2.5. The main problem is that it feels so dated now. I've never seen the film, but for some reason, I always had it in my mind that100th book of 2024.
2.5. The main problem is that it feels so dated now. I've never seen the film, but for some reason, I always had it in my mind that they were zombies, so I was continually jarred when the vampires spoke, or acted like regular humans in the book. From what I've gathered about the movie (posters and conversation-osmosis) this seems quite different. I wouldn't go as far as saying some bits are laughable, but the horror element certainly hasn't survived the last seventy-years since it was published. Vampires are seen very differently now, of course. The prose was fine, but it was very American: Neville was reminiscent of a Stephen King character, making corny one-liners to himself and saying things like, Hold it together, man! Makes my stomach turn. The ending was, at least, interesting, and even now felt subversive. ...more
Such a complex relationship with this small book: it's stuffy, detached, boring, but has also completely overtaken my mind over the 92nd book of 2024.
Such a complex relationship with this small book: it's stuffy, detached, boring, but has also completely overtaken my mind over the days reading it and since finishing it (on Saturday), I've been exploring it in my head. All the negatives above actually aid the book. The stuffiness made it feel real, like I was reading dusty old travelogues of an arctic explorer. Lovecraft's wordiness sometimes got the better of him, but I was also drawn into descriptions, which were startlingly vivid.
Little by little, however, they rose grimly into the western sky; allowing us to distinguish various bare, bleak, blackish summits, and to catch the curious sense of fantasy which they inspired as seen in the reddish antarctic light against the provocative background of iridescent ice-dust clouds. In the whole spectacle there was a persistent, pervasive hint of stupendous secrecy and potential revelation. It was as if these stark, nightmare spires marked the pylons of a frightful gateway into forbidden spheres of dream, and complex gulfs of remote time, space and ultradimensionality. I could not help feeling that they were evil things— mountains of madness whose farther slopes looked out over some accursed ultimate abyss.
And reflecting on the horror, I've come to realise that it is a horror of 'exceptional' calibre, for it is so understated. Why were so many passages unnerving me, particularly when the majority of the story was given to describing the icy wastelands of Antarctica and the jagged structures of ancient, uninhabited alien buildings? Because Lovecraft places the alien not on another planet, but on our own, and the empty forgotten cities are marked with a forgotten and terrible history. He somehow created fear by simply describing a desolate black city surrounded by ice and snow. It is the uncanny perfected.
The more it has sat in my mind, the more I've come to respect it and enjoy it in retrospect. Lovecraft's longwinded descriptions sometimes made me feel impatient, but every time I left the book, I left it a little unsettled. There was a lingering disquiet.
At nearly midnight the other night my girlfriend suddenly remarked that she could not see the cathedral spire out the window. We can usually see it. The sky had a strange remote orange tint and a thick fog had fallen. At once we put our shoes on and headed out. A few drunkards were wandering and yelling, but once we reached the cathedral, there was a strange muffled quality. We could hardly see far ahead of us, and the cathedral spire, even up close, disappeared out of sight into the fog. We walked about for half an hour, and I kept thinking, for some reason, of At the Mountains of Madness, and the slow, meditative, even boring, horror that lay within its pages....more
My friend and fellow-booklover, J, who once studied under Abdulrazak Gurnah, recommended me this book. I've owned a few Gene Wolfe n81st book of 2024.
My friend and fellow-booklover, J, who once studied under Abdulrazak Gurnah, recommended me this book. I've owned a few Gene Wolfe novels over the years but never read him. He told me this was a good starting place. J is completely disillusioned from academia (he was once a lecturer himself) because of the elitism and narrowmindedness he found in the field. He tried for a long time to write papers and get Wolfe's name considered seriously among his peers, but to no avail. J promised me this book is complex. He even promised a near-on 'Proustian' beginning. I could not refuse.
And for 220 pages or so, it is insanely complex. The beginning is Proustian, or at least nods its head to the Frenchman, 'When I was a boy my brother David and I had to go to bed early whether we were sleepy or not', and throughout the other novellas I was reminded of countless other books, Darkness at Noon, The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn . . . The three novellas collected as The Fifth Head of Cerberus slowly unravel a chilling plot about colonialism. Did the colonisers who go to Saint Anne kill all the aliens there (the shapeshifting abos) or did, as some people believe, the abos kill the colonisers and assume their forms and identities? Even at the end, I was left with so many questions and wanted to begin the text again. The most literary science-fiction I've read in a while. ...more
3.5. So many paradoxical thoughts about this book: on the one hand it has so many fascinating ideas and 'predictions' of the future,75th book of 2024.
3.5. So many paradoxical thoughts about this book: on the one hand it has so many fascinating ideas and 'predictions' of the future, wrapped up in a post-Vietnam (Haldeman was a combat engineer, wounded in action) military science fiction, but equally has some ridiculous ideas (everyone in the future is a homosexual) that are told in bizarre ways and for bizarre reasons and so very American (and therefore, to my Britishness, very corny, in American fashion ('Try me, buddy.')).
