Showing posts with label McCaffrey. Show all posts
Showing posts with label McCaffrey. Show all posts

Wednesday, April 13, 2022

Tomorrows from 1973 by A McCaffrey, P Sargent and L Niven

Here at MPorcius Fiction Log we are reading Roger Elwood's 1973 anthology of all new science fiction stories, Ten Tomorrows.  In our last episode we read stories by Robert Silverberg (in the future you should work for the Revolution), Barry Malzberg (in the future you will be allowed to hunt down and kill old people), Laurence M, Janifer (in the future a chronoscope device will allow us to make decisions that end racism and avert nuclear war) and Edgar Pangborn (in the future we'll live on communes and have lots of gay sex.)  Let's see what futures Anne McCaffrey, Pamela Sargent, and Larry Niven came up with in their contributions to Elwood's anthology.

"The Rescued Girls of Refugee" by Anne McCaffrey

As a youth I read a bunch of those Pern books and I guess I enjoyed them.  As an adult I tried to reread one and thought it pretty poor.  This is the first time I have read any fiction by McCaffrey in ages, and seeing as the story is mediocre, it is perhaps the last time I read any fiction by her.

The protagonist of "The Rescued Girls of Refugee" is a young woman living in an authoritarian matriarchal society, I guess a colony on an alien planet set up by feminists who fled Earth or whatever.  Like all the young women in the colony, the protagonist has never seen a man and has been conditioned to believe men are filthy disgusting dwarves.  This girl has had a complex and vivid dream, and is greatly troubled over it, so she is describing it to one of the matriarchs.  In the dream she met men, and they were handsome and kind.  It was explained to her in the dream that she was being conditioned to like men, in fact to be attracted to a specific man, to counteract the conditioning of the matriarchs who have squelched the natural desire of most women to have a sexual relationship with a man.  It turns out that our protagonist is not the only woman in the colony to have this dream.

In the end of the story a space ship lands and men come out of it and the young women who had that dream run to join them.

There is a long SF tradition of stories in which different factions of the cognitive elite are battling over the shape of society behind the scenes, and the plot of the story concerns the protagonist learning this and having to choose sides between the secret factions, and there is a related tradition of stories about how the elite are fully justified in manipulating the common run of humanity.*  There is also a long tradition of SF stories which depict societies run by women; some of them depict such matriarchal societies as utopian, others as dystopian.  "The Rescued Girls of Refugee" is an addition to all these traditions that doesn't do anything particularly new or do anything particularly interesting, but isn't exactly bad.  It makes sense to interpret McCaffrey's story here as an anti-feminist story, but the fact that the leaders of the heterosexual society uses the same intrusive methods on the hapless girls as do the rulers of the authoritarian lesbian society adds a level of moral ambiguity--at least I think it does.    

Merely acceptable.  The style is not very good--the protagonist's dialogue sounds more like the overwritten purple prose of a professional genre writer than the speech of a confused girl talking to a fearsome commissar--but at least the story is short at eight pages.    

"The Rescued Girls of Refugee" reappeared in Elwood's 1976 anthology Visions of Tomorrow, and then never again.

*Many van Vogt works, Asimov's famous Hari Seldon stories, Heinlein's The Moon is a Harsh Mistress, and Sturgeon's "Slow Sculpture" are some prominent examples of SF productions that fit into either or both of these categories. 

"Matthew" by Pamela Sargent

I don't think I've ever read any fiction by Pamela Sargent.  "Matthew" has never been reprinted, so is perhaps not representative of her best work, but let's see; you never know, maybe I'll like it.

"Matthew" is a first-person narrative delivered by a guy living in the future who has a difficult family life.  This isn't one of those stories in which the author tells you the background setting of the story at the start, and then you get the plot in a straightforward chronological manner; rather, Sargent explains things gradually in dribs and drabs, out of order, so as you read it you are piecing it together.

