|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
my rating |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1506712274
| 9781506712277
| 1506712274
| 3.57
| 2,751
| Nov 05, 2019
| Nov 05, 2019
|
liked it
|
An epic sci-fi of political scandal between a well fixed religious cult and a massive corporation with only a ragtag shipping crew to expose the truth
An epic sci-fi of political scandal between a well fixed religious cult and a massive corporation with only a ragtag shipping crew to expose the truth, this first volume of Invisible Kingdom is a gorgeously illustrated wild ride. Writer and artist duo G. Willow Wilson and Christian Ward plunge us into an exciting and dynamic galactic adventure that may have a bit of a cliched assortment of elements that feel rather on-the-nose at times, but the overall interplay between them feels successful and like a shortcut to excitement. Drawing on many noticeable influences like Dune and the tv series Cowboy Bebop and Firefly, this is a high-stakes space extravaganza that has some early pacing issues, though there is a lot of moving pieces to coordinate in order to light the fuse of conflict that I am eager to watch play out further. A critique of capitalism and religious influence in government and the corruption that can occur, Invisible Kingdom shows a lot of promise, and some extraordinarily eye-popping artwork, despite a bit of a jumbled narrative that needs more room to breathe. [image] The story follows space captain Grix, who pilots a Lux cargo ship (the Lux corporation is a bit heavy-handedly just Amazon in space, but I’m into the criticisms so lets goooooo), and Vess who has just joined a religious sect called The Renunciation. This cult swears off all worldly possessions in a galaxy where rampant consumerism seems to be the only joy left for anyone. While the two groups seems diametrically opposed, an uncovered scandal links the two and Grix and Vess’ destiny cross in order to stop in, or be blown to space dust. The story really addresses capitalism head of with the major corporation doing what major corporations do best: corruption. And also how under capitalism it’s so expected that a for-profit company would be shady that nobody seems to care as long as they get their consumer goods. There is a great look at how the government’s hands are tied to the corporation and the religious sect over the need for donations and votes and why would the politicians act when it would be political suicide to expose the truth? It gives a good high-stakes tone for the series to progress, added by the fact that literally everyone is trying to kill our “found family”-style crew. [image] Starting with the positives, the art is incredible. The character designs are great (and are a variety of humanoid species) and the colors really pop. There is a sense of bright, in your face pop-culture marketing to the color palettes or the video com systems. It’s just so pretty to look at and there is awesome stuff like a floating cathedral. [image] The story is fun, but it really struggles to find its legs. It jerks back and forth like Grix’s ship doing evasive maneuvers more so than flow forward and a controlled pace, and some of the major reveals at the beginning are a bit hard to follow at first. They try to tease tension through a slow reveal but it mostly just makes it feel clumsy as everything comes at you a bit fast, especially Vess’ storyline that needs a bit more breathing space to capture the sense that they have been there awhile. It also just feels like “Epic Sci-Fi Starter Kit” with many of the elements. But it works for the most part and I enjoyed it. I do enjoy the sapphic elements as well, and that Vess’ species has numerous different genders. Overall, I’m really enjoying this and optimistic about where it is headed. Will they survive? Will they topple empires? Tune in next time. 3.5/5 [image] See you, Space Cowboy… Volume 2: read my review here Volume 3: read my review here ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Feb 2023
|
Feb 2023
|
Feb 01, 2023
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
154930304X
| 9781549303043
| 154930304X
| 3.83
| 44,429
| Oct 22, 2019
| Oct 22, 2019
|
really liked it
|
Witches, werewolves, demons, ghosts, a dude with a bird for a head…this book has it all for a great spooky season read. Mooncakes by Suzanne Walker an
Witches, werewolves, demons, ghosts, a dude with a bird for a head…this book has it all for a great spooky season read. Mooncakes by Suzanne Walker and wonderfully illustrated by Wendy Xu (who wrote and illustrated the very lovely Tidesong) is an adorable queer graphic novel packed full of action and emotion. When Tam, a werewolf runaway, returns to their childhood town to hunt a demon they are reunited with their former best friend, Nova, who aims to help them in their quest to discover ancient werewolf powers to defeat the demon. It is a story of experimentation, research and romance, with a large cast that examines family dynamics and trauma and while the story is a bit clunky it is so sweet and heartwarming that I couldn’t help but love it. Also there is plenty of [image] Witchcraft! One thing I really enjoyed about Mooncakes was how much it covers that will be relatable to teens living lives outside the realm of witches and werewolves. Tam is running from an abusive step-father, Nova is dealing both with the death of her parents and her parents (as ghosts) disappointed in her for not leaving town to pursue her dreams of witchcraft. Along the way we have friendly neighbors hiding ulterior motives, cults and a full on demon stalking about the town so mileage may vary if this is like your town or not. Seemed pretty believable as far as Holland, MI goes. I really enjoyed that there was non-binary representation with Tam using they/them pronouns and nobody having any issue switching to that, as well as Nova using hearing aids and finding ways to combine them with her magic to be more powerful. So that was all very cool. Speaking of which, the action scenes are pretty great and one thing Wendy Xu excels at is having frames that are stuffed full of things going on without ever feeling overcrowded or confusing. [image] The artwork is fantastic in this and has a bit of a Studio Ghibli vibe to it with all the cottagecore scenery and outfits. It’s just all so very pretty to look at. The story itself is pretty involved with a pretty rich world and a lot of implied backstory, though sometimes it does feel less like being dropped into a larger world you can pick up through context and more like you accidentally skipped over an earlier volume or something. The characters are adorable though, if even a bit one-note, but I quite enjoyed them all interacting and supporting one another. It’s cute enough to gloss over a lot. So if you want a good queer graphic novel, Mooncakes is an adorable delight full of fun. This is perfect for the coming Halloween season, or just a cute read any time of the year. ⅘ [image] ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
not set
|
not set
|
Sep 15, 2022
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
1473563259
| 9781473563254
| 1473563259
| 3.54
| 13,525
| May 28, 2019
| May 28, 2019
|
it was amazing
|
‘The monster once made cannot be unmade. What will happen to the world has begun’ There is a certain spark that catches fire within me whenever I start ‘The monster once made cannot be unmade. What will happen to the world has begun’ There is a certain spark that catches fire within me whenever I start a Jeanette Winterson novel, her prose immediately transporting me into her realm of wild logic and zany brilliance that I’ve come to find so intoxicating. It’s like when I was a child and the LucasFilm logo would come up on the theater screen, shooting a chill and thrill through my body because I knew what was imminent, or that feeling when the roller coaster crests the first drop—the feeling of Here. We. Go. And what a wild ride Frankissstein: A Love Story is as Winterson creates with a patchwork of past—reanimating the story of Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley as she writes Frankenstein and all its lessons within&with the ‘future/now’ of AI, transgender and transhuman and brings them to life with her special shock of prose and plot styling. Frankissstein is endlessly playful and humorous and Winterson excels at making everything fluid from the prose to genders and the timeline of the novel where one moment you are in the Swiss Alps in 1816 and then next traversing subterranean tunnels with severed hands crawling like spiders. While both a paean to the past and warning to the future, Frankissstein is a love story at heart, between lovers, of humanity, of progress and all the terrors it may bring, and of creator and creations. ‘Why is it that we wish to leave some mark behind? said Byron. Is it only vanity? No, I said, it is hope. Hope that one day there will be a human society that is just.’ I had been intending to keep reading Winterson from oldest to most recent but after having, quite by coincidence, made my summer reading full of queer mosters stories (Our Wives Under the Sea and Carmilla), it felt only right to see how my now-favorite author would approach the genre. As always: brilliantly and unconventionally. The narrative here rotates between Mary Shelley during the summer retreat with Lord Byron, John William Polidori, her soon-to-be-husband Percy Bysshe Shelley and half-sister Claire that inspired Frankenstein and Ry (from Mary), a trans doctor set in the ‘future/now’. Winterson has a knack for weighting a novel in historical fiction while sashaying across a timeline, creating a wonderful juxtaposition between the ideas of Mary Shelley and company with the modern anxieties of AI as well as the themes from the source material of Frankenstein with Winterson’s own themes and theories in Frankissstein. In this way we see the catalyst for the Peterloo massacre contextualized alongside Brexit, offering an abstract commentary on recurring themes of history through their adjacencies. Mary’s comments in 1816, in this way, function just as well as a commentary on the present: ‘ saw that the wretched creatures enslaved to the machines were as repetitive in their movements as machines. They were distinguished only by their unhappiness. The great wealth of the manufactories is not for the workers but for the owners. Humans must live in misery to be the mind of the machines.’ They say the past is a foreign country but in Winterson’s hands it is also a borderless one, the past, present and future folded together into the quagmire of history and Ideas. ‘The opposite of the past is the present,’ says Victor, ‘anyone can live in a past that is gone or a future that does not exist. The opposite of either position is the present,’ and in this way we see past and present as two sides of the same whole, as if simultaneously in the narrative. The effect also grants a more dynamic aspect to the seemingly recurring characters (Ry Shelley, Victor Stein, or Lord Byron/Ron Lord) making them more expressions of their themes and a multifaceted idea with constant energy from creator/creation chasing one another across history. ‘My mind idled around the difference between desire for life without end and desire for more than one life, that is, more than one life, but lived simultaneously,’ thinks Ry, positioning it as akin to the dual lives across time in Sexing the Cherry and allowing for a greater nuance of character as they wrestle with themes throughout time unrestrained from one-to-one comparisons. ‘Like Victor Frankenstein’s, our digital creations depend on electricity – but not on the rotting discards of the graveyard. Our new intelligence – embodied or non-embodied – is built out of the zeros and ones of code.’ -Jeanette Winterson, 12 Bytes: How We Got Here. Where We Might Go Next In an interview with Literary Hub, Winterson discusses ‘the corporatization of everything,’ and how that has, with AI, come to even have influence over the way we love one another, a major theme of the book. ‘I am not at all anti-tech,’ she says, ‘but we really can’t leave this stuff to socially stunted white boys and corporate greed,’ which is at the root of several ethical quandaries in Frankissstein. Namely, if AI learns from us, what reflection of our society will it give with concerns of racial and gender bias and will this further harm marginalized people with the novel taking a special focus on trans and non-binary people (which is a modern twist to Shelley’s Frankenstein about how lack of paternal care caused the creation to become monstrous and we, people, might be the true monsters). This has long been a concern, and, as Caroline Criado Pérez discusses in her book Invisible Women: Data Bias in a World Designed for Men, in virtually every aspect of life ‘ we continue to rely on data from studies done on men as if they apply to women.’ She demonstrates how this appears everywhere for the medical field, car safety design, urban planning and even standard hand size for tools. Winterson asks us to consider how this will show up in AI, especially considering it is a known issue such as when a 2020 report found that 90% of companies have faced at least one instance of ethical issues due to AI systems, with 60% of these involving legal scrutiny. ‘He is not human, yet the sum of all he has learned is from humankind.’ Shelley writes, a message that applies to both Frankenstein’s monster and the machine learning of AI. The biases learned from the data is something UCLA professor Safiya Umoja Noble terms in her book Algorithms of Oppression: How Search Engines Reinforce Racism as ‘technological redlining’ which is ‘embedded in computer code and, increasingly, in artificial intelligence technologies that we are reliant on, by choice or not.’ She shares Winterson’s concern that ‘where men shape technology, they shape it to the exclusion of women, especially Black women.’ With Silicon Valley having a large gender gap as well as a notable issues of rampant misogyny and sexual harassment, this seems a valid worry, on that is voiced by several characters in Frankissstein, most notably Vanity Fare journalist Polly D who ask ‘will women be the first casualties of obsolescence in your brave new world?’ This eventually seeps into a criticism of cis liberals and the way they fetishize trans ideology for argumentative points as well as gatekeep gender performance, but more on that later. One of the more humorous aspects of the novel is Ron Lord’s sex-bot industry—which at all time risk waking up and moaning ‘daddy’ at inopportune times in the novel—but also soft pitches the first ethical queries about creating, AI and how technological advances will alter the way we love and interact. Ron sees sex-bots as freedom and a way to empower men, while others worry it is another way that ‘men subjugate women.’ In her non-fiction work 12 Bytes: How We Got Here. Where We Might Go Next, which feels like the essay version extension of this novel, Winterson explores this at length in the essay Hot for a Bot. She contrasts notable Chinese feminist Xiao Meili who argues that ‘men will always have outdated expectations, and ‘sex housewife robots’ might actually help women’ with Dr Kathleen Richardson, who founded the Campaign Against Sex Robots in 2015, and ‘is concerned that sex robots reinforce stereotypes, encourage the objectification and commercialisation of women’s bodies and increase violence towards women’ (Ron mentions clients smashing or maiming the heads of his sex-bots is a common problem). I enjoyed the characterization of Ron as a stereotypical ‘tech bro’, yet in many ways he becomes a rather endearing character and seeing him at least try (though mostly failing) to understand the arguments, particularly around transgender and transhuman issues. ‘Doll-world likes to paint itself as a daring challenge to convention,’ writes Winterson, ‘in reality, doll-world reinforces the gender at its most oppressive and unimaginative.’ There is certainly something to ponder about the way the dolls are ‘made to look like the male-gaze stereotype,’ and programed to be submissive and get off on abuse will do to human relationships, something Frankissstein approaches with humor tinged with horror. ‘All our faults, vanities, idiocies, prejudices, cruelty. Do you really want augmented humans, superhumans, uploaded humans, forever humans, with all the shit that comes with us?’ Winterson plumbs the depths of the creator/creation ideas from Frankenstein in multiple ways here, with Victor Stein pushing boundaries in the whole ‘playing God’ idea as he hopes to resurrect dead organs and even map the brain to upload consciousness for digital and eternal life. There is some great stuff here when present-day Claire, the anti-robot, ultra-Christian unexpectedly joins forces with Ron Lord because she wants to see if the soul will return to the self upon reanimation. Even Mary Shelley must confront a literal flesh-and-blood Victor Frankenstein in a sanitorium, only to find the motif of herself chasing him through all of history as he chases his creation. Winterson World is wild and I love it. We are even treated to real-life I. J. Good’s head preserved in a jar awaiting Victor Stein to ‘steal life from the gods. At what cost?’ ‘And what if we are the story we invent?’ The digital or reanimated self, as well as tech-implant in the novel quickly juxtapose issues of transhumanism and transgender questions that make up for some of the most interesting aspects of the novel. Through Ry, a trans man, we see Winterson address the hypocrisy of tech-bros who preach of digital consciousness while still reacting violently (as a misogynistic policing for the patriarchy, as Dr. Kate Manne would put it) or squeamishly to trans people. Men here gender robots they have sex with can’t call Ry by his correct pronouns. When Ron questions how digital existence will change online dating, Ry comments that it would be like old correspondence, all consciousness without the body: ‘there would be no straight, gay, male, female, cis, trans. What happens to labels when there is no biology?’ Winterson steps us through multiple examples of reinventing or rebuilding oneself but then questions why being the gender one identifies with is crossing the line for some. Mary’s half-sister changes her name, for example (‘I did not disapprove of this. Why should she not remake herself? What is identity but what we name it? Jane/Claire’) and Mary considers the story of Pygmalion marrying a statue that he brings to life and then becomes a woman—’a double transformation from lifeless to life and from male to female.’—or the statue of Hermoine that comes to life in Shakespeare’s The Winter's Tale (which Winterson reimagined in The Gap of Time). Naming is important, Winterson writes, as is using correct pronouns lest we Other people. As Albert Camus said ‘to name things wrongly is to add to the misfortune of the world,’ such as how calling Frankenstein’s creation a monster drove him into violent isolation. ’If you believe, as I do, that religious texts – like myths – are texts we create to mirror the deeper structures of the human psyche, then yes, naming is still our primary task. Poets and philosophers know this…I cannot conjure spirits, but I can tell you that calling things by their right names is more than giving them an identity bracelet or a label, or a serial number. We summon a vision. Naming is power.’ Ry faces a lot of resistance and fetishizing for being trans (particularly from Vic who is a stereotypical “ally” that amounts mostly to fetishization, you know, they type that will argue that someone isn’t performing identify enough to meet their standards of how trans identity can be discussed) and asks ‘if the body is provisional, interchangeable, even, why does it matter so much what I am?’ Even Victor seems to view Ry mostly as a curiosity, attracted to him as someone who reinvented himself but trips up when Ry asks if he had a penis would Victor still be attracted. Victor, who thinks consciousness and the human body are separate and the former will live without the confines of the latter in his future. Winterson has said ‘‘gender identity is more fluid,’ and grappled with that in extraordinary fashion in Written on the Body which features a narrator with no gender identifies, and it is interesting to see this explored in context of digital futures. There is a sexual assault scene, reminding us that trans people face extreme aggression and violence to the extent that the Human Rights Campaign declared it an epidemic. This is just all very interesting to see addressed in a modern sci-fi novel like this, building on themes Winterson has approached since the 80s. ‘This is a love story’ As with most Winterson, an examination of love is at the heart of this book. And is always written about in such gorgeous prose and phrasing. Take for example Victor’s speech here (there is, to be fair, a lot of soliloquizing in this book): ‘We read a book about ourselves and wonder if we have ever existed. You hold out your hand. I take it in mine. You say, this is the world in little. The tiny globe of you is my sphere. I am what you know. We were together once and always. We are inseparable. We can only live apart.’ This perfectly addresses the theme of Mary Shelley and Frankenstein across time and is rather cute. So is Victor’s constant return to Baye’s theorem telling Ry his presence is new data that alters the outcome. Scientists sure know how to flirt in Winterson World. If I have one criticism of the novel, it is that occasionally the dialogue reads a bit off or forced, though these are characters that are oddballs in society so maybe it works? Whenever there is a clunky moment in the novel it is also Winterson experimenting and I give it grace for at least trying new things. I do enjoy how Winterson has an uncanny pulse on modern day tech and language though, and when Mary responds in all caps ‘THIS IS THE MOST PROFOUND THING THAT CLAIRE HAS SAID IN HER LIFE,’ the folding of past and present makes it read in current twitter voice that makes you !!!! and is just funny. Winterson even makes quoting The Eagles sound brainy. ‘This is madness, I said. What is sanity? he said. Can you tell me? Poverty, disease, global warming, terrorism, despotism, nuclear weapons, gross inequality, misogyny, hatred of the stranger.’ Frankissstein is a bold, brash and brilliant novel that takes you through corkscrews of ideas Winterson continues to astonish me and I have to admit it was also the most fun I’ve had with a book lately. I really enjoying doing outside reading on the topics, such as how Lord Byron was a prick. The Mary scenes are extraordinary, I could have read a book of just that. This is a fun book, though those looking for an entry point might want to start with her earlier work, and while having read the source material was nice, it is not necessary. That said, Winterson reanimates Frankenstein here for a further examination of it’s themes coupled with a modern landscape of technology and ethics for a wild ride of a book you won’t soon forget. 4.5/5 ‘Humans: so many good ideas. So many failed ideals.' ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Aug 15, 2022
|
Aug 15, 2022
|
Aug 15, 2022
|
ebook
| |||||||||||||||
0525562028
| 9780525562023
| 0525562028
| 4.03
| 344,418
| Jun 04, 2019
| Jun 04, 2019
|
it was amazing
|
Need a good cry? Do I have the book for you! Ocean Vuong will completely destroy you emotionally and then put you back together as a new person. Slaps Need a good cry? Do I have the book for you! Ocean Vuong will completely destroy you emotionally and then put you back together as a new person. Slaps some line breaks into this prose and it’s pure poetry. An absolute devastating banger of a novel. Bring tissues. ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
not set
|
not set
|
Aug 07, 2022
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
1782275843
| 9781782275848
| 1782275843
| 3.86
| 144,559
| 1872
| Sep 07, 2021
|
it was amazing
|
‘Love will have its sacrifices. No sacrifice without blood.’ Step aside, Dracula, Carmilla by Sheridan Le Fanu is my new yardstick for vampiric stories ‘Love will have its sacrifices. No sacrifice without blood.’ Step aside, Dracula, Carmilla by Sheridan Le Fanu is my new yardstick for vampiric stories. You may have heard the big talking point around Carmilla, a queer vampire story published as a serial in The Dark Blue (later collected in La Fanu’s In a Glass Darkly) in 1871 and predates Bram Stoker’s Dracula (1897) by several decades. But does it live up to the hype? Yes, and some. Set in Austria and drenched in gothic tones of dread, Carmilla is a gripping tale of seduction and bloody horror, treating us to the mysterious Carmilla growing close to 19-year old narrator Laura as a strange plague seems to be killing the young women in the local region. As scary as it is spicy, Carmilla is a riveting read that presents early vampiric lore as well as some excellent examinations of class warfare and a loss of innocence in this chilling coming-of-age tale. [image] Original llustration from Dark Blue publication by D.H. Friston For maximum reading experience, listen to this song. The notion of a seductive vampire is alive and well in Carmilla, with Le Fanu boldly exploring themes of women’s sexuality. For the 1870s, this book feels pretty erotic, with a lot of caressing and kisses that do not disguise a craving of sexual intimacy between Carmilla and Laura. If one is anxious this will lead to an assertion of the draw of homosexuality as demoic or anything like that, rest assured this is not present in the text. It is frequently noted that the two girls are drawn to one another’s beauty, and even the old men of the book seem charmed by that (the father is actually a rather endearing character). The short novel creeps forward, piling dread upon dread across supernatural sequences with some truly frightening imagery. The gothic setting of constantly grey weather in a countryside full of decaying castles (Le Fanu uses the utterly delightful term schloss as often as possible) set a perfect tone for the tale. This has a growing tension that reminded me of Henry James’ The Turn of the Screw, though it has been suggested that James was inspired by this novel for the narrative framing in his own book. With each surmounting horror, from shared dreams between the two girls, Carmilla disappearing from her room, a shadowy figure walking through the fog down a path beyond the schloss, and frequent deaths in the town, the novel will keep you flipping pages eagerly enjoying this little gothic gem. ‘But to die as lovers may—to die together, so that they may live together.’ Carmilla is one of the earlier vampire stories, but by no means the first. For example, The Vampyre by John William Polidori predates it, published in 1819 during the same writers retreat as Mary Wollstonecraft Shelley’s Frankenstein, but there was already a rich vampire lore for Le Fanu to draw from. It has been asserted that 18th century monk Dom Augustin Calmet’s vampire story served as an inspiration, and Samuel Taylor Coleridge’s poem of a succubus,Christabel, (and the shared theme of hospitality betrayed) each influenced Le Fanu. A major source of inspiration was also found in a memoir by Captain Basil Hall, Schloss Hainfeld; or a Winter in Lower Styria, which shares the same setting as this novel and the family name Cranstoun is likely the source of the deceased Hungarian family Karnstein in Le Fanu’s novel. That said, an aspect I found interesting reading it in the present is how I had to cast aside any preconceived notions of vampires, as there is a fairly rigid modern vampire lore that has been built over time and any deviation from it always stands out. At the novel’s conclusion there is a brief recounting of what is purported to be known about vampires at the time, insinuating a robust lore this story is immersed in. The story is framed as being from the case files of Dr. Hesselius, Le Fanu’s paranormal detective, and this story functions as Hesselius’ investigation into vampires through a first-person account written to him by a now-adult Laura. In Carmilla, vampires are able to go about in sunlight, but cannot travel far from their burial place where they return to sleep without disturbing the soil above their coffin. One aspect I found rather silly but wish continued through vampire lore is that the vampire can only disguise themselves using an anagram of their name while alive (Mircalla/Millarca/Carmilla). So if you ever meet a dude named Veste--watch out, I’m about to vampire you. Carmilla appears as a black cat instead of a bat and also can more or less teleport. But one description stands out to me: ’One sign of the vampire is the power of the hand. The slender hand of Mircalla closed like a vice of steel on the General's wrist when he raised the hatchet to strike. But its power is not confined to its grasp; it leaves a numbness in the limb it seizes, which is slowly, if ever, recovered from.’ This is the perfect metaphor. The grip of a vampire will leave you numb forever, such as how the seductive grasp Carmilla holds over Laura will either leave her dead or a vampire like her. It is said here that vampires like to multiply their numbers (which occurs either through being turned, like Carmilla, or suicide), and the story is vague on what Carmilla plans for Laura. I have my opinion, but I think the vagueness makes the story all the more eerie. ‘Dim thoughts of death began to open, and an idea that I was slowly sinking took gentle, and, somehow, not unwelcome, possession of me. If it was sad, the tone of mind which this induced was also sweet.’ This book situates Carmilla as a member of the Hungarian aristocracy, a line that ended during an uprising. There is an interesting look at class warfare and keeping down of the poor here, with peasant girls being the usual victims from the vampires.The middle-class members such as Laura’s father or the General seem to write these deaths off, assuming some disease spread amongst the poor and that their wealth and schlosses will protect them. There is certainly a disdain for the lower classes, particularly from comments by Carmilla. For her, the poor are merely a meal and we have a pretty blunt metaphor of the rich feeding off the suffering of the poor. Laura, on the other hand, offers her resources and wealth, making her much more alluring (as did the General’s niece). We see the vampire always as a social climber. I quite enjoyed how in order to integrate into human society the vampires here are always presenting a narrative involving intrigue and danger. It seems as if this playacting is a foreplay of sorts to the vampires. ‘But dreams come through stone walls, light up dark rooms, or darken light ones, and their persons make their exits and their entrances as they please, and laugh at locksmiths.’ What really drives this novel home, however, is the language. Everything is dripping in dread and gothic tones and Le Fanu has a large vocabulary surrounding dreariness and blood (or lack thereof). As the book presents itself as a scientific examination of vampires, it is interesting to note how much humorism plays into the language used. Characters are often described as languid, plaid or languorous to nudge to ideas of the blood being drained. The weather is without warmth or sun and everything is decaying or corpse-like. It is perfect. 'You are mine, you shall be mine, you and I are one for ever.' This is an excellent early vampire story that certainly has deserved to survive through the public consciousness. It even influenced Dracula, most notably in the deleted first chapter that later appeared as a short story, Dracula’s Guest, but one can see similarities in characters like the Baron or the General being an influence for Van Helsing. Anne Rice has cited Carmilla as a major influence for her Vampire Chronicles series, and there have been comic and film adaptations of Le Fanu’s slim novel. I quite enjoyed the openness of women’s sexuality here and Le Fanu certainly knows how to succinctly create a sensual atmosphere within an otherwise deathly cold tone. While the ending is a bit abrupt, it isn’t unsatisfying and still leaves a lot to ponder over. Also it’s always fun to consider this theory that correlates the popularity of vampire or zombie media with the rise of either right or left-wing politics. Carmilla is a classic and has certainly seduced me. Now to figure out these bite marks on my neck… 4.5/5 [image] Below is art from an unreleased graphic adaptation by Rosemary Valero-O'Connell [image] [image] ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Jul 20, 2022
|
Jul 29, 2022
|
Jul 20, 2022
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
0802135161
| 9780802135162
| 0802135161
| 3.73
| 85,426
| Mar 21, 1985
| Aug 20, 1997
|
it was amazing
|
‘To eat of the fruit means to leave the garden because the fruit speaks of other things, other longings.’ Jeanette Winterson writes prose that seeps in ‘To eat of the fruit means to leave the garden because the fruit speaks of other things, other longings.’ Jeanette Winterson writes prose that seeps into you the way warm sunshine does at the final edges of winter. She has a distinct voice with a confident cadence that can seamlessly sway between realism and the fantastical or fairy tale elements, harmonizing each aspect of her storytelling into a grand orchestral narrative that in each of her books pushes boundaries and doesn’t shy away from experimentation. What’s more is it always comes across as overtly cool and collected, like some celestial being wearing an edgy jacket with “punk as fuck” scrawled on the back. In Oranges are Not the Only Fruit, Wintersons 1985 debut novel that reads like someone already deep into a celebrated writing career, this prose is put to the task of documenting a provincial pentocostal church community and Winterson’s depictions of evangelicalism is so deadpan and unironic at times it practically loops back into satire that the moments of direct criticism feel so nestled up in the narrative to make you understand how integral these dark moments are to the entirety of this lifestyle. Winterson’s use of diction and sharp imagery are as entertaining as they are direct, signifying how surreal the whole experience was to Winterson as she looks back on her own upbringing through the lens of fiction. The thing is, much of Oranges are Not the Only Fruit is autobiographical and there are very authentic and lived emotions pulsating through every page. Like Jeanette, the young narrator of the novel, Jeanette Winterson was adopted into an evangelical community and faced ostracism for being a lesbian. This book will ring true to anyone who spent their youth at Bible camps and growing up in a church community, which, as shown here, can be tight-knit communities that use religion to validate distrust of outsiders and dominate nearly every aspect of your social and emotional life. For those who are forced out it is like losing the earth underneath your feet, an aspect Winterson examines as a way that members are kept compliant and made to act against their own true selves. ‘History should be a hammock for swinging and a game for playing, the way cats play.’ The autobiographical inspirations acknowledged, this is not simply a memoir, and the act of fictionalizing her own experiences, as well as threading fairy tales throughout as abstract commentary on the socio-emotional underpinnings of the novel, is what gives it true power: a narrative constructed from history taps into meaning and purpose in a way a recounting of history cannot because ‘stories helped you to understand the world.’ This is something Jeanette comments on several times in the novel (the introspective segments blur Jeanette the narrator and Jeanette the author in a gleefully postmodern way): ‘[T]hat is the way with stories; we make them what we will. It’s a way of explaining the universe while leaving the universe unexplained, it’s a way of keeping it all alive, not boxing it into time…Very often history is a means of denying the past. Denying the past is to refuse to recognize its integrity.’ To write a narrative is to fulfill the integrity of history. Fairy tales and Biblical stories, in this way, are given the same weight in Winterson novels as narratives that construct meaning. This becomes much more prominent in her following two novels, with both The Passion and Sexing the Cherry combining historical narrative with magical-realism to tell a new story from history that gives voice to the usually voiceless, and here Winterson recasts what is undoubtedly told in this particular church community as a wayward youth consumed by the Devil into a narrative that gives the supposed “sinner” the voice to show how they were wronged and abandoned. ‘We are all historians in our own way,’ Winterson writes, and she proudly affirms the powers of storytelling, both as a redemptive and retributive vessel. It is literary empowerment at its finest and teaches us ‘there is an order and a balance to be found in storytelling.’ As she writes in her memoir, Why Be Happy When You Could Be Normal?, 'I believe in fiction and the power of stories because that way we speak in tongues. We are not silenced...somebody has been there for us and deep-dived the words.' Winterson has been there and this book can likely be a life raft for those who need it. ‘If there’s such a thing as spiritual adultery, my mother was a whore.’ The novel is framed around Jeanette’s relationship with her mother and, because her mother figures herself an appendage of the Lord, the religious community she was brought up within. Adopted into the family ‘I had been brought in to join her in a tag match against the Rest of the World’ she says from the start, quickly characterizing her mother as someone who considered herself always right and any dissent to be ‘not holy’ as she frequently says. The mother is fully devoted to the church and her only interests are in expanding her devotion, which over time includes working in a religious MLM and reading books on missionary work that are revealed to be increasingly racist propaganda. It is a rigid childhood, one of prayer and routine where Jeantte’s only acquaintances are members of the church, most notably the aging Elsie who was once a young prodigy of the church and has taken a special interest in her upbringing. ‘Eventually, I thought, I’ll fall in love like everybody else. Then some years later, quite by mistake, I did.’ Jeanette is always engaged in passing out bible tracts (you ever get one as a server that looks like a $20 bill and it says something like 'you'd be rich with Jesus' with a church address and you realize they did not tip you...fun stuff) finding new converts. Jeanette converts a young girl she meets and their private bible study sessions blossom into something more. The shame and confusion felt by knowing this is something you want and something that feels right but having been brought up to deny it and demonize it is a really uncomfortable maelstrom of emotions to be in. It can often turn into self-hatred or denial, and as much as one is their own worst critic, one can be their own worst judge, jury and jailer. ‘It is not the one thing nor the other that leads to madness, but the space in between them,’ she comments, and all the internal struggle of denying oneself who you are and being told you are a sinner for simply being yourself is a hellish place to be in between the major events such as Jeanette being caught and facing the public exorcism from the Pastor. Winterson uses the condemnation of her being a lesbian to look at how aversion to LGBTQ+ folks is often an aspect of patriarchy enforced by misogyny to separate anyone who is not white, heteronormative male. ‘The real problem, it seemed,’ Jeanette observes during her second round of punishment for being found out with another woman, ‘was going against the teachings of St. Paul, and allowing women power in the church.’ While initially it was assumed her ‘going astray’ came from outside influences such as public school (a ‘breeding ground’ for sin, her mother claims), the church elders get right into it and announce that women being allowed to preach opens up a weakness for the Devil to exploit. Jeanette understands then that the church powers exist to ensure ‘the message belonged to the men.’ Reading this novel written in 1985 England still resonates in 2022 America where this same anti-LGBT rhetroic is increasingly used as fundraising grifting for politicians. What Jeanette finds confusing, however, is the insistence that her ‘unnatural passions’ are ‘aping men.’ To sleep with a woman, it is implied, is only something a man can do. ‘There are women in the world. There are men in the world. And there are beasts. What do you do if you marry a beast?’ Much of this is tied into the ways Winterson examines how girls are socialized into submission, doubling down on the repressive nature of the church community for those who are women. ‘I was a little girl, ergo, I was sweet,’ is an early lesson she learns from a lecherous shopkeeper who gives her candies, ‘and here were sweets to prove it.’ It’s a sort of purity culture that is certainly present in many evangelical communities that often teaches girls they should be compliant and submit to men. When Jeanette complains her uncle hurts her by rubbing his beard stubble on her face, she is told that he didn’t hurt her, but that it was ‘just a bit of love.’ She demonstrates the early childhood lessons that a man can harm her and still call it love, all aimed at keeping women subservient in a patriarchal culture. Melanie, Jeanette’s first lover, is thought to be recovered from her sins when she marries a man and devotes her life to having children, to which Jeanette observes she appears docile and ‘serene to the point of being bovine’ with all the spark that drew her to Melanie now snuffed out. Winteron also examines the double standards in judgment on gender biases. She juxtaposes Jeanette’s harmless love with consenting a peer, for which only she suffers consequences that upend her life, to the sexual transgressions and embezzelment of the pastor in the MLM, which harms many people and causes financial strains for the community. While Jeanette faces public humiliation and punishment, this man has people rally to cover his debts and even provide him a paid vacation. The double standard is readily apparent. ‘I peeled it to comfort myself, and seeing me a little calmer, everyone glanced at one another and went away.’ Somehow I’ve gotten this far in thinking about the novel without addressing oranges, which make for a multifaceted metaphor throughout the book. The mother only gives Jeanette oranges to eat, and the gift of an orange is often in place of emotional support, a treat meant to pacify but not heal. Late in the novel when she stands accused by her mother and her pastor, she offers them an orange, much to their confusion. It is a brief but brilliant moment where she puts their own symbol back in their face to express the inadequacy of their support.Late in the novel the mother eventually decides that ‘oranges are not the only fruit’ when it is advantageous to her missionary aims, which reads as ironic when her refusal to understand that heterosexuality is not the only path chased away the member of her flock most dear to her. ‘It is not the one thing nor the other that leads to madness, but the space in between them.’ The orange also appears as a demon Jeanette see’s during times of emotional stress, a demon that asserts demons are not bad, just a change in their life and tells her she can keep her demons and live a difficult life—but one that may be worth the difficulty—while reminding her that her sexuality is normal and being ‘different’ doesn't mean being bad. ‘Everyone has a demon,’ they tell her, ‘but not everyone knows how to make use of it.’ That it is a demo who pushes for self-acceptance and finding autonomy in her life is amusingly scandalous, as it is something conjured from the evangelical teachings yet also in opposition to them. The demon will travel everywhere with her, a reminder that the past follows us no matter what, but that we can survive it because ‘it was not judgment day but another morning.’ What truly brings this book together are the interspersed fairy tales that season the novel and serve as commentary on the story while being fully immersive experiences on their own. The final tale of Winnet, intertwined with the story of Sir Percival, creates a way to grasp Jeanette’s predicament that opens up such an emotional resonance that feels like an earthquake rather than the tremor of discomfort in the aspects of realism. Winnet’s tale briefly retells the novel through fantastical metaphor and leaves us with the feeling of dread with the wizard’s string tied around her that explains the Jeanette’s feeling of being unable to fully escape her mother’s control. If anything, this book is a testament to storytelling on multiple levels. ‘She must find a boat and sail in it. No guarantee of shore. Only a conviction that what she wanted could exist, if she dared to find it.’ Reading Winterson, I feel understood. I’ve had this with other authors but Winterson reaches into my being and polishes elements I didn’t think anyone else could know about. Which is part of the reason we all read, right? To discover we are not alone, that someone empathizes, that someone can put into words things you feel but thought otherwise ineffable. Oranges are Not the Only Fruit is a book that I could see having a huge impact on those who escaped similar situations, or could find themselves in this novel as a compass for where to go next. This book is actually quite funny and warm, despite the difficult topics, and it will pluck every emotional string you have in ways that will surprise you. Most importantly, this book gives hope. A harrowing debut that reads like a seasoned veteran of letters, Oranges are Not the Only Fruit is a must-read. 5/5 ‘I still don't think of God as my betrayer. The servants of God, yes, but servants by their very nature betray. I miss God who was my friend. I don't even know if God exists, but I do know that if God is your emotional role model, very few human relationships will match up to it.’ ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Apr 17, 2022
|
Apr 22, 2022
|
Apr 17, 2022
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
0593300238
| 9780593300237
| 0593300238
| 3.93
| 31,582
| Apr 05, 2022
| Apr 05, 2022
|
really liked it
|
‘Nobody’s free without breaking open.’ 2016 saw the rise of Ocean Vuong with his incredible and well-lauded debut collection of poetry. Deservedly so a ‘Nobody’s free without breaking open.’ 2016 saw the rise of Ocean Vuong with his incredible and well-lauded debut collection of poetry. Deservedly so as Vuong has a gift of language to discuss difficult and painful subjects in a way that illuminates them in beauty. Time is a Mother, his second full-length volume of poetry, makes good on his early promises of excellence as Vuong examines grief from a multitude of vantage points, be it grief from loss of a loved one or a country. Following his debut novel, On Earth We're Briefly Gorgeous, an autobiographically informed work that centers on the death of his mother, here we find poems that extend the theme and processing of grief, frequently drawing parallels between human and animal bodies as if to remind us that any loss is tragic. He simultaneously grieves the loss of cultural identity as one ages in the United States instead of a home country where the scars of war stand out in the family history of relocation. Vuong is at his best when playing with form and in the longer poems that give room for experimentation and compounding of an idea, and Time is a Mother is a gorgeous and heartbreaking collection that is as teeming with emotion as it is poetic integrity and execution. ‘You’re smiling because the stars are just stars & you know we’ll only live once this time.’ There are few aspects of life more universal than the mourning of death, and birth and the inevitability of dying are two things we all have in common. ‘Lest we forget, a morgue is also a community center,’ Vuong writes, and these poems are something we can all come together around and harmonize about the human condition. Time is a Mother feels the natural follow-up to Vuong’s novel like an abstract afterword as commentary on what had transpired in the book but also a bridge forward to whatever will come next. In these pages we see the whole of Vuong’s life, such as family members, generational trauma, musings on identity and more culminate into the grieving process and an inward look at one’s small position in a vast universe as memories show they have emotional barbs and processing pain and feeling the weight of existence becomes a necessity to continue living. ‘Because this mess I made, I made with love.’ There are a wonderful variety of techniques utilized here, from short poems that deliver a staccatoed burst of images to multipage emotional epics and dense prose poems that read nearly like deleted scenes from Vuong’s novel. Personally, the more daring and experimental poems or longs ones work best for me, such as the poem Reasns for Staying, an emotional knock-out inspired by his Vuong’s uncle who took his own life in 2012 that lists soul-stirring moments of life that uphold the beauty of existence. ‘Because they came in to my life, these ghosts, like something poured,’ he writes as he lists reasons to live that include rain falling on his partner’s shoulder, reading ‘my books by the light of riotfire,’ or ‘because this body is my last address.’ In another poem he lists the Amazon purchases of his mother over the course of a year, a narrative of a life suddenly upended by cancer slowly and cleverly being revealed by the list of items in a way that touches on the way details of our lives become marketing data for corporations to sell us products. List poems appear several times in this collection, with Old Glory listing common phrases to show how normalized violence and death is into our language. It makes us stop and consider how phrases like telling someone to “go in guns blazing” might not seem like positive encouragement to someone who has experienced war or been a family of refugees. Some of the later poems are written as dense prose poems, which aren’t my favorite personally, but Vuong packs a lot of emotion into them. ‘Because the fairy tales were right. You’ll need sorcery to make it out of here.’ The grief in these poems is not only for those who have passed, but also for the living who are marginalized by society. ‘I used to be a fag now I’m a checkbox,’ he writes in Not Even a poem that later details a scene where a white woman tells him he is lucky that his identity as a queer immigrant lets him write about war and sexuality. ‘Because everyone knows yellow pain, pressed into American letters, turns to gold,’ he remarks, commenting on how his griefs aren’t simply a marketing trick and that the idea of being jealous of it is rather disturbing. Time is a Mother is an impactful collection that shows Vuong has plenty more to say and will continue to be a big name in poetry. While it doesn’t hit me as strongly as the first collection, which is so endlessly quotable, it is still quite an impressive collection that resonates and left me thinking of these poems when I was away from them. May we be reading Ocean Vuong for a long time to come. 3.75/5 ‘How else do we return to ourselves but to fold The page so it points to the good part.’ ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
not set
|
not set
|
Apr 05, 2022
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
1941302467
| 9781941302460
| 1941302467
| 3.87
| 9,821
| Sep 26, 2017
| Sep 26, 2017
|
really liked it
|
Cute, creepy, wholesome, artistically gorgeous and delightfully queer, Taproot from author/illustrator Keezy Young is a lovely little paranormal roman
Cute, creepy, wholesome, artistically gorgeous and delightfully queer, Taproot from author/illustrator Keezy Young is a lovely little paranormal romance that will warm the heart. The story follows Hamal, a young gardener who is able to see the spirits of the dead that have not yet moved on, and Blue, a ghost who likes to hang around Hamal because, secretly, he is in love. But when a Reaper shows up looking to track down a necromancer that can see the dead, their awkwardly peaceful life is shaken up. While a bit disjointed in narrative, Taproot is so sweet and beautiful to look at that it won’t matter much and make for a charming short read. [image] First off, the art here is wonderful. It is a nice loose style with gorgeous landscapes and pleasing palette choices that reminds me a bit of my favorite graphic novelist, Tillie Walden. There are some great shades of blue and green here and this is worth reading for the art alone. This book is also nice and creepy, but in a fun sense. The characters are full of sass and the interactions between Blue and Hamal are adorable. Plus the secondary characters are great, if only a bit underused, such as the teenage girl ghost who smashes things in Hamal’s shop just because she can. The plot sort of propels forward a bit too quickly and the second half never feels like it quite takes hold due to the pace, but it is still quite fun. Really its the character dynamics that take center stage anyways. And I love the Reaper, they are the coolest. There isn’t much explanation to the paranormal universe going on here, but the small hints at it deliver a lot of impressions that make it work and make it super fun. [image] Keezy Young is great and I definitely need to read more of their work. This is such a cute little story that you can easily devour in a single sitting but will want to come back to just to stare lovingly at the artwork. 3.75/5 [image] ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Apr 2022
|
Apr 2022
|
Apr 01, 2022
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
0593120043
| 9780593120040
| B08VRJ4K9Y
| 3.51
| 3,828
| Jan 18, 2022
| Jan 18, 2022
|
liked it
|
‘We’re strongest when we can learn from each other…when we can bend and change to help one another.’ Jessi Zabarsky, the author/illustrator of Witchlig ‘We’re strongest when we can learn from each other…when we can bend and change to help one another.’ Jessi Zabarsky, the author/illustrator of Witchlight, returns with her new graphic novel Coming Back, an adorable tale of magic, love, and learning to not be caught up in the old ways as to miss out on adapting to new and better ones. The art here is the real shining star, brilliantly conveying emotion and crafting an imaginative fantasy world with the tone set by the most pleasing color pallets imaginable. This is a very cute story that plays with Joseph Campbell’s hero’s journey, when a young couple is separated when one woman must go on a quest to save the town while the other is banished when she breaks the strict codes of their society. Fast, fun and full of heart, Zabarsky’s new queer graphic novel is a bit light on the mechanics but this is a visual feast that satisfies. [image] The art here is divine, seriously. It has a wonderfully cozy vibe to it that feels akin to the landscapes of Tillie Walden but more snug and warm as if by way of Kay O'Neill. If you’ve enjoyed either of those graphic novel artists, this will certainly be of interest to you. The colors really pop so peacefully, and the intricate outfits of the characters as well as the creative fantastical village designs are really lovely. There is a fascinating mythology going on here. The village is very isolated and obdurate, living in strict tradition to the magic that created them and their society. There is a pretty cool magical explanation to how life and (re)birth works which is a clever way to create the all-woman gender utopia of the village. While we learn the basics of the magic, and that there is Shifter magic as well as Shaper magic, it is all told pretty loosely and very much up to your imagination and interpretation. Which I can appreciate, though sometimes it is a bit vague. World building is left mostly to the artwork, though the other village in which Preeta and her daughter briefly stay is pretty excellent and populated by all sorts of whimsical species. The central message of the book is to learn to say sorry and open your mind to new ways of thinking, doing, and being. ‘Our stories are only good as long as they help our people,’ Valissa teaches the village. While the outside world can be scary and different, we can learn and grow if we open our minds and hearts. It is a beautiful message that really works here, showing that traditions can be important but not to be rigid about them because welcoming, understanding and loving one another are more important. Like the hero’s journey, Preeta and Valissa must come back and share what we have learned so all can benefit and thrive. ‘Sometimes we will lose stories…We can tell the stories we remember, though, and make up new ones.’ This is a quick read and occasionally feels a bit light and moves too fast, but it also covers a lot of ground and the two “quests” intertwined in the narrative take you through a lot of wondrous stories. It is also an adorable story of lesbian couple and how our insecurities can play out in the world. But most of all, the visuals here are fantastic. 3.5/5 ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
not set
|
not set
|
Jan 14, 2022
|
ebook
| |||||||||||||||
9781838390020
| 1838390022
| 3.52
| 11,389
| Oct 28, 2021
| Oct 28, 2021
|
it was amazing
|