The idea of the Forever War is brilliant as it captures the hopelessness and pointlessness of combat. Haldeman supposedly struggled adjusting to civilian life after his service, so the time-dilation in the book (when travelling through space for combat against the Taurans, Mandella doesn't age as much as earth. By the end, he has been fighting for over 1000 years in earth years). The Forever War is in fact 1143 years long. Not forever, but nor was the Hundred Years' War one-hundred years.
I enjoyed a lot of it in a non-intellectual way. That sounds belittling, but I don't read sci-fi for the prose but the ideas, so generally find myself reading more for pleasure than I would normally read something. Alongside some of the stranger ideas in the book, one that surprised me the most was this description, set in the 2020/2030s, so roundabout now,
Some of the new people we'd picked up after Aleph used 'tha, ther, thim' instead of 'he, his, him', for the collective pronoun.
I was startled that he'd even 'predicted' the timeframe.
More important coming from a post-Vietnam America, I think, but nowhere near as affecting or important as other science-fiction classics I've read so far. ...more
Read for a bookclub back in July. Despite being science-fiction, the noir elements seemed to severely date the text. Gibson's prose72nd book of 2024.
Read for a bookclub back in July. Despite being science-fiction, the noir elements seemed to severely date the text. Gibson's prose was clunky and chockfull of jargon. I didn't find the plot, the characters or the prose remotely desirable. Some of the ideas were fascinating, and reading this after watching so many things that have come from it, most obviously The Matrix, it is hard to ignore its cultural significance... but it's a chore to read. ...more
Weirdly, I had a conversation with a colleague of mine the other day about how women eating people seems to be in vogue right now. S37th book of 2024.
Weirdly, I had a conversation with a colleague of mine the other day about how women eating people seems to be in vogue right now. So I waved this book in her face and said, You won't believe it, this is about a woman eating people (she's a zombie!). She replied, "God forbid women have hobbies."
Trust Fitzcarraldo to publish a zombie book. If it's one thing you'd expect never to work, it's zombies. The only writer who has written a zombie book that I can think of, and one of the few writers I trust to write a zombie book, is the inimitable Vladimir Sorokin; but, you know what, de Marcken gives it a good go. This is a "funny", first person narrative about a girl who is a zombie. Her arm falls off in the first line of the book. The world is a wreck, humans run around avoiding zombies and zombies, when they're not hungry, avoid humans.
When I was alive, I imagined something redemptive about the end of the world. I thought it would be a kind of purification. Or at least a simplification. Rectification through reduction. I could picture the empty cities, the reclaimed land. That was the future. This is now. The end of the world looks exactly the way you remember. Don't try to picture the apocalypse. Everything is the same.
There is a horrible moment in the book where the narrator spots a little old lady, alive, going into a little shed. On the other side of an inner wall, the narrator hears a small voice, "I'm hungry." The old lady reassures the little voice before putting a wooden spoon in her mouth and sticking her already-stump of an arm through a sort of cat-flap. The sound of noisy eating commences, and the old lady cries. Her grandson, a zombie, is on the other side of the wall. She is slowly feeding him her arm so he doesn't go hungry....more
Often regarded as one of the greatest science-fiction books ever written, and recommended by a colleague who has read (it seems) eve27th book of 2024.
Often regarded as one of the greatest science-fiction books ever written, and recommended by a colleague who has read (it seems) every novel ever written, Bester's book left me a little underwhelmed. It's pulpy, rough and jagged. Bester's prose staggers along so there's hardly a pause in the book. It's The Count of Monte Cristo in space, and minus about 900 pages. So there's credit there, that Bester does it in such a short space. And for its publication date in 1956, all the jaunting (teleporting), technology (accelerating time), Solar Wars and whatever else, it is impressive when looking at it with context; but it's aged, it feels lacking. The writing suffers and isn't as strong as other sci-fi writers and generally pulp doesn't interest me anyway. A massively influential book (often hailed as influencing the rise of cyberpunk in the 80s), that has its issues as it ages. Bester also wrote for DC Comics ("He clearly didn't mind slumming it," as my colleague put it), and when he died, left his literary estate and home to his bartender. ...more
2.5. My fourth or fifth Wells novel and certainly a lesser book of his. I suppose his visions of the moon (breathable air, vegetatio7th book of 2024.
2.5. My fourth or fifth Wells novel and certainly a lesser book of his. I suppose his visions of the moon (breathable air, vegetation, and insect aliens living under the surface) in light of our later explorations make it a little ridiculous. The plot is more action-packed and less philosophical than his magnum opus, which, at this point in time, is still The Time Machine. Enjoyable for the silliness of the plot and scoring his imagination (wild as ever!) against our 21stC knowledge....more
Such a fun, messy book. Clarke could have easily ruined this: the amount of time jumps, setting moves and character introductions 146th book of 2023.