In brief, our narrator lives in a world where most people don't have to work, because robots and computers do most everything--you just "dial" up you meals from a machine.  A few conservative types dial up the groceries and cook the food themselves, but they are considered retrograde weirdos.  This world is no utopia, though!  Due to a capital-P Plague in the past, few women are able to carry a baby successfully to term--births are so rare that they are news events broadcast on TV.  By the end of the story it is clear that population is in radical decline, there are fewer than 100,000 people in the whole world, and the computer network everybody relies on is breaking down because nobody has the knowhow to maintain and repair it, most people being decadents who spend their time using drugs and watching TV.

The narrator has a job filming births for the TV.  He had a sexy girlfriend, a Greek-American expert on Ancient Greece named Athena, and had a child with her, Matthew.  Matthew is a genius, but was born without hands.  When Athena was pregnant with Matthew, the narrator married his other sexy girlfriend, a volatile African-American woman with yellow eyes, Laura.  Laura is apparently unable to have a child, and is jealous of Athena and Matthew, whom the narrator goes to see every month or so.

Adults try to keep the truth about the terminal decline of the human population from children, but Matthew is a genius and has access to the computer network and all its records and has made friends over the network with other genius youngsters, and has figured it out.  He has also figured out that the Plague was likely engineered by somebody in authority in the Northern Hemisphere as a way to solve the overpopulation problem--he theorizes it was meant to just afflict Indians and Africans and Latin Americans but got out of hand.  

The narrator decides little Matthew needs psychiatric intervention to stop him from thinking these dark thoughts.  But before his appointment, Matthew turns up dead at the bottom of a cliff at the beach--did he commit suicide, or was it just an accident?

This story is pretty good.  The SF stuff works, and all the human drama works, Sargent successfully constructing characters who have believable personalities and act in a believable fashion and about whom we are interested and can even feel for.  I've read five stories from Ten Tomorrows so far and "Matthew" is the second best of them.  Maybe I should read more things by Sargent.  According to isfdb, she wrote a history of women characters in SF that is illustrated with paintings of naked women having sex--that sounds worthwhile.

[UPDATE MAY 8, 2022: isfdb says Firebrands: The Heroines of Science Fiction and Fantasy "Contains much erotic imagery and nudity;" I have acquired a copy of the book and I can assure you this simply means that many of the women in the paintings are baring their breasts or bottoms; there is no sexual activity depicted.  Also, I have to say that I don't think Ron Miller is very good at painting people or animals.] 

"The Defenseless Dead" by Larry Niven

This is one of Niven's Gil Hamilton stories; I don't think I've ever read any Gil Hamilton stories before, though I've read numerous things by Niven, before and during this blog's tenure.  After debuting here in Ten Tomorrows, "The Defenseless Dead" was reprinted in quite a few Niven collections, including in two different Italian editions of The Long ARM of Gil Hamilton.  "The Defenseless Dead" is pretty long, like fifty pages, so I'm hoping it is good.

Thankfully, "The Defenseless Dead" is moderately good, a SF story built on a classic model--a police detective story set in the future complete with a manly man protagonist who has a shootout with a criminal that is integrated with speculations on how high technology will affect politics and society.  The technology in question is medical technology, efficient organ transplants and the ability to cryogenically freeze people who are ill in hopes of reviving them in the future when their ailments can be cured.

(The Gil Hamilton stories are set in Niven's Known Space setting, and we have already read a little about this transplant business in another Known Space story, Niven's 1967 tale "The Jigsaw Man."

The Background: In the 22nd century, people's lifespans can be greatly extended by trivially easy replacement of their organs and body parts.  But there is a shortage of spare human parts.  One solution to this problem is passing laws mandating the death penalty for more and more crimes--people who get executed for making a mistake on their taxes or running a red light are a source of new body parts.  (This was the theme of "The Jigsaw Man.")  Another solution is the black market--criminals known as organleggers kidnap people and carefully kill them and cut them up and sell the parts.  Gil Hamilton is a cop with the united world government's federal police (the Amalgamated Regional Militia--ARM), he has psychic powers and he is working for the division of the feds' police force assigned to hunt down organleggers.  As the story begins the organleggers have been doing less work lately, as a law was recently passed that opened up a new source of body parts: people who had been frozen.

