) but, if you can prove that the account it's yours, I think we can rename it! But have you tried to recover it from here? If you can't, try to open a task on phabricator (explaining that you have lost your password and the reason why you cannot recover it), usually they are able to solve these problems :) If you have any other doubts or requests, just write me here, I will be happy to help you! Regards Superpes15 (talk) 17:20, 3 February 2022 (UTC)
- How can I prove that "Svartava" was my account? The problem with recovering it was that I don't have access to the email registered with it (if any, I don't remember now). Would a check user be able to prove this case with the similarity in IP and device between "Svartava" and "Svartava2"? And this is known by the whole Wiktionary community, if that could be taken as proof. Svartava2 (talk) 02:30, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Svartava2: My advice is still to try to open a task on phabricator in order to try to regain possession of the account. "Svartava" cannot be checked because the account has contributions that are too old for a CU (and this would not be the main purpose of a CU). In case you are unable to recover it also via phabricator, we will look for an alternative solution through your community, don't worry :) The important thing, also for security reasons, is to try to recover the account imho! Regards Superpes15 (talk) 02:40, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
- How can I prove that "Svartava" was my account? The problem with recovering it was that I don't have access to the email registered with it (if any, I don't remember now). Would a check user be able to prove this case with the similarity in IP and device between "Svartava" and "Svartava2"? And this is known by the whole Wiktionary community, if that could be taken as proof. Svartava2 (talk) 02:30, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
- I would prefer the alternative solution through my community, because I assume phabricator would also require similar evidence which might be pretty difficult. So what should I do next? Best, Svartava2 (talk) 03:25, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
- Also, what about the duck test, which, although isn't used usually for this purpose, may work? Because: 1) Both edited en.wiktionary 2) both edited in the same languages (Indo-Aryan) 3) with same editing styles. Svartava2 (talk) 03:30, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Svartava2: On phabricator there is the T&S team, they can see other data (your email for example), so they could help you better than me. Btw, if you just want to be renamed, please ping a trusted user who knows you, asking them to confirm that Svartava and Svartava2 are the same person (we have already done this in the past with this type of request). Regards :) Superpes15 (talk) 09:03, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you; yes, I just want to be renamed. I'll ping a Wiktionary admin User:Vininn126 to confirm that both are me. Svartava2 (talk) 12:53, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
- Both accounts belong to the same person. Vininn126 (talk) 12:54, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
- Many thanks Vininn126 :)
- @Svartava2: Done Superpes15 (talk) 13:06, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
- Wow... that's cool. Thanks a lot :)
- Can you recreate my doppelgänger "Svartava2" with my email and mail me a temporary password? Best, Svartava (talk) 14:09, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Svartava: I suggest not sharing sensitive data such as email, even if anonymous, publicly. To do what you say just click here. If it doesn't allow you to select that username, choose any other one, then ask me to rename it :) Regards :) --Superpes15 (talk) 14:16, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
- Yeah, it didn't allow me to take "Svartava2", so I chose Svārtava2; please rename it to "Svartava2". Svartava (talk) 14:56, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Svartava: Done I remain available for any other need! Regards :) --Superpes15 (talk) 15:17, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks you so much for the time and help! ^^ Svartava (talk) 15:19, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Svartava: Done I remain available for any other need! Regards :) --Superpes15 (talk) 15:17, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
- Yeah, it didn't allow me to take "Svartava2", so I chose Svārtava2; please rename it to "Svartava2". Svartava (talk) 14:56, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Svartava: I suggest not sharing sensitive data such as email, even if anonymous, publicly. To do what you say just click here. If it doesn't allow you to select that username, choose any other one, then ask me to rename it :) Regards :) --Superpes15 (talk) 14:16, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
- Both accounts belong to the same person. Vininn126 (talk) 12:54, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
- Thank you; yes, I just want to be renamed. I'll ping a Wiktionary admin User:Vininn126 to confirm that both are me. Svartava2 (talk) 12:53, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Svartava2: On phabricator there is the T&S team, they can see other data (your email for example), so they could help you better than me. Btw, if you just want to be renamed, please ping a trusted user who knows you, asking them to confirm that Svartava and Svartava2 are the same person (we have already done this in the past with this type of request). Regards :) Superpes15 (talk) 09:03, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
- Also, what about the duck test, which, although isn't used usually for this purpose, may work? Because: 1) Both edited en.wiktionary 2) both edited in the same languages (Indo-Aryan) 3) with same editing styles. Svartava2 (talk) 03:30, 4 February 2022 (UTC)
Global Sysop Granted
[edit]Congratulations on your successful global sysop request! Use your mop well! Bobherry (talk) 01:00, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- Hi Bobherry, many thanks, hope I deserve your support and do well :) Superpes15 (talk) 05:46, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
About cebwiki...
[edit]I don't think local admins, specifically the last active one – Lsj – ever care about CSD things. Most pages have been there for years. NguoiDungKhongDinhDanh 06:29, 27 February 2022 (UTC)
Filtro anti abusi
[edit]Hi. I am so suprised. Can you fix it? --Victor Trevor (talk) 14:11, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
Hi. I think there is sockpuppetry, see #92409 and #92297. Thanks! -- CptViraj (talk) 04:31, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
Deletions
[edit]Hello! I have made 2 somewhat restrictive proposals for mass deletion and nobody has answered during 1 month. I wonder whether the stuff can be deleted now. Taylor 49 (talk) 21:11, 27 June 2022 (UTC) Done
Hello! I have made 2 new proposals of exactly same type for mass deletion and nobody has answered during 16 days. Maybe the stuff could get deleted again. Taylor 49 (talk) 22:39, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
- Hello ... could you please look into the proposal above? Taylor 49 (talk) 20:28, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Taylor 49: Done The empty categories have been deleted! Thanks :) Superpes15 (talk) 23:25, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks. No empty junk categories left. In the other category there are ca 190 former language code templates. BTW, "konata neuzata" means "known disused", the affected codes are known to the new module caring about languages. Taylor 49 (talk) 23:34, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
- Done too. Taylor 49 (talk) 19:33, 9 December 2022 (UTC)
- Thanks. No empty junk categories left. In the other category there are ca 190 former language code templates. BTW, "konata neuzata" means "known disused", the affected codes are known to the new module caring about languages. Taylor 49 (talk) 23:34, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
- @Taylor 49: Done The empty categories have been deleted! Thanks :) Superpes15 (talk) 23:25, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
Congratulations, dear administrator!