Such a fun, messy book. Clarke could have easily ruined this: the amount of time jumps, setting moves and character introductions for a 250 page novel is slightly ridiculous. We get into a character before he rushes the narrative on and they're left behind. Somehow, he makes it work. It is a mess, but the book is so enjoyable I didn't overly mind. I was right back to being a second year university student when I was just getting into the likes of PKD and Vonnegut (and 2001). A fresh take on alien invasion, even now. I was thrilled by the first portion of the book with all the unknowns, but even as he answered questions and things became clearer, Clarke keeps it alive with the idea of utopia, humankind as a whole and a few twists in the plot. Some of the descriptions at the end, like in 2001 had me in awe of Clarke's imagination. One could believe he had been to space himself. For me, now I'm older, science-fiction is so far beyond fantasy as a genre. ...more
118th book of 2023. #9 with my challenge with Alan, read a book set in England/Canada (the latter for me, being English - he's got it considerably eas118th book of 2023. #9 with my challenge with Alan, read a book set in England/Canada (the latter for me, being English - he's got it considerably easier).
A great and unnerving idea that falls short of its execution. Set in a future Labrador, post some nuclear event, humans are frequently born with deformities. They're mostly small: six toes, in one case, long limbs in another. These deformities are seen as being against God's image and are driven out to the 'Fringes' or exterminated. Obviously, the whole idea reeks of Nazism. There's a chilling scene that I described to my mother the other day and she told me I'd upset her by telling her. So there are certainly great beats throughout the novel, but towards the end it became a little too fast-paced and lost some of the chilling slowness of the first half. Others will no doubt find the dramatic ending closer to their tastes. I just felt like Wyndham had a great idea and slightly squandered it, which, sadly, is often the case in science fiction. Still a decent read. ...more
4.5. A stunning novel: epic in scope and almost cinematic in execution. Anyone who likes Interstellar will like this. What begins as89th book of 2023.
4.5. A stunning novel: epic in scope and almost cinematic in execution. Anyone who likes Interstellar will like this. What begins as a slow and dreamy account the narrator's (Leigh) upbringing in Rotterdam with her abusive father becomes a thrilling and daring work of soft-science-fiction (i.e. it feels mostly grounded in reality, though set in the 2030s and with advanced technology), through the stars and beyond our cosmos. Leigh is a microbiologist and the first part of the book has her on a ship investigating an unusual trench. She specialises in algae. All this leads to to Leigh's involvement in the space program and the ascension to the stars. I read two or three hundred pages of this book in about 24 hours. Some other reviewers, I see, call it overlong, boring, too much science, etc., but I love physics and astronomy, so there were no complaints here. The ending fascinated me, terrified me, blew me away. It all leads to that final charged moment. Leigh's narration is also fascinating in itself: MacInnes somehow writes her as being incredibly detached but also philosophical. Near the beginning of the book there is a moment where she is floating in the sea above the trench and has the sensation that the stars above her are the same distance as the bottom of the sea. This image sums up the novel for me. It is the micro, the algae, and the entire cosmos. It is one woman, one family, and yet the whole planet. I had to return it to the library as it has a reservation on it but honestly, I could have started it again. I want to read those early scenes again, see how MacInnes sets it all up, links it all together. A joy to read. I put it down on my lunchbreak and then walked through the gardens that span off the side of the cathedral. I had that sort of luminosity one feels after finishing a powerful book, sort of floating in its wake and reverie. There is something so compelling, human, scary and awe-inspiring about the book, and yet it reads with such ease. I'll be reading it again....more
1.5. I hate to be so cliche and rate Rand 1-star, but I've finally read a book of hers. Objectivism is something I've read so much a39th book of 2023.
1.5. I hate to be so cliche and rate Rand 1-star, but I've finally read a book of hers. Objectivism is something I've read so much about online, and in university, I became aware of Rand through the flippant and damning statements made by professors whenever she somehow happened to come up. And you don't have to look far online to find hatred for Rand and her philosophy. And yet, things we do not agree with tend to be far more interesting than things we do agree with. Anthem was, originally, going to be called Ego, according to my introduction. At one-hundred pages long, this is the bitesize approach to Rand and her belief. The best video I've seen on Rand, and which I've actually watched numerous times, is this. Here we hear Rand saying her philosophy came from her own mind, and partly from Aristotle, the only philosopher, she claims, who ever influenced her. The video essentially sums up the bedrock that lies (barely hidden!) behind this novel and its purpose. That "We" is flawed, and "I" is not. Ego. That communism is bad. '...man will go on. Man, not men.' Rand's philosophy is attacked for being juvenile, flawed, etc., etc., it's certainly born from her own life experiences with communism. Ignoring the philosophy, the book is vapid. The final five pages beats objectivism over the reader's head. Subtlety begone. I'd be interested in reading The Fountainhead, which is apparently better, but I've had a copy of Atlas Shrugged since my university days and never so much as opened it. ...more
3.5/4/who even knows. So. There's a lot of chaos in this book from Mr Entropy himself T.R.P. And a lot of light. Compared to the dar27th book of 2023.
