Welcome to the Online Archive of the Old PublicEye.Org WebsiteIf You Are Looking for the Current Website for Political Research Associates, Please Click HerePlease remember that this is an archive of an older website for researchers, and it is not being updated. |
EditorialThe same First Amendment that guarantees separation of church and state guarantees the rights of Christian conservatives to defend their views in the public square, and to seek redress of grievances through a variety of political and social channels. In recent months, however, there have been indications that some in the leadership of the Democratic Party, and some of its candidates for public office, are seeking the votes of Christian conservatives by suggesting there is room to compromise on reproductive rights and gay rights. While public debates over social issues are a sign of a healthy democracy; it is not proper for politicians to negotiate away basic human rights for any group of people in the United States. | Andy Singer/caglecartoons.com |
The problem is not "abortion" or "reducing the number of abortions." The problem is unwanted pregnancies, how to prevent them, and how to support women who get pregnant in the decisions they deem appropriate. This includes access to legal and safe contraception and abortion; as well as access to health care and child care for women who choose to give birth and raise children - concepts seen as fundamental rights in other industrialized countries. Our rights, and the rights of our friends, relatives, and neighbors who are women, are not political commodities to be traded for votes.
The problem is not "gay rights" or "gay marriage." The problem is building a society where the basic human rights of all people are respected and defended. Under the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights, there is no such thing as "Special Rights." When some Christian conservatives claim that gay people want "Special Rights," it is a falsehood. Our rights, and the rights of our friends, relatives, and neighbors in LGBTQ communities, are not political commodities to be traded for votes.
Many of us intend to vote in the upcoming elections in 2008, and we intend to vote for candidates who make it crystal clear that they support basic human rights for all. At the same time, we will continue to build broad and diverse coalitions seeking fundamental progressive social change. As we rebuild our progressive social movement, we will pay special attention to politicians who have through words or actions objectively undermined basic human rights for women, the LGBTQ communities, or any other group in our society.
Fall 2007
Vol. 22, No. 3 :
- Legacies of Lynching
Sherrilyn Ifill Interview - Male Victims of Abortion
by Eleanor J. Bader - The Libertarian Theocrats
by Michael J. McVicar - Editorial by Chip Berlet
- Book Review by Abby Scher
- Reports in Review
- Eyes Right
PRA is an affiliate of:
Copyright Information, Terms, and Conditions
Please read our Terms and Conditions for copyright information regarding downloading, copying, printing, and linking material on this site; our disclaimer about links present on this website; and our privacy policy.