‘Ghosts are born from trauma and violence.’ I relish the rare moments when a book can completely annihilate you. Tell Me I’m Worthless, the debut novel ‘Ghosts are born from trauma and violence.’ I relish the rare moments when a book can completely annihilate you. Tell Me I’m Worthless, the debut novel by promising young writer Alison Rumfitt, is a horror novel that not only has teeth but an intelligence and power to tear you to pieces and put you back together in a way that leaves you forever haunted, and glad for it. Seriously, this book is intense and while the content warning that precedes her grisly tale lets you know what you are in for, nothing can truly prepare you for how unsettling this is in the way it forces you to confront the violent and pervasive ideologies of fascism as it slimes its way through modern society. Drawing on a long history of horror and fairy tale literature, Rumfitt delivers a razor-sharp and very political haunted house narrative that explores issues of trauma and the trans experience under creeping fascism. The novel rotates between perspectives of Alice, a trans woman, and Ila (with an intentional choice to mirror their names), her former girlfriend that is now a public figure for trans exclusionary radical feminists, and the voice of the House itself, as the two women deal with the aftermath of them having entered the house years ago with their friend Hannah. Only the two of them walked out, both with conflicting memories of abuse from the other that occurred during their stay, and are forever traumatized and haunted by both figurative and literal ghosts. Tell Me I’m Worthless is an unrelenting horror festival that boldly pulls the reader through the hell of modern discourse and violent ideologies to explore the real-life horrors of queer life in the UK. ‘Where were you when we lost the culture war?’ This book is a lot, and I’m completely blown away by it. Alison Rumfitt, a trans woman, has delivered a harrowing narrative on the trans experience that hits with a truly astonishing force and is a perfect example why we need inclusivity in publishing to tell a more encompassing range of stories. While Tell Me I’m Worthless draws on horror and fairy tale fiction influences complete with homages to Shirley Jackson, Angela Carter, Helen Oyeyemi, books including Jamaica Inn or Jane Eyre, as well as allusions to pioneers of literature on gender and race such as Audre Lorde, there is still a thrilling uniqueness to the novel that feels it couldn’t—and maybe shouldn’t—have been created by anyone but Rumfitt herself. The inspirations and occasional pastiche that occur are very welcomed, and Rumfitt has a reading list that I simply adore (it helps that with each reference I caught I thought, “I love that book too!”). The Haunting of Hill House is a clear inspiration and model for much of the book, and lovingly so. Look at one of Rumfitt’s descriptions of the House: ’ No live organism can continue to exist compassionately under conditions of absolute fascism, even the birds in Italy under Mussolini were observed to take part in rallies and violence. Albion, not compassionate, not sane, stood ringed by a tangled forest, holding inside, however messily, its overpowering ideology; it had stood so for a hundred years but would only stand for one more before it entered into the long process of becoming something else, at the end of which it was hoped it would seem to all the world that it had always been that way. Within, floors crumbled, ceilings gaped open, vines choked the chimneys and the windows. Silence lay steadily against the wood and stone of the house, and whatever walked there marched on Rome.’ It is a wonderful reimagining of the imagery and ideas expressed by Jackson and her notable opening paragraph to Hill House: ‘ No live organism can continue for long to exist sanely under conditions of absolute reality; even larks and katydids are supposed, by some, to dream. Hill House, not sane, stood by itself against the hills, holding darkness within; it had stood so for eighty years and might stand for eighty more. Within, walls continued upright, bricks met neatly, floors were firm, and doors were sensibly shut; silence lay steadily against the wood and stone of Hill House, and whatever walked there, walked alone.’ It feels less like a clever remake and more like passing the torch, continuing the tradition of psychological horror to battle the demons of the present with the support of those who came before. The whole book reads as very personal to Rumfitt and of-the-moment in a way that truly shines, with Rumfitt admitting it is build from a space of being ‘quite tuned into discourse, in a way that can be bad for my own health,’ and, written during the pandemic lockdowns, was constantly informed and updated to address the ever changing arguments that flood social media with each news cycle. It is effective and the language of the novel crackles in the tongue of modern internet discourse, twisted and imperfect as hot takes and viral twitter threads and soiled with the rhetorical maggots that lay their eggs and thrive in the damp and dark of 4chan anonymity. Tell Me I’m Worthless feels destined to become a cult classic as it truly captures uneasy existence as violent ideologies are given space and taken seriously in the general public while violence against trans people is so prevalent it has been declared an epidemic Or, perhaps, in ten years we may look back on it as outdated and not in line with a more inclusive present. This would be preferable, and the book argues for a future such as this. ‘The fascists are already here…’ As stated in the content warning, Tell Me I’m Worthless focuses on ‘trauma and fascism.’ This book is triggering in very many ways, dealing with sexual assault, transphobia, antisemitism, and racism among others, and it should be kept in mind they are used for more than mere discomfort for the horror genre and to make a very loud statement against them. Be warned though, this book is intensely graphic and uses a lot of language and explanation of ideas that are extremely uncomfortable (though very effective). Nothing is very subtle here either, with the house being very obviously a metaphor for how fascism can infect through entry points of fear, feelings of inadequacy, thirsts for power and more. However, there is no need for subtleties here, with bold choices such as the house being named Albion (a word that is used to name the island of Great Britain) and the directness of the book gives it a rather punk flair that works particularly well with the horror aesthetics. While Rumfitt avoids directly naming him, one of the ghosts that haunts Alice is the musician Morrissey—who’s political statements of late have more or less made him the older generation’s J.K. Rowling but for music—who appears eyeless out of her torn The Smiths poster she keeps up to cover a frightening looking stain on her wall. The effect is both comical and utterly terrifying to read, with Rumfitt being astonishingly good at creating very visual scenes full of terror, and this combination of horror and dark humor really drives the enjoyment of this book. This book is punk as fuck, as the saying goes. This book is set in our present, where LGBTQ+ issues have gained visibility but also continue to have a frightening and often violent backlash. ‘Notable reversals have appeared in nations overtaken by right-wing populism,’ Jules Joanne Gleeson writes in an introduction to a collection of essays on the intersections of politics and trans culture, and in her interview for the Guardian between her and gender-studies philosopher Judith Butler, Butler (most notably in an answer that was removed hours after initial publication despite pushback from Gleeson) notes the large overlap between trans exclusionary radical feminists (TERFs) and neo-fascism, claiming an anti-trans ‘ ideology is one of the dominant strains of fascism in our times.’ The TERF ideology is prevalent through the novel, as Ila is an active member of an anti-trans organization and frequent contributor of essays and interviews on the subject. These passages may be difficult to read and much of the book makes the reader confront the rhetoric of anti-trans arguments. In an interview with Pink News (highly recommended read), Rumfitt explains that the narration from Ila was written for ‘ getting into the headspace of someone who, if they met me on the street, would probably hate me… it’s so much a part of modern discourse in this country that it’s kind of strange that it’s gone so unexplored.’ As she is someone who has undoubtedly heard these arguments far too often and made to feel unsafe because of them, Rumfitt delivers a very disturbing exploration. ‘ Now, if three girls enter a house and only two leave, who is to blame? And if both girls tell a different story, but you read online that you have to BELIEVE WOMEN, what do you? Do you decide one is a woman and one isn't, so you can believe one them but not the other? Do you take the side of the woman who is most like you? Or the most intersectional one? But one is rich, and white, and trans, and the other is rich, and Asian and a lesbian, and cis (?), and fuck, who wins here? In the end it's so hard to choose where your sympathies settle. So, you go online and find an `intersectionality score calculator' on the internet…Numbers have been known to lie. Numbers have been known to show bias, statistics often have racist undertones, for example. What makes Tell Me I’m Worthless so effective is how well it captures the nuance of modern discourse that is often swept aside out of inconvenience to get the best hot take. The nature of social media also positions people against each other, where the best spicy quip is often more valued than discourse. We exist in a world where access to information and theory is right at our fingertips, but there is still the difficulty in navigating and rationalizing it all. Activist Emma Dabiri discusses the difference between information and knowledge in this regard, and how the latter requires much more experience and cerebral undertakings to effectively utilize. Which is also Rumfitt’s point in presenting some of the more toxic ideologies and then framing them in complex and intricate scenarios almost as a test to see if you will succumb to the voice of the House as so many others do. The book borrows language and imagery from fascist political figures like Pinochet and Mussolini, or drawing from fear-mongering speeches like the ”rivers of blood” speech by Enoch Powell to demonstrate how persuasive they can be, particularly under extreme circumstances or while bathed in fear. While the growing fascism examined in the book is particularly framed as it occurs in the UK, the darkness of it is universal to anyone who has encountered far-right authoritarians in their many forms. ‘You, too, are implicated in its presence. Don’t forget that. You, me. Those you love.’ The House itself is written as a root of these ideas, spreading them throughout the land as well as claiming victims for itself in a way that feels like a more subtle version of the monster that infects the citizens of New York City with racism in The City We Became by the wonderful N.K. Jemisin. The House reminds us of our complicity in the society we exist within and that our systems and structures can be rotted at the core, creating a systemic violence or oppression that thrives on our denial of them. The effect here is that while people might not be knowingly fascist, it shows how they become willing to accept fascist rhetoric and arguments into their minds, which then festers and grows within them like vines slowly strangling out their empathy and humanity. ’The House spreads. Its arteries run throughout the country. Its lifeblood flows into Westminster, into Scotland Yard, into every village and every city. It flows into you, and into your mother. It keeps you alive. It makes you feel safe.’ Presenting this topic through the genre of horror is brilliant, keeping fear and safety a central topic in the novel. ‘For someone to feel safe, another has to be safe,’ the House preaches, ‘for someone, the majority, to prosper, another has to… well. I think you understand…’ The book places the characters in that unsettled, deflated feeling of being post-college and wallowing while waiting to land somewhere, making them all the more susceptible in their unease, and we watch as they are losing a battle of becoming a product of their traumas rather than one they wish to be. Only by returning to the House and confronting them can they ever move forward in life. In the present, Hannah is absent, the friend who ‘always ended being the odd one out, the third wheel,’ which made her the perfect victim for the House where she may or may not be either trapped inside or have fallen victim to the horrors she endured. ‘We were young and idealistic,’ they think of when they braved the House the first time, ‘ we wanted to make some political point of the whole thing.’ The political is always present in this book, but beyond topics of gender Tell Me I’m Worthless also tackles social class head on. Immigration, Brexit, crime, and more are all public conversation, one political ideologues capitalize on for power and profit, and the House is a well-constructed metaphor of these. ‘The most famous haunted places in the world tend to be the big houses and castles,’ Rumfitt writes, ‘because rich people lived in them and the collective blood on their hands, the collective violence that they caused on everyone else in the world, manifests into ghosts.’ Albion, the House and the nation, are examined as the product of years and years of bloodshed, colonialism, racial oppression, patriarchy and more amalgamating into a dark force that transcends the physical world. The reaches of the House occur in every corner of society, even property ownership that leads to pushing out the unhoused and anyone deemed an Other. An effective image occurs early in the book of an abandoned church with ‘a sign outside reading TRESPASSERS WILL BE PROSECUTED. God’s body, decaying, has now been cut off from society; do not touch him, for he is owned by a variety of contractors, and they have legal power over the likes of you.’ Tell Me I’m Worthless is an unflinching and brutally direct novel that combines horror with political and social discourse to deliver a fantastically unsettling story. Alison Rumfitt has taken the reigns from her predecessors and driven the genre of horror and fairy tales deep into the heart of our modern condition, constructing amazing imagery that thrills as much as it chills. Rumfitt has crafted a stunning debut here. This is certainly not for everyone, and I will caution that this book can be quite triggering, but if you dare to enter this book will have its ghosts following you forevermore. 5/5 ‘Sometimes, at the end of everything, the only option you have is to make it worse.’ ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
not set
|
not set
|
Dec 31, 2021
|
Paperback
| ||||||||||||||||
B0DN3JM259
| 4.05
| 2,793
| Jun 15, 2021
| Jun 15, 2021
|
really liked it
|
‘I’m angry that I have to make my own gods. I’m angry that even the gods I make can’t help my family.’ If you are looking for a historical fiction grap ‘I’m angry that I have to make my own gods. I’m angry that even the gods I make can’t help my family.’ If you are looking for a historical fiction graphic novel with a ton of heart, look no further than The Legend of Auntie Po, written and illustrated in gorgeous watercolor by Shing Yin Khor. Set in a Sierra Nevada logging camp in 1885 following the Chinese Exclusion Act, The Legend of Auntie Po follows Chinese immigrants Mei and her father as they navigate the difficult and often violent racial tensions in the United States while working in the camp’s kitchen. Written as a middle-grade graphic novel, this is still moving and enlightening through adulthood and the illustrations are simply magical. Shortlisted for the 2021 National Book Awards, this story of a young, queer woman caught in the racial politics struggles of American history is a beautiful coming-of-age story about the tradition, standing up for oneself, and the power of storytelling. [image] Mei has lived her entire life in the United States. Born in Reno, Nevada, she is constantly ‘othered’ for her Chinese heritage and denied access to most of American society, such as the ability to attend a University. She enjoys her life with her father, feeding the men at the logging camp and being with her friend Bee. Though recently Mei has begun to notice her affection for Bee may be more complex than friendship. Mei is not just an amazing cook, however, but is known for her storytelling. When violence against Chinese immigrants begins to flare up, Mei begins to see her own mythological story, a logging god named Auntie Poe, come to life and this helps keep her brave. This is an important and often overlooked aspect of American history. During the California Gold Rush in the late 1940’s-early 1950’s, Chinese immigration jumped and they were welcomed as laborers on railroads and mining. When surface gold began to slow, animosity towards Chinese immigrants began to grow, with racist depictions in media turning the white public violent towards them. The largest mass lynching in US history occured in 1871 in Chinatown in L.A., when a mob of 500 people killed 19 Chinese immigrants. As violence grew, President Chester Arthur signed the 1882 Chinese Exclusion Act, blocking all Chinese immigration into the US (a 1875 ‘Page Act’ had previously banned all Chinese women) which only further stoked racial violence against Chinese workers. The Legend of Auntie Po occurs during this time and also makes several mentions of how the Black families at the camp are also under threat of violence everywhere. While the white logging boss of the camp insists they are ‘all family,’ he is unable to protect Mei’s father from demands that the company cease any hiring of Chinese workers. Mei and her friend Bee, the daughter of the boss, find what poet Claudia Rankine calls their ‘historical selves’ putting them at odds, with Bee being unable to truly understand the struggles faced by Mei and her family. [image] This is a very moving story that reminds us how important storytelling is and how it functions as part of culture. Are Mei’s gods real or do they become a metaphorical expression of her people? Can stories be shared? These questions come together at the end of the story, which is both very sad yet ultimately heartwarming and bittersweet. The intended audience are younger readers and there is nothing that would be too much for them, but it still lands with full impact as an adult. What is truly beautiful are the ways Shing Yin Khor shows the power of storytelling to heal and process the world around you, with Mei using her stories as an outlet for her emotions at times. The Legend of Auntie Po is an extraordinary graphic novel. The colors and art style are so delightful and the story gives voice to an often swept-under-the-rug part of US history. A must read. Also you should follow Amanda because pretty much all my graphic novel recommendations come from her and she never misses. She knows the best books. 4.5/5 'If history failed us, fiction will have to restore us.' ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
not set
|
not set
|
Nov 27, 2021
|
Unknown Binding
| |||||||||||||||||
1620109557
| 9781620109557
| 1620109557
| 4.23
| 10,447
| Aug 10, 2021
| Aug 10, 2021
|
really liked it
|
Fitting in is always a challenge during teenage years, especially when everyone has different ideas of what that might mean. Cheer Up: Love and Pompom
Fitting in is always a challenge during teenage years, especially when everyone has different ideas of what that might mean. Cheer Up: Love and Pompoms by Crystal Frasier and illustrated by Oscar O. Jupiter is an adorable little graphic novel about friendship, challenging preconceived ideas and learning to listen to what others need instead of trying to help in ways we think they need. While the story is a bit too short, I’m hoping this is the start of a series because it is fresh, fun and surprisingly packed with valuable lessons and perspectives that are often overlooked. [image] Annie and Beebee make a great due in this cute little graphic novel. Annie is a bright but very antisocial lesbian known for being rough around the edges (she once bit someone) and having no desire to fit in. Beebee is a people pleaser and also uncomfortable with her local celebrity status when newspapers were eager to report on her cheer team accepting a trans girl on their squad. This graphic novel has really sensitive and empowering representation and is written by a trans author. Transphobia becomes a frequent hurdle in several situations (readers who may be uncomfortable with this be advised), particularly in situations where a person is unaware how their actions may be harmful. Which is where this book shines best because it is a good reminder how allyship can quickly become problematic when people aren’t asking the person they are allying with what the best ways to help them actually are. [image] I think this is a really important lesson, as many of the times Beebee’s friends think they are being supportive it is actually making her very uncomfortable. The way the team is so eager to show how inclusive they are, such as making her team captain against her wishes or wanting to vote her as homecoming queen, put Beebee in a situation she does not want to be in. Even her parents have good intentions but become overprotective to their detriment. Yet, despite the heavy themes, this story is quite fun and uplifting. Unfortunately it feels a bit rushed, with problems arising only to be solved almost immediately and after the set-up the story barrels straight towards a tidy conclusion. I hope this is an indication there will be more, because there is still a lot that could be explored with these characters, particularly the romance growing between Annie and Beebee. Highly recommended, fun, fast and a good reminder to ask how to best help instead of simply offering your help. 4/5 ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