3.5/4/who even knows. So. There's a lot of chaos in this book from Mr Entropy himself T.R.P. And a lot of light. Compared to the darkness of Gravity's Rainbow, Against the Day feels far more fun. In a way bouncier, whatever I mean by that. And of course the book is about... What? Light? Grace? Technology? Coincidence? Randomness? Innocence? For one the book is extremely easy to understand compared to GR. There are a lot of characters but it isn't hard to follow, there are multiple narratives but I never got overly muddled. I'd say the hard thing about the book is simply the length of it, but it is not 'hard' to read. The Chums of Chance are a load of boys (who can age!) flying around on an airship. They drop in and out of the narrative. Perhaps they can travel in time. Lew is a detective, with some sort of special power. The Traverse family are at the heart of the story, a revenge plot embedded deeply, with all sorts of family stuff reminiscent of the sweet bits of Vineland. Kit was my favourite, with the Chums. He has a wild time throughout the book, nearly drowning in mayonnaise and has some trippy times in Siberia. His brother Reef was stranger. At one point in the book he tries to coax a dog into giving him oral... that can put you off a character. I never got massively into Cyprian and his business, but he was clearly a Sebastian Flyte character, particularly with his time in Venice, à la Flyte. Dally, Yashmeen, and numerous other characters doing all sorts of things, etc., etc., Pynchon likes his characters. Big events. WW1 looming as WW2 looms in GR. And how many countries in this single book, certainly most of Europe, or so it felt. A real globe-trotting book.
I'll be honest though. As fun as some bits were, the novel is wildly uneven. Some bits are fantastic, some bits feel completely disjointed and pointless to the narrative (but then I'm not as smart as T.R.P., and everything is probably beautifully connected). The last 200 pages felt like 400, not because they were any worse, but simply because I was starting to feel burnt-out, and wanted it to end. I've said it before, I respect Pynchon and his work but his humour doesn't align with mine. I can identify his playfulness, but don't find it overly entertaining myself. That said, this was fun at times. Certain events in the novel, which I won't say, had me wondering, But why Tom? What's the plan here? What's the arc? And that's what partly makes him so enjoyable, trying to figure these things out. What is the book about? What happens to the characters? Why is there so much light? Time travel? Alternate selves and universes? Why are there talking dogs? Sentient hurricanes? Glowing beetles? What's it all saying?
But then he is also saying things like this:
The skies were interrupted by dark gray storm clouds with a flow like molten stone, swept and liquid, and light that found its way through them was lost in the dark fields but gathered shining along the pale road, so that sometimes all you could see was the road, and the horizon it ran to. Sometimes she was overwhelmed by the green life passing in such high turbulence, too much to see, all clamoring to have its way. Leaves sawtooth, spade-shaped, long and thin, blunt-fingered, downy and veined, oiled and dusty with the day—flowers in bells and clusters, purple and white or yellow as butter, star-shaped ferns in the wet and dark places, millions of green veilings before the bridal secrets in the moss and under the deadfalls, went on by the wheels creaking and struck by rocks in the ruts, sparks visible only in what shadow it might pass over, a busy development of small trailside shapes tumbling in what had to be deliberately arranged precision, herbs the wildcrafters knew the names and market prices of and which the silent women up in the foothills, counterparts whom they most often never got even to meet, knew the magic uses for. They lived for different futures, but they were each other’s unrecognized halves, and what fascination between them did come to pass was lit up, beyond question, with grace.
Because Tom can write. He chooses to write about some surprising things, but he can write.
Now everybody—
It went on for a month. Those who had taken it for a cosmic sign cringed beneath the sky each nightfall, imagining even more extravagant disasters. Others, for whom orange did not seem an appropriately apocalyptic shade, sat outdoors on public benches, reading calmly, growing used to the curious pallor. As nights went on and nothing happened and the phenomenon slowly faded to the accustomed deeper violets again, most had difficulty remembering the early rise of heart, the sense of overture and possibility, and went back once again to seeking only orgasm, hallucination, stupor, sleep, to fetch them through the night and prepare them against the day.
Science-fiction, alternate reality, pastiche... A lot to process. Maybe more to come....more
Never a bad thing when the most fun I had with this book was on page 3 when the narrator of the first story takes the metro to Kong108th book of 2022.
