What kind of talk is that?

Philosophers including Gramsci, Marx, Orwell, Russell and Wittgenstein noted that language shapes thought. Authoritarians from Lenin onwards built their dictatorships on this principle.

Anarchist blogger and linguistic pedant Mal Content, author of runaway bestseller The Authority of the Boot-Maker, has noted that when people fail to communicate effectively they are apt to stab one another. His glossary of current usage explores the deliberate blurring of meaning driven by the media and political class, with a little help from A.I.

“He who knows, does not speak. He who speaks, does not know.”

– Lao Tzu.

“Lao Tzu didn’t know, or he wouldn’t have spoken.”

– Kenneth Roy Park.

What is Mal talking about?

What’s wrong with class politics? By Mal Content.

It isn’t enough; you’ve got to have a plan.

The world has changed in ways we did not predict and have no answer to. Before the First World War and the Bolshevik takeover of the Russian Revolution, the proletariat was international and had revolutionary intent, but sections of our class were seduced – or frightened – into nationalism and got stuck there. Capital is still global and so is the alienation of labour, therefore the Working Class has no country and needs no borders, but no-one who says so has any influence any more. If you hadn’t noticed, war between nation-states, however sold, is simply a continuation of the competition to accumulate between different pools of capital that have outgrown their market limits.

Technology forges ahead to no good purpose; what is the internet for? Gaming, gambling, wanking, scamming, surveillance, and bickering; mass infantilisation. What a wonderful tool it might have been for teaching and learning, yet science is ill-understood and widely misrepresented while religion is back with a vengeance. People are still killing each other over it, and that’s very profitable. Anarchists are supposed to be atheists yet they tiptoe around Judaism, Islam, Hinduism trying not to upset anyone. Some even take sides! Educated Westerners embrace mysticism or believe that a virgin gave birth (there’s a simpler explanation for that one) and that a dead hippy lives in the sky somewhere, drawing on ancient cosmology despite their daily reliance on satellites.

For the left, the reluctance of the capitalist market to collapse under its internal contradictions has left it stranded, like fish up a tree. As long as the accumulation of value, debt-tokens and political power continues, the market races on blindly, not to its historic destiny but towards the annihilation of humanity, in spirit and in body.

Capital’s apologists will point to advances in manufacturing, medicine and food production, life expectancy tends to increase, unless you happen to live in one of those areas capital craps on. Pollution, weapons and famine are the bourgeoisie’s excrement. While capitalism reduces itself to the absurd* the leaders of the means of production, those venal con-artists, pathetic clowns and genocidal demagogues are having a pedal over it. You either play their game or you don’t, “download our app”.

* Reductio ad absurdum is a classical way of defeating a specious argument.

The bourgeoisie remains the only successful revolutionary class and has, I believe, been coached by Marx’s detailed explanation of how their system works. Perhaps they’ve even taken Debord on board, having lived through the counterculture, absorbed, commodified and disarmed it. Their manipulation of media and public discourse is modelled on the professional liars of the Comintern and its successors, as described by Orwell and Havel. The spectre of Leninism hangs in the air like the one Marx boasted about.

A contemporary definition of class is elusive. Arguably the ‘revolutionary proletariat’ has been abolished, set back to the level of landless peasantry and pauperage, like latter-day sharecroppers only packing boxes or delivering other people’s food. Who are the ‘middle class’ we keep hearing about?  It’s either an aspiration or an insult, depending on where you stand. I’ve defined them as people who have yet to make up their minds what side they’re on, but today that applies equally to most industrial workers, even the poorest. I can’t imagine how it would feel having to look up to some people and down on others, for reasons that are constantly shifting.

Marx spoke of petty bourgeoisie and Engels of labour aristocracy, while Kropotkin defined “social capital” as educational privilege or family contacts. Today’s sole traders, artisans and professionals are likely mired in debt, taxed to the hilt and/or dependant on institutional funding. In days gone by, miners and steel workers occupied privileged positions as their work was essential. My late father made a fortune on bonus agreements as a skilled aircraft fitter at De Havillands – until they shut it down to buy planes from overseas. From South Wales to Asturias, the Ruhr and Iva valleys, miners used their incomes to build their communities and self-help mechanisms (on which the social democratic settlement was modelled). The most skilled workers were often the most militant, and a culture of autonomy can be built in a factory such that issues are often decided long before they reach the desk of the Branch Secretary. The (often violent) dissolution of these communities has long since robbed them of political and economic power.