not set
|
not set
|
Nov 26, 2021
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
0802158781
| 9780802158789
| 0802158781
| 3.67
| 13,954
| Jun 28, 2019
| Nov 16, 2021
|
really liked it
|
‘Do you think our lives would look like this if our plans always worked out?’ Young adulthood is a tumultuous time juggling part-time jobs and relation ‘Do you think our lives would look like this if our plans always worked out?’ Young adulthood is a tumultuous time juggling part-time jobs and relationships—neither of which tend to last long—along with school, family, and all the traumas from these that the adult mind is finally starting to unpack. Love in the Big City by Sang Young Park is both comedic and desolating as it explores all these ideas from the mind of a young, queer man living in Seoul. Beautifully translated by Anton Hur (they also translated Cursed Bunny by Bora Chung), this book is bubbling over with personality and the charming prose and excellent dialogue will propel these introspective stories right into your heart. Love in the Big City feels deeply personal and autobiographical, with the narrator (called both Mr. Young or Mr. Park at various times) being a semi-successful short story writer who’s stories of sexual escapades and rough living in the Korean queer scene were awarded for their ‘objective self-judgement,’ which very much describes the honest and upfront narration here. Across four parts, each with their own internal thematic arc, Love in the Big City explores the many different kinds of love one feels, as well as their successes and failures as Sang Young Park delivers a moving account of young life and the difficulties of being a queer man in a world still rife with homophobia. ‘But is love truly beautiful?’ the narrator asks themselves midway through the novel. They have experienced the highs and lows of many types of love and sometimes things just don’t feel optimistic. The young student narrator tends towards quick flings, spending each night with a different man as he and his best-friend, Jaehea, live their early twenties in a hazy bliss of alcohol and strangers beds. ‘My devil, my savior, my Jaehee,’ he muses as he chronicles in hilarious detail their tight-knit friendship with this quirky young woman who once steals a medical model from a hospital when denied an abortion, who keeps her Marlboro cigarettes in the freezer, who is the ‘backup drive of my love life’, but when she eventually marries and moves out of his life, Young begins to feel unmoored. He lives with his mother, with whom he has a fraught relationship and must care for as she undergoes cancer treatment for the second time and has a tragic relationship with an older man. Love, at many times in this novel, does not feel beautiful. And yet the heartbreak often seems part of the beauty, particularly later on. The difficulty of love, it seems, is a world that refuses to allow the LGBT community to live life on their own terms. Even his older boyfriend, a former student activist who frequently chastises him for wearing brands that bear the flags of Western imperialist nations (he reprimands Young for having bedsheets with a Union Jack on the tag, and it is interesting how, along with Gyu-ho’s mattress later in the book, there is always some sort of tension about a partners bed functioning as a metaphor for the difficulties of relationships), has internalized homophobia and an search history full of articles denouncing a queer lifestyle. Young himself faced ‘forced hospitalization’ by his mother when she discovered him kissing a man and has never accepted his queerness, something that haunts their relationship forever as he only wishes she would apologize. ’suddenly felt that I was owed an apology. From whom? The idiots who blamed homosexuality for every stupid thing? Or the specific idiot next to me for smothering himself in that bullshit and being unable to accept himself for who he was? Or the other idiot who fell for the first idiot, even when he knew the first idiot was an idiot, who fell for him so hard he dug through his computer to know everything there was to possibly know about him? Maybe I was owed an apology from all of the above. Or maybe from none of them.’ It is a complex identity, and he grapples with what it means to be a queer Korean man while being the ‘by-product of American imperialism and Western capitalism that I was,’ and how anyone can love and live in a world dominated by money and success. Frequently in the novel we find characters that are struggling with denial of their own conditions, such as the older, self-hating boyfriend who views homosexuality as an ‘evil colonial practice of the American Empire,’ or the mother that won’t accept the severity of her cancer diagnosis. Similarly, much of the book revolves around issues of if being publicly “out” is accepted or safe, as are other aspects of young life that are deemed taboo. When living with Jaehee, she tells everyone her roommate is a shy woman. ‘In those days, we learned a little bit about what it was like to live as other people. Jaehee learned that living as a gay was sometimes truly shitty, and I learned that living as a woman wasn’t much better. And our conversations always ended with the same question. When a lover lingers long enough in her life to notice something is amiss and Young is found out, even the fact that he is a gay man isn’t enough to quell the notion that a woman living unmarried with a man is shameful. The boyfriend allows it to continue but frequently plays the martyr stating that ‘other men’ wouldn’t allow it. In contrast to Young and his group of club-going friends, dubbed the T-aras after the South Korean all woman musical group, we see his older boyfriend being unable to allow public affection in fear of being outed. Other stigmas, such as HIV, come up in the novel such as when Young has to submit a blood test for a job and his condition becomes something that is career-prospect stifling as well as socially. While the novel shows a thriving LGBTQ+ community in Seoul, this is with the knowledge that there are no legal protections against discrimination due to gender identity or sexuality in housing in South Korea, and gay marriage has yet to be legalized. ‘An excess of self-awareness was a disease in itself.’ All these social and identity issues play out across the four stories taking Young from his early 20s to early 30s and across multiple relationships. As Sang Young Park mentions in the afterword, ‘”Young,” who narrates the four stories in this book, is simultaneously the same person and different people.’ He explains that the book ‘leans on the past, both on my own personal history and that of many people around me,’ and explains that the author’s voice is not necessarily the same as the author and that we change in different stages of life. This opens up some excellent autofiction territory for the book, and we see the snarky and self-aware Young from many different angles in many different situations. ‘Life had always been eager to fail my expectations, no matter how low I set them.’ A narrative aspect I found to work particularly well is that some events will be briefly mentioned in one story only to be examined at length in a later one. The vacation Young takes with his boyfriend, Gyu-ho, for example, is glossed over in the section about their relationship but the memories of it come flooding back a year later when he is staying in the same hotel on a hook-up with an older business man after their break-up. The authentic remorse where a time and place doesn’t take on a deep emotional resonance until examining it in retrospect was quite impactful and colored the final section of the novel with a somber beauty. ‘That is how my memories of him are preserved under glass,’ he thinks, ‘safe and pristine, forever apart from me.’ The end has a bit of a self-sacrificial feel to it. ‘When you try to have too much, you’re bound to stumble at some point,’ he reflects, and there is remorse for the ways of the world that lead to these stumbles, while also accepting his own hand in having gotten there as well. ‘Bitterness,’ he thinks, ‘my favorite taste in the world.’ It’s a very self-aware and moving novel, and while much of it is quite funny there is also a pervasive melancholia weighing on the tone. ‘I used to feel like I’d been given the whole world when I held him. Like I was holding the whole universe.’ There are some beautiful passages here though, particularly about love. And that is what this book nails so well: that love is both bitter and beautiful and that love comes in many forms. Platonic love, familial love, and self-love as well as romantic love. This novel reads very quickly and the prose and dialogue is very infectious, wonderfully rendered into English by Anton Hur. Love in the Big City is sharp, smart, wickedly funny and it will break your heart and make you glad for it. Is love truly beautiful, he asks and the answer is a bittersweet ‘yes.’ 4.5/5 ‘I tasted something on his lips that I had never tasted before. The fishy, chewy taste of rockfish. Maybe the taste of the universe.’ ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Mar 29, 2022
|
Apr 04, 2022
|
Oct 29, 2021
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
1911284207
| 9781911284208
| 1911284207
| 3.78
| 375
| 2014
| Oct 04, 2018
|
it was amazing
|
‘People are trifling, their lives meagre and fleeting. But this, Nana thinks, is also what makes them loveable.’ Some books have the ability to harmoni ‘People are trifling, their lives meagre and fleeting. But this, Nana thinks, is also what makes them loveable.’ Some books have the ability to harmonize with your emotional currents, casting you about in their waves but before dashing you upon the rocks drift you safely to a glorious shore of understanding. Books you don’t simply read but experience. Hwang Jungeun has managed to craft precisely that kind of book with I’ll Go On, a book about two sisters and their lifelong friend as they question meaning in life and love, and a book that dominated my thoughts through early summer and left me so speechless I’m only now writing about it. This very lyrical novel is brilliantly translated by Emily Yae Won and conveys a linguistic playfulness in styles and structures that differentiate the internal monologues of the three characters. Social criticism abound in this novel, which feels like a cross between the themes in both Breasts and Eggs by Mieko Kawakami and Kim Jiyoung, Born 1982 by Cho Nam-Joo yet, perhaps even more effectively orchestrated despite being less overt. This melancholy but poignant and poetic novel takes aim at social constructs of family while examining the ways trauma and close-bonds travel with us throughout our lives, asking us what to make of our experiences in this vast world. ‘Don’t erase things from the world just because you are incapable of imagining them.’ This novel came to me highly recommended by Emily and her review is outstanding. I had to immediately order this, particularly as Tilted Axis Press is an incredible little publisher out of the UK with a mission statement about atoning for the harm of imperialism on global literature through centering translations of underrepresented writers, particularly women. This novel by South Korean author Hwang Jungeun perfectly fits that mission, with depictions of lower class working women—the sisters Nana and Sora—and a queer male character in Naghi, their lifelong friend. The inclusion of the queer perspective adds such a necessary and important voice to the prevailing themes of trauma and non-traditional family and is perhaps the most powerful section of the novel. Which is saying something as at the end of each section it seemed impossible for it to get any better but Hwang manages to consistently transcend. Central to the novel is a trauma from childhood. The sister’s father has been killed in a workplace accident—devoured by the gears of a large machine—and their mother, Aeja, slips into depression and abandons her will to live, leaving the young girls to take care of themselves and each other. ’Aeja, was someone who, true to her own name, once brimmed with love, was nothing if not love. And so upon losing that love, she endued up a curious thing: she ended up a mere empty husk.’ Listening to their mother talk about the meaninglessness of life, ‘futile to the end - that’s human life for you and there’s no use fighting it,’ she says and her nihilistic worldview begins to seep into their lives while also fearing becoming the empty husk like their mother. Luckily they move into a shared building where they meet Naghi, who has also lost a father. Through shared meals, struggles and jokes, the three form a lasting bond, a ‘tribe’ they like to call it. As they grow up, they grow apart and Sora is shocked to discover through intuition that Nana is pregnant. How to care for another person is a theme pulsing through the novel. Sora’s attempts at closeness are resisted by Nana who claims ‘you fake kindness, hiding your resentment and pretending to look out for me.’ The neglect from early life has left them timid of care from others, pushing people away when knowing they need them. Nana finds she is ‘between wishing for things to remain as they are and desiring just as strongly to smash things up, to break everything apart…’ There is a strong social insistence on marriage and family, particularly if a woman is pregnant or has a child, yet Nana’s section explores her fears of losing herself in the notion of a family. Hwang takes aim at patriarchal family structure, with Nana repulsed that her boyfriend’s father has a chamber pot only he uses but makes his wife clean for him. She is doubly repulsed when her boyfriend does not find this strange. ‘That's what family means to him: no longer counting as other people.’ She resists being married for the sake of family, numbing yourself into oblivion with a glazed gaze into a TV all day, everyday as your family members meld into a malaise of strangers around you like his family. But, if not family, what then? The original title, Soranananaghi, combines the character names and references a drunk episode where Naghi makes three drops, each drop he names after the three of them, flow into one larger drop. While I’ll Go On is still a perfect title, being a mantra of Nana’s as well as the central statement of the book, this earlier title and scene show that family can simply be people who care about each other. Naghi acts as a caring father-figure to the girls, a stark contrast from his own abusive father. He works in a bar and is fond of preparing food, which becomes a symbol for shared love in the novel. This is particularly apparent in the three’s tradition to make dumplings together. They feed each other, they nourish each other, and through their shared strength each can say ‘I’ll go on.’ Contrasting to the nourishing of food is the way society consumes them. The father is quite literally consumed by a machine in the factory, a fairly direct criticism to the gears of capitalism devouring lives in labor to nourish itself in wealth much like Hwang examines in her other novel, One Hundred Shadows. In a quest for meaning in life, have we replaced meaning with consumption for the sake of consumption? Marketing of products tends to focus on the “experience” of the product or brand, targeting consumer psychographics for those most likely to be drawn into their mimicking of meaningfulness. But does it garner any real, authentic value in our lives? Hwang ask us to consider if we are all, like the father, the ones actually being consumed and digested by the machinations of capitalism. Furthermore, she questions the ways we contort our own authentic experiences into ones that are better marketed through storytelling to achieve a purpose, such as the way Naghi distorts and escalates his father's flaws in order to impress the boy he likes until even he himself can't remember the truth. Storytelling is a way of passing on meaning, and Hwang caustions us that there is responsibilities to consider in such an art. Society insists they act a certain way, marry a certain way, love a certain way, and those who are outcasts like the trio in this novel are assumed to be washed away into meaninglessness. Naghi can’t even love who he loves in the open. But love is what matters, and Naghi explains that pushing away those who truly care about you causes harm. Harm that lasts. In one of the most powerful scenes of their childhood he explains: ’Anytime you hurt, remember that other people can hurt just as much. You've got to make that connection. But ...most of the time it might seem more natural to pretend otherwise. But that's why we've got to remember. Because if we don't, we'll forget, entirely. It is a plea to end the cycle of trauma, to not let one’s own hurt become a hurt to others. Each character has experienced their own share of grief, we all have in life, but smothering the grief in love and shared empathy is far more effective than allowing the grief to grow fangs and lash out at those around us. ‘Well, that’s how his words and his stories got to be in my blood and in my bones.’ There is a melancholy that seeps through the story and deep into the reader, but it is not one that saddens you so much as makes you slow down into it’s rhythm and feel the world pulse around you. It is kept upbeat and alive through the terrific wordplay and an introspective format that pushes the narrative forward while also mimicking interior conversations questioning the self. The translation is excellent and is careful to not overtranslate, keeping the culture within its own framing and allowing an outside reader to feel welcomed but allowing opportunity to dig into word meanings and cultural dynamics on their own time if they so choose. It’s a translation style I’ve come to appreciate most. All this adds up to quite a remarkable novel and Hwang is able to fold a multitude of themes into the mix while successfully investigating all of them without it feeling overly stuffed. It wades into really nuanced examinations on society, womanhood, queerness, poverty and more and continuously returns with golden insights. While the book may seem dark, the tone is rather inviting and warm and so are the conclusions. Sure, life may seem meaningless, particularly for those on the outside of things, but, perhaps, nothing is all that meaningless. Perhaps the sheer act of going on amidst it all is what matters. Hwang has crafted a gorgeous novel that will inspire you and help you remember that you, too, can go on. 5/5 ’all may well be insignificant so far as the world's concerned, mere fleeting and therefore inconsequential beings. But the more she thinks about it, the more it seems untrue that by the same token they're therefore not worth cherishing.’ ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Jun 21, 2021
|
Sep 02, 2021
|
Jun 21, 2021
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
006289000X
| 9780062890009
| 006289000X
| 4.26
| 57,756
| Feb 06, 2020
| Apr 28, 2020
|
it was amazing
|
‘Some people, some events, make you lose your head. They’re like guillotines, cutting your life in two, the dead and the alive, the before and after.’