[edit]Deutsch | English | español | français | italiano | 한국어 | Nederlands | português | Türkçe | русский | العربية | Tiếng Việt | edit
Congratulations, Superpes15! You now have the rights of an administrator on Meta-Wiki. Please take a moment to read the Meta:Administrators page and watchlist related pages (in particular Meta:Requests for help from a sysop or bureaucrat, and Meta:Requests for deletion, but also Talk:Spam blacklist and Talk:Interwiki map), before launching yourself into page deletions, page protections, account blockings, or modifications of protected pages. The majority of the actions of administrators can be reversed by the other admins, except for history merges which must thus be treated with particular care. Please feel free to join us on IRC: #wikimedia-adminconnect. You may find Meta:Admin handbook to be useful. Please also check or add your entry to the Template:List of administrators. You're also allowed to subscribe to the metawiki-admins private mailing list. Again, congratulations and welcome to the team. |
Welcome to the team, Congratulations. --Sotiale (talk) 06:48, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
- Many thanks Sotiale :D Superpes15 (talk) 07:15, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
Global rename
[edit]Hello! There is a sharp reason, most likely the election of the kaawiki administrator, there is a vote before I wanted to introduce work with a nickname. Please help with this. soon the election of the administrator will end before that I wanted to change the name. Thank you
Hello
[edit]Hello! Sorry to bother you, I asked how many votes you had to make in order to visit three months of the administration. — The preceding unsigned comment was added by QRNKS (talk) 10:52, 26 December 2022 (URC) (UTC)
- @QRNKS: Hello, absolutely no bother, you can see the minimum vote requirements here. As you can see no votes are needed, but if there are oppositions, a full discussion with a consensus is needed. Best --Superpes15 (talk) 12:00, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
Thank you! Best QRNKS (talk) 13:02, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
Hello, sorry to bother you again, 3 votes for, one against, but there was no discussion, I put it on the mark to approve not temporarily, for an indefinite period, could this be or the first for 3 months? thanks for the answer. QRNKS (talk) 07:24, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
- Hi @QRNKS: the stewards decide on flag requests, so I could only give you my opinion (maybe wrong). But note that if you have 3 supporting votes and 1 against, the support is still 75% (please remember that you need a full discussion if there's an opposing vote). Best regards Superpes15 (talk) 11:09, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
Thank you! Best QRNKS (talk) 11:16, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
Recently, the Sovereign Republic of Karakalpakstan, the new head, Amanbay Orinbaev, was appointed chairman, there are wikipedias in other languages, but the English wikipedia refuses, the reason is not clear. indicated all sources look? QRNKS (talk) 14:13, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
- @QRNKS: I don't quite understand your question but it seems to concern enwiki. You should ask the enwiki community for support and not here on metawiki. Thanks for understanding Superpes15 (talk) 15:37, 27 December 2022 (UTC)
Why you revert this edit? 156.206.113.1 17:48, 26 December 2022 (UTC)
Usurpation
[edit]You said that new users can't usurp other users' usernames. I tried to find a page that says that, but I couldn't find it. So, in which page is that explained? Internet Protokolla (talk) 14:56, 28 December 2022 (UTC)
Hello
[edit]Hello, Sorry to bother you again, participants from our wikipedia, which is going discord with each other, a participant with the name Rahman put himself as a candidate for bureaucrat election, while voting participant Nurlan took care of prevailing his powers of the administrator, out of spite Rahman put himself as a candidate for administrator election, Administrator Nurlan also removed him from there, you can see the whole story stands,
Rahman angrily messengered him on his messenger, an administrator's demand for a month of at least 200 edits, Rahman has been crawling around for a long time so he did not agree to the new demand. QRNKS (talk) 12:15, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
- I'm out myself, you can see how their showdown started here QRNKS (talk) 12:24, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
- @QRNKS: Thanks for your message, but I'm a bit confused, mainly because my machine translator can't translate most of the content on kaawiki :( Superpes15 (talk) 12:28, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
- started from this QRNKS (talk) 12:37, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
- @QRNKS: Thanks for your message, but I'm a bit confused, mainly because my machine translator can't translate most of the content on kaawiki :( Superpes15 (talk) 12:28, 29 December 2022 (UTC)
Hello, can I ask you a favour? Any article which and has no encyclopaedia value has no one source to back it up. Shouldn't it be deleted? QRNKS (talk) 17:25, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
- Hi @QRNKS:, if we are talking about Wikipedia it's generally like this, but the threshold of encyclopedic relevance is established by the single local community so you should ask that local community to get the exact answer to your question :) Superpes15 (talk) 23:02, 30 December 2022 (UTC)
Thank you, The Best :) QRNKS (talk) 04:30, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
Wish
[edit]Superpes15 WISHING YOU A VERY HAPPY NEW YEAR 2023. ^_^ :-D YIEWI talk 19:50, 1 January 2023 (UTC)
Regarding talkpage vandal
[edit]Regarding the talkpage vandal that was dumping German language text on their and another users talkpage, they seem to be on 2a02:3037:600::/43. From xtools, the number of the edits from that range that have been reverted increased greatly last month. Just in case you end up having to widen the block. Mako001 (C) (T) 🇺🇦 11:29, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
- That's a German LTA who has been around for many years in dewiki and dewiktionary. A bit unusual that he's vandalizing Meta so intensely (not the first time though). If this continues I might implement a filter similar to de:Special:Abusefilter/275 on Meta. Johannnes89 (talk) 19:14, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Johannnes89: Thanks, hope they don't continue, but the filter seems the best solution to me ;) Superpes15 (talk) 19:18, 2 January 2023 (UTC)
Block and delete request
[edit]Please block User:Rookie orator Lanson Wong vs senior orator Brina Cha in zh.wikiquote,LTA,thanks!-- MCC214#ex umbra in solem 08:06, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
- @MCC214: Done Thanks for reporting :) Superpes15 (talk) 08:11, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
Talk page access
[edit]Hi, can you disable talk page access for an anonymous user. They continue inserting inappropriate unblock requests. Tropicalkitty (talk) 01:31, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Tropicalkitty: Done I’m from mobile at the moment and I was handling another vandal, so I didn’t notice that they were continuing, many thanks for the ping :) Superpes15 (talk) 01:37, 5 January 2023 (UTC)
Please help me protect this page to prevent vandalism. Thanks! Tryvix1509 (talk) 12:21, 20 January 2023 (UTC)
Steward application statement
[edit]Caro Superpes15,
mi sono preso la briga di tradurti lo statement, ma capisco di essere stato così letterale da lasciar trasparire che il testo è una traduzione dall'inglese e non la trascrizione del tuo pensiero. Posto che l'italiano è la tua lingua madre sentiti libero di smussare le mie spigolosità traduttive da antichista. In bocca al lupo per la (quasi certa) promozione. εΔω 08:54, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
- @OrbiliusMagister: Oh, grazie mille, sono certo che sia stata tradotta in modo corretto ;) Alla fine, in quest casi, è il contenuto a parlare e non la semantica! Mi spiace averti fatto fare questo lavoro, avevo intenzione di postarla in italiano prima dell'inizio delle votazioni, anche perché ho cercato di stringere il più possibile ma, trattandosi della prima elezione, non me la sono sentita di rimuovere altre parti e il testo è venuto un po' lunghetto! Riguardo alle elezioni, viva il lupo, ma ti assicuro che niente è certo! Anche se ti ringrazio di cuore per la fiducia :D Ti auguro una buona domenica :) --Superpes15 (talk) 09:04, 22 January 2023 (UTC)
@Superpes15-san how did you revert the page? what should i do on occasions like this next time? because i faced same problems in the past but i wasn't sure how to fix them properly. 🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 18:55, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
- and on my way here same thing happened on Movement Strategy/ru :) looks like a frequent problem. 🌸 Sakura emad 💖 (talk) 18:57, 25 January 2023 (UTC)