Then we have the pointless oafs who “work from home”, sat before their computers knocking themselves off like safari park chimps. Nothing worth mentioning was ever done in an ‘office’ and now they do it elsewhere, their bosses having conned them into paying for their own electricity. Self-obsessed  and dim as Toc H lamps: bureaucrats, media pundits and ‘influencers’ are only a buffer for the real bourgeoisie, who are easy enough to spot – they all live in fucking great houses and have a new car every six months.

As a 20th Century boy I harbour a suspicion that this might be a blip, that there must be a future beyond mobile phones, scooters and vapes. The internet and the silly bitcoin delusion are consuming more energy than the steel industry and a ‘viral tweet’ uses enough to power a Western family dwelling for a year, just so millions of ordinary fuckwits can learn what one famous fuckwit thinks about a subject they’ve failed to grasp. Server farms must compete for dwindling water supplies with actual farms growing food, here is the elephant in the room; this culture is barely ten years old and is nowhere near sustainable. On a bad day I’m convinced that the climate will not be saved (the planet doesn’t care by the way, it’s just a rock) and there is nothing left to us but revenge, like the prisoner who kicks off and strangles a guard on the way to the gallows.

So what’s the plan? If you’re familiar with my writing you know I have no time for arguments about class versus identity. Getting Working Class people to identify as such is the first step but will be of no use unless they understand their relationship to the means of production and have the will to change it. Identity and lifestyle can be subversive, if they resist the market’s efforts to commodify them. Class has only one weapon, the withdrawal of labour, I’m all for that, but stoppage of production can also be achieved simply by refusal to take what is offered. Don’t buy their gadgets and gimmicks, don’t keep your life in your pocket, don’t share your proclivities, gender or ethnicity however important these things are to you. If you can walk, don’t order groceries on line, if you can’t, ask a mate or a neighbour to go for you. Don’t download the app!

Can we feed ourselves without engaging in the market? Yes, and the more people do it the more stable it will become. Shelter is more difficult, I’ve been involved in several autonomous projects but there isn’t enough of it. There are a million empty dwellings on this island, and land where tents can be pitched or vehicles parked – and vegetables grown. We must take space and be prepared to defend it, they can’t evict us all.

We don’t need any more academics telling us how weak we are; we need architects, carpenters, chemists, cleaners, bricklayers, plumbers, electricians, farmers, fabricators, millers, turners, grinders, welders, civil engineers, cooks and medics. Yes, we also need artists and musicians, if we are to retain our sanity. Let the Working Class do what it has always done, and as for old-fashioned class struggle that is best done through rank and file syndicalist unions that are not chained to employers or the nation-state. We pick fights we can win, and make sure we do, sabotage their ‘business models’ at every opportunity.

Where we face total repression, let us not rule out nihilism either, when the enemy is everywhere, we can attack it anywhere. If the self-appointed leaders feared to step onto our streets, that would be a step in the right direction.

Mal C x

Statement from Tekoşîna Anarşîst on Developments in Syria: “We Are Not Afraid of Ruins!”

The Black Rose/Rosa Negra International Relations Committee (IRC) republishes this statement from our International Anarchist Coordination (IAC) sibling organization Tekoşîna Anarşîst (Anarchist Struggle).

Background

On November 27th the loose coalition of forces that has been engaged in a years-long military conflict with the government of Syrian president Bashar al-Assad, broke out of a containment zone in the country’s North Western Idlib province. In a matter of days they were able to drive out government forces and claim control over Aleppo, the country’s most populous city.

While made up of a variety of discrete factions, the group responsible for leading the lightning advance is Hayʼat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), a Sunni militant organization and successor to Jabhat al-Nusra, the former al-Qaeda franchise in Syria.

The advance of HTS has threatened areas held by the Autonomous Administration of North and East Syria (AANES), colloquially referred to as Rojava. Both HTS and the anti-Assad Syrian National Army (SNA) are backed by Turkey, which seeks the elimination of AANES. In response to these developments, AANES has called for a general mobilization of the constituent militias in the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), including Tekoşîna Anarşîst.

Though this brief background is insufficient to fully grasp the rapidly developing situation, we present it here in order to better contextualize the statement from Tekoşîna Anarşîst reproduced below.

This statement is unedited, save for the explication of acronyms.

We Are Not Afraid of Ruins!