Some years ago, there was a youth craze that saw some daffy young people, even though they were healthy, getting themselves frozen with the idea that they would have the chance to wake up in the far future when life would be more interesting or more comfortable due to technological and societal advances.  People who wanted transplants saw these frozen healthy people as a source of new body parts.  Now, obviously, it costs money to keep people frozen, and some of these silly kids' estates, due to bad luck or incompetent management or whatever, had run out of money and could no longer pay to maintain the frozen kids.  In response to public demand, the government passed a law that allowed frozen people who could no longer pay the maintenance fees to be killed and their parts added to the organ banks.  This flood of legal parts onto the market meant the organleggers were largely out of business.

The Plot: As the story begins, the organ banks are again running low on supplies.  A new law is proposed that will allow people who were frozen because of mental illness to be killed and their healthy parts put into the organ banks.  One side effect of this law would be that the heirs of frozen people who are killed would inherit the money of their formerly frozen relatives, an incentive for them to not oppose passage of the law.  (Thus the title, "The Defenseless Dead.")  Will the organleggers oppose the law because it will again create competition for their illegally obtained spare parts?  Or can they turn the new law to their advantage by using their expert kidnapping skills to sieze and hold for ransom the new millionaires who will be created when frozen rich people are slain?

I won't summarize the somewhat complicated mystery plot, in which Gil Hamilton and his girlfriend are attacked by a laser armed organlegger for unknown reasons and then Hamilton and his police colleagues hunt for clues and interview people and have to see through disguises and all that, all the while taking into account how their actions might affect the upcoming vote on passage of the new law; I'll just say it is reasonably well handled, moderately interesting and entertaining.


**********

I can mildly recommend Sargent's and Niven's stories, and McCaffrey's isn't actually bad.  People into police procedural detective stories may like the Niven more than I did, and people who are fascinated by SF depictions of women-only or women-led societies, or SF stories which comment on homosexuality or feminism, might find McCaffrey's tale to be historically valuable.

We'll finish up Ten Tomorrows in the next thrilling episode of MPorcius Fiction Log, reading the included stories by David Gerrold, James Blish and Gardner R. Dozois. 

Saturday, December 14, 2013

Half Price Books' List of 100 SF Novels: 26-50

Here we have Part 2 of my look at Half Price Book's list of 100 Science Fiction and Fantasy novels, covering selections 26 to 50.  This idiosyncratic list was selected by 3,000 bibliomaniacs, or so says the Half Price Books website.


26) Eye of the World by Robert Jordan
I read the first volume of this series when it was new, and enjoyed it, but didn't pick up the second volume when it came out.  Perhaps for the best.

27) The Man in the High Castle by Philip K. Dick
I'm not really into alternate history or any of that, and I think stuff like the I Ching is ridiculous.  Still, if I was living in an alternate universe in which I had to read a Dick novel, it would probably be this one, as it is so highly regarded.  Also, the title is good poetry.

28) Robots of Dawn by Isaac Asimov
Is this the detective one in which the shock ending is that a woman had sex with a robot?  I read this as a kid, and was disappointed that there wasn't something more to it.

29) Elantris by Brandon Sanderson
What?

30) I Will Fear No Evil by Robert Heinlein
I'm a little surprised to see this on the list instead of Starship Troopers, which is so famous and controversial and includes the awesome and influential opening chapter in which the heavily armored human marine fights aliens with a hand flamer.

I read I Will Fear No Evil as a kid, and, looking back, I am surprised I finished it.  Presumably I was charmed by the idea of a friend in my head to keep me company, and I guess there must have been some sex in the book.  I do want to reread this one; I think Heinlein has a good writing style, and there is no way it could be as bad as Number of the Beast.

31) Faith of the Fallen by Terry Goodkind 
This is the Objectivist fantasy epic, right?  I'm sympathetic to Ayn Rand's individualistic philosophy, but I don't want to spend time reading a long book about it.  I haven't read any Ayn Rand's own novels, and I'm not going to read any of this guy's novels.  Those two page articles in Reason magazine about Rand are enough for me to get the gist of her thought and move on.