Can I add a Vietnamese translation here? I don't see any Vietnamese section. Tryvix1509 (talk) 14:13, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
- Hi @Tryvix1509:, I added it, you can do the same in the other confirmations! Best ;) Superpes15 (talk) 14:27, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
- Looks like I have to copy the signature, right? Tryvix1509 (talk) 14:37, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Tryvix1509: Yep! Just copy-paste it ;) Superpes15 (talk) 14:39, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
- Looks like I have to copy the signature, right? Tryvix1509 (talk) 14:37, 27 January 2023 (UTC)
query
[edit]I did not. — xaosflux Talk 23:57, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
- @Xaosflux: Thanks for the fast reply :) Superpes15 (talk) 00:02, 1 February 2023 (UTC)
SE2023 eligibility checks
[edit]Regarding Special:Diff/24499894, I know (see Special:Diff/24495304). I'm not too sure about the bot's underlying code (Alchimista will know) but if a voter's eligibility has been checked by a human, I don't think that the bot double-checks that: it just moves it from one section to another (I know it also adds voters, but that isn't strictly relevant here). If the human checkers are moving usernames to the right section after checking, surely that saves the bot from clogging watchlists further? Moving usernames doesn't seem to break the bot, so I don't think that moving usernames back to the wrong section was completely necessary. Sdrqaz (talk) 16:34, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Sdrqaz: Tbh I just follow the instructions. Since it says in bold "Don't move lines around" I'd suggest don't do it (although it won't break the bot). It seems to me this has been reversed in the past but, if you feel I'm wrong, revert me without problem! Pinging also @Martin Urbanec: who create the template and probably know more :) Best Superpes15 (talk) 16:42, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
- Hmm. Thanks for the reply. I'll wait for Martin's input as well, but it seems to me that the notice should be rephrased to something discouraging people from seeing checked usernames in the "Need Checking" section and editing the template just to move them to "Checked" (like "it is not necessary to move lines around" rather than a blanket ban on all moves), since moving lines around when checking prevents watchlists from needing things like Special:Diff/24495505. Sdrqaz (talk) 17:03, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Sdrqaz: Uhm yep, I don't know if "need checking" is for the bot to do something before updating the list, but you're probably right. It would certainly avoid an edit to the bot. Thanks! Superpes15 (talk) 17:44, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
- Hmm. Thanks for the reply. I'll wait for Martin's input as well, but it seems to me that the notice should be rephrased to something discouraging people from seeing checked usernames in the "Need Checking" section and editing the template just to move them to "Checked" (like "it is not necessary to move lines around" rather than a blanket ban on all moves), since moving lines around when checking prevents watchlists from needing things like Special:Diff/24495505. Sdrqaz (talk) 17:03, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Committed identity
[edit]Ehilà, che vuol dire sto template che hai nella tua pagina utente? Àncilu (talk) 21:57, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Àncilu: Ciao! Si tratta di una chiave cifrata che permette di recuperare l'account in caso di problemi. Basta che cerchi SHA online e ti si aprono un sacco di siti. Scrivi una frase lì (che sai solo tu e lunga quanto vuoi tu) e verrà generata una chiave cifrata che potrai aggiungere al tuo account tramite il template {{User committed identity}}. Se dovessi perdere accesso all'account, mail, phabricator ecc. è l'ultima spiaggia. Ricorda che è case-sensitive e che anche uno spazio in più o in meno alla fine cambiano totalmente la chiave cifrata :D Superpes15 (talk) 22:21, 13 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Superpes15: Grazie mille, l'ho aggiunta (so come funzionano, visto che ho studiato [e versato lacrime amare sul]l'argomento :P, ma non ne capivo l'utilità su una pagina utente qui su meta) alla mia pagina utente. Àncilu (talk) 22:26, 14 February 2023 (UTC)
А question
[edit]Hi Superspes15, I have one question: whom would you recommend for me to contact on en.wikipedia in order to remove some sensitive personal information posted way back? Are stewards up for this as well? You can also email your rsp. to me if you like. Thanks. — Sadko (words are wind) 20:35, 16 February 2023 (UTC)
Request
[edit]Hi! It would be very nice if you could also mark these pages for translation also. Thanks. ValentynNefedov (WMUA) (talk) 13:03, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- @ValentynNefedov (WMUA): Done Thanks for your work! Superpes15 (talk) 13:11, 25 February 2023 (UTC)
- Sorry to bother you again but could you again mark this page for translation? ValentynNefedov (WMUA) (talk) 08:42, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
- Hi @ValentynNefedov (WMUA):, absolutely no bother, I've marked it for translation :) Best! Superpes15 (talk) 10:59, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
- Sorry to bother you again but could you again mark this page for translation? ValentynNefedov (WMUA) (talk) 08:42, 3 March 2023 (UTC)
Congrats
[edit]Congratulations on being elected steward! I hope that you will always do well on your cross-wiki work as a steward. P/s: Because I'm at school, I should use this alt account to avoid revealing the main account password. Tryvix1509 (test) (talk) 05:23, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Congratulations! AlPaD (talk) 07:52, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- @Tryvix1509 and AlPaD: Thank you both for your trust and support! I hope so too :D Superpes15 (talk) 11:20, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- Dear Superpes15 Congrats now you are a Stewards on WM Meta. →ÀvîRâm7(talk) 15:31, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- Many thanks @Aviram7: :) Superpes15 (talk) 15:56, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
- Dear Superpes15 Congrats now you are a Stewards on WM Meta. →ÀvîRâm7(talk) 15:31, 27 February 2023 (UTC)
Request for global lock of ab open proxy range
[edit]Hello Superpes15,
I'm an user from french Wikipedia. During a local CU request about acounts an IPs from a recent meatpupett/ sockpett and far probably a return or a looooooooong term abuse, we found a range of multiblocked open proxy IPs. It's 50.7.140.0/22. As you can see in this range several IP have many local an global blocked. Localy we blockedd it for 5 years. Could you extand it for a global block ? Thanks a lot--Le chat perché (talk) 21:08, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
- @Le chat perché: Done Thanks for reporting this! I've gblocked the whole /22! Wish you good evening :) Superpes15 (talk) 21:35, 7 March 2023 (UTC)
Hello could you delete this LTA’s user page? Airtransat236 (talk) 12:41, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
- @Airtransat236: Done! Thanks for reporting this :) Superpes15 (talk) 12:42, 15 March 2023 (UTC)
Deletions
[edit]Hello ... could you look into the pending deletions? Taylor 49 (talk) 22:45, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
- @Taylor 49: Doing right now! Thanks for reporting this to me :) Superpes15 (talk) 22:48, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
- @Taylor 49: Done! Let me know if you need anything else :) Superpes15 (talk) 22:56, 19 March 2023 (UTC)
SRP
[edit]Hi, I don't think this was a double request [1], but rather one request for wikiquote and one for wikivoyage? --Johannnes89 (talk) 14:29, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
- @Johannnes89: Oh, you're right! Fixed, my bad :D Superpes15 (talk) 14:31, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
Thanks
[edit]For globally locking that annoying LTA that was spamming on enwiki. Cheers, 47.227.95.73 00:13, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
Ciao
[edit]Scusa il disturbo ma visto che sei italiano ne approfitto,sai quanto tempo potrebbe durare questa discussione? [2]. Grazie. 79.18.238.28 22:15, 27 March 2023 (UTC)
- Scusami di nuovo,la richiesta è stata chiusa e rifiutata. Sai,se fosse possibile,e in che modo fare una richiesta di "aministia"? Naturalmente senza partecipare a FP ? Grazie. 151.19.38.61 07:43, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
- c'è nessuno?--176.201.22.119 11:33, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
- una risposta anche negativa sarebbe stata apprezzata. Molto gentile,saluti.--176.201.181.51 19:21, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
- c'è nessuno?--176.201.22.119 11:33, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
URGENT: Global lock for Smagazine sock
[edit]- هنريسونسين (talk • contribs • block • xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date (alt) • CA • gblock • ST • lwcheckuser)
