"So Carnehan weeds out the pick of his men, and sets the two of the Army to show them drill and at the end of two weeks the men can manoeuvre about as well as Volunteers. So he marches with the Chief to a great big plain on the top of a mountain, and the Chiefs men rushes into a village and takes it; we three Martinis firing into the brown of the enemy".
Kipling "The Man Who Would Be King"
Yapton Beer Festival come and gone again - another year gone..! ππ»
Picture courtesy http://devoursussex.co.uk |
The sun shone, the beer flowed again, and Yapton worked it's usual magic and we got mildly sun burnt and enjoyed some decent (but not outstanding) ales... another small turnout from the jolly boys (the bunch I go drinking with) this year, a feeling I think that beer festivals for them may have had their day?
Beers were still cheap - I think in 2019 we were paying £1.70/ £1.90 a half and this year it was £2/2.10, but still excellent value. Unfortunately I thought the choice of beer was down this year (again) so that may be the price for that cheapness.
So why the apathy? I think the beer drinking culture in the UK has changed significantly since we first started going to festivals (and we've been going to this one for 20+ years) - put bluntly I think CAMRA (the Campaign for Real Ale pressure group) has achieved their aim, and there are now micro pubs (some brewing on premises) and real ale pubs in every town and city, and we are now spoilt for choice.
An example, one of the pubs I go to in Portsmouth ("The Hole in the Wall" in Southsea) has just put on tap it's 170th different ale this year - their target for the end of the year is 500 different ales served. They charge the same price per pint as were paying at the festival. The rest of the guys I think look at that, then the fact it's local and easy to get to, that they can save the ticket price and then put it over the bar there instead.. π
Anyway - what did I drink?
- Roosters Brewing Company - "Pangea" - 5.2%
- "A fusion of three styles of IPA (Traditional English, West Coast & New England), brewed using British, Australian, NZ and US hops, as well as being co-fermented with West Coast & New England yeast strains. The beer pours with the clarity of a classic IPA, while displaying the juiciness associated with the New England style".
- Poor choice for a first beer - too strong - but in my defence I didn't have my glasses on and had just arrived hot and thirsty and this was a free half included in the ticket price.. π It was OK but not outstanding
- Goldmark - "Citra Smash" - 4.3%
- "Single Hop and Single Malt pale ale classic, generously dry hopped with Yakima Valley Citra hops".
- Drinkable but again not outstanding
- Langham Brewery - "Victory Ale" – 4.5%
- "Offering floral notes intertwined with light fruity esters from the English yeast, this beauty has a pleasing amber colour and a slight citrus palate, overlaying a light biscuit-malt back bone, and a more-ish bittersweet finish".
- Now I'd had a couple of pints of this in the pub earlier in the week, and in the face of pages and pages of brewers in the programme I had not heard of (and if I don't know the beer I go with the brewer as that is usually the safe bet) I seized upon this as a life belt in a stormy sea.. and then proceeded to drink it for the rest of the festival.. an above average pint definitely
"[Item #]76. With a view to secure Portsmouth from capture by land, lines of defence have been constructed at different times during the last two centuries; those immediately covering the dockyard and town were commenced in the reign of James II., and were continued at intervals until near the end of the last century, when the works at Portsea were completed. The earthworks and wet ditch on the Gosport side, enclosing the victual- ling yard, were constructed about the year 1678, and were extended to Priddy's Hard [we've been there - clicky] about 1790.
These lines have long been considered a most inefficient protection, not only on account of the limited space enclosed by them, and the obstruction caused by the spread of buildings round them: but also on account of their having no influence whatever in protecting the naval establishments and harbour from bombardment.We are nevertheless of opinion, that as these works exist, they ought to be maintained in a state of efficiency, to protect the naval establishment [so they were already thinking of maintaining the Dockyard defensive walls only, as there's no mention of 'town'] from capture in the event of an enemy forcing a landing in their immediate neighbourhood ; and we recommend that the right of the Portsea Lines, which is now open, should be closed by being joined to the left of the Town Mount Bastion of the Portsmouth Lines [in other words they were advising a continuation of the walls at Hilsea Lines all the way down the west side of the harbour to join up with those that already existed - suffice to say this was never done], and that when this is done, all the fortifications from that bastion round to King James's Gate should be removed [ and there's the confirmation - see map]. This would add considerably to the strength of the lines, and the expense would be insignificant as compared with the value of the land, above 37 acres, which would thus be enclosed by the fortifications and rendered available for the exten-sion of the Government establishments".
..from the Royal Commission Report of 1860.. my highlights.. interesting, eh?
- Royal Commission on the Defence of the United Kingdom - Wikipedia
- Palmerston Forts Society - a scanned copy of the actual report
Laters, as the young people are want to say...