Tekoşîna Anarşîst – December 3, 2024

More than five years ago the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) brought the caliphate of ISIS to an end. Now, with the new offensive of Hayʼat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), we risk a rebirth of their atrocities. HTS has united many jihadist groups with ex-fighters of the caliphate in their ranks. Recently they started a big offensive, breaking through the seige of Idlib and making the Syrian Arab Army (SAA) collapse. Aleppo has been the first big city they captured, seizing big amounts of advanced weapons left behind by regime soldiers.

SDF reacted fast, sending reinforcements to protect the kurdish neigborhood of Sheh Maqsoud in Aleppo as well as the refugee camps of the Sheba region. But the proxy force of the Turkish army, the Syrian National Army (SNA), started a new offensive coordinated with HTS, invading that same region of Sheba. The refugees displaced by the Turkish invasion of Afrin in 2018 are, once again, forced to leave their homes at a point of a gun. More than 100,000 people are now looking for shelter in improvised tents on the shores of the Euphrates river, still threatened by further advances of jihadist groups.

These new developments aggravate the instability of middle east, and should be observed together with other conflicts ongoing on the region. The Israeli occupation of Gaza, together with their attacks against Hezbollah, weakened Iran’s position in Syria, limiting their ability to support the SAA. Russian troops, also weakened after almost three years of war in Ukraine, abandoned several ground positions and are brutally bombing Idlib and Aleppo from the sky.

The US tries to keep outside of the conflict, knowing that Trump may push to withdraw their troops from Syrian soil. Turkish soldiers are not openly involved for now, but Turkish state is pulling the strings of SNA to continue their genocidal policies against kurdish people. Assad is trying to rally some international support from other Arab countries, and Iran already started to send reinforcements for a combined counter-offensive with the SAA. In between this chaos, the Rojava Revolution and the Kurdish Liberation Movement resist as the main hope for revolutionaries in the Middle East.

The largest realignment of forces in Syria in the past five years is under way, and it may have implications we can not yet forsee. It is a complex situation, and we see how many journalist are stuggling to grasp it. Many western media have been encouraged by the march of HTS, even calling them a revolutionary opposition, “rebels” against the dictatorship of Assad. We also wish for the fall of the regime, but HTS and their “salvation government” is not a liberatory solution. Their aim is to replace the Assad dynasty with Sharia law and an Islamic State, little different from what the Taliban are doing in Afghanistan or what the Islamic Republic of Iran have done since 1979. This is not a future we can accept, and many Syrians won’t accept it either.

We, as anarchists and as internationalists in Rojava, will play our role in these challenging times. We will fight alongside the SDF to defend and spread the revolutionary project, building a stateless society where the principles of democratic confederalism, pluralism and women’s revolution prevail. We call for all anarchist and other revolutionary forces, now more than ever, to defend Rojava!

We know that war brings suffering and destruction, but it can also open opportunities of free life for those who are ready. We saw what the victory over ISIS made possible here, and we are ready to continue fighting for a better future. Because we are not afraid of ruins!

The original version of this statement can be found here. You can follow Tekoşîna Anarşîst on Twitter at @TA_Anarsist.

The resistance for a democratic Middle East will remain unbroken

Internationalist Commune

4th December, 2024

A lot has happened since the beginning of the attacks that the Turkish state, with the help of Islamist gangs, began on November 29 against the Autonomous Self-Administration of North-East Syria. Only now have we found the time to speak out on behalf of the Internationalist Commune and to point out some of the background. We are all, just like the organized population in Rojava and North-East Syria, preparing and organizing for the resistance. Be it on a civilian, military or media level, work is in full swing in all areas and all of us are involved in it in different ways.

Since all kinds of assumptions and speculations about the background, course and outcome of the fighting and battles are currently circulating in the media, we would just like to call on all friends to stick to the media of the self-defense forces and not to help the information war of the international and local occupying states to succeed.

Regardless of the front lines and war events, it is essential to understand these attacks as part of the imperialist project of a Neo-Ottoman Empire. Turkish fascism has been pursuing this since 2011 and plans to bring parts of Syria, Iraq and Lebanon under its control. The Azerbaijani attack on Artsakh in 2023 occupied another part of Armenia. The ethnic cleansing and cultural genocide of first the Armenian and then the Kurdish population is now to be brought to an end. This project goes back to the Misak-i-Milli (Ottoman National Pact), which covers the area in which the Young Turk movement actually wanted to build the Turkish state after the First World War. However, it was later destroyed by the Western powers, especially England and France. On the basis of the pact, Turkish fascism sees all the areas included in the pact as its rightful property, which it now wants to reclaim. Within these borders, a homogeneous, unified and purely Turkish society based on patriarchal and racist principles is to be achieved. In this way, the Turkish state wants to become the only great power in the Middle East. This colonial project of Turkish fascism poses no less of a threat to the entire region, women, young people and all peoples than the reign of terror of the Islamic State or the imperialism of Israel, with which Turkish fascism has very close ties. As part of NATO, it is clear that the Turkish state has agreed on such operations with the military alliance and that the alliance supports the attacks, just as it supports the genocide in Palestine. Western imperialism is thus pursuing the weakening of Iranian influence. All events of the last few days and what is still to come should therefore be understood as part of the policy of Turkish fascism and NATO.

