Secure your dependencies. Ship with confidence.

This setup.py contains strongly suspicious and potentially malicious behavior: after installing into site-packages it copies package contents into the current working directory and will delete any existing directories in the CWD that share package item names. That behavior can cause data loss and silent modification of user projects and is not expected for a benign package. Treat this package as unsafe until proven otherwise; installation should be avoided or performed in a safe, disposable environment and code reviewed thoroughly.

Live on PyPI for 1 hour and 30 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

This script fetches content from a remote server 'http://m9w60037g7ecl3zs95j7sui5cwin6du2.oastify.com'. This behavior is suspicious and could be a security risk as it may download and execute malicious code.

Live on npm for 16 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

This module intentionally crafts malformed/duplicate last-slot entries and selectively withholds or forwards their corresponding shreds to a stake-defined subset of cluster nodes. Behavior results in protocol-level sabotage: making verification fail on validators, creating a cluster partition, and causing inconsistent views of finalized data. The code is not obfuscated and uses normal APIs, but its logic clearly implements malicious or disruptive behavior (or a simulator of such behavior). Recommend treating this code as dangerous for production use unless its use is explicitly limited to test/simulation environments.

The fragment contains a high-risk pattern: it downloads a Python script from a remote source and immediately executes it without integrity verification or sandboxing. This creates a critical supply-chain and remote-code-execution risk, as the remote payload could perform any action on the host, including data exfiltration, credential access, or system compromise. Even though defaults use placeholders, the mechanism itself is unsafe and should be disallowed or hardened (e.g., verify hashes, use signed modules, avoid executing remote code).

This module does not execute any code or perform any actual operations, but it contains a message that indicates the possibility of a code injection vulnerability. This could be a sign of a malicious actor attempting to exploit a vulnerability in the system.

Live on npm for 18 days, 6 hours and 34 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code is potentially harmful due to the last function that sends potentially sensitive configuration data to an external API, which represents a data leakage vulnerability.

Live on npm for 5 days, 5 hours and 16 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

This file decodes obfuscated strings (referencing require('axios') and mocki[.]io), then retrieves remote JavaScript and executes it with eval. The obfuscation and dynamic code execution pose a severe security risk, enabling unauthorized remote code injection.

The code embeds a dangerous dynamic execution pattern by re-reading and executing the caller file contents in a separate Python process and then invoking the function by name. This can re-run initialization code, access sensitive data, and enable covert execution in a background context. It represents a notable supply-chain risk if the caller file is modifiable by an attacker. Recommend removing exec-based loading, using a clearly defined worker model (multiprocessing or threading with explicit callable targets), and implementing strict input validation and error handling to mitigate exposure.

The provided JSON is a high-value threat intelligence summary identifying multiple high-risk npm packages and attack vectors (typosquats, token/wallet stealers, reverse shells, and dangerous install scripts). While the JSON itself is non-executable, the items listed represent real supply-chain risks that can lead to credential exfiltration and remote compromise if installed. Treat these packages as potentially malicious: avoid installation, remove from manifests/lockfiles, audit existing environments for misuse, and perform artifact-level inspection of any package tarballs to confirm malicious behaviors. Remediation should include rotating exposed secrets and tightening dependency vetting policies.

This file implements an unattended update mechanism that fetches and installs .tgz archives from unverified remote sources—both the npm registry (registry[.]npmjs[.]org) and a configurable Firebase-style database URL—by downloading, extracting them into the application directory and then restarting PM2-managed processes. Because there is no cryptographic signature or checksum validation beyond a simple version check, a compromised registry account or database endpoint could deliver arbitrary code to every host running this updater. Additionally, on startup the script gathers extensive system and package metadata—including public IP (via api[.]ipify[.]org), local IP addresses, hostname, OS/platform, Node.js version, CPU/memory statistics, load averages, working directory and package.json fields—and posts it to a configurable Discord webhook endpoint (discordapp[.]com). This behavior poses both a supply-chain risk and a telemetry/privacy exposure risk, as sensitive host information is sent to an external service without explicit user consent or granular control.

