With my
most recent reading experience, Joan Morgan's Citizen of Westminster (1940), I have certainly journeyed back to
the enjoyable realms of the most obscure books and authors of my time
period. Cinema fans who pride themselves
on arcane knowledge of that art might be familiar with the name Joan Morgan
(see her Guardian obituary)—either because of her own
silent movie career in the early days of British cinema, or because of her
second novel, Camera!, published the
same year as this one and described by ODNB
as "the most affectionate—and the most accurate—account of film-making in
Britain in the early days." But
even many of those fans will not have ventured any deeper into Morgan's
literary output. That I did really stems
from our wonderful vacation in and around London a couple of years ago.
Our very own snapshot of the entrance to Dolphin Square |
On the
recommendation of my then-boss, who had stayed there the previous year, Andy
and I spent our two weeks enjoying the charms of Dolphin Square, which these days
rents apartments for short-term visitors as well as long-term homes for
permanent residents. We felt that we
were in the lap of luxury, and were in awe of the size and all-round attractiveness of the
complex, but we had no idea that we were staying in a historic landmark. Least of all did I realize that several of the women who would eventually make it to my then-unfathomed
Overwhelming List had once lived there.
If I had, I might have spent much time trying to maneuver my way into a
tourist pic fawningly stroking the outside of Radclyffe Hall's apartment door,
so perhaps it's just as well.
Apart
from Hall, a bevy of other famous people have lived at Dolphin Square over the
years, including dozens of MPs (among them Ellen Wilkinson, who is on my list
for her two novels), Princess Anne, actor Peter Finch, the scandalous Christine
Keeler, British Intelligence figure Maxwell Knight, and—perhaps most notorious
of all—William Joyce, who was later known as Lord Haw-Haw and was executed for
treason after World War II. They could
make a fortune offering guided tours to dim-witted tourists (like me, no
doubt)! One wonders if the current
residents of Princess Anne's or Lord Haw-Haw's previous abodes are aware of the
previous tenants?
Not the best photograph by yours truly, but it gives an idea of the scope of the garden and the entire complex (as see from our living room) |
Even
more interesting to me than all of those residents, however, is a much lesser-known
figure from my list—romance novelist Ida Cook, who, along with her sister
Louise, must have livened things up at Dolphin Square in the late 1930s and
after. The two spinster sisters spent
several years rescuing German Jews from pre-war Germany, and their techniques
and experiences would surely make a brilliant film. The following is from Ida's ODNB entry:
Under cover of their international
reputation as eccentric spinster-sister opera fanatics willing to go anywhere
to hear a favourite singer, … the Cooks made repeated trips to Germany from the
mid-1930s until the outbreak of war between Britain and Germany in 1939. Under
the pretext of going to the opera the sisters would arrive in Germany,
interview Jews desperate to emigrate, attend a performance, and return to
Britain with jewellery and other valuables hidden on their persons or in their
luggage. The valuables, property of the would-be emigrés, served as immigration
guarantees for the British government, which accepted few immigrants who could
not guarantee their financial security—a virtual impossibility for German Jews,
forbidden by law to leave Germany with their money. Unlikely smugglers, the
mild-mannered sisters were endlessly inventive in their strategies of evasion.
Once, entrusted with a diamond brooch, they pinned it to a cheap jumper and
walked through customs unmolested. Before smuggling out furs they replaced the
German labels with labels from London stores. With these precautions, and by
themselves engaging in a little theatricality, putting on their nervous British
spinster act, the sisters managed, despite great risk to themselves, to help
twenty-nine persons escape from almost certain death.
The article goes on to mention this little tidbit: "The
Cook sisters kept a flat in Dolphin Square, London, where they housed refugees
during the war and later fĂȘted such opera stars as Callas and Gobbi." Who knows?
Perhaps Maria Callas graced the very hallway in which Andy and I
stayed—or the very apartment, for that matter!