The forces that stand in the way of this imperialist plan are, on the one hand, the Kurdistan Freedom Movement, led by the PKK and the Rêber APO paradigm, Democratic Confederalism. On the other hand, it is all the peoples of the region who work and fight every day to build a democratic and independent Middle East. The Democratic Autonomous Administration of North-East Syria (DAANES) sets an example for the entire region. After the democratic awakening of the “Spring of the Peoples” (also known as the Arab Spring) was crushed by imperialist and Islamist forces in 2011, the revolution in Rojava was able to take place, develop further and spread after the victory over the Islamic State. Even more than the liberation of territories, the women’s revolution and the brotherhood between the peoples of the region are essential successes. This revolution is therefore not only militarily opposed to Turkish fascism, but above all ideologically. For years, it has therefore done everything imaginable to wipe it out, and the recent attacks represent another attempt to do so. After the Turkish occupation of Iraq and Southern Kurdistan failed due to resistance from the professional guerrilla forces of the PKK, it is now trying to achieve success in north-east Syria.

Since the beginning of the revolution, the people of Rojava and North-East Syria, as well as the organized self-defense forces, have been resisting all kinds of attacks and massacres that Turkish fascism and its Islamist gangs have carried out without ceasing. In defense of the revolution in North-East Syria, 12,000 people have already died in battle and at least twice as many have been injured in the war. Territories have been occupied and thousands have lost their homes. In addition, over the last hundred years, Turkish fascism and its imperialist allies have repeatedly tried to physically and culturally destroy the peoples of the region, first the Christian minorities and then the Kurds. From the deportations and mass murders of Armenians from 1915, the Dersim massacre in 1938, the torture prisons and burning of villages in the 1990s in Northern Kurdistan, the genocide of the Yazidis in 2014 and the terror of the Islamic State, no means have been left untried. But especially since the emergence of the liberation movement under the leadership of Rêber APO 50 years ago, all of these attacks have been met with resistance: the resistance in the Turkish torture prisons in 1982, the guerrilla war of self-defense since 1984, the struggle of the autonomous city administration under the leadership of the youth in Northern Kurdistan in 2015/16 and the resistance in Kobanê are just a few examples. The current attacks are not the first attempt to complete the genocide that has begun and to completely subject the Middle East to the patriarchal rule of the hegemonic states, and it will not be the last, that should be clear to us. It should also be clear that this has not been achieved for a hundred years, and that this time and in the future they will fail due to the resistance of the peoples.

Therefore, the only option not only for the peoples of North-East Syria and the entire region, but for all revolutionary, socialist and democratic youth is to participate in the resistance against the occupation of Turkish fascism. Wherever it tries to sell itself as an advocate of the oppressed and its Islamist mercenaries as rebels, it must be unmasked as an enemy of the peoples of the region. Wherever it tries to present itself as anti-imperialist, its colonial and genocidal nature must be revealed. Whether within the borders of Turkey or in the areas occupied by the Turkish state or its mercenary armies, the murder of women, rape and sexism are the order of the day. Sexism is state doctrine in Turkey and the perpetrators are mostly soldiers, police officers or other henchmen of fascism itself. Therefore, these attacks must be understood as counter-revolutionary attacks against the Jin Jiyan Azadî Revolution. The heart of this revolution lies in Rojava, where the women’s defense units YPJ have defeated the Islamic State and, of course, the forces of patriarchy are trying to destroy this revolution of women in its heart as well.

Against its ideology of sexism, racism and fascism, we will continue to build a free and equal life and a society based on women’s liberation, ecology, self-organization and self-defense, side by side with all young people, women and peoples of the region. If you can, come to Rojava yourself and participate in social self-defense in various ways. If you have no opportunity to do so, look for ways where you are to hit Turkish fascism most sensitively. If the imperial system increases the war against the peoples immeasurably, we must work with even more confidence to build alternatives and long-term structures. If this system is now waging World War III and has destroyed millions of human lives over the past hundred years, we know that we have the task of developing revolutionary organization even more conscientiously and uniting our forces around the world against its wars.