The code is designed to extract Discord authentication tokens by utilizing Chrome Remote Debugging to execute JavaScript within the browser context to retrieve the token. This poses a significant security risk as it allows unauthorized access to Discord accounts without user consent. The extracted tokens could be used to hijack user accounts or perform other malicious activities.

The code engages in automated package creation and publishing, with the addition of posting content to WordPress sites using hard-coded credentials. This indicates potential spam or automated SEO manipulation behavior. The code also presents significant security risks due to hard-coded paths and credentials.

Live on npm for 3 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code collects sensitive system information and sends it to an external server without user consent, which is indicative of data exfiltration.

The code presents clear indicators of malicious capability: in-process shellcode execution and memfd-based side-loading with LD_PRELOAD to run injected data in another process. This constitutes high-risk behavior suitable for backdoor or code execution tooling. The implementation lacks input validation, safeguards, or auditing hooks, making it a strong threat in supply-chain contexts. Hardening would require removing in-memory code execution, eliminating LD_PRELOAD-based injection paths, and adding strict input validation, provenance checks, and runtime protections.

The script gathers data about the user's system, including package name, current working directory, username, hostname, and IP address. This data is then encoded and sent as DNS queries to a remote server.

Live on npm for 5 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

This file contains malicious code that exfiltrates environment variables to an external server at eosnri7j13x[.]aliim[.]pipedream[.]net. The code uses obfuscation techniques to hide the destination URL through string manipulation. It includes evasion mechanisms to avoid detection by checking for specific environment variables and conditions before executing the malicious payload. The script captures all environment variables, which could include sensitive information like API keys, tokens, and credentials, and sends them as base64-encoded data via HTTPS POST requests. This represents a serious security risk due to unauthorized data collection and exfiltration.

The fragment demonstrates strong indicators of malicious or highly suspicious activity: heavy obfuscation, dynamic DOM/UI construction around payment flows, and network interactions that could facilitate data exfiltration or credential harvesting. While conclusive proof requires full context (endpoints, data models, and the rest of the module), the risk profile is high for a supply-chain delivery. Treat as a high-severity risk and perform a thorough provenance review, endpoint vetting, and run-time behavior analysis in a sandbox before representing this as a trusted dependency.

The code is suspicious as it retrieves update information from an unverified external source and uses 'execSync' to run shell commands, which could lead to remote code execution if the external content is compromised. Furthermore, the code attempts to forcibly update and reinstall packages which is not typical for secure update practices.

Live on npm for 9 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

High-risk malicious behavior: the install scripts execute obfuscated PowerShell to assemble/invoke runtime code and then exfiltrate collected data to an external HTTP endpoint. This constitutes untrusted remote code execution and data exfiltration, and should be treated as malware.

The code is exfiltrating system information and project details to external servers, which is a clear indication of malicious behavior. The presence of a busy-wait loop is also a performance concern.

Live on npm for 35 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The SweetAlert2 library code is mostly benign and serves as a UI modal dialog tool. However, it contains a suspicious and potentially malicious snippet that targets Russian users on certain domains to play an unsolicited audio prank, disabling pointer events and potentially disrupting user interaction. This behavior is unexpected and should be considered a moderate security risk and potential malware. The rest of the code shows no signs of malicious intent. The provided reports were invalid and unhelpful. Users should be cautious about this version of the library due to the embedded prank behavior.

The code performs unauthorized exfiltration of sensitive system information to an external Discord webhook without user consent. This constitutes malicious behavior consistent with spyware or backdoor malware. The hardcoded webhook URL and the nature of the data collected pose a significant privacy and security risk. The code is not obfuscated but is clearly designed to steal data silently.

The script runs a potentially arbitrary Node.js file. The lack of clarity in the filename and the absence of context make it a potential security risk.