User is engaged in a cross-wiki editwar to remove speedy delete tags from his spam pages. Please lock ASAP! Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 18:59, 6 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Someone who's wrong on the internet: Sorry for the late :( I'm a bit busy these days! Superpes15 (talk) 16:46, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- Moot: Account has been locked by another steward Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 18:34, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- Yep lol I immediately noticed it! That's why I said "sorry" :D Superpes15 (talk) 20:44, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
- Moot: Account has been locked by another steward Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 18:34, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
A question
[edit]For the similar account created in zhvoyage, do you have any clue? Hehua (talk) 12:41, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- Hi @Hehua:! Uhm what accounts do you mean? Superpes15 (talk) 22:42, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
- https://zh.wikivoyage.org/wiki/Special:%E6%97%A5%E5%BF%97/newusers e.g.https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:CentralAuth/%EF%BE%93%EF%BE%93%EF%BE%93%EF%BE%93%EF%BE%93%EF%BE%93%EF%BE%93%EF%BE%93%EF%BE%93%EF%BE%93%EF%BE%93%EF%BE%93%EF%BE%93%EF%BE%93%EF%BE%93%EF%BE%93%EF%BE%93%EF%BE%93%EF%BE%93%EF%BE%93%EF%BE%93%EF%BE%93%EF%BE%93%EF%BE%93%EF%BE%93%EF%BE%93%EF%BE%93%EF%BE%93 You locked this account but many other similar accounts have been created. Hehua (talk) 13:14, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
- I wonder whether we sysop should ban them or not? Do you have any idea about it? Hehua (talk) 13:16, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Hehua: Oh! I actually have no clue, I saw a lot of repeatedly created accounts (~200) cross-wiki by a single person, most of them with abusive username like this one! I'm still trying to understand who they are! This is actually weird but I didn't see edits, so you can proceed as you prefer, you can also report them on SRG (or to me) if you want :) Superpes15 (talk) 21:23, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
- OK,Thank you. Hehua (talk) 01:00, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Hehua: Oh! I actually have no clue, I saw a lot of repeatedly created accounts (~200) cross-wiki by a single person, most of them with abusive username like this one! I'm still trying to understand who they are! This is actually weird but I didn't see edits, so you can proceed as you prefer, you can also report them on SRG (or to me) if you want :) Superpes15 (talk) 21:23, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
ℋℯℒℒℴ!
[edit]Superpes15, I've answered your question, so please give me steward's permissions. こにしかめやも2 (talk) 04:56, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
A question of a done rename request
[edit]Hello, I have a question of a done rename request. The account is a test account which was being renamed to QTE-Test7-WMF on 12 September 2022 by office action by NahidSultan (WMF) (talk · contribs). I don’t think that account should be rename without notifying the T&S. 211.30.8.164 01:17, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
- Oh thanks but I don’t understand what’s the question in this case :) Superpes15 (talk) 07:24, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
- What I mean is that I think that only T&S can vanish a staff account and the T&S should be notified. 211.30.8.164 07:39, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
- Just see the reason of the rename. I'm sorry I can't says a lot about a VRTS ticket. Thanks! Superpes15 (talk) 07:57, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
- It is a role account which being renamed before by an office action. Office action cannot be revoked by anyone else unless with the approval of the T&S. That’s why I said the T&S should be notified before the rename. 211.30.8.164 09:57, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
- Yep, I understand, but where did your read that it was an office action, which is a particular and different process? I only see "Role account of Wikimedia Quality and Test Engineering Team (ZD#46503)"! It was an internal rename, T&S members can rename without asking us but, if they want, they can also ask us to rename :) Superpes15 (talk) 10:05, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
- Thank you for your reply. 211.30.8.164 10:20, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
- Yep, I understand, but where did your read that it was an office action, which is a particular and different process? I only see "Role account of Wikimedia Quality and Test Engineering Team (ZD#46503)"! It was an internal rename, T&S members can rename without asking us but, if they want, they can also ask us to rename :) Superpes15 (talk) 10:05, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
- It is a role account which being renamed before by an office action. Office action cannot be revoked by anyone else unless with the approval of the T&S. That’s why I said the T&S should be notified before the rename. 211.30.8.164 09:57, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
- Just see the reason of the rename. I'm sorry I can't says a lot about a VRTS ticket. Thanks! Superpes15 (talk) 07:57, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
- What I mean is that I think that only T&S can vanish a staff account and the T&S should be notified. 211.30.8.164 07:39, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
How are you so fast?
[edit]I barely have the time to click on a certain LTA's new accounts that they're already glocked. How do you do that? LilianaUwU (talk / contributions) 15:24, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
Re: Lookruk's Red Tapes
[edit]While I recognize that the SRP is not the place for the discussion of merits of the permission, the reason I posted a comment here on Meta is due to the lack of knowledge in Lao Language and the fact that I do not have an account there (though the account may be created automatically by virtue of the SUL, using that account to post a comment in permission request may be considered canvassing. While I do the same during Lookruk's Adminship Nomination at Thai Wikiquote, that RfA was cross-posted with Thai Wikipedia where I and the user are far more active and I have sufficient knowledge and understanding in Thai to do so). I did retract my comment in order for the RfP to pass without further hassle, though I feel I should provide further clarification on why I do so and why I decided not to post the objection at lowikt. G(x) (talk) 04:09, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
- @G(x): That's fine, I also had some concerns as you saw, but I didn't consider them a clear barrier. This is also due to the fact that the number of potentially dangerous administrative actions on that project are very few, and in any case I'll monitor the project constantly, and it's important that users want to help in minor projects. Surely with experience users will improve and will reduce their mistakes in doing the sysop :) Thanks anyway for your comment and for the fact that you wanted to clarify the reasoning that led you to withdraw it!
- P.S. It's not cavassing imho, even if you've never used the account there, any comments are welcome! Superpes15 (talk) 08:55, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Correction SEO-support page
[edit]Hello @Superpes15, I hope you can help me with my question. My account was wrongfully added to the list of SEO support socks and was blocked. I have been able to rectify the situation and received an exception to the blocking, but I saw that my username is still added on the list of contentspammers by SEO support. Can you remove my name from that list? You can find the topic about the blockage here. The list with contentspammers [./Https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Checklijst_langdurig_structureel_vandalisme/SEO-Support here]. I've contacted you, as you seem to have been involved in the case. :)
Thanks for your feedback! Marc Eteer (talk) 07:49, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
- Hi @Marc Eteer:, thanks for contacting me, I'll ping @Daniuu:, who unblocked you, since I'm not an active editor on nlwiki! I take the opportunity to ask you a question! Do you have any idea why somoeone considered you a spammer? Thanks :) Superpes15 (talk) 09:54, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
- Hi, I removed Marc Eteer from the list of SEO-support accounts. Daniuu (talk) 10:03, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks @Daniuu! Marc Eteer (talk) 11:16, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
- Hi @Superpes15, thank you! I had just created the account and tried do update some information about the company I work for on a page where we were mentioned (to be transparent, I do have a Conflict of Interest).