Never a bad thing when the most fun I had with this book was on page 3 when the narrator of the first story takes the metro to Kongens Nytorv. And this was only fun because of the happy recognition of the metro stop. Last month when I was in Copenhagen, I took the metro every morning from Norreport to Kongens Nytorv. Sadly, my fun with this Danish novelist ended with the first story (which, on the whole, I thought was OK). The rest? Quite honestly, when I put the book down, I had no idea what I'd read. Two of the stories are both titled the same and deal with beach boys helping clients. As with the other stories though, there's a lot of surrealism and abstraction. There are paragraphs like,
In the pentagon around the hole, we plant five parasols upside down in the sand, twist them down into the viscous layers. The last three inches of the shafts sticking out of the sand we grease with after-sun before getting on our knees and letting our arseholes slide slowly down around them.
And,
Then it's night and he pushes me headfirst into the pool in front of the bench in the changing room. Seawater steams orange, comes up to the middle of my thighs. It's thick and living with the jellyfish blobs we've been filling it up with day after day; they've fused with each other and the salt: little, veined whitish eggs bulging in clusters. I'm on all fours in front of Manu, who's on his knees, feeding me the living water, shovelling it into my ass with his hand. The sun is inside me now because the sun sets in the ocean. Then he shows me a transparent, hollow shrimp shell he found on the beach, sticks his hand into his swim trunks and pulls out his long, thin dick. 'Do you want to?' he asks, nodding, and I nod too, and he twists the head off the shell and softens the rest in the living water. It fits snug around his dick except for the legs dangling from its base. I let myself float in the pool with my back arched and my ass in the air, let myself relax inside and feel him slide in: a ribbed and prickling sensation in the slime and cold. Through the hole in the wall, the sun makes a column of light in the water. He moves inside me, my spine turns to jelly. I can feel the eggs inside it: we're throbbing at the base of the spine, wandering slowly through the abdomen. Squirt of thick white juice, first Manu inside me and then me with eggs in the sun lands on the sandy ground. We make the best of what we've got.
1.5. Extremely surprised this made the Man Booker International shortlist. I honestly have no idea how it managed it. The blurb inf63rd book of 2022.
1.5. Extremely surprised this made the Man Booker International shortlist. I honestly have no idea how it managed it. The blurb informs that this is a 'genre-defying collection of short stories' that blur the lines between 'magical realism, horror and science-fiction,' which sounded instantly like something I would love. Not the case. Firstly, the prose is bland, so horribly bland. By the third story I was questioning the talent of the writer. I've read an Anton Hur translation before and enjoyed it so that's why I exclude them. The stories themselves, despite sounding fantastic, were on the most part just simply terrible.
To kick off the collection is a story about a head in a woman's toilet that has slowly been created by all the shit, toilet paper, hair and sanitary pads. She goes slightly insane with the thought of it growing in her toilet while her family around her seem nonchalant. The titular story was no better, a literal rabbit curse that sends people twitching and sitting in roads. Another story involves a woman getting pregnant by taking too many contraceptive pills (I know?) and then having to find a father before the baby is born otherwise something, the doctors tell her, awful will happen to the baby/her. Some stories were slightly better. The premise of "Ruler of the Winds and Sands" was cool, but again, Chung just butchered it with boring prose and a rubbish ending. The 1-star is really just to rage against the longest story in the collection, "Scars", which is one of the worst short stories I've read in a long time. The entire thing felt utterly pointless and read like stories my classmates and I used to write on our BAs. Most of the story is spent describing fighting, a boy fighting animals and men and then a monster. I don't even know. Just bad. The other Hur translation I read was Park's Love in the Big City which was better than this and was left behind on the longlist. The fact Paradais didn't make the shortlist but this did is so beyond me I can't even begin to comprehend their thought process. ...more
The Master and Margarita is one of those novels I'm ashamed I haven't read yet, and continues to elude me for some unknown reason. 108th book of 2021.
The Master and Margarita is one of those novels I'm ashamed I haven't read yet, and continues to elude me for some unknown reason. And it eluded me once again when I was in W. Library several months ago and saw this, an early Bulgakov novella, from 1925. A satire, of course, mocking the 1917 Russian Revolution, this Kafkaesque science-fiction story is influenced by the work of H.G. Wells, namely, The Food of the Gods and How It Came to Earth (a Wells novel I haven't read) where the same sort of science is taking place: a way to accelerate growth. In Bulgakov's novel, the same thing occurs, a light ray is discovered that accelerates growth and reproduction rates in living organisms. As with anything of this nature, it rarely goes well, and things quickly (actually quite slowly for such a short novella) go out of hand. A violent and ridiculous finish after a meandering and strange set-up, it's an interesting look into Bulgakov's early writing. Apparently he used to read this novella aloud and it was always met with great reception; it is, admittedly, the kind of novel that would be fun aloud, with voices for the mad scientists and screaming in all the right places. It goes that after presenting the story in 1924 (when it was written, published the following year) at a literary evening, he went home and wrote in his diary, 'Is it a satire? Or a provocative gesture? . . . I'm afraid that I might be hauled off . . . for all these heroic feats.'...more
Not my favourite PKD novel but it has some interesting ideas. The best part about it is probably the afterword and the idea that Di109th book of 2021.