Because resistance means life, and without resistance there can be no life.

Fascism or right-wing populism? By Mal Content.

Antifascists, above all, need flexibility, precisely because fascism, though practiced by the most inflexible of people, has never been a coherent ideology. Its constituency is by definition the most confused section of any population, but a mob of confused people is dangerous; some years ago a confused but presumably well-meaning gang attacked the office of a paediatrician. This story tears me apart; there was a brass plaque on the door – as if you would … I have a belly laugh over how thick some people can be, then rage that members of my own Class have been so badly served by the education system we all paid for, and are so ill-equipped to live in the modern world.

Mussolini, who started in the labour movement, set about incorporating it into capitalism, ‘vertical syndicalism’, and the bourgeoisie into the state apparatus. This he called “Corporatism, a merger of corporate and state power”, everyone in their place, set from above. It requires a closed system, sited within one geopolitical entity, or nation-state.

Mussolini set the tone for the 20th Century, he read widely: Hegel, Kant, Kropotkin, Nietzsche, Marx, but rather than adopt any particular moral philosophy he learned the technique of creating inspirational, wise-sounding slogans that appealed to the masses. So to Hitler and his National Socialist Workers Party; smarting from the humiliation of Versailles, and paranoid antisemitism, the great depression gave them the popular support they needed to take power. Full employment was achieved through military Keynesianism.

During the Comintern’s “class against class” period, the phrase “social democracy equals social fascism” was their excuse for waging war on the parties of the Second International rather than the emerging fascist movement – with catastrophic consequences for both tendencies. The phrase is entirely apt, however. Under the dictatorship of Primo de Rivera which followed Mussolini’s example, the socialist U.G.T. union leader Largo Caballero collaborated with the government in compulsory arbitration boards, robbing the Spanish Working Class of any agency in industrial disputes. So between the wars Europe and the U.S.S.R. re-armed and re-built with centralised economies. It turns out the only viable way to fight an industrial mechanised war is to have everyone working for the state, and so it was for the next lot.

The cold war was a replay of ‘class against class’, allowing fascists to re-group in Britain unchecked apart from periodic Working Class direct action. Meanwhile the authoritarian Atlee government stuck to the corporatist model, building a social democratic settlement by ruthlessly pillaging Britain’s colonies as they struggled to break free, using conscripts to scab on strikes and enacting repressive anti-working class legislation. The bourgeoisie weren’t happy either, as they wanted unlimited capital accumulation – because that’s what capitalism requires. ‘Corporatism’ was still being used without irony by Labour politicians in the 1970’s, to describe the mixed economy.

The problem with all this is that the citizen is both client of the state and its adversary. This is felt viscerally and populism recognises it. Wage labour is an abusive relationship however you dress it up, and nationalised industry means your boss has his own army and police force, an unattractive proposition. If bureaucrats fix both prices and wages no-one is going to be happy with their decision, so to many, a free market was easily sold by bourgeois politicians.

This is why 20th Century politics has lost its relevance; populism is right-wing by default because no party offers credible redistributive economics, the only worthwhile signifier of ‘the left’. Corbyn’s attempt at left populism failed because it didn’t – and couldn’t – go far enough. The people wanted brexit, dammit, not free broadband! “We want are country back” and they didn’t believe he could make the trains run on time.

But what about ‘social justice’? Well that always was a load of bollocks, justice is a bourgeois concept related to payment of a debt, it relies on transaction and coercion, which defeat both morality and utility. The only way to achieve freedom and equality for all is collectively, through Working Class solidarity, but end-stage capitalism has atomised the Class into a socio-economic continuum, so workers no longer identify with their Class, but with those who share their language, ethnicity, sexuality, gender, religion or football team.

Right populists like to define their views as ‘conservative’; it has an air of respectability about it and implies defence rather than attack, or even return to an earlier time. It is instructive that many A.F.D. supporters in East Germany are nostalgic for the D.D.R. They have no ideology, they want a wage, a roof, food and drink, and to not work too hard for it. If that means they have no say in the composition of any executive body, why would they care? Can you honestly say it’s helped you? Whereas the old regime struggled to keep people in, the A.F.D. – whose support is greatest in the least diverse areas, has a sinister policy it calls “re-migration”, a euphemism for deporting German citizens of non-German ethnicity; that won’t end well.