- I did this because I read that you have to make a number of edits before you can suggest to create a page and my goal is to create a page for the company I work for, as it is notable - in our opinion - (we produce sugar beet seeds and do a lot of breeding and scientific research on sugar beets, which is also published by independent sources). I did those edits, because it was information that I was sure of, as I don't want to start editing at random on subjects I'm not knowledgeable about. But I didn't do the edits the right way, as I wasn't aware yet of the whole COI-thing. I completely agree with the reverting of the edits I made and I wanted to explain myself, but I got immediately blocked as a spammer/sock puppet (I hadn't heard of sock puppets before - Wikipedia definitely is the place to be to learn something new ;) ). When I got in contact with the Dutch Wikipedia via e-mail, they told me that the person had acted a bit too rashly as they thought that my account was an alternate account for someone who was spamming. They also sent their apologies.
- As the ways of working on Wikipedia is a lot more complex than I first imagined, I am trying to read more on the correct steps to take for the creation of a page for the company I work for. I do really want to comply with Wikipedia rules. I have also asked to change my user name, so my Conflict of Interest is more visible, but I am waiting for feedback on that part. Marc Eteer (talk) 11:16, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
- Hi Superpes, see this ticket for additional information (it was forwarded by the arbcom, who could not handle the case based on a technicality). Daniuu (talk) 11:20, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
- Hi, I removed Marc Eteer from the list of SEO-support accounts. Daniuu (talk) 10:03, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
User harassing with username
[edit]Hello. So a user who had an editing conflict with me on Wikipedia changed their username to one similar to mine. Would you be able to assist with revert the name change? Other users attempted to help, but nothing has happened. You can take a look here for more information. Thanks! WMrapids (talk) 08:17, 28 May 2023 (UTC)
en-wiki local account setup for Aafi
[edit]Hi @Superpes15: I have been trying to setup Aafi on en-wiki but a local block on an IP-range does not allow me to auto-create the account. I reached to blocking admin and they suggested IPBE but I am not sure if that is warranted given that I do not need to edit from that account, and I am able to edit from my main account from the same place. Please take a look here and tell me what should be the best avenue to have this fixed. Regards, ─ The Aafī (talk) 10:04, 4 June 2023 (UTC)
Request for Rollbacker
[edit]I'm currently an active member patrolling and editing viwiki (see my contributions at viwiki). So on this meta environment I would like to be granted the right of a backer to help prevent vandalism. Can you give me the rights to a backer or a patroller in this meta? Thank you. Do Tri ✓ 💬 15:07, 8 June 2023 (UTC)
Activities of User:Mirzoulug'bek
[edit]Hello. This user block my account in Uzbek Wikipedia at 22:20, 19 June 2023 for 3 days. After 1 day, he reblocked it. I think both activitions aren't correspond to the actions of the administrator. Umarxon III (talk) 13:46, 13 July 2023 (UTC).
- Hi @Umarxon III:, thanks for this report! Seems you was blocked by mistake and then unblocked (and not re-blocked), so no issue imho. The only problem I see is that, reading at the reason of your block, Mirzoulug'bek's account was compromised or someone did a login without permission. Is this correct? Was the compromise problem solved? Superpes15 (talk) 19:29, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
- The problem is not solved. I think he tried to compromise me in front of all the users and then changed his mind. Umarxon III (talk) 20:34, 13 July 2023 (UTC).
Deletions 2023-07
[edit]Hello ... could you please delete 100 listed pages? Silent consensus, nobody answered during 20 days. All those pages are from the recycle bin, have been waiting for 25 days ... several years, proposed for deletion due to "unused template", "copyvio", "bot error" and other reasons. Taylor 49 (talk) 11:41, 29 July 2023 (UTC)
- @Taylor 49: Done Sorry for the late even in this case :) Superpes15 (talk) 21:07, 25 August 2023 (UTC)
Deadlock
[edit]Hello ... could you please look into permanently deadlocked cases at Global sysops/Requests? Taylor 49 (talk) 15:07, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Taylor 49: Can i delete also the modules? :) Superpes15 (talk) 17:05, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
- Sure. Taylor 49 (talk) 17:07, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Taylor 49: Some categories have pages! I'll delete the empty ones ;) Superpes15 (talk) 17:09, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
- Yes I meant to skip the non-empty ones for now. Taylor 49 (talk) 17:10, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Taylor 49: Done Thanks for reporting :) Superpes15 (talk) 18:31, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks ... can you delete the dupe file too, and look at the old request at the top ("Mediawiki:" page)? Taylor 49 (talk) 18:35, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Taylor 49: Sure! Can you please link me the duplicate on Commons? Thanks :) Will look into the other request in the meantime! Can I also remove the sitenotice? Looks very old! :) Superpes15 (talk) 18:40, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
- Yes you can remove the old notice too (I am used to it to a degree that I do not see it anymore ...) https://eo.wiktionary.org/wiki/Dosiero:pomo_ora.png https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:PMEG-14-0-pomo-ora.png Taylor 49 (talk) 18:43, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Taylor 49: Done Let me know if everything is fine! Thanks :) Superpes15 (talk) 18:51, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
- Seems to be, thanks. :-) Taylor 49 (talk) 18:57, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Taylor 49: Done Let me know if everything is fine! Thanks :) Superpes15 (talk) 18:51, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
- Yes you can remove the old notice too (I am used to it to a degree that I do not see it anymore ...) https://eo.wiktionary.org/wiki/Dosiero:pomo_ora.png https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:PMEG-14-0-pomo-ora.png Taylor 49 (talk) 18:43, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Taylor 49: Sure! Can you please link me the duplicate on Commons? Thanks :) Will look into the other request in the meantime! Can I also remove the sitenotice? Looks very old! :) Superpes15 (talk) 18:40, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks ... can you delete the dupe file too, and look at the old request at the top ("Mediawiki:" page)? Taylor 49 (talk) 18:35, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Taylor 49: Done Thanks for reporting :) Superpes15 (talk) 18:31, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
- Yes I meant to skip the non-empty ones for now. Taylor 49 (talk) 17:10, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
- @Taylor 49: Some categories have pages! I'll delete the empty ones ;) Superpes15 (talk) 17:09, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
- Sure. Taylor 49 (talk) 17:07, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
ticket already done
[edit]Hi Superpes15, I think you have already handled this ticket: ticket:2023100110001658, if so would you please close it out? Best regards, — xaosflux Talk 12:54, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
- Uhm @Xaosflux: tbh I followed a request on IRC! Btw I closed it ;) Superpes15 (talk) 21:55, 1 October 2023 (UTC)
Hi, and sorry for replying only now to your email regarding the 'crat status for User:Edgar Allan Poe on sh.wiki. I see that's been taken care of in the meantime, so all is good. Apologies again, I was down with a rater nasty bout of Covid when you wrote... Best, --Igor Windsor (talk) 17:19, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
- @Igor Windsor: Absolutely no problem, we are all volunteers here, and we spend time on wiki matters when we have time! I'm sorry to hear that and I just hope you've recovered and are well now :) Superpes15 (talk) 10:09, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
Sockpuppet Investigation request
[edit]Dear Superpes15, Hello, You currently globally lock this user for spamming but now he creates a other account with this name on hiwiki and using own account for spamming and So, I think checkuser is most helpful in this case,
- Please see this edit and this edit both are same and those edits are made by different account.
