In T379615#10339580, @SuzanneWood-WMDE wrote:

A question I have is:
Should we add the additional info into all dumps/exports, or provide a checkbox to opt in to the additional data? The two considerations for this are:

• Backwards compatibility: from the above documentation it looks like adding a new field is fine so for this a checkbox wouldn't be necessary
• Impact on size of files/time to export - it would be good to check what this would be, both interally and externally

Thanks @Ifrahkhanyaree_WMDE and @karapayneWMDE.

Thanks, @Danny_Benjafield_WMDE and @SuzanneWood-WMDE. I've just asked the person who submitted the initial ticket what they want to use the Wikidata QIDs for. Hopefully, we will get a response soon.

Hi @Sylvain_WMFr, my team is investigating this ticket. We're curious about what types of editors create XML exports. Could you tell us what you would require the Wikidata QID for in your exports? Thank you.

Hi @SuzanneWood-WMDE, thanks for the questions, the example and the instructions. I was able to create my own XML files, and that was really helpful. I'm missing some info which might have already been discussed last week. Apologies if I'm repeating stuff. I have a few questions that might help me answer where the Wikidata ID should be placed and what it should be called. Some of the questions are UX-related, so we might not be able to get through all of them right now, I'll list them here as a starting point, and we can discuss them from a technical point of view.

Thanks for adding this to our project, @Lydia_Pintscher. We'll look into it and add some updates before the week runs out.

Thanks for adding this to our project, @Lydia_Pintscher. We'll look into it and add some updates before the week runs out.

Hey @seanleong-WMDE, I'm tagging the Product Platform team which could investigate the API issue during their planning meeting. Could you please briefly describe the API issue and let us know if it's the action API? Thank you

Next steps:

• Further investigations to see how we can improve TermLookup::getDescription and RevisionLookup::getFirstRevision and any other properties we can cache. It is possible that both functions already have cached values
• Look into tracking how much we can improve the article request time

hey @AndyRussG should we go ahead and close out the analytics tickets under the exploratory research project?

an FYI for anyone following this ticket. The Wikidata for Wikimedia projects team will be taking this over.

In T295356#10135181, @Ainali wrote:

Has this already been deployed? The project added by ReleaseTaggerBot, the roadmap and the Tech News suggests so, but my watchlist is still full of irrelevant changes.

Thank you @Strainu. We'll share some updates on our work on this soon :)

Hi @Strainu, We're looking into this ticket and trying to replicate the error, but we're having difficulty. Could you please share any useful information regarding this? Thanks a lot!

Thanks Katie <3

In T371796#10043749, @Dzahn wrote:

@Ifeatu_Nnaobi_WMDE Could you please send an email to Katie Francis and tell her your full name and that you want to sign an NDA for a WMDE employee? She will tell you more and once that process is done we can move forward here. Thanks!

In T371796#10041787, @Aklapper wrote:

@Ifeatu_Nnaobi_WMDE Hi, why is this task assigned to Fabfur?

Thanks :)

Thank you, I have sent the email requesting the NDA :)

Thanks for the ticket @WMDE-leszek. And thanks for the action @taavi I'm now in :)