Menu

Code Merge Request #2: Update license notices (rejected)

Merging...

Merged

Something went wrong. Please, merge manually

Checking if merge is possible...

Something went wrong. Please, merge manually

Boris Pek wants to merge 1 commit from /u/tehnick/dcplusplus/ to default, 2019-09-17

Commit Date  
[996adf] (defaulttip) by Boris Pek Boris Pek

Update license notices

See: https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-howto.en.html

2019-03-23 21:02:19 Tree

Discussion

  • poy

    poy - 2019-03-26

    thanks for the change - however I think this has been revised in GPL 3 but not GPL 2. https://www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-2.0.html still shows the older postal-address version at the bottom; I'd rather keep that version for now until we move to GPL 3.

    unless lawyers who would know better can confirm the website-address version also works for GPL 2? :)

     
    • Boris Pek

      Boris Pek - 2019-03-26

      1) Have you looked at proposed changes? All versions of GPL are available at https://www.gnu.org/licenses/
      2) This is just license notes, but not the license itself. Have you read why they are needed at all?
      3) And the final shot: current "postal-address" in your sources is invalid: FSF have moved from "59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307, USA." to "51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA." very long time ago...

       
    • Boris Pek

      Boris Pek - 2019-03-26

      unless lawyers who would know better can confirm the website-address version also works for GPL 2? :)

      Why do you need a lawyers opinion if article at page https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-howto.en.html exlicitly say:

      To use a different set of GPL versions, you would modify the end of the first long paragraph. For instance, to license under version 2 or later, you would replace 3 with 2”.
      
       
  • Boris Pek

    Boris Pek - 2019-03-26

    And I didn't even mention that:

    • Paper correspondence for such issues in 2019 is absolute nonsense.
    • Other projects under GPLv2 license already use proposed above license notices during long time and I have not heard about any issues with this.
     

    Last edit: Boris Pek 2019-03-26
  • Boris Pek

    Boris Pek - 2019-04-03

    Please merge or reject this MR.

     
  • Boris Pek

    Boris Pek - 2019-04-13

    Ping?

     
  • Boris Pek

    Boris Pek - 2019-05-04

    Ping?

     
  • Boris Pek

    Boris Pek - 2019-05-11

    Mercurial is extremely inconvenient and intransparent software. Please merge or reject this MR, so I will be able to propose other changes.

    Or do you reject changes from exterior developers at all? This would explain the amount of DC++ forks...

     
  • Boris Pek

    Boris Pek - 2019-09-17
    • Status: open --> rejected
     

Log in to post a comment.

Want the latest updates on software, tech news, and AI?
Get latest updates about software, tech news, and AI from SourceForge directly in your inbox once a month.