But just as one old gang of authoritarian demagogues liked to call themselves ‘communist’; conservative means nothing any more. Their opponents are characterised as ‘liberals’. Liberalism is simply the postulate of a theoretical freedom and equality under the law, with private property and the enforcement of debt, this takes in most modern vote-beggars but anarchists see it for the scam that it is. In the U.K., historically all fascist and proto-fascist groups have come out of the Conservative and Unionist Party, or the Young Conservatives, taken briefly to the streets then returned to electoral politics in a different form. This has been the case for over a Century.

One of the pillars of populism is artificial scarcity, an invention of the bourgeois state. If you want a hierarchical society, in which power is expressed by denying the needs or desires of others, you have to persuade your citizens that the necessities of life are in short supply, that they must be rationed or bargained for. Even that the state could “run out of money” – there’s another catastrophic failure of our education system! The Communists used artificial scarcity also, in a vast empire that produced unimaginable quantities of wheat, rice, coal, oil, minerals and manufactured goods. Better to export these to buy arms than let the workers have the fruits of their labour.

Does it matter then, whether the gang we face on the streets are National Socialists or right-wing populists? Not really, what counts is whether they can stand in the way of us acting collectively as a Class. We could draw a line however, between the sellers of this crap and the punters. That will take thousands of individual conversations between Working Class people, and will have to wait until the fighting is over, or ideally, before it starts.

The arguments are simple: firstly, there is no shortage of anything on this island; there are a million empty dwellings and millions of tons of food thrown away annually. Healthcare is rationed only because this social duty has been turned into a commodity, for profit. Secondly, borders serve only the bosses, not us, they exist to maintain differentials in prices and wages to keep down the price of raw materials and boost the markup on manufacturing. Gentrification creates borders even within the territory; we all know districts where we couldn’t afford a coffee, let alone accommodation, but you may still have to commute there to clean offices.

Remind your audience that capital, unlike labour, flows freely around the globe. Should the phrase “economic migrant” come up, I like to introduce vacuum cleaner merchant James Dyson, who received every privilege of the social democratic settlement, free education paid for by the Working Class, even free school milk, and is now reputed to be the fifth richest person in Britain. He moved hundreds of jobs from Wiltshire to Malaysia to pay them £3 per hour, which begs the question: if we all worked for that rate who’d buy his bloody vacuum cleaners at five hundred quid a pop? Imagine the outcry if Malaysians were coming here to take advantage of our paltry minimum wage, and if they get visas as doctors or midwives, that’s just a rich country leeching the education system of a poor one, and they won’t be allowed to bring their kids.

“What about all these asylum seekers?” Ask the criminal gangs that bombed the crap out of five countries to maintain their supply of petroleum. ‘Radical Islam’ promoted by NATO (yes, including bin Laden and Hamas) during the cold war turned out to be more successful at exploiting the grievances of marginalised and ill-informed populations than Marxism-Leninism, and came back to bite the West on the arse. Refugees are small in number compared to middle-class Ukrainians and Hong Kong Chinese, who have been allowed to work and pay tax, smoothly integrating with the economy.

Of course the real fascists don’t want them either. The hand-wringing of Tory politicians over children drowning in the channel cuts no ice with those who want to burn the survivors in their beds. I have no hesitation in describing such people as fascists, regardless of affiliation. They need taking out, not by the state but by the Working Class.

That just leaves the plethora of weird online cults devoted to misogyny, transphobia, conspiracy, crank science and what-have-you, tilting at windmills. They are in good company with the self-styled Western Jihadis. I can’t see these fantasists being defeated in their natural habitat, but eventually they must emerge from their holes into the real world, and where they resort to violence, they must be met by violence. I always advocate vulnerable people to form affinity groups with others who share their circumstances. These can federate into defence committees, co-opting any others willing to turn a hand. As ever, let the boots do the talking.

The Authority of the Boot-Maker, by Mal Content.


To order the book quote quantity and delivery address. Make payment £20 each including postage, by bank transfer to: ‘Dorset Bookfair’, Account number 84669314, Sort code 51-81-18

If the above link takes you away from the page, it’s dorsetbookfair [at] riseup [dot] net

Or read it online.

A political and personal statement as well as a review of our solidarity work around the war in #Ukraine so far

Anarchist Black Cross Dresden.