32) A Princess of Mars by Edgar Rice Burroughs    
This is one of my favorite books.  I love everything about it; Burroughs comes up with a very exciting, even beautiful, version of Mars, and his writing really brings it to life.  The fact that the book is so old, and written in an old-fashioned style, and espouses old-fashioned values (it is basically an apologia for 19th-century imperialism, isn't it?) makes it even more alien and perhaps paradoxically even more believable.  At the same time it is an over the top wish fulfillment fantasy: John Carter is immortal, the best swordsman in the solar system, and also scrupulously honest and decent.  He doesn't use his superior fighting ability to rob people and sleep around like Conan; he is faithful to his wife and tries to teach the people of Mars how to behave.  Somehow Burroughs makes it work and people like Ray Bradbury, Robert Heinlein, and Gene Wolfe have been singing Burroughs' praises ever since.

33) Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy by Douglas Adams
I read the four Hitchhiker books as a kid, and I enjoyed them, but I remember little now.  I might read these again.

34) Dragonsinger by Anne McCaffery
I read a bunch of these Pern books as a kid; I liked the idea of having a little friend dragon that would keep me company all the time.  Also, the idea of the Thread attacking the planet every century or whatever is exciting.  As an adult I tried to read Dragonflight, which I think is the first of these Pern books, and thought it was horrible and wrote a scathing review on Amazon. 

35) The Sword of Shannara by Terry Brooks
I loved the Elfstones of Shannara as a kid; it was like 300 pages of guys running around, fighting with swords and bows and magic fire.  I imagined that the Elfstones were like my light blue plastic D&D dice.  Then I read The Sword of Shannara, and I liked it, but I found the end disappointing, anti-climactic.  It was trying to teach you a lesson about telling the truth or something, which I found condescending.  I can still remember sitting in the car, riding home from Nana's in my Dad's car, reading by the dashboard light, finishing the book and thinking, "Is this really how it ends?  This is like a book for kids."  I got the Wishsong of Shannara as a gift, and started it, but the magical artifact wasn't as cool as the Ellfstones, I was older, and the story seemed repetitive, so I abandoned it.

I've been thinking of reading Elfstones again, but I'm afraid the same thing might happen as happened when I tried to read Dragonflight.

36) The Once and Future King by T. H. White
My mother gave me a paperback copy of this and it sat on my bookshelf for twenty odd years.  I don't know where it is now; maybe my brother has it.

37) Brave New World by Aldous Hiuxley
This is pretty good.

38) Foundation by Isaac Asimov  
I tried to read this as an adult; I read the first two or three stories, and then abandoned it.  Asimov's writing style was feeble.  Even worse was the plot: besides being outlandish (a guy can predict exactly what will happen hundreds of years in the future?) it is terrible drama.  (A guy teleporting to Mars and sword fighting everybody is outlandish but good drama.)  The stories consist of a guy sitting in a room, watching a movie of a dead guy telling him what to do; then he does it, all goes perfectly, the end.  There is no humanity, no feeling, no tension, it's as exciting as watching a guy order a burger at McDonalds' drive thru; wow, look, he ordered a quarter pounder and... he receives a quarter pounder! 

What is the ethic, the ideology of these stories?  That an elite of smart guys should manipulate the rest of us behind the scenes?  Sickening. Who does this appeal to?  Smart guys who want to manipulate other people?  I've heard that Paul Krugman and Newt Gingrich love Asimov's Foundation books, that they were inspired by the idea of using math to bend history and society in the direction they want it to go.  Horrible.

I remember, as a kid, reading an essay by Isaac Asimov.  I'd like to read it again, but of course I can't recall the title or where I saw it.  It must have been in an SF anthology or something.  Asimov was decrying stories in which a barbarian defeats a wizard.  Presumably he was referring to Conan.  I had never read such stories, they not being at the local library, and I remember thinking it odd that Asimov, who had like a dozen books at the local library, was attacking writers whose work I had never seen as if they were a ubiquitous plague.  Asimov thought it bad that the smart guy in the story was the villain, and the strong guy the hero, that this would teach people the wrong values or something.