- If you interest in this case, so please help us to investigate this Case. Thnx :)
Kind regards~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 15:50, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
- @Aviram7: Thanks! I locked the user, but I'm a little busy right now, will deeply investigate in a few hours :D Superpes15 (talk) 15:52, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
- Dear Superpes15, Sounds good! Ok I 'll wait your reply after you finish this Sockpuppet Investigation request as soon as possible. Thnx :) Kind regards~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 16:03, 3 November 2023 (UTC)
Rinomina utenza
[edit]Ciao @Superpes15, ci tenevo solo a ringraziarti per il cambio nome utente, grazie mille ancora! Adesso procedo a sistemare i vari testi :) E.D.G. (talk) 18:54, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
- @E.D.G.: Di nulla, sono qui appositamente per aiutare :) Se vedi qualcosa che secondo te andrebbe rimossa, fai pure un fischio! Buon proseguimento ;) Superpes15 (talk) 18:59, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
Revision
[edit]Dear Superpes15, can you hidden/deleted from public view this revision fron Hindi wikipedia. On Hindi wikipedia's administrators are not permission to oversight any revision. Kind regards:) ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 04:55, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
- Hi @Aviram7:, first of all please consider that requests for revdel/oversight should always be private (see policy), in this way you can publicize private matters more and this could be a problem! We have the vrts queue for oversight and IRC. I don't understand why the local sysops didn't perform a revdel on that diff, looks weird. Have you asked sysops for a revdel? The right procedure should be: immediately ask privately for a OS on VRTS/IRC, if stews don't reply immediately, ask local sysops for a revdel (waiting for a stew)! I did the OS but, as you can see, more that one day passed with the information visible for anyone! Thanks Superpes15 (talk) 09:56, 12 November 2023 (UTC)
Richiesta
[edit]Ciao Superpes, ti scrivo per reiterare la mia richiesta di supporto datata #Agosto 2023. Sono ormai quasi 4 anni che uso questa utenza ed ancora oggi il blocco su it.wiki mi viene rinfacciato su ogni progetto, da Wikipedia a Commons, passando per Wikidata. L'essere bloccato a tempo indefinito sul mio progetto madre viene sempre visto come motivo di dubbio nei miei confronti, specie nelle discussioni in merito ai miei diritti come utente. Chiedo il tuo supporto per liberarmi di questo pregiudizio che danneggia quotidianamente il mio percorso in progetti a cui contribuisco attivamente. Est. 2021 (talk) 09:39, 13 December 2023 (UTC)
Merry Christmas!
[edit]Hey Superpes15, I wish you Merry Christmas and a good new year 2024! TenWhile6 (talk | SWMT) 15:25, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
Talk page protection
[edit]Hello there! Just a quick question, as you probably know the answer, I hope this is the right spot too. How come when users with promotional usernames are blocked on the Italian Wikipedia, their talk page is also fully protected? I have noticed that it is the standard practice on that wiki, and just wanted to know, as I have handled cases where users requesting a new username are blocked on itwiki and the blocking admin has to be contacted after renaming as they can't request an unblock themselves. So, just curious about the reasoning behind that practice. Thanks! EPIC (talk) 17:07, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
- @EPIC: Unfortunately itwiki is the only projects in which the block applies on the user talk page too (and sysops cannot unblock the talk page)! I hope we can solve this, imho it's a problem, because there's no way to ask for the unblock (except for the email). Also, the user talk pages are protected, because we often use a tool that automatically block them after the block! At the moment it's better if the renamer contact the blocking admin (or let some Italian renamers to process the requests).Thanks :) Superpes15 (talk) 17:18, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the reply! So, if I understand it correctly, the talk user talk pages are automatically locked when the user is blocked? If so, it would be the opposite of what I thought, but that explains it to me. I learned my mistake the last time I rejected a renaming request from a blocked user on itwiki, but the blocking admins I have contacted for an unblock after renaming have been fast. EPIC (talk) 17:52, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
- Exactly, hope this will change soon, but we have to discuss locally the issue :) Thanks! Superpes15 (talk) 17:57, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
- Forgot to ping :( @EPIC: --Superpes15 (talk) 18:39, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
- Didn't notice the ping until now apparently. But thank you - the situation is a bit clearer to me now! I would also hope for a potential change. EPIC (talk) 22:21, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
- Forgot to ping :( @EPIC: --Superpes15 (talk) 18:39, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
- Exactly, hope this will change soon, but we have to discuss locally the issue :) Thanks! Superpes15 (talk) 17:57, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the reply! So, if I understand it correctly, the talk user talk pages are automatically locked when the user is blocked? If so, it would be the opposite of what I thought, but that explains it to me. I learned my mistake the last time I rejected a renaming request from a blocked user on itwiki, but the blocking admins I have contacted for an unblock after renaming have been fast. EPIC (talk) 17:52, 16 January 2024 (UTC)
Your feedback is requested
[edit]Hello Superpes15, We are conducting a poll of global renamers and stewards regarding some future toolings related to some rename requests. Your feedback is requested at the poll on VRT WIKI. Best regards, — xaosflux Talk 00:18, 17 January 2024 (UTC)
appelli e contrappelli
[edit]a furia di dare seconde, terze, quarte, quinte, sessantaduemilionesime opportunità finisce che it.wiki è piena di voci da ricostruire perché la gente deve mettere la seicentodiciottesima reappresentazione al teatro dell'opera di Borgo di Sotto Val di sopra, le ottocentosettantunesima rappresentazione al teatro dell'opera di Cassano con Usmate e Vallombrosa, cosa ha fatto Machobel nella puntata di wwe del 15 febbraio, del 16 febbraio, del 17 febbraio, del 18 febbraio eccetera.
Poi chi cerca di fare un lavoro fatto almeno benino viene messo sotto osservazione (e sin qua chi se ne frega) e le voci che vuole fare le rinvia alle calende greche.