Wikipedia will give you
a taste of Dolphin Square's history, and this
article mentions some of the darker happenings there, including Lord
Haw-Haw's residency. The fantastic
garden in the middle of the complex is discussed here,
and I was interested in this Independent article on the recent death of an MP
and the rather surprising isolation of life at Dolphin Square. And the Telegraph reported a few years back on the
changes wrought by the sale of the complex to American developers (damned
Yanks!).
All of which provided me with some quite interesting
background for my growing interest. But
then I discovered that there is actually a new book which will surely scratch
my itch quite thoroughly. I will
certainly need to track down a copy of Terry Gorvish's book, Dolphin
Square: The History of a Unique Building. What fun!
And what a strange coincidence, really, since all of my
interest stemmed from just happening to proceed with an interlibrary loan
request I'd been intending to make for at least a years. My
digression about Dolphin Square may have seemed to have completely derailed any
discussion of Joan Morgan's novel. But then,
you see, Joan Morgan's novel is actually as obsessed with Dolphin Square as I
am.
The
first half or so of Morgan's book hardly qualifies as a novel at all. The characters, as such, are the builders of
the original house on the site and, later, the builders of the unprecedentedly
ambitious Dolphin Square—none of which are provided with much in the way of
character development. Unlike such
better-known works as Norah Lofts' The
Town House, which takes as its focus the entire history of a single house, Citizen of Westminster has the unique
quality of taking as its main character the site itself. Morgan begins her tale well back in history,
with Canute and the Romans and the arrival of Roger Borlase in the 1500s to
build Borlase House. But she quickly
wends her way to World War I and the rapid rise of a family of builders, the
Challoners. Another generation on, when the current Borlase heir, also named Roger, decides to lighten his load and
sell the estate, the Challoners are wealthy enough to acquire it, and their
radical dream of building the largest apartment complex in Europe begins to
come to fruition.
The
Challoners, Roger Borlase, other builders and investers and employees of the
project—these are the main characters of the novel. But they take a definite back seat to
Morgan's loving descriptions of the site and the construction process, as well
as the changes being wrought in London more generally:
Where a few shops or a row of slum cottages or a warehouse had
stood before, great blocks of flats were rising up all through Kensington and
Chelsea and Bayswater, and in the suburbs and Earl's Court houses that had, in
Edwardian days, accommodated one family now housed six.
Particularly
fascinating to me were the detailed descriptions Morgan provides of the designs
of the three different types of flats offered in "Borlase House," the
fictional alter-ego of Dolphin Square:
The firm which had contracted to furnish the flats had shown
great ingenuity in the bachelor one, and Charlie and Willie found a
safety-valve for their pent-up feelings in boisterous fun with a couch that
became a bed, a writing-desk that became a dressing-table and a table that
became nothing at all. The flat was a cheery young affair of shiny white walls
and a navy-blue carpet spattered with anchors. The buttercup-yellow kitchen resembled
a control-room at Broadcasting House with its battery of knobs and switches.
The bathroom, entirely made of green glass tiles, was of the type
labelled" de Mille" in 1927 and" standard" ten years later.
"Enough to make any girl leave home," Willie grinned.
The three-room family flat was designed to demonstrate the
fallacy of the idea that a flat cannot also be a home. Persian rugs were strewn
casually about, small pieces of Queen Anne furniture cropped up at unexpected
moments with here a petit-point pole screen and there an old lacquer work-box
to give an air of family friends and fluttering curtains and freshness.
In the super-flat the decorators had been given their head.
Each room expressed someone's theory.
There was a white room, a satin room, a gold room and an
under-sea room. Shadows of fish floated behind glass walls, stars spattered
ceilings and stiff pink satin was dimpled with buttons on couches and in
alcoves to form what Charlie called the Padded Cell.
When
Morgan sums up the tenants swarming into the newly-completed complex,
presumably she is being a bit self-referential in her inclusion of ex-film
stars:
Week in, week out they arrived, the tenants. The Peers and the
journalists and the bankers and the novelists and the barristers and the M.P.s,
the ex-film stars and the ex-cabinet ministers, the Tories and the Pinks, the
pro-Germans and the anti-Fascists and the anti-Reds, the yachtsmen and the
airwomen and the Old Blues and the great mass of opinionated and unopinionated,
reckless, law-abiding, wealthy, solvent and insolvent citizens who were to fill
the cells of the hive and save Sir Charles Challoner's reason.