Obviously, in the Foundation stories we see Asimov doing the opposite, giving us a story in which a smart guy tricks the strong guy.  In one of the stories I read in the first volume of the Foundation series the heroes win by selling to the villains a space battleship that they have sabotaged.  The villains are so stupid they don't realize the ship has been sabotaged and try to use it to conquer some planet or other, and of course are humiliated when their weapons don't work.  Maybe this is the wish fulfillment fantasy of a smart but weak kid, but to me, this is not drama.

Maybe it was not obvious to Asimov, but it seems obvious to me why stories of strong guys fighting hand to hand with enemies and monsters is appealing -- it is an allegory for our lives, which are a long lonely struggle which we are doomed to lose.  And it is obvious why people like the story of the ordinary man who defeats the smart man who has specialized knowledge.  In our everyday lives we are all at the mercy of people who are smarter than we are, or have knowledge we lack: lawyers, politicians, doctors, bankers, car mechanics, etc.  These people could use their specialized knowledge to take advantage of us, and sometimes they do.  And of course many people envy the wealth that clever people in our modern society can accumulate.  So of course people like the idea of the barbarian overcoming the crafty wizard.  Who would identify with a guy who sells another guy defective merchandise, a guy who wins by lying, by trickery? A lot of people, apparently, because we see Foundation on these lists all the time, but I don't get it.  

39) Northern Lights by Phillip Pullman
This is the guy who hates religion, right?  I'm an atheist already, so what would be the point of me reading this book?  Religion in the West has been in decline for centuries; is it fun to kick a man when he is already down? 

My brother read some of these His Dark Materials books, and said the early ones were good, but they got worse as more and more anti-religious stuff took over the page count.

40) Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? by Phillip K. Dick
This is the basis of the film Blade Runner, I believe.  I thought that movie was OK, but apparently it is common for people to praise it extravagantly.  Once I was sitting with two college professors, and one of them told the other that Blade Runner was the movie that best portrayed "the urban space," or some jargon like that.  I think they were talking about the movie Children of Men, which he had just seen and thought was Blade Runner's only competition for top spot in depicting what city life was all about.  I haven't seen Children of Men, and I haven't read Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep?, and I don't need to use the I Ching to tell me I am probably not going to do either.

41) Anathem by Neal Stephenson
This guy has a good reputation, but somehow his books always look like a slog, like a project, and self-consciously educational. Forbidding.

42) The Black Company by Glen Cook
I have read all ten of the Black Company books, and enjoyed and recommend the first four.  The first one, or maybe the "spin off," The Silver Spike, are the best.  As the series ground on it became slower paced and eventually tedious, but out of curiosity I read them all.

The Black Company are a bunch of ruthless jerk offs, a mercenary unit in a world dominated by warring evil wizards. In the first episode of the book the Black Company betrays and murders the people who have hired them because they realize they are on the losing side of a war. The cool thing about the first book is that Cook conceives of ten bizarre evil wizards, each one with a cool name, like The Hanged Man or Nightcrawler or The Howler, and each one has a weird deformity, strange mannerisms, and special powers.  I would have loved reading about these wizards and their insane adventures trying to conquer the world and each other.  Unfortunately, these wizards all get killed pretty quickly.

The books in the Black Company series are the record of the Company's career, written by the unit's annalist.  Early in the first book the Black Company is hired by a female wizard known as The Lady, the most ruthless, evil and powerful wizard in the world.  In a bizarre piece of foreshadowing, the annalist entertains the Black Company's troops by writing and reciting pornographic stories about his imaginary love affair with The Lady!  (This pornography is not reproduced in the book.  You can decide on your own if this makes the books more attractive or less attractive.)  Then, to my dismay, the Lady is overthrown and joins the Black Company and turns out not to be a bad person after all and the Black Company starts being the good guys.  With the Black Company now the good guys, the series loses much of what made it distinctive. 

The Silver Spike is a sort of noirish story of criminals who mess with an undead wizard or something like that; there are lots of plot twists and double crosses and so forth.  I liked it.

43 & 44) The Dragon Prince by Melanie Rawn and The Magic of Recluce by L.E. Modesitt Jr.
I saw these, but I didn't touch them.