Vedi tu come finisce it.wiki. 2.237.220.21 12:43, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
- @IP Capisco pienamente il punto di vista, ma appello non vuol dire "essere sbloccato automaticamente", si dà una possibilità di revisione del proprio blocco. Direi che è sacrosanta come cosa. Discutiamone su itwiki :) Superpes15 (talk) 12:59, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
Testo candidatura in lingua italiana
[edit]Carissimo, come ho già avuto modo di scrivere anche a Melozzo per la sua (ri)candidatura, ho tradotto per tutti gli altri Steward/candidati Steward il loro testo. Non l'ho fatto per te, dal momento che essendo anche tu it-N, avrebbe avuto poco senso. Un saluto e un abbraccio M/ (talk) 10:56, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
- Ciao @M7:, grazie anche per le altre traduzioni, mi eviti un bel da fare visto che nell'ultimo periodo sono sempre preso da mille cose :D Nessun problema per l'italiano, avevo già intenzione di farla a breve, devo solo vedere se aggiungere ancora qualcosa e poi la traduco. Tanto fino al 6 c'è tempo. Un abbraccio :) Superpes15 (talk) 11:15, 28 January 2024 (UTC)
Voting for the UCOC Committee
[edit]Hi Superpes15, sorry to come to your talk page, but since at the charter talk page and other venues I hardly received an answer, I come to you who is listed as one of the scrutinizers of the vote (If you don't know yet, check here). I have just voted on the charter, but I am actually blocked in two projects, so I am not really sure if the requirements are listed correctly, but either way, I believe either many who are entitled to vote believe they are not entitled to vote, or many vote who should not vote. Still I believe it's a bit weird (or at least I do not understand why), if editors blocked in two projects are not allowed to vote as they are likely interested that the charter is understandable so there will be no misunderstandings. But not only twice blocked editors had questions also highly experienced admins in their respective projects. No answers for them either. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 21:04, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @Paradise Chronicle: and thanks for the ping! We, as scrutineers, just check if everything is fine from a sockpuppeting/requirements point of view and so on. WMF takes care of the organization of the election and decided the requirements. It's strange that you were able to vote (give the two indefinite blocks)! We'll check the situation immediately :) Thanks for writing us and for your interest into the matter! Best Superpes15 (talk) 21:42, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Paradise Chronicle: WMF should have resolved this! Could you please check if you are able to vote again? Thanks again Superpes15 (talk) 22:19, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- I did check and I am not allowed to vote anymore.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 22:56, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Paradise Chronicle: Thanks for the confirmation! Superpes15 (talk) 23:07, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- Hey dear, how are you? Busy scrutinizing? What are the plans about announcing the results? Couldn't find them yet. Then the fact that the announcement of the vote came on 29th January with only 4 days more to vote (even though the voting process began at least a week before) was questioned at the talk page of the charter. Many other comments, doubts and questions also remained unaddressed during the voting process as you can observe at the same talk page. I hope you can include this observations in your evaluation of the voting process while scrutinizing. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 16:10, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @Paradise Chronicle: and thanks for your message! Unfortunately we have found clear cases of socking, other suspects, there aren't many but we are working on it, we hope to complete everything in a couple of days. Our goal is to have a precise work, quality precedes speed but I don't think the work will last much longer :) Once the work is completed it will be WMF's job to start counting the votes and announce the result (and this will take the time that WMF establishes internally). We simply verify that the votes were given by users with the requirements and without cases of socking (as far as possible given that votewiki is not a perfect system on the socking side) and, then, will verify and confirm the result reported by WMF! Thanks again for your help, reporting that bug saved us a lot of time, I'm serious :D Superpes15 (talk) 17:57, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- Hey dear, how are you? Busy scrutinizing? What are the plans about announcing the results? Couldn't find them yet. Then the fact that the announcement of the vote came on 29th January with only 4 days more to vote (even though the voting process began at least a week before) was questioned at the talk page of the charter. Many other comments, doubts and questions also remained unaddressed during the voting process as you can observe at the same talk page. I hope you can include this observations in your evaluation of the voting process while scrutinizing. Paradise Chronicle (talk) 16:10, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Paradise Chronicle: Thanks for the confirmation! Superpes15 (talk) 23:07, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- I did check and I am not allowed to vote anymore.Paradise Chronicle (talk) 22:56, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
- @Paradise Chronicle: WMF should have resolved this! Could you please check if you are able to vote again? Thanks again Superpes15 (talk) 22:19, 30 January 2024 (UTC)
Boa tarde!
[edit]Re our discussion earlier, I've made an initial dump of edits on en:wp with "vxfc" in the edit summary, which I assume will be reversions, to test Johannnes89's claims that the content is "Long-term abuse". You can view on my talk page at en:wp but I'm rather worried that I'm not finding any "abuse" there at all - it all seems to be constructive editing. Can you take a look? If Johannnes89 is incapable of distinguishing between constructive editing and "Long-term abuse" this needs to be flagged up before voting starts. Felicitações. Actually not had time to finish will continue tomorrow. 2A00:23D0:7A8:AB01:DC89:6424:A1CF:5A02 17:58, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
- [3][4][5][6][7][8] all blocked per en:WP:BMB. Further edits on metawiki will be met with en:WP:RBI again per en:WP:LTA/VXFC instructions. --Johannnes89 (talk) 19:28, 1 February 2024 (UTC)
Request
[edit]Dear Superpes15 ,Hi and can you proceed my request at WM:RFH? ~~ αvírαm|(tαlk) 04:18, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
How did the IP know about my mom?
[edit]Hey there, Superpes. Thanks for blocking the IP. However, I am confused about one thing. How on earth did the IP know my mom's first name? Nobody knows my mom's name except my entire family and her friends. Also, I don't want the IP to leak her information. If you can, please reply back to me. Can you ping me if you can, since I'm always on the regular Wikipedia? I'm actually scared since I love her and don't want her info to get doxxed. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 19:43, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- @NoobThreePointOh: They didn't write any name but only insults as I can see! I don't know when you read this name! If you have more information just email me :) Superpes15 (talk) 19:46, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- @NoobThreePointOh: You just doxxed it... I said to email me! Superpes15 (talk) 19:49, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- And they never wrote that word on metawiki as I can see :) Superpes15 (talk) 19:50, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- Welp, I won't worry about it anymore. All i cared about was them getting blocked, and you did it. Thanks. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 19:52, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- Yep yep don't worry :) Superpes15 (talk) 19:57, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- Welp, I won't worry about it anymore. All i cared about was them getting blocked, and you did it. Thanks. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 19:52, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- And they never wrote that word on metawiki as I can see :) Superpes15 (talk) 19:50, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
- @NoobThreePointOh: You just doxxed it... I said to email me! Superpes15 (talk) 19:49, 5 February 2024 (UTC)
Voto in riconferma - un problema tecnico?
