https://www.closeuphotography.com/50-dollar-componon-vs-mitutoyo-objective
What if you could find a lens for less than $100 that could produce image quality as good as a microscope objective
3Dprinting (173) A.I. (694) animation (337) blender (195) colour (229) commercials (47) composition (150) cool (359) design (629) Featured (68) hardware (304) IOS (109) jokes (134) lighting (280) modeling (118) music (183) photogrammetry (175) photography (749) production (1245) python (85) quotes (485) reference (309) software (1321) trailers (295) ves (530) VR (219)
https://www.closeuphotography.com/50-dollar-componon-vs-mitutoyo-objective
What if you could find a lens for less than $100 that could produce image quality as good as a microscope objective
https://gilwizen.com/laowa-25mm-ultra-macro-lens-review/
https://www.cameralabs.com/laowa-25mm-f2-8-2-5-5x-ultra-macro-review/
Combining a Laowa 25mm 2.5x lens with a Kenko 12mm extension tube
To find the combined magnification when using a Laowa 25mm 2.5x lens with a 12mm Kenko extension tube, given the magnification of the lens itself, the extension tube length, and the combined setup, you can calculate the total magnification.
First, consider the magnification of the lens itself, which is 2.5x.
Then, to find the total magnification when the extension tube is attached, you can use the formula:
Total Magnification = Magnification of the Lens + (Magnification of the Lens * Extension Tube Length / Focal Length of the Lens)
In this case, the extension tube length is 12mm, and the focal length of the lens is 25mm. Using the values:
Total Magnification with 2.5x = 2.5 + (2.5 * 12 / 25) = 2.5 + (30 / 25) = 2.5 + 1.2 = 3.7x
Total Magnification with 5x = 5 + (5 * 12 / 25) = 5 + (60 / 25) = 5 + 2.4 = 7.4x
https://visualeducation.com/macro-probe-lens-comparison-astrhori-28mm-vs-laowa-24mm/
https://petapixel.com/2022/11/01/astrhori-has-a-28mm-macro-probe-lens-that-looks-a-lot-like-laowas/
Overall, the Laowa did perform better than the AstrHori across all of our tests. The AstrHori lost contrast and suffered from flare when the subject was backlit. It also struggled to achieve perfect neutrality in terms of colour balance.
However, as mentioned above, the cost difference between these two lenses is significant. Considering that it costs less than half as much as the Laowa, the AstrHori is an impressive macro probe lens for the price.
www.heliconsoft.com/heliconsoft-products/helicon-3d-viewer/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LiwxPsOGQOY (more…)
The main question being: Is it better to use a macro rail or is it better to vary the focus of the lens?
A scanning electron microscope image of spider silk glands making a thread originally from Dennis Kunkel Microscopy.
The average interocular of humans is considered to be about 65mm (2.5 inches.) When this same distance is used as the interaxial distance between two shooting cameras then the resulting stereoscopic effect is typically known as “Ortho-stereo.” Many stereographers choose 2.5” as a stereo-base for this reason.
If the interaxial distance used to shoot is smaller than 2.5 inches then you are shooting “Hypo-stereo.” This technique is common for theatrically released films to accommodate the effects of the big screen. It is also used for macro stereoscopic photography.
Hyper-stereo refers to interaxial distances greater than 2.5 inches. As I mentioned earlier the greater the interaxial separation, the greater the depth effect. An elephant can perceive much more depth than a human, and a human can perceive more depth than a mouse.
However, using this same analogy, the mouse can get close and peer inside the petals of a flower with very good depth perception, and the human will just go “cross-eyed.” Therefore decreasing the interaxial separation between two cameras to 1” or less will allow you to shoot amazing macro stereo-photos and separating the cameras to several feet apart will allow great depth on mountain ranges, city skylines and other vistas.
The trouble with using hyper-stereo is that scenes with gigantic objects in real-life may appear as small models. This phenomenon is known as dwarfism and we perceive it this way because the exaggerated separation between the taking lenses allows us to see around big objects much more that we do in the real world. Our brain interprets this as meaning the object must be small.
The opposite happens with hypo-stereo, where normal sized objects appear gigantic. (Gigantism.)
http://dashwood3d.com/blog/beginners-guide-to-shooting-stereoscopic-3d/index.html
http://3d-con.com/2014/files/NSA2014-MACRO1.pdf
http://nzphoto.tripod.com/stereo/macrostereo/macro3dwindows.htm
COLLECTIONS
| Featured AI
| Design And Composition
| Explore posts
POPULAR SEARCHES
unreal | pipeline | virtual production | free | learn | photoshop | 360 | macro | google | nvidia | resolution | open source | hdri | real-time | photography basics | nuke
FEATURED POSTS
Social Links
DISCLAIMER – Links and images on this website may be protected by the respective owners’ copyright. All data submitted by users through this site shall be treated as freely available to share.