45) Alice's Adventures in Wonderland by Lewis Carroll      
I haven't read this.  My wife read it some years ago.  I may read it someday. 

46) Legacy of Heorot by Larry Niven, Jerry Pournelle, and Steven Barnes
It took three guys to write this?

I read this when it was new, a million years ago.  As I remember, some guys try to explore or colonize a planet, and some monster attacks them.  This novel is an homage to "Beowulf;" the monster is called "a grendel."  I'm not exactly a fan of the whole "I'm going to rewrite Romeo and Juliet and put it in a New York slum," or "I'm going to write Moby Dick, but in outer space," or "I'm going to write a feminist version of the Trojan War," school of literature.  I guess everybody thinks they can do this because James Joyce did it.

I did like when Gilligan and the Professor put on their own production of Hamlet, though.

I guess I liked Legacy of Heorot, but was disappointed that there weren't more monsters or something else going on with the plot.  Or maybe Niven's, Pournelle's and/or Barnes's writing style wasn't doing it for me.  Still, I'd consider reading this again.

Niven and Pournelle aren't exactly master wordsmiths, but they seem like smart guys and Niven definitely has good ideas when it comes to setting.  I liked the setting of the two Integral Trees books, and Ringworld was alright, and Mote in God's Eye was pretty good.  I'm a little surprised Legacy of Heorot is here and not Mote.  I'd bet a million dollars Mote is more famous and sold more copies.

My rule of thumb, based on my career working at book stores and in academia, is that when more than one author is listed, the last person listed probably actually wrote the book.  So I'm guessing Steven Barnes did most of the work on Legacy of Heorot[UPDATE AUGUST 19, 2022:  As a helpful commenter pointed out, I mixed up John and Steven Barnes here.  Doh!]  I have two John Barnes books on my shelf, but I haven't read them yet.  I bought them because Orson Scott Card and Poul Anderson both compare Barnes to Heinlein.  I should make an effort to read them.

47) Dark is the Sun by Phillip Jose Farmer
I am surprised this is on here instead of To Your Scattered Bodies Go.  I have mixed feelings about Farmer, who tries to do adventure stories like, say, Edgar Rice Burroughs, but tries to make them more "modern" or sexy.  I've read several of Farmer's books, with To Your Scattered Bodies Go being good, Maker of Universes bad, and Dayworld and Dare average.  I might read Dark is the Sun if I stumble on it for a few dollars or at a library.  The cover looks like that of a solid adventure story, and my man Tarbandu at PorPor Books Blog praises it.


48) Off Armageddon Reef by David Weber
I've considered reading Weber, but never actually done it.  I am interested in military history (I have big piles of books about WWII tanks and planes and ships, books about Horatio Nelson and the Duke of Wellington, a stack of those Osprey books about medieval knights and WWII infantry tactics, etc.) and like the idea of space navies fighting vast wars, but the few times I've tried to read "military SF" I've been disappointed.  Heinlein's Starship Troopers, Haldeman's Forever War, and the Aubrey/Maturin books by Patrick O'Brian are good fiction about guys participating in wars because Heinlein, Haldeman and O'Brian are good writers, and their books are about more than just fighting, they are about politics, society, human relationships, etc.  I guess I'm worried that Weber's books will just be page after page of people shooting it out, and I have no idea if Weber is a good writer.  Perhaps I am doing him a disservice.

49) Dying Inside by Robert Silverberg
This is, in my opinion, Silverberg's best book, and the book of his I'd expect to see on a list like this, a book that is quite like a modern mainstream literary novel, about a smart guy living in a big city, trying to face life and its challenges and changes.  I think this is the kind of book a person who reads Nabokov and Saul Bellow, but looks down at science fiction, could enjoy.

50) Watch on the Rhine by John Ringo and Tom Kratman
Most of what I say about David Weber above could probably go for John Ringo.  This book, according to the synopsis on Wikipedia, seems kind of crazy, like it was deliberately written to piss people off.  Aliens attack the Earth, so the Earth raises the Waffen SS from the dead to fight them?  Cripes!   

***************

Tomorrow the saga of Half Price Books' list of 100 Science Fiction and Fantasy books will continue.