Not my favourite PKD novel but it has some interesting ideas. The best part about it is probably the afterword and the idea that Dick wrote this novel as a homage to all those friends who died of drug use. His afterword is rather touching, and scary.
To Gaylene—deceased To Ray—deceased To Francy—permanent psychosis To Kathy—permanent brain damage To Jim—deceased To Val—massive permanent brain damage To Nancy—permanent psychosis To Joanne—permanent brain damage To Maren—deceased To Nick—deceased To Terry—deceased To Dennis—deceased To Phil—permanent pancreatic damage To Sue—permanent vascular damage To Jerri—permanent psychosis and vascular damage
Substance D is the fictional drug at the heart of this bizarre novel, set in the then-future 1994. It's one of PKD's most famous books and perhaps his most autobiographical one too as he said in an interview, "Everything in A Scanner Darkly I actually saw." The dialogue throughout is almost Beckettian, going around in circles, maddening, funny, sad; it is a portrayal of lives ruined by drugs. It also has the typical Dickian paranoia thrown in there too and the idea of reality, and what is the self? Essentially is a schizophrenic novel, where we cannot tell who the protagonist really is, who are the allies and who are the enemies in the seedy drug house setting. Drugs and undercover agents are sometimes indistinguishable and sometimes they are the very same person. It is also centred around the idea of being watched, constantly, and conspired against. I don't want to spoil too much of the plot, but that's the general gist of things and the themes.
My main issues came down to me finding it less compelling than other PKD novels and the writing being fairly poor. Though a lot of his work isn't what I would call amazingly well-written (I would call some of his novels more "cinematically" written), I felt this one suffered. The dialogue is fitting for the drug-house setting but distracting. The paranoia, though there, didn't feel as prevalent as other novels, but then I've read Gravity's Rainbow between this and my last PKD so maybe that has something to do with it too.
Some people can tell when they're being watched. A sixth sense. Not paranoia, but a primitive instinct: what a mouse has, any hunted thing. Knows it's being stalked. Feels it. He's doing shit for our benefit, stringing us along. But—you can't be sure. There are shucks on top of shucks. Layers and layers.
My interest just waned between the good bits and the sad bits. I can definitely see Dick writing about the dangers of drugs and how sad it is, what he must have seen,
'I'm happy; aren't you happy? I get to come home and smoke high-grade hash every night . . . it's my trip. Don't try to change me. Don't ever try to change me. Me or my morals. I am what I am. And I get off on hash. It's my life.'
and partly experienced himself. At one point in the Author's Note Dick writes,
'I myself, I am not a character in this novel; I am the novel.'...more
66th book of 2021. Artist for this review is Russian painter Konstantin Yuon (1875-1958).
3.5. Wild: violence, rape, drugs: utterly bizarre and over-th66th book of 2021. Artist for this review is Russian painter Konstantin Yuon (1875-1958).
3.5. Wild: violence, rape, drugs: utterly bizarre and over-the-top. Sorokin's dystopian vision of 2028 is hardly imaginable as prophetic, but an interesting look nonetheless. And contextually it plays a large role in a pool of Russian fiction, but I'll get to that later. It has been interesting reading this immediately off the back of Zamyatin's We, which must have been somewhere in Sorokin's mind when writing a Russian dystopian. The only striking similarity is the idea of a Wall that separates Russia from its neighbours, or in the case of We, the forgotten outside world.
Sorokin's unlikely vision of a 2028 future (published in 2006) is a world where the Tsardom of Russia has been restored and the protagonist (Komiaga) is an Oprichnik, a "government henchman", a sort of Gestapo-like figure. They kill the enemies of the state, rape their wives, burn their properties. They also seem to take a copious amount of very bizarre drugs; one instance: Komiaga acquires a tank of tiny golden fish which the Oprichniks put into their veins and allow the fish to swim into their bloodstreams and consequently have a collective trip together (where they become a many-headed dragon). At another point in the novel they take tablets and their ballsacks glow. So between violence and raping and sex, the book becomes a strange mix of A Clockwork Orange, Fahrenheit 451, Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep (or any PKD novel filled with drug-use/abuse) and We.