‘Some people, some events, make you lose your head. They’re like guillotines, cutting your life in two, the dead and the alive, the before and after.’ Every so often a book comes along that just hits all the right notes for you, charming you while also compelling you to grip the covers as each frenetic flip of the page pulls you further into a story you want to see how it plays out yet never want to reach the ending. Polish author Tomasz Jędrowski’s glorious debut, Swimming in the Dark, did just that for me and I was enraptured by this tragic love story where politics and history threaten to pull these two men apart at every turn. Set in a 1980s Poland but told retrospectively in letters addressed to “you” from the ‘dreadful safety of America’ as unrest boils over back home, Jędrowski examines the painful uncertainties and fears faced by LGBTQ+ communities under the Party but also the joys of first love. The style and themes here will likely draw comparisons to Call Me By Your Name. The novel vibrates with the arts and joys of social lives—with Giovanni's Room by James Baldwin playing a central role and the nightclub and social scenes of dreary Warsaw sharing thematic importance with vibrant rural Poland—to draw you into the character’s livelihoods as if you were a participant, which also forces you to feel the shadow of an obdurat ruling structure creeping over their lives all the more. Swimming in the Dark is a gorgeously written novel rife with symbolism that reads like an instant classic, telling a singular yet universal tale of life and love being tossed about the waves of political turmoil as a powerful microcosm of history. [image] (Demonstration in Warsaw, 1982. Previously banned photograph, Karta Centre Collection) Like any love story bibliophiles crave, Swimming in the Dark begins with a book: an ‘unauthorized, underground’ printing of Giovanni's Room our narrator, Ludwik, obtains after an overheard conversation in a gay bar. Jędrowski really goes for the heartstrings, having Janusz come upon Ludwik lying in the grass reading Baldwin while the two are attending the mandatory summer work camp to graduate university. There is an instant connection, and Ludwik risks being exposed--both for his sexuality and possessing banned literature--by lending Janusz the book. ‘You listened, really listened, gentle eyes taking me in without judgment,’ Ludwik writes of their early meetings, ‘making me feel more heard than I knew I could be.’ To commit to Janusz is to give himself into the freedoms and raptures of love, but also to risk everything. He is, as he writes so eloquently, ‘paralyzed by possibility, caught between the vertigo of fulfillment and the abyss of uncertainty.’ So much of this novel delves into the socially taboo. ‘There was a certain pleasure in doing what I had not allowed myself before,’ Ludwick writes, ‘a satisfaction in the forbidden, a challenge.’ With so much lurking in the forbidden, to trust or not in another bears the risk of ruin and often in matters of life or death. Trust is central to this narrative and the difficulties of navigating a relationship where being exposed can have terrible consequences. Each characters presents unique avenues to explore the theme, from trusting a stranger to hide Ludwik when he acts as an antagonizer to the crowd during a workers uprising, to trust that is taken advantage of or otherwise abused. The philosophical dualites between Ludwik and Janusz that tests their relationship over time extends beyond their opposing political viewpoints to how they handle issues of trust. Duality itself is a major theme in this novel that constantly juxtaposing various pairs to create an emotional analysis and imagery in high contrast. While both of them exploit issues of trust for personal gain, it is the way Janusz does so by taking advantage of another and disrespecting them as a person that truly creates a cataclysmic chasm between them. ‘we can never run with our lies indefinitely. Sooner or later we are forced to confront their darkness. We can choose the when not the if. And the longer we wait, the more painful and uncertain it will be.’ The political landscape of the novel worms its way into everything and makes trust all the more precarious of enterprises. What is most charming, and will likely be an empathetic aspect to readers, is the way the two young men’s duality is best examined in their trajectory from literature. Both studied literature at the University and Ludwick sets out to do a PhD, writing his proposal on James Baldwin. While he connected to Baldwin over his openness over the traumas of being a young gay man in a society that violently frowns upon such thing, he writes his paper on the racism in America that Baldwin wrote about. For one, he cannot admit he has read Giovanni’s Room—which officially doesn’t exist as far as the Party is concerned—and writing on this topic would surely be dismissed. Writing about racism in America allows him to bypass the censorsorial nature of the University and please them for criticizing the West and thereby upholding the Soviets, but secretly he is still making a statement on the mistreatment of LGBT citizens. Additionally, Ludwick has seen racism first hand in Poland, when the first boy he ever kissed as a child is disliked and pressured to leave for being Jewish. There is a lot of textures and layers to the inclusion of Baldwin in this book On the other hand, Janusz joins the Office of Press Control where he decides what to ban and what to publish. This sort of ideological difference is root in all their arguments and political discourse always threatens to tear them apart. Disagreements over the Party frequently occur, becoming more ethically murky when proximity to the Party is a gatekeeper for their futures with Ludwick beholden to Janusz’s connections after he obtains medicine to save the life of Ludwick’s impoverished landlady. ‘One day your country is yours, and the next it isn’t.’ The youth culture of 1980s Poland really comes alive through club and party scenes on the tab of wealth Party-connected friends contrasting with the workers fighting police in the streets and the drab poverty of struggling citizens. We have the official narratives of the Party versus the secret nightly listening to Radio Free Europe. Meat prices are skyrocketing and food is hard to come by as citizens are merely ‘queing for a possibility, queuing for something, maybe queuing for nothing.’ The meager housing of Ludwick looks rough compared to Janusz’s Party Official pay level apartment but completely dwarfed by the wealthy possessions of Hania, Janusz’s high-level Party connection. She lives in ‘a place of pleasure and peace, indifferent to governments, faithful to whoever happens to be in power,’ which offends Ludwick to his core as he thinks ‘how undeserving you all were of it.’ Those with power hold it so strongly as to push around and push out lives on a flight of fancy while others live entirely on the brink of destruction. While holy devoted to the party, Janusz see’s the wealth of others as something to exploit, claiming innocence as its just something he must do to survive and if he fools them it is their own fault. He even uses Hania’s affection for him to keep her favors coming, leading her on much to the heartache and ethical frustrations of Ludwick. Later in life Ludwick will wonder ‘what kind of pact you’ve made with yourself. Because we all make one, even the best of us. And it’s rarely immaculate. No matter how hard we try.’ What is most astonishing in this book, though, is how dynamic the characters can be. They are flawed people who behave in shocking yet authentic ways, with the surprising mercy and kindness shown from one character near the end delivering such a powerful wave of emotion that it shook me deeply. While the scene figures as a sort of "coming out" moment, but the author didn't want this to be the 'major message' because 'really what I care about is trying to discover those grey znes and, really, the truth...I've always been more comfortable with what I do, with verbs rather than nouns.' The way this moment is blended with other themes and Hania's reaction is worth the entire ride. Jedrowski opens these characters up to the reader, feeling the raw nerves of their anxieties, frustrations and devastation. This book is an emotional symphony, sometimes caustic, sometimes bittersweet, but always beautiful. This book reads like a classic in all the best ways. The prose is arresting and serene and though there are a few overwritten flourishes, the language truly astonishes on the page. The novel was written in English despite not having grown up in an english-speaking society. ‘It’s my literary language,’ Jedrowski explains in the interview after the novel. ’Because it’s in English that I really started reading books properly. It’s this part of my mind that feels really intimate and private, but not the same as intimacy between me and my family or intimacy between me and my husband. It’s a sort of self-intimacy. This gives a very intimate tone to the work itself, with each page truly embodying a tenderly written reminiscence of love. The imagery is very romantic at times, with sexual intimacy with Janusz described in cosmic metaphor of infinity and freedom, starkly contrasted with a scene of sexual betrayal that is very beastial, and earthly with pagan connotations. This is a novel that can be heavily analyzed, with Jedrowski offering plenty of carefully packed messages encoded all over the book. This book truly grabs your heart and doesn’t let go. The political is personal and the person is political in Swimming in the Dark, and Jedrowski has crafted a spectacular novel that is an instant favorite. 5/5 ‘we can never run with our lies indefinitely. Sooner or later we are forced to confront their darkness. We can choose the when not the if. And the longer we wait, the more painful and uncertain it will be’ ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Apr 20, 2021
|
May 13, 2021
|
Apr 20, 2021
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
0593192338
| 9780593192337
| 0593192338
| 3.25
| 4,680
| Apr 06, 2021
| Apr 06, 2021
|
it was amazing
|
What does it mean to be seen by those you value, and what befalls you when you become invisible to them? Helen Oyeyemi’s Peaces is a skilful and unset
What does it mean to be seen by those you value, and what befalls you when you become invisible to them? Helen Oyeyemi’s Peaces is a skilful and unsettling fable that is difficult to pin down, slowly allowing the existential angst to seep into the reader. Known for brilliant fairy tale recreation that perfectly embodies the genre in a literary sense, here Oyeyemi slips comfortably into train-mystery aesthetic that feel like Hitchcock’s The Lady Vanishes meets surrealist horror that just so happened to collaborate with Wes Anderson. This is an elusive little tale of Otto and Xavier Shin (and their pet mongoose)on their ‘non-honeymoon honeymoon’ (they legally took the same last name but have declined from being married) in a former tea smuggling train run by a young woman who must prove her sanity on her 30th birthday or lose a vast inheritance as stipulation of a will. The enigmatic nature of her work is the engine driving Peaces, a novel where someone you can’t quite see might be lurking amongst the train passengers who are slowly realizing they have been brought together for nefarious purposes by a common element they can’t quite identify. While one of her more straightforward works, Peaces is a delightfully dark yet comical psychological drama that is still full of unexpected turns and occasionally abstruse misdirections to examine the very essence of enigmatism. Early in the novel, narrator Otto details the ‘four different philosophies of enjoying’ a marionette show, all of which also make for succinct metaphors of the ways someone would read a novel. There are those ‘whose attention is reserved solely for the actions of the marionette;’ those who look at or for the puppet master; those who watch the faces of the other audience members; and, finally, ‘those who follow the strings and the strings alone.’ Now, as a metaphor for reading, all of these are valuable and it’s worth considering which you are. As a string watcher myself, I found the performance of Peaces highly enjoyable because the way she crafts sentences and sets them on a winding and chaotic path without ever tangling the strings is nearly miraculous to behold. ’[W]hen I look at matters in those light...as arrangements rather than relationships, the primary movers starts to look...familiar’ This description of attempting to understand the novel’s events also verbalize some of Oyeyemi’s narrative techniques. It is fascinating how she is able to orchestrate the elements of the novel and suddenly reorganize and re-juxtapose them to unveil a different impression of everything like a slight of hand trick. The slightest change in string pulling for the maximum effect. Oyeyemi’s magic act on the strings makes this a novel that is tough to pin down. Oyeyemi as puppeteer seems to embody this as a major element in her ouveur. Novels like Mr. Fox weave and reinvent themselves metafictionality, her books are populated with shapeshifters, ghosts, and marionettes, her narratives have dual metaphors, etc. All of these nuances create a slippery and shifting landscape of meaning. Her work is often couched in the theories and traditions of fairy tales but set in modern day, such as the gingerbread house of Hansel and Gretel being a factory that makes gingerbread as part of a larger statement on slavery and Brexit in Gingerbread. Here, enigmatism seems to be the primary function of the novel, turning a mirror back onto itself as if attempting the improbable task of understanding something not meant to be fully understood. ‘What if this longing actually is him, and he was a living, breathing strategy for its fulfilment?’ This is a book where practically nothing is clear, and Oyeyemi is frequently refitting images. This is also elaborated in the mysterious passenger Otto can see but can’t focus on (like some weird cousin of the Silence from Doctor Who), or the artworks in the studio car that appear as a blank canvas but when talking about them aloud your words uncontrollably spew out to depict a vivid image the eyes can’t see. Central to this novel is a young man, Přem, whom the inheritress, Ava Kapoor, either cannot physically see or hear him or she has been playing a cruel trick on him for years. Přem is never present through the novel, or is he? Is he pulling the strings here, making the characters all his marionette in power move for the inheritance? Has he entered the lives of each character at some point, yet as a different person for each one, only to inevitably vanish? Is this meant literally or as a personality trope? Do people vanish from our lives or do they actually become unseen? Is this to be understood at face value or a metaphor for the ways we erase a person after a break-up? Pull all social media, lose their number, change your hangouts, extricate each other from your existence. Then there is the questions wheter Kapoor wrote ‘help’ or ‘hello’, and did the man in the burning house tell Otto to ‘save’ his son or ‘stop him? These questions are the pulse of the novel, and they almost make a point. Which isn’t a failure as much as it is the only logical answer that there is no definite answer and the metaphysical space between the dualities is the essence of what Oyeyemi is trying to focus on. You can almost see it, you are aware it exists, but you can’t ever quite make out it’s features. This is akin to what Thomas Pynchon terms 'The Zone' in Gravity's Rainbow: the space between the binaries of 1 and 0. You can cover it in words and chart it with analysis but still only make out a vague sense of its outline and never the thing-in-and-of-itself if you want to get all Heideggerian about it. Or, like the music from the theremin Kapoor plays, you can hear it but you can’t see it. Without touching the instrument Kapoor makes it play, but still moves her hands like conducting a musical marionette on invisible strings. This the realm of poetry, perhaps, the abstraction. Personally I find this all rather comforting as a reader, its rejection of ever coming completely together, like that old desktop screensaver where you waited for the bouncing pong ball to perfectly land in the corner of the screen--Oyeyemi refuses to let the ball ever land there like slowly turning the screw of tension and abstract angst. She makes you feel the itch you can’t scratch and live in that moment to explore and reflect on it.This probably sounds in no way appealing but the effortlessness of creating the effect and keeping you engaged is worthy of admiration. There is a playfulness with the characters that is really charming. Oyeyemi often withholds details about characters until just the right moment where it will refocus your impression of them, such as how Xavier’s description late in the book about first meeting Otto gives you a few tiny details that make you really reexamine his personality. When Xavier mentions he is a frequent liar, you begin to question what you know of the entire novel since it is told to you from Otto’s point of view. We begin to wonder how much we know of anyone and realize the iceberg theory of writing characters applies to what we know of everyone around us. How does this apply to giving in to love with another, then? Otto takes a stab at this considering his romantic journey with Xavier: ‘You run the romantic gauntlet for decades without knowing who exactly it is you're giving and taking such a battering in order to reach...and then, by some stroke of fortune, the gauntlet concludes, the person does exist after all.’ Heartbreak, it seems then, is when the other person ends up not existing, or exists as someone else than how you catalogued them in your head. Oyeyemi takes this one step further and asks what if it is you that doesn’t exist. What if the object of your affection cannot see you and you do not know if they chose this or--as is in the novel--quite literally cannot see you. This seems an unbearable burden, to exist in a reality where the stories we live out occur through the intersections and collisions with others but to be unseen and unknown to others. While this is meant as literal to one character, it also serves as a sharp social criticism as the cast are identities who are often unseen by society seeing as they are almost all BIPOC LGBTQIA characters living in Brexit-era Britain. ‘Art is made of other people.’ Peaces is a very funny and wild ride and really leans into the train-mystery aesthetics that texture cozy mysteries. This is a book where the little details have a great effect. It is also full of great asides, often diving into an adjacent story for pages, examining the story at large as one made up of as many stories are packed into the life stories of each person we meet. As one should expect with Oyeyemi, there is no stable ground and it is best to just let yourself be carried along. I could see this being a good introduction into her work, however, though I tend to recommend her short stories What Is Not Yours Is Not Yours as the best way to ease oneself into her unique an inimitable literary canon. This is a novel where watching the marionettes play out the story is fun, but the real experience is watching the strings pull the act along and discovering that our impressions and emotions are attached to Oyeyemi’s string, making us, the reader, another marionette in her surreal artistic creation. 4.5/5 ‘But the people will not allow the instrument to exist. Not even as an idea.’ ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
Apr 06, 2021
|
Apr 14, 2021
|
Jan 12, 2021
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
1945492341
| 9781945492341
| 1945492341
| 3.63
| 707
| 1954
| May 19, 2020
|
liked it
|
‘For me, that’s where the war began, in Erica’s room.’ For every story of love there are also stories of hardship love must endure to survive. The Tree ‘For me, that’s where the war began, in Erica’s room.’ For every story of love there are also stories of hardship love must endure to survive. The Tree and the Vine, written in 1952 by Dutch author Dola de Jong had to overcome many of its own struggles in order to bring this beautiful story of love to light. Despite her established success, de Jong’s novel of two women in Amsterdam grappling with emotional entanglements at the outbreak of WWII was deemed “shameless” and “unpublishable”. It took the intervention of many friends and her American editors to finally bring de Jong’s story of the reserved Bea and her more erratic roommate Erica to print. Now with Kristen Geherman’s exquisite new translation, readers can once again experience what de Jong called her favorite novel. While much of the novel may feel less-than-original by modern standards and the sexuality is so delicately mentioned that many could miss it entirely and only focus on the vague accusations of poor morals thrown at Erica, this book is more than just an artifact from LGBTQ+ literary history and shines as an elegant and deeply emotive psychological novel of frustrated emotions beset by the chaos and threats of violence from war. ‘Things aren’t fairly distributed in the world.’ Erica and Bea are wonderfully dynamic characters and Bea’s narration hums with such potent insight and emotion despite a sparse and direct prose style. Narrated over a decade after the events, there is a tenderness in her telling that betrays remorse as much as fondness as Bea has yet to fully detangle and digest her feelings for Erica and what has transpired. There is a shadow that looms over the novel with ominous interjections from the present juxtaposed with what Bea understood of Erica at the time. ‘Those early days with Erica were a mystery to me,’ Bea reflects. Erica tells tragic life stories but always with an air of humor that Bea cannot comprehend. ‘There’d come a time when Erica wouldn’t be able to see the humor in all this anymore, but that wasn’t until much later.’ While Bea’s accounts of events initially show Erica as lighthearted, full of energy and always eager for what comes next, she juxtaposes this with insinuations that Erica is a tragic figure which builds for a perfectly unstable emotional tone to the novel that compels the reader forwards the way Erica pulls Bea along the streets to theaters and bars. The reader is quickly as engulfed and overwhelmed by the ominous feverish tone as young Bea was in her feelings towards the enigmatic Erica. ‘Even now, with my broader understanding of humanity,’ Bea ruminates on her friend, ‘I wonder whether what I took to be a tree growing off in the distance wasn’t in face a lifeless trunk, its own leave strangled by the vines growing up around it.’ While Erica isn’t the most original character one will encounter, Bea’s feelings for her are sure to attach her into your own heart. Erica is a character who tempts fate and pushes headlong into life always in the extremes. She dates women who fight violently with her, she drinks heavily, wages a vicious war of attrition on Bea’s boyfriend to drive him away and get sole custody of her roommate back, and moves at a pace that has Bea always pleading for her to slow down. Later on there are scenes reminiscent of something from Fitzgerald with poor yet elegantly dressed artist types drinking in dilapidated apartments, but through Bea’s eyes all the drunken joy has drained from the frame to reveal a depressed and painful scene of people living out their anxieties as if to more quickly snuff out their lives. Destined for self-destruction, it would seem. de Jong's tender examination of Erica makes it easy to empathize with her, especially as fragments of insight into the mystery of her childhood are slowly pieced together. ‘Maybe I knew I’d been trying to save a sinking ship.” Bea cares for Erica, literally and emotionally. When the Nazi’s finally come, Bea attempts to help Erica flee, her being half-Jewish. The world events feel very peripheral, however, with Bea’s feeling for Erica always remaining forefront. The war is still felt all around, particularly through it's reverberations in society. People are fleeing while others are joining the Nazis, such as Erica's own mother becoming a party member and asking to give Hitler a chance because she thinks he will save the European economy. Much of the book is Bea in the present still trying to process her feelings, all of which are still tinged with shame and guilt having grown up in a society that viewed same-sex sexuality as a immoral. She never fully accepts what is felt between them, but it is there despite de Jong’s very light references to it. ’I couldn’t make out what she said and she had to repeat it.She never spoke those few words again. It wasn’t necessary. We both knew they were irrevocable and would last forever. We’ve accepted it, each in our own way.’ The delicate touches of love amidst the maelstroms of grief, anger, jealousy, and fear are truly moving. This is a book that crawled so that later LGBTQ+ novels could walk and run. The ending is tragic leaving the reader confronting a void as the novel abruptly ends much like those in wartime find themselves looking at the voids created in their own lives. This is also why it is important that now, with the privilege of LGBTQ+ characters becoming more normalized in fiction, books can depict their lives and loves without it having to be some monumental or tragic event in order to justify telling them and simply let people exist in the pages because they exist. The Tree and the Vine is a lovely and bittersweet little novel that I am happy to have discovered through this new translation. It is a beautiful piece of history and contains an powerful dynamic between its two heroines. Erica and Bea will definitely reside in my mind and heart from here on out. 3.5/5 ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
not set
|
not set
|
Jul 14, 2020
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
1594634653
| 9781594634659
| 1594634653
| 3.05
| 15,248
| Mar 05, 2019
| Mar 05, 2019
|
really liked it
|
‘The way to read a fairy tale is to throw yourself in.’ ― W.H. Auden An element of fairy tales that I particularly enjoy is the way you allow the story ‘The way to read a fairy tale is to throw yourself in.’ ― W.H. Auden An element of fairy tales that I particularly enjoy is the way you allow the story to happen to you like a wave washing over you. Literature that utilizes the genre effectively taps into a primordial reading experience that bears the wonderment of a world where magic and danger may lurk unexpectedly all around and the fantastical is still possible. You don’t question the oddities, you gleefully plunge deeper down the rabbit hole. Helen Oyeyemi has perfected the fairy tale medium over her 15 year career and her sixth novel, Gingerbread, is a marvelous addition to her catalog. Whereas her earlier works tended to experiment with a specific tale in an exciting new way, such as Mr. Fox did with Bluebeard or Boy, Snow, Bird did with Snow White, here she mixes familiar elements (there is a large homage to Hansel and Gretel at play, as well as Shakespearian allusions) in order to construct her very own fable. Gingerbread is a book you experience akin to a dream. Propelled by prose that is about as close to magic as one can find in the world, it consumes the reader with its own elusive logic in a hazy yet comforting realm slightly adjacent to reality. This is a story about family and a family recipe for gingerbread, but it is also an insightful look at African diaspora, Brexit, identity and class relations all as delicious ingredients for a fantastic modern fairy tale that pays homage to traditional structures and theories. Oyeyemi has a true talent with words. The prose rises from the page and consumes your senses much like one imagines Harriet’s gingerbread would. There is something about it that feels dreamlike and just beyond reach. I find that Wes Anderson films have a similar effect: it all feels somehow behind glass and unable to be touched, or like a play that is unconcerned if there is an audience as a good friend once stated. Both also have names that are just delicious to hear and say, like Gretel Kercheval or Dottie Cooper in Gingerbread. Oyeyemi’s imagery in the novel is stunning--the opening description of Margot, Harriet, and Perdita’s apartment high up an impractical building that reflects the idea of a gingerbread house, for instance--and is so physically mapped and ornate in the mind as if Oyeyemi wanted to be sure you shared her vision. There is a dry field with a giant jack-in-the-box that occasionally pops out throughout the day that is read like a fleeting moment from a dream that sticks deep within you but you can’t grasp. Moments like this are what make the novel truly gorgeous but also like something that happened TO you and not something you participated in. Which, if you can let down your ego, is a good thing as it is also thematic to a novel where Harriet must endure the things that happen to her. While some may feel distant from the book, it should be considered that perhaps not all novels are directly for you. In a book about Black women who must flee their country and be taken in like refugees only to be told they are a burden, perhaps not fully grasping it is a privilege. Either way, the elusive quality of the book’s atmosphere is such a strong point that it circles your mind like smoke for days to come: something you know is there but cannot get your hands on. Gingerbread is a difficult novel to pin down if one were to ask what it is “about”. The novel tells the life story of Harriet Lee from her humble farm beginnings and factory work in Druhástrana, a potentially imaginary island nation that might merely by ‘a profound mistranslation of Czech humor’, to her move to the UK and all the tangled webs of extended family she encounters. The bulk of the novel is framed as Harriet telling the story to her daughter Perdita Lee (a nod to Perdita, daughter of King Leontes in Shakespeare’s The Winter's Tale, a reference that also takes life with a nod to the play in the question over who is Perdita’s father later in the novel) in order to explain how she came to be. However, any explanation of the narrative falls short of unlocking the essence of the work. Literary critic and sociologist Tzvetan Todorov wrote that the understanding of a fairy tale ‘must be narrative mood, or point of view, or sequence, and not this or that story in and for itself,’ so that the point isn’t the story as a whole but the collage of images and events that culminate into a story. Each event, he writes, is a constant flux from equilibrium to disorder and then back to a new equilibrium. Gingerbread embodies this theme through it’s episodic structure of events that accrues into a beautiful portrait of family. Each shift is a constant reestablishing of footing for the Lee family in the world that is continuously shaken again and again. The episodic nature of the plot that drives it forward so engrossingly also cleverly follows a traditional fairy tale structure termed ‘The Initiation Tale: The Maiden’s Tragedy’ by mythology scholar Walter Burkert. Having regarded Vladimir Propp’s work on the 31 structural elements of fairy tales, Burkert looked at the way the elements serve a problem-solving function. ‘The quest,’ he writes in Creation of the Sacred: Tracks of Biology in Early Religions, ‘is established as the means for problem-solving, and it is represented and communicated through the tale.’ Each moment of disorder confronts Harriet or her mother with a new problem to be solved, such as the oppression of the Druhástranaian tenant farmers who lose money by the year or the fake money Harriet is paid in at the factory. These roadblocks become the modus operandi for plot progression and all follow the structure of ‘the maiden’s tragedy,’ the five key functions of a quest tale for female protagonists that Burkert proposed in addition to Propp’s pattern: 1. An eruption in a young girl’s life that causes her to separate from family and home. Gingerbread follows this structure, though in a way that subverts several of them. Stage one is seen with Harriet meeting Gretel and leaving the farmstead to work in the gingerbread factory. Stage two is the factory, however it is not as idyllic as it may seem. The gingerbread factory functions on many levels. There is a sense of the rural vs city life at play here as well as an admonishment on the dehumanizing aspects of capitalism and it’s favorite weapon: marketing. The farm girls are taken to a factory in the capital city that also serves like an eyes-only brothel where they must perform ‘traditional’ dances and flirt with customers to encourage them to buy the product. The dances are not actually traditional, which serves as a pointed critique on cultural fetishization, such as the ‘traditional tulip festival’ we hold annually where I live in Holland, Mi full of faux traditional dances and Americanized celebrations at which authentic Dutch visitors scratch their heads. On the surface, this factory is an idyllic place where the girls are forced to talk about how good they have it despite being kept in dank cells receiving forged letters from their families who, in turn, receive fake letters from their daughters telling of how wonderful they have it. It is later revealed in an embarrassing moment for Harriet when she tries to treat someone to drinks that the money they receive isn’t even real, which is the trigger for the third stage in Burkert’s structure. The fourth stage is the bulk of the novel, with Harriet and her mother Margot staying with relatives in the UK and trying to make their way in the world, while the fifth, without ruining anything, is rather open ended but involves the crisis in the present from which Harriet tells her story. Though it could also be the open ended haunted house tour at the tail end of the novel and its elusive conclusion. What is most interesting about the framing of the novel as a story about Harriet’s life told in the middle of a crisis, however, is that it invokes the idea of the oral tradition in fables and fairy tales. It also helps construct a destabilizing tone in the novel, such as the way dialogue is written in italics to denote that it was in the past. The narrative jumps back and forth, often interrupted by the inquiries or complaints from Perdita’s dolls, which--for reasons unexplained--are alive and all have plant leaves for hands and function as the guiding fairies in this story (while the novel seems mostly grounded in reality, it is punctuated by magical elements that the reader just accepts, like any fairy tale). The framing is both the call to action as well as the resolution of one of the primary narrative arcs. What makes Gingerbread most impactful is socio-political critiques it delivers through the fable elements. Jack Zipes, a major fairy tale scholar, speaks on how the fairy tale is a vessel to critique the political in his essay Breaking the Magic Spell. ’[I]f we reread some of the tales with history in mind, and if we reflect for a moment about the issues at stake, it becomes apparent that these enchanting, loveable tales are filled with all sorts of power struggles...and that their real ‘enchantment’ emanates from these dramatic conflicts whose resolutions allow us to glean the possibility of making the world, that is, shaping the world in accord with our needs and desires. In essence, the meaning of the fairy tales can only be fully grasped if the magic spell is broken and if the politics and utopian impulse of the narratives are related to the socio-historical forces which distinguished them...’ Regarding Gingerbread, a novel taking place in the present in the current UK society, if we pause to consider the political landscape of the world many of the novel’s political messages unfold out of the fairy tale magic. The class divide in Druhástrana is self perpetuating through oppression of the lower classes, such as the aforementioned factory issues. When traveling about the city, Harriet notices that everything exists behind gates, quite reflective of the class gatekeeping imposed by the upper classes. Her escapes from the farm, the factory and Druhástrana itself are all made allowable by a familial connection with a member of the upper class. Druhástrana keeps everyone in their place through the sheer impenetrability of paperwork and necessary documents and much upward mobility is merely an illusion (ie, the fake paychecks for the factory girls who were quite literally sold into unpaid labor). A brilliant anecdote is of the two lottery systems there, a fake lottery upheld by the State which uses propaganda to insist on its validity while denouncing the real lottery as fake to gatekeep money within the ruling class. Druhástrana itself becomes an impressive metaphor for Brexit, which is doubly interesting as the UK figures into the novel but Oyeyemi packs the criticisms of the UK into the fictional nation.It is a place of destabilized identity enforced through its own mythology and the propaganda of it’s textbooks. Harriet learns that a referendum was passed to ‘definitively withdraw from the so-called brotherhood of nations,’ who were ‘trying to propagate distracting inequalities, stuff about physical appearance and who people should and should not fancy and places of prayer that were better than others.’ Druhástrana teaches that they must ‘keep things simple and concentrate on upholding financial inequality.’ Oyeyemi does not hold back when she punches. The UK is reserved for commentary on the diaspora where Harriet must fit in a new land and find kinship with those she finds can speak her language. Margot and Harriet arrive through a near-death process and are transported to the UK in body bags stacked in a cargo hull, a sharp reference to the slave trade. However, both locations serve as one large commentary on society and with Oyeyemi boundaries are never clearly defined. ‘Talking or thinking about ‘there’ lends ‘here’ a hallucinatory quality that she could frankly do without. Pull the thread too hard and both skeins unravel simultaneously.’ This is the magic of a fairy tale: packing the political into an elusive package. There are the family politics as well, which is juxtaposed to those of friendship. In the UK, we see the distant relatives--a wealthy sort upheld by convoluted and questionable business--offer their aid as their 'yearly good deed'. This 'good deed' is not unlike the deal-with-the devil Margot and the farmstead family has made with Margot's other relative who owns the factory, her good deed of paying the families to place their children into slavery so they can own their own farms. It is a classic look at the wealthy class' idea of aid to the lower classes that in no way solve the systemic issues creating class divide but merely put a bandage over a festering wound and declare themselves saviors. However, one family member, Gretel, is the only saving grace of these relatives. Gretel is Harriet's only friend and claims to be a Changeling. This trickster figure is also Harriet's saving grace and provides direction in her life, albeit obfuscatingly. In fairy tales nothing is quite what they seem, and the dangerous family members play right into the classic notions of wicked stepmothers (a prominent theme in Oyeyemi's early work Boy, Snow, Bird). As a whole, Gingerbread is a masterful literary fable. Oyeyemi has drawn from a wealth of theory and carefully constructed references to build magic in the ordinary. The novel meanders and may seem obtuse at times, but, like any good fairy tale, questioning it as you go is beside the point. When the final page concludes, the totality of it is something to behold, particularly with the adorable final passage (shoutout for LGBTQ+ inclusion as well in this novel). Fantastical and fantastic, Oyeyemi is a masterful writer. 4.5/5 'A gingerbread addict once told Harriet that eating her gingerbread is like eating revenge. “It's like noshing on the actual and anatomical heart of somebody who scarred your beloved and thought they'd got away with it,” the gingerbread addict said. “That heart, ground to ash and shot through with darts of heat, salt, spice, and sulfurous syrup, as if honey was measured out, set ablaze, and trickled through the dough along with the liquefied spoon. You are phenomenal. You've ruined my life forever. Thank you.”' ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
not set
|
not set
|
Jun 13, 2020
|
Hardcover
| |||||||||||||||
1571315055
| 9781571315052
| 1571315055
| 4.14
| 803
| Aug 14, 2018
| Aug 14, 2018
|
really liked it
|
i care so much abot the whord i cant reed Much of the work for a poet is to probe the undercurrents of reality through transformative language, making la i care so much abot the whord i cant reed Much of the work for a poet is to probe the undercurrents of reality through transformative language, making language malleable as an abstract expression to the abstractness of life. In her 2019 poetry collection Feeld, the trans poet and translator Jos Charles pushes the exploration of linguistic malleability in extraordinary ways. Poet Fady Joudah, who selected Feeld as winner of the National Poetry Series, describes the language as ‘Chaucerian English [translated] into the digital twenty-first century,’ as Jos Charles plays with phonetics to reclaim language for a trans space. The disarming use of language is ripe for interpretations, such as a representation of the disorientation for queerness in an obdurately gendered society enforced through rhetoric control of language, or the need to reappropriate language--’a whord lost inn the mouthe off keepers--from the social gatekeepers. Though, as said in her interview with Frontier Poetry, it is less about reclaiming but more ‘identifying what is useful in what is adjacent’. While the use of language may sound daunting at first, there is a real pureness to it all and it is an utterly pleasant experience akin to childlike awe. Furthering the reclamation, Feeld is primarily poetry centered in nature, reclaiming the traditional cis male tradition of nature poetry for a trans space. Blooming with whimsical double entendres and searing social critique, this empowering and joyously inventive collection puns and probes its way deep into the hearts and minds of readers. a chylde is wut ideologie looks lik Feeld delivers poetry that is simultaneously disorienting and familiar, softly moving through a garden of words at a slow pace as if to take it all in and bask within itself. Charles has a delicate construction that carefully uses both words and blank space to allow the poem to breath and give the reader space to sink into its beauty. While the language is admittedly difficult to initially grasp, Charles manages to make it a pleasant instead of laborious experience with form that encourages slow, careful reading at your own pace. There is a sense that Charles is carefully guiding the reader the way a parent slowly walks their young child out into the world with love and shared joy. While, yes, others have used phonetic spelling before for other purposes, Feeld utilizes it in a breathtaking way that helps to fully embody its messages. The phonetic spellings, such as ‘mornynge’ for morning, ‘wymon’ for women, or ‘wite’ for white, become something you read not just with your eyes but with your ears and mouth. It becomes a fully encompassing work of the body, and discussions on the identity of the body are quite central to the work. There are more playful moments as well, such as the title term that appears in nearly every poem--‘feeld’--and how it seems all at once both ‘field’ and to ‘feel’. Again this technique is used with ‘breasthes’ as both ‘breaths’ and ‘breasts’ or the pun on ‘queries’ as ‘queerys’ to keep the discussion on queer identity central to the work. The fragile barrier between words breaks down within this collection as representation of the fragility of gender binaries. i a woake 1 mornynge / 2 see the hole whorld off thynges befor me The use of the natural world in these poems is both soothing and wonderfully subversive. Drawing on a tradition often associated with masculinity, as she says in interviews, Jos Charles says has made a point to show that this can be a space for queerness as well. Brilliantly, by aligning trans identity with the natural world and incorporating it into that world, she asserts trans as natural. This meshes well with the language of the whole, not just of the body as examined previously, but the wholeness of nature and living beings. The natural world gives way to a political world, however, with imagery of fruit going bad on the tree or when ‘gendre is not the folde but a siteatione ’, particularly in the poems that deal with bathrooms. ‘boyes r not alowd in this pome’, she concludes in a poem heavy with mention of a ‘feemale depositrie room, moving from an image of a tall woman washing their hands to what seems a play on a common outburst experienced by a trans woman in these situations. it is horribel off corse to be tangibel / inside kapitel Trans identity in a gendered world and the ways capitalism seeks to make us all pawns in its game are major themes running through Feeld. There is the empowerment to become ‘tagibel’, to exist outside the norms and to be yourself, yet this also is examined for the way the world preys on tangibility. Social stigma oppresses trans people in horrific ways, often violent with an alarming number of murders of trans individuals each years--predominantly trans women of color. ‘did u kno not a monthe goes bye’, she writes, ‘a tran i kno doesnt dye’. She writes on the struggles to be open as trans while existing in ‘masckulin economyes’, acknowledging the plight that befalls those who are. There is also the issues of acceptance: ‘ how many/ holes would blede/ befor/ u believ/ imma grl’, writes Charles on the plight of being taken seriously with a trans identity in a world stuck in gender binaries. Much of the work also looks at the ways that sexuality is commodified and ‘bye definision a cruele economicks’. She writes you are born boy, girl, or worker, and that these identities control much of your social and financial life, nodding to the gender pay gap here. ‘i am afrayde / i am riting myeself’, says Charles, playfully teasing authorial intent. While the themes of identity being forced into a political sphere through the weaponization of language is clearly at heart of Feeld, the collection is self-aware and seems to avoid taking itself overly seriously. She concludes a poem almostly blithely with ‘trama lit is so hotte rite nowe’, retaining a sense of playfulness but also reminding the reader that this isn’t being written just to follow a trend but to give voice to those often voiceless. This seems a call out to those who accuse people when they come out as ‘just doing it for attention’ or that it’s ‘trendy’ (a term Charles uses as well to bat away critiques. If you haven’t been following, there is a major backlash against poet who write about non-white, non-hetero identities, particularly on internet communities). ‘Feeld is not part of a trend but a bold and brave voice crying out. The inventive use of language and the carefully constructed use of space make this a complete joy to read and while this collection has teeth it also has a loving sweetness that will certainly last long after you close the book. 4.5/5 ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
not set
|
not set
|
Apr 26, 2019
|
Paperback
| |||||||||||||||
1555977855
| 9781555977856
| 1555977855
| 4.47
| 11,712
| Sep 05, 2017
| Sep 05, 2017
|
it was amazing
|
Anything is possible / in a place where you can burn a body / with less outrage than a flag Since the day I purchased the wonderful Don’t Call Us Dead Anything is possible / in a place where you can burn a body / with less outrage than a flag Since the day I purchased the wonderful Don’t Call Us Dead by Danez Smith, it has accompanied me everywhere in my shoulder bag. It is a collection that has felt like a companion for a year now, travelling across train, plane, down the familiar roads to work and the coffee shops where I do homework and most importantly often in my heart and mind. Yesterday, Danez Smith was awarded the high honor of the Forward Prize, much deservingly so because this book, this poet, is an extraordinary bright light in a world that seems to be always tightening its bitter grip. Not that this collection shirks grim reality. No, it looks it straight in the eyes both fearless and unafraid to show fear, pain, sorrow, and laughs and shouts and reminds us that we are alive even if only for a short while, and that life and death is a bittersweet ball of beauty. Danez Smith covers a lot of territory, from police brutality, gun violence, the black experience, being queer in an unkind world to living with HIV and while the subject matter may be heavy with anguish and anger--and if this collection doesn’t spark outrage at the world you aren’t paying attention--the ultimate feeling is courage and love. You cannot get through this collection with dry eyes. please, don’t call / us dead, call us alive someplace better. Danez Smith is a joy. Their first collection insert boy won the Lambada Literary Award in 2014 and they were twice a finalist for the Individual World Poetry Slam. To label them a “slam poet” is to miss the mark--the term “slam poet” has long been used to subjugate black poets under an idea of a “lesser genre” of poetry even when white poets began to popularly appropriate the form in the recent decade--and their words sing beautifully on the page as spoken aloud. There is certainly a marvelous melodiousness to their language, and it cuts straight to the heart. Hearing them aloud is a real treat, check out Danez reading Dinosaurs In the Hood with the plea “& no one kills the black boy. & no one kills / the black boy. & no one kills the black boy.” near the end before reminding the reader of the beauty of “his dreams possible, pulsing”. America has not been kind to the black boy, and Danez Smith is here to attack this head on. The opening poem summer, somewhere weaves beauty, violence and heartbreak across it’s many pages dealing with the killing of black boys--particularly Trayvon Martin--by police officers. ‘dear badge number,’ they write, ‘what did i do wrong? / be born? be black? meet you?’. The poem moves in and out of perspectives, most emotionally so from the view of the mother: they buried you all business, no ceremony.These are poems that take on America’s sick love of guns--‘paradise is a world where everything / is sanctuary & nothing is a gun’, and that ‘some of us are killed / in pieces, some of us all at once.’ These are poems that take a hard look at race and are unafraid to confront whiteness and it’s hand in oppression and violence. ‘ask why does it always have to be about race? because you made it that way! Smith says in Dear White America. Violence is everywhere and these poems keep us centered in the death that goes on when people do not love each other enough to actually value one another. In every day is a funeral & a miracle Smith weaves a history of police violence with the destructive power of HIV: i survived yesterday, spent it There is much remorse for those gone from this world, and they