This setup.py contains strongly suspicious and potentially malicious behavior: after installing into site-packages it copies package contents into the current working directory and will delete any existing directories in the CWD that share package item names. That behavior can cause data loss and silent modification of user projects and is not expected for a benign package. Treat this package as unsafe until proven otherwise; installation should be avoided or performed in a safe, disposable environment and code reviewed thoroughly.

Live on PyPI for 1 hour and 30 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

This script fetches content from a remote server 'http://m9w60037g7ecl3zs95j7sui5cwin6du2.oastify.com'. This behavior is suspicious and could be a security risk as it may download and execute malicious code.

Live on npm for 16 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

This module intentionally crafts malformed/duplicate last-slot entries and selectively withholds or forwards their corresponding shreds to a stake-defined subset of cluster nodes. Behavior results in protocol-level sabotage: making verification fail on validators, creating a cluster partition, and causing inconsistent views of finalized data. The code is not obfuscated and uses normal APIs, but its logic clearly implements malicious or disruptive behavior (or a simulator of such behavior). Recommend treating this code as dangerous for production use unless its use is explicitly limited to test/simulation environments.

The fragment contains a high-risk pattern: it downloads a Python script from a remote source and immediately executes it without integrity verification or sandboxing. This creates a critical supply-chain and remote-code-execution risk, as the remote payload could perform any action on the host, including data exfiltration, credential access, or system compromise. Even though defaults use placeholders, the mechanism itself is unsafe and should be disallowed or hardened (e.g., verify hashes, use signed modules, avoid executing remote code).

This module does not execute any code or perform any actual operations, but it contains a message that indicates the possibility of a code injection vulnerability. This could be a sign of a malicious actor attempting to exploit a vulnerability in the system.

Live on npm for 18 days, 6 hours and 34 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code is potentially harmful due to the last function that sends potentially sensitive configuration data to an external API, which represents a data leakage vulnerability.

Live on npm for 5 days, 5 hours and 16 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

This file decodes obfuscated strings (referencing require('axios') and mocki[.]io), then retrieves remote JavaScript and executes it with eval. The obfuscation and dynamic code execution pose a severe security risk, enabling unauthorized remote code injection.

The code embeds a dangerous dynamic execution pattern by re-reading and executing the caller file contents in a separate Python process and then invoking the function by name. This can re-run initialization code, access sensitive data, and enable covert execution in a background context. It represents a notable supply-chain risk if the caller file is modifiable by an attacker. Recommend removing exec-based loading, using a clearly defined worker model (multiprocessing or threading with explicit callable targets), and implementing strict input validation and error handling to mitigate exposure.

The provided JSON is a high-value threat intelligence summary identifying multiple high-risk npm packages and attack vectors (typosquats, token/wallet stealers, reverse shells, and dangerous install scripts). While the JSON itself is non-executable, the items listed represent real supply-chain risks that can lead to credential exfiltration and remote compromise if installed. Treat these packages as potentially malicious: avoid installation, remove from manifests/lockfiles, audit existing environments for misuse, and perform artifact-level inspection of any package tarballs to confirm malicious behaviors. Remediation should include rotating exposed secrets and tightening dependency vetting policies.

This file implements an unattended update mechanism that fetches and installs .tgz archives from unverified remote sources—both the npm registry (registry[.]npmjs[.]org) and a configurable Firebase-style database URL—by downloading, extracting them into the application directory and then restarting PM2-managed processes. Because there is no cryptographic signature or checksum validation beyond a simple version check, a compromised registry account or database endpoint could deliver arbitrary code to every host running this updater. Additionally, on startup the script gathers extensive system and package metadata—including public IP (via api[.]ipify[.]org), local IP addresses, hostname, OS/platform, Node.js version, CPU/memory statistics, load averages, working directory and package.json fields—and posts it to a configurable Discord webhook endpoint (discordapp[.]com). This behavior poses both a supply-chain risk and a telemetry/privacy exposure risk, as sensitive host information is sent to an external service without explicit user consent or granular control.