[image] "Planet"—1921
It gets quite extreme. At one point there's a giant homosexual-penetration scene where they become a caterpillar of penetration. There's the description of systematic rape fairly near the start of the novel too. The drug-use is mostly bizarre and entertaining. The murder is comical almost. In a way, it's a sick sort of tragicomedy about Russia. One review, by Victoria Nelson, summed it up nicely: "It's an outrageous, salacious, over-the-top tragicomic depiction of an utterly depraved social order whose absolute monarch (referred to only as "His Majesty") is a blatant conflation of the country's current president with its ferocious 16th-century absolute monarch known as Ivan Grozny." The rape of the woman in the beginning is justified by its unifying nature, that each having a turn raping the same woman made the Oprichniks feel togetherness, as a we, as a system, a collected identity. Overall the novel is an interesting (sickly so) and bizarre novel of violence and vague ideas of Russia and a persistent Soviet mentality, persisting to 2028.
[image] "People"—1923
***************************************
It is a single day, one day, in the life of this Oprichnik, which seemed similar, of course, to Solzhenitsyn's novel One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich. It turns out Sorokin doesn't like Solzhenitsyn, as a man or as a writer. Apparently the novel is also a parody of the 1927 novel Behind the Thistle by General Pyotr Krasnov, but as I haven't read it, I can't comment. I read a fair amount about it and the connections but don't feel qualified to report it here. There is also a giant influence from a Russian literary thinker, Mikhail Bakhtin, and his ideas of the collective grotesque body. A lot going on in the background of this seemingly ridiculous novel. Sorokin is regarded as one of the greatest living Russian novelists and his Ice Trilogy looks excellent. I think I'll be moving there next.
102nd book of 2021. Artist for this review is Lea Guldditte Hestelund, with whom this novel began as a collaboration with*.
3.5. An extremely tricky n102nd book of 2021. Artist for this review is Lea Guldditte Hestelund, with whom this novel began as a collaboration with*.
3.5. An extremely tricky novel to review because it sits within that awkward space as being interesting, thought-provoking, but at the same time, devoid of fully grasping something, reaching its supposed purpose, if we believe that novels such as these have purposes. The distinctive thing about The Employees is that Ravn did not originally set out to write a novel. As she says in an interview**,
'At that time I was very unsatisfied with my own job, I worked in an office. So I asked Lea if I could do something about people working for the exhibition. When I began to write I quickly realised that it would be more than four pages, and we ended up doing a book. They were lying around in the exhibition space, with no name, as if the text was a part of the artwork. A month later it was published as a novel.'
[image] "The Arrival Room"
Inspired by Hestelund's art and Le Guin's writing, Ravn developed The Employees, subtitled "A workplace novel of the 22nd century". It's a short novel and told only through witness statements by humans and humanoids alike. Without reading the blurb one might be relatively lost on what is going on within the pages. Ravn wastes no time explaining anything and in that sense the novel falls into that strange space of "hardcore" sci-fi, where answers are not readily given. On the spaceship 'Six-Thousand' there are humans like us from planet Earth and humans, humanoids, that were 'made', and never saw our planet. From another planet, 'New Discovery', strange objects were found (we can surmise that the novel's jumping-point was these objects, no doubt inspired by the strange objects throughout Hestelund's exhibition), and brought onboard. Now the crew, the employees, are reacting to them, and many of the witness statements refer to these strange objects which trigger emotions in humans and humanoids both (a lot of the time the distinction between either human or unhuman isn't made clear in the statement). The novel is hinged around these objects and what the humans and humanoids onboard feel. There is a creepiness to the novel all the way through, especially by the end, that comes from the form of these witness statements. It brings an odd silence to the text, perfect for the 'Six-Thousand' hurtlingly through the vacuum of space; it is like a chorus of voices all talking into a dead telephone line.
One quote on the book describes the novel as being as if 'Samuel Beckett wrote the script for Alien'. I didn't massively feel the Beckettness but there's something to be said about it all the same. It is an impressive novel that feels so full and empty at once. Lines like this, 'We don't fly under a sky here, but through a slumbering infinity', only add to the desolate wasteland of space that is forever just on the edge of the narrative, on the outside. The objects are never truly explained but give off great sense of smell, touch and feelings for the employees and these are explained well by Ravn. I think above all it is a novel about longing, partly about home, and of course, what makes us human and what art has to do with that. The latter themes remind of Ishiguro's Never Let Me Go. Ravn says in her interview, 'In all my books I’ve been interested in finding—I know it is not possible—but the area between what you are and what you are told', which then places another theme into the short book: the self; she also says, 'Actually an idea of what a human is isn’t big enough to actually hold what a human is. You get the sense you are moving in the outskirts of what a person should be, and that interested me.'