[edit]Buongiorno, Superpes, non vorrei aver fatto un pasticcio con questo parere nella riconferma di Vito. Infatti su questa pagina riesco a vedere sia il mio commento sia quelli che seguono, ma su questa pagina no. Non vorrei che il mio parere, lungo e pieno di formattazione, avesse creato qualche problema di natura tecnica. Gitz6666 (talk) 16:23, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Gitz6666: In genere è una questione di cache e anche a me succede di non vedere tutto subito sulla pagina generale. Con un purge di solito si risolve. A meno che i pareri non siano stati lasciati nel punto sbagliato di solito si risolve entro poco tempo (e nessun problema di formattazione credo dia come risultato questo)! Superpes15 (talk) 16:46, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- ah, bene. Grazie della spiegazione - in effetti da cellulare vedo tutto. Gitz6666 (talk) 16:54, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- ...credo però che ci fosse davvero un problema di formattazione, creato con questo commento e appena risolto con questo edit. Ciao, Gitz6666 (talk) 23:57, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Gitz6666: Eh si come ti dicevo a volte si sbaglia punto, quel rigo va sempre alla fine, altrimenti poi non si vedono i commenti! Bisognerebbe farci un filtro perché ogni volta crea casini in ogni riconferma! Superpes15 (talk) 00:09, 7 February 2024 (UTC)
- ...credo però che ci fosse davvero un problema di formattazione, creato con questo commento e appena risolto con questo edit. Ciao, Gitz6666 (talk) 23:57, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
- ah, bene. Grazie della spiegazione - in effetti da cellulare vedo tutto. Gitz6666 (talk) 16:54, 6 February 2024 (UTC)
Request - for Hyphen
[edit]Yesterday Hyphen asked to revoke his administrator right on HeWiki. This morning he deleted the request, but Mykola returned it after an hour, and wrote: "It's not done like that. If you change your mind, just write it like that".[9] Less than half an hour later you made the request. Can it be canceled? מביע עניין (talk) 11:49, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- @מביע עניין: I'm sorry but I didn't notice this edit before removing the flag. As far as I know stew cannot give back the flag once removed (as explained in the instruction). Also, the requests cannot be deleted, if Hyphen wanted to change their mind, why didn't they write it or ask how to do it (even "I withdraw my request" would be sufficient)? Hyphen has not yet confirmed that they have changed their mind. If so, I would advise them to write to the stewards on SN, so that it is a collegial decision, being a precedent that I don't think has ever happened or, if they prefer, to start a new local RfA. Thanks for your understanding! Superpes15 (talk) 11:58, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you. (@מקף). מביע עניין (talk) 12:17, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- @מביע עניין: Sorry again for the misunderstanding! We'll wait for your updates :) Superpes15 (talk) 12:19, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you. (@מקף). מביע עניין (talk) 12:17, 8 February 2024 (UTC)
Stewards/Elections 2024
[edit]Hi, can you please stop my stewardship request? Turkmen talk 06:20, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Turkmen: Forwarding to ElectCom and will let you know asap the process! Superpes15 (talk) 11:25, 24 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Turkmen: If you are sure you want to withdraw your request, since 24 hours passed, please write it on your statement. Please note that there is little time left until the end of the election. Thanks! Superpes15 (talk) 23:55, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
- Okay then let's stay, it ends tomorrow anyway Turkmen talk 08:31, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Turkmen: If you are sure you want to withdraw your request, since 24 hours passed, please write it on your statement. Please note that there is little time left until the end of the election. Thanks! Superpes15 (talk) 23:55, 25 February 2024 (UTC)
Vote checking
[edit]Just fyi: I've added a missing vote template to a couple of votes [10]. Not sure if the bot will still list it at Template:Stewards/Elections 2024/Voters/Check as the voting period is over now – if not it needs to be checked manually. Johannnes89 (talk) 15:24, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
- @Johannnes89: Thanks! I was waiting for the last edit of the bot (in some minutes)! Superpes15 (talk) 15:25, 27 February 2024 (UTC)
You have an unread message. Hide on Rosé t 11:22, 18 March 2024 (UTC)
About zhwikinews` election
[edit](sorry for my poor english) I would like to inquiry about the zhwikinews` elections. As a steward, will you grant permanent adminship for them if it`s an admin-election, not crat election? (=what`s your opinion about whether zhwikinews is large enough) Thank you. ChasingAirtalk 12:06, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @ChasingAir:, this is an interesting topic, I think this is not a decision that a single steward can take! We'll talk about it if you want :) Superpes15 (talk) 09:13, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Superpes15 If the voting requirements can be met, can the Chinese Wiknews be considered a large enough wiki? What kind of scale in terms of numbers and logs would be required to fit within that assessment criteria? Kitabc12345 (talk) 14:09, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- I think a steward-talk would help our zhwikinews` community a lot. Thanks in advance. ChasingAirtalk 14:22, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- The breakthrough for zhwikinews was that in the past it had Bureaucrat access. Kitabc12345 (talk) 15:22, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Kitabc12345 and ChasingAir Yes, but all of their past crats were granted before the enforcement of Steward requests/Permissions/Minimum voting requirements (probably in 2019?), for the current situation, I would also agree that zhwikinews is a "small enough" wiki instead of "large enough". (NB: This is also the reason why the rest 6 zhwiki* projects (zh.wikipedia didn't involve) don't have crats, as they rarely have records of granting adminships/bots.) Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:03, 23 May 2024 (UTC)
- The breakthrough for zhwikinews was that in the past it had Bureaucrat access. Kitabc12345 (talk) 15:22, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
Blocage IP
[edit]Bonjour,
Nous sommes bloqués depuis notre école pour modifier la page de notre école: IP:185.18.171.17 Identifiant blocage: 4174050. Voici l'URL que nous souhaitons mettre à jour: https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%89cole_sup%C3%A9rieure_d%27art_et_design_de_Valence
Nous sommes surement coincé car notre IP est publique et fixe pour toutes les personnes de l'école. Merci de votre aide ESADGV (talk) 15:03, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Bureaucrat access on uz.wiktionary
[edit]Hello there. Uzbek Wiktionary does not currently have a bureaucrat. I developed local rules. Now we need to choose one of the active administrators among us. I have two questions on this topic.
1. If a bureaucrat is elected, can he be elected indefinitely?
2. Can a bureaucrat grant administrative and other rights indefinitely?
Thanks for the reply. Umarxon III (talk) 18:04, 29 June 2024 (UTC).
- Hi @Umarxon III:, the answer is yes to both questions. The point is that to elect a local bureaucrat you must have some requirements to comply with the policy, and I don't think the uzwiktionary can consider itself ready to have local 'crats. Please read the requirements here (and note that stewards should consider this wiki to be large enough based on statistics)! Thank you for your understanding :) Superpes15 (talk) 18:10, 29 June 2024 (UTC)
Reminder to vote now to ratify the Wikimedia Movement Charter
[edit]- You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to your language
Dear Wikimedian,
You are receiving this message because you previously voted in the 2021 Movement Charter Drafting Committee (MCDC) election.
This is a reminder that if you have not voted yet on the ratification of the final Wikimedia Movement Charter draft, please do so by July 9, 2024 at 23:59 UTC.
You can read the final text of the Wikimedia Movement Charter in your language. Following that, check on whether you are eligible to vote. If you are eligible, cast your vote on SecurePoll.
On behalf of the Charter Electoral Commission,
RamzyM (WMF) 15:24, 5 July 2024 (UTC)
Attacking page and insult
[edit]Hello Superpes15. Could you check this page please? This user insult me due to my admin action in trwiki. Thanks. Vincent Vega msg? 18:14, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
Logo Font ans Wikipedia Font and Size
[edit]Hello and greetings,
I have a few questions. Firstly, I would like to change the logo of our Wikipedia (dv.wikipedia). The current font used in the logo is very old and outdated. Secondly, the font and size used throughout the Wikipedia need to be updated as well. Can you guide me in the right direction?
Glacious (talk) 09:53, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
Aide pour modification de nom de page
[edit]bonjour @Superpes15 , désolé de vous déranger, j'ai déposé une requête ici. Pouvez vous nous aider à ce sujet ? Merci Ross.Patrick (talk) 06:11, 20 November 2024 (UTC)