The truthful way to draw...
I was going to title this "the right way to draw", but it's not really. I was thinking about how sometimes I come across pictures where the anatomy is just off, but it looks like the artist really does know what they're doing. I'm always puzzled by these - at Wondercon I saw this huge poster of a guy riding a horse, and one of the joints on the horse's front leg (only ONE leg, the other was perfectly fine) was backwards. Its wrist/knee had turned into another elbow, or a hock or something.
It was just so weird and jarring - the rest of the horse looked like the artist knew how to draw it. The other front LEG looked right. What had happened? Did he have reference for the rest of the pose, but not that leg? Did he just have a brainfart? Did someone else dislike how his pose looked and fix/maul it themselves?
And that got me thinking. I noticed it immediately because I've been drawing horses forever, and have always tried to learn more about how they're built, how they move, etc. So I guess when a horse is drawn weird, it really jumps out at me - because I know the shapes so intimately. I may not be able to always get it right in my own drawings, but I can tell when it's weird.
But I wonder, can people who don't pay attention to horses tell if it's drawn weird? Something like putting knees instead of hocks on the back legs, that's probably immediately noticeable by anyone. Or is it? I read misspelled words all the time, just skimming over them and not realizing until maybe the third time I read it that it's spelled "thrid" instead of "third" - I understand what it's supposed to be, given the context, and I don't pay any attention to the mistake.
Do non-artists (and artists, too, I guess) scan images like that? Identify the elements that say "horse" to them, and not notice the rest?
Just thoughts. AND NO PICTURE... oh noes.
It was just so weird and jarring - the rest of the horse looked like the artist knew how to draw it. The other front LEG looked right. What had happened? Did he have reference for the rest of the pose, but not that leg? Did he just have a brainfart? Did someone else dislike how his pose looked and fix/maul it themselves?
And that got me thinking. I noticed it immediately because I've been drawing horses forever, and have always tried to learn more about how they're built, how they move, etc. So I guess when a horse is drawn weird, it really jumps out at me - because I know the shapes so intimately. I may not be able to always get it right in my own drawings, but I can tell when it's weird.
But I wonder, can people who don't pay attention to horses tell if it's drawn weird? Something like putting knees instead of hocks on the back legs, that's probably immediately noticeable by anyone. Or is it? I read misspelled words all the time, just skimming over them and not realizing until maybe the third time I read it that it's spelled "thrid" instead of "third" - I understand what it's supposed to be, given the context, and I don't pay any attention to the mistake.
Do non-artists (and artists, too, I guess) scan images like that? Identify the elements that say "horse" to them, and not notice the rest?
Just thoughts. AND NO PICTURE... oh noes.