Long English Version

Since the first day of the Russian invasion of Ukraine, we have been working with friends on the ground as well as comrades from Belarus, Russia and Poland. This has been made possible by thousands of donations from people around the world who have understood the importance of international solidarity at this critical moment. And for this we would like to thank all those who responded to the calls and provided help, not only with money, but also with direct actions, logistics and media work.

We are partly from these places and partly we are just very connected personally and politically with the region, the political events, the people and their struggles. We see ourselves as anarchists.

In almost nine months of organizing, we have had many different challenges that have shaped our work with fellow anarchists in Ukraine, and we would like to share some of these challenges with you as an important critical assessment of what has been achieved by the international anarchist solidarity movement during this time.

More, and other languages.

Antifa Enternasyonal: Time to defend the revolution!

Nûçe Ciwan.

ROJAVA – Stating that an alternative to the capitalist system has emerged with the 21st century women’s revolution in Rojava, Firaz Dağ from the Antifa Enternasyonal organization stated that Turkey targeted this alternative with its attacks on Northern and Eastern Syria, and said, “It’s time to defend the revolution.” Against Turkey’s attacks on Northern and Eastern Syria and Southern Kurdistan, reactions from the international ground and the Kurds continue.

On behalf of the Antifa Enternasyonal (International Antifascist), Firaz Dağ from Rojava evaluated the bombing of the living quarters and cities of the Kurds fighting against ISIS to JINNEWS.

Airspace under Russian control

Stating that Turkey’s attacks on Kurdistan with the idea of ​​conquest never stopped, Firaz reminded that the airspaces are under the control of Damascus and Russia. Firaz said, “The fascist Turkish state once again attacked positions in Northern and Eastern Syria and Southern Kurdistan in order to create fear among the Kurdish people. The attacks and invasions against the Revolution never stopped, but as earlier this year, the Turkish state attacked several targets simultaneously in a coordinated operation. It is known that the airspace of Rojava and the whole of Syria is under the control of the Assad regime and the Russian state.”

‘Attacks with the support of Russia never stopped’

Noting that the air attacks on Rojava never stopped, Firaz said that the fascist states cooperated in destroying the revolution and said: “During the occupation of Afrin in 2018, the Russian state allowed dozens of warplanes to enter its airspace and bombard Afrin nonstop for 2 months. Drone attacks have never stopped in Rojava, and coordinated attacks like last night are nothing new. Cooperation between the existing nation-states in the region and their interests in overthrowing the revolution were once again clearly seen.”

‘Rojava has become a symbol of hope and strength’

Stating that Rojava has become a symbol for all the oppressed peoples of the world, Firaz said that the coalition against ISIS did not act without harming the interests of the guarantor countries, and said: “As long as they are not harmed, they are not very interested in attacks against the people of the region. While playing volleyball at a school located 2 kilometers from the coalition base in Hesekê in August, 5 girls were martyred and 10 girls were injured in the attack carried out by the Turkish state with an unmanned aerial vehicle. The answer was a statement condemning the attack, but without mentioning the perpetrator… Turkey being the second largest army and one of the founding members of NATO, It is wrong to understand and think that these constant illegal and immoral attacks are only a conflict of interest. These attacks in Rojava and the constant attacks in the mountains of Kurdistan are fully compatible with the interests of the hegemonic forces of capitalist modernity. The only reasonable and correct attitude to prevent such attacks on the revolution lies in ourselves. Rojava has long become a symbol of hope and strength for all the oppressed peoples of the world, demonstrating that it is possible to create a revolutionary alternative to the women’s revolution, the capitalist system and its inhuman practices in the 21st century. The only reasonable and correct attitude to prevent such attacks on the revolution lies in ourselves. Rojava has long become a symbol of hope and strength for all the oppressed peoples of the world, demonstrating that it is possible to create a revolutionary alternative to the women’s revolution, the capitalist system and its inhuman practices in the 21st century. The only reasonable and correct attitude to prevent such attacks on the revolution lies in ourselves. Rojava has long become a symbol of hope and strength for all the oppressed peoples of the world, demonstrating that it is possible to create a revolutionary alternative to the women’s revolution, the capitalist system and its inhuman practices in the 21st century.”

‘The attacks clearly reveal the mentality of the system’

Regarding the ongoing bombing, Firaz said, “The fact that the attacks target civilian infrastructure and civilian deaths clearly reveal the mentality of the system. Those who accuse the YPG/YPJ of being a terrorist organization are the same ones who financed the Islamic State and today finance the al-Qaeda Front Al Nusra and now former members of Hayat Tahrir al-Sham State (HTS).”