[image] "The Inner Space"
The full interview is linked down below and unpacks a lot more. From that springboard, the novel became the vessel for a lot of thoughts. In a way it deserves more than the 3-stars I gave it for being original, creepy, thought-provoking. I also think, despite my rating, it belongs on the shortlist because the idea of our longing, our human longing, and what makes us human, what makes us what we are and how we are connected to our planet and to others, is vitally important for today's world. I recommend the novel strongly for these reasons alone. Maybe if it sits in my mind even more I'll bump it up to 4-stars. The interview ends with these lines,
'I like to sit with the thought that right now we have thousands of eggs inside of us. Clusters and clusters and clusters of tiny eggs. Also even more bacteria, we have so much bacteria going on. You could almost say we are vessels for these lifeforms. As such, The Employees is about moving away from the singular, as it is a group of people talking, but also viewing your own body not as a central thing but as a home for yeast, bacteria, blood and virus. I’m not making it up, it’s not a metaphor. It’s real life.'
_________________________________ *Full art exhibition here, titled Consumed Future Spewed Up as Present. **Full interview here....more
A fin de siècle novel with three narratives in an alternate America. I wonder if Yanagihara is taking a stab at the Great American N32nd book of 2022.
A fin de siècle novel with three narratives in an alternate America. I wonder if Yanagihara is taking a stab at the Great American Novel, which, by one common list I see of the GAN candidates, only sports four women [1]. Even The New Yorker asks, "Can an Asian American woman write a great American novel?", and, "Can it cross from realism to dystopia? And — most important of all, perhaps — can it center on gay men?" Of course, it can, but that doesn't mean it can do it well.
We begin in an alternate 1893 [2], which as an opening Book, almost forced me to put the novel down. The setting was interesting, Washington Square, but the prose was à la Henry James (no surprise with Washington Square), and heavy and wooden as oak. Gay marriage is accepted and frequently practiced and we follow a young man and his age-old fiction battle with the man he ought to marry and the man he wants to marry. Old concept, wooden prose: it was a slog from page 1, near enough. And how disappointing it was that Yanagihara had fabricated this alternate post-Civil War America as the map suggests and then barely explored it as an idea. Instead we are put through long stilted dialogues and letters. The names of the characters, David, Edward, Charles, are the names that come up time and time again throughout the various Books, over 3 centuries.
Book II moves to New York in the 1990s in the middle of the AIDS epidemic and Hawaii [3]. I didn't mind the first part in New York, though, again, it was a little lifeless. The second part was a drag and looking around, it seems most people disliked the Hawaii part. By this point I was wondering exactly why Yanagihara chose to write the novel, what did these three parts say when lined up in tandem under the guise of a single novel? Other than the recurring character names, the recurring setting of Washington Square, of gay characters, what really tied them together? I don't side with the 'human experience' theme tying them together; by that logic, almost any book could be combined with another. I kept hacking through it though, in hope that Book III would have the answers.
So, Book III: 2093 [4]. I'm a big fan of SF and dystopias in general so being thrown into the world of this book, futuristic America battling infrequent pandemics, with coupons with food, mass sterilisation, camps, districts, 'Flies' (government drones), and so on, caught my attention at last. And this time through the eyes of Charlie (close enough to Charles), our very first female protagonist, a 'socially delayed' woman attempting to navigate the world with a gay husband who doesn't love her, but promised her grandfather to protect her all the same. Gay marriage is now illegal, in this form of America. The UK is known as New Britain and there are dreams of a better life there, where people can marry who they please and grow their hair long, if they so desired. Coupled with Charlie's chapters there are alternating epistolary chapters, starting 50 years before, written by her grandfather. It's the general consensus that Book III is the best part of the novel and the 'true' novel. Why were there 400 pages to get there, though? What do Book I and II bring to the narrative as a whole? That all our experiences are universal? I'd argue books give us that affirmation without needing 3 centuries worth of fictional work. On this point, Yanagihara has written an ambitious but an ultimately failed novel. Its unity gathers towards nothing, it's singular parts aren't strong enough to stand under their own weight. On almost all fronts it's a failure. ______________________
[1] The Last of the Mohicans. James Fenimore Cooper. The Scarlet Letter. Nathaniel Hawthorne. Moby-Dick. Herman Melville. Uncle Tom’s Cabin. Harriet Beecher Stowe. Adventures of Huckleberry Finn. Mark Twain. The Red Badge of Courage. Stephen Crane. The Great Gatsby. F. Scott Fitzgerald. Absalom, Absalom! William Faulkner. The Grapes of Wrath. John Steinbeck. The Fountainhead. Ayn Rand. The Catcher in the Rye. J.D. Salinger. Invisible Man. Ralph Ellison. The Adventures of Augie March. Saul Bellow. Lolita. Vladimir Nabokov. To Kill a Mockingbird. Harper Lee. Gravity’s Rainbow. Thomas Pynchon. Blood Meridian. Cormac McCarthy. Beloved. Toni Morrison. American Psycho. Bret Easton Ellis. Infinite Jest. David Foster Wallace. Underworld. Don DeLillo. Freedom. Jonathan Franzen. Telegraph Avenue. Michael Chabon.