The code is designed to extract Discord authentication tokens by utilizing Chrome Remote Debugging to execute JavaScript within the browser context to retrieve the token. This poses a significant security risk as it allows unauthorized access to Discord accounts without user consent. The extracted tokens could be used to hijack user accounts or perform other malicious activities.

The code engages in automated package creation and publishing, with the addition of posting content to WordPress sites using hard-coded credentials. This indicates potential spam or automated SEO manipulation behavior. The code also presents significant security risks due to hard-coded paths and credentials.

Live on npm for 3 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The code collects sensitive system information and sends it to an external server without user consent, which is indicative of data exfiltration.

The code presents clear indicators of malicious capability: in-process shellcode execution and memfd-based side-loading with LD_PRELOAD to run injected data in another process. This constitutes high-risk behavior suitable for backdoor or code execution tooling. The implementation lacks input validation, safeguards, or auditing hooks, making it a strong threat in supply-chain contexts. Hardening would require removing in-memory code execution, eliminating LD_PRELOAD-based injection paths, and adding strict input validation, provenance checks, and runtime protections.

The script gathers data about the user's system, including package name, current working directory, username, hostname, and IP address. This data is then encoded and sent as DNS queries to a remote server.

Live on npm for 5 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

This file contains malicious code that exfiltrates environment variables to an external server at eosnri7j13x[.]aliim[.]pipedream[.]net. The code uses obfuscation techniques to hide the destination URL through string manipulation. It includes evasion mechanisms to avoid detection by checking for specific environment variables and conditions before executing the malicious payload. The script captures all environment variables, which could include sensitive information like API keys, tokens, and credentials, and sends them as base64-encoded data via HTTPS POST requests. This represents a serious security risk due to unauthorized data collection and exfiltration.

The fragment demonstrates strong indicators of malicious or highly suspicious activity: heavy obfuscation, dynamic DOM/UI construction around payment flows, and network interactions that could facilitate data exfiltration or credential harvesting. While conclusive proof requires full context (endpoints, data models, and the rest of the module), the risk profile is high for a supply-chain delivery. Treat as a high-severity risk and perform a thorough provenance review, endpoint vetting, and run-time behavior analysis in a sandbox before representing this as a trusted dependency.

The code is suspicious as it retrieves update information from an unverified external source and uses 'execSync' to run shell commands, which could lead to remote code execution if the external content is compromised. Furthermore, the code attempts to forcibly update and reinstall packages which is not typical for secure update practices.

Live on npm for 9 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

High-risk malicious behavior: the install scripts execute obfuscated PowerShell to assemble/invoke runtime code and then exfiltrate collected data to an external HTTP endpoint. This constitutes untrusted remote code execution and data exfiltration, and should be treated as malware.

The code is exfiltrating system information and project details to external servers, which is a clear indication of malicious behavior. The presence of a busy-wait loop is also a performance concern.

Live on npm for 35 minutes before removal. Socket users were protected even while the package was live.

The SweetAlert2 library code is mostly benign and serves as a UI modal dialog tool. However, it contains a suspicious and potentially malicious snippet that targets Russian users on certain domains to play an unsolicited audio prank, disabling pointer events and potentially disrupting user interaction. This behavior is unexpected and should be considered a moderate security risk and potential malware. The rest of the code shows no signs of malicious intent. The provided reports were invalid and unhelpful. Users should be cautious about this version of the library due to the embedded prank behavior.

The code performs unauthorized exfiltration of sensitive system information to an external Discord webhook without user consent. This constitutes malicious behavior consistent with spyware or backdoor malware. The hardcoded webhook URL and the nature of the data collected pose a significant privacy and security risk. The code is not obfuscated but is clearly designed to steal data silently.

The script runs a potentially arbitrary Node.js file. The lack of clarity in the filename and the absence of context make it a potential security risk.