Having
read the first half of Citizen, I was
convinced it was a perfect choice for my independent (well, independent of
reality, anyway) Furrowed Middlebrow Books imprints. I thought it would be a fringe choice, but
one which would appeal to anyone who, like me, had an interest in the history
of London.
Joan Morgan in her cinematic days |
Then
came the second half.
Oh, how painful it is to watch quietly while a novel which has seemed quite promising not only goes off the rails but seems to absolutely fling itself, gleefully and wholeheartedly, from the rails. This was Morgan's debut novel, so certainly some roughness around the edges could be forgiven. But after such an interesting, if unusual, beginning, she doesn't seem to have had a clue what to do once her favorite character—the building itself—is completed. She flails about a bit, but ultimately chooses to steer the novel down the path of rather tawdry and distinctly tedious romantic melodrama. Just a couple of samples, both having to do with Roger Borlase's widowed mother—terrible, superficial, oft-married, and never developed as a character beyond a sketched-in narcissistic selfishness—might make this clear:
Oh, how painful it is to watch quietly while a novel which has seemed quite promising not only goes off the rails but seems to absolutely fling itself, gleefully and wholeheartedly, from the rails. This was Morgan's debut novel, so certainly some roughness around the edges could be forgiven. But after such an interesting, if unusual, beginning, she doesn't seem to have had a clue what to do once her favorite character—the building itself—is completed. She flails about a bit, but ultimately chooses to steer the novel down the path of rather tawdry and distinctly tedious romantic melodrama. Just a couple of samples, both having to do with Roger Borlase's widowed mother—terrible, superficial, oft-married, and never developed as a character beyond a sketched-in narcissistic selfishness—might make this clear:
As Roger picked up the phone to make arrangements for
Adriaan's luggage to be collected at Victoria, he caught sight of his mother's
face.
Pamela's eyes were on Adriaan. Roger knew that look in women's
eyes, knew it and was sickened by its helpless, hopeless betrayal. A shuddering
little mongrel begging its master to kick it or pat it, but at least to notice
it…
And
later, feeling the threat of her love interest looking elsewhere:
Suddenly her heart went back on her and a black mist of terror
hung in front of her eyes.
Youth. Prudence was one young girl. There were other young
girls. She had seen Adriaan's walk, the swing of his lithe body as he crossed to
the girl. She saw it still in fear, saw it in all its animal grace. His body
haunted her. There had never been anything like this before with all the men
she had known. Her mind revolved through the months around the apex of his
body, his golden skin and the muscles of his back and the way his head was
poised on his shoulders.
Oh,
dear. It hard to imagine what audience
Morgan hoped to attract with this novel.
Surely any shopgirl readers of romance novels—who might have quite
enjoyed the second half—would have stopped reading long before they had waded through
the long, detailed descriptions of a building's construction. And those intrigued by the building itself
and by its place in London history would surely, like me, have at least been
tempted to toss the book aside when they reached its tepidly torrid second
half. What to make of it all?
But
despite the contempt I could heap (and, I suppose, have heaped, a bit) on the second half of Morgan's novel, I'm actually
glad that I finally made the long-delayed interlibrary loan request and read
it. As a novel, it's faulty to say the
least, but as an excursion into London's past and the building of one of its
landmarks, it's really quite worthwhile.
By the
way, the novel ends with a powerful Thames flood, supposed to have taken place
in 1938, just as war is looming over Dolphin Square. I'm assuming that this is fictional, or at
least greatly exaggerated, as Google seems to know nothing about significant
flooding in London during 1938. 1928,
yes, and of course 1953 offers many water-logged horror stories. But searching for 1938 brings up nothing. Am I wrong in assuming that Morgan made up
this flood to add a bit more melodramatic flare to a novel that had veered out
of control?