‘The AKP-MHP government has been preparing for an operation for months’

Stating that preparations for an operation have been made for months to ‘protect’ his power due to the upcoming elections, Firaz continued: “The explosion in Istanbul was a pretext for attacks without any evidence of any connection with Rojava (except for what the Turkish state itself said). The fascist Turkish state has been preparing to launch a new ground operation in the region for months as it is in the election period and the AKP-MHP fascist coalition needs to gather more votes for re-election. However, the fact that they have not advanced significantly in the mountains so far makes a direct attack on Rojava impossible.”

‘Defend the Revolution!’

Finally, Firaz, who called on the whole world to defend and embrace the Rojava Revolution, said, “Therefore, it is in the hands of anyone who claims to defend democracy and socialism to rise up against the Turkish state wherever they are. Demonstrate your solidarity in a practical way by performing actions, occupations, direct actions, whatever. Time to answer! We demand that the fascists be held accountable and punished for their war crimes. Fight for Rojava. Defend the Revolution!” used the phrases.

Prisoners and war. What happens inside Russian and Ukrainian prisons while the whole world is not watching

Anarchist Black Cross Belarus

Data correct as of September 2022

The war in Ukraine has kept everyone’s attention for over eight months now. Many were horrified by the atrocities that accompany war efforts and are ongoing. We see dead soldiers, tortured civilians, sad faces of those who found their relatives killed and happy cries of locals on de-occupied territories. However, not much is known about one of the most marginalised and invisible groups of the population – the prisoners. This text will give you an overview of how prisoners are treated and used in war by both the Ukrainian and Russian state. We are not going to cover the topic of war prisoners (soldiers who were captured by the enemy and placed in special prison) as their conditions of imprisonment and prospects of release depends in many ways on diplomatic relations.

PRISONERS INSIDE UKRAINE

According to the Ukrainian Ministry of Justice, as of 2021, there were 49,823 prisoners in Ukraine who were held in 160 penitentiary institutions. Just before the war, the Association of Ukrainian Human Rights Monitors on Law Enforcement UMDPL urged the Ukrainian government to take measures to protect the prison population and prepare the emergency guidelines for the prison staff in case of war.

Several months into the war, most of

 View post

The Guillotine, by Mal Content.

What is the Guillotine actually for?

Driven like many to outrage at the brazen depravity of the ruling class, I’ve been thinking about revenge lately.

Revenge is a visceral reaction therefore irrational and anarchists ought to eschew it, as anarchism is a rationalist philosophy. It only has propaganda value where the object is generally seen within our Class to be ‘guilty’, and when carried out by the underdog with cunning and daring. A prisoner on the Guillotine, however entitled, is by definition a helpless victim.

No doubt we’ve all fantasised about executing the bourgeoisie en masse, but that would only make martyrs of them. Think of the cult of the Romanovs, the epitome of idle, despotic wastes of space. It would grant them unwarranted importance as individual operators of an exploitative system. Better to give them a small allotment and leave them to fend for themselves.

Punishment is a kind of revenge that implies competence to judge. The oppressed must be the judges of the oppressor, victims the judges of the perpetrator. The state cannot take revenge as it doesn’t represent any people, only a mode of production. It simply flaunts its monopoly on violence and coercive force by ‘punishing’ breaches of that monopoly.

What then would be the benefit to the victors of a revolution punishing the losers? I imagine the upheaval that would accompany the rupture of capitalist power relations would provide enough emotional catharsis for those who need it. The Bolsheviks opposed capital punishment during the Russian revolution then ‘rediscovered’ it once they had taken over. Mostly it was not used against recalcitrant bourgeois but fellow revolutionaries who got in their way. Had they actually created their promised free society they would never have needed it.

The post-war Spanish action groups often came together with a pact not to seek personal retribution, since everyone had lost family and friends during the war, and their torturers, rapists and executioners were walking the same streets. Each had dozens of scores to settle and it would have consumed all their time and energy. Instead their aim was to kill Franco, to cut the head off the snake, not revenge but a practical solution to a practical problem.

Mal C x

  • Reference Library

  • The Authority of the Boot-Maker, by Mal Content.

  • New T shirt designs from Wessex Solidarity, Proceeds to D.R.B.

  • Dorset Radical Bookfair 2024

    Dorset Radical Bookfair 2023
  • Red and Black Telly.

  • Dorset IWW

  • Anarchist Action Network.

  • Anti-Fascist Network

  • Anarchist events

Design a site like this with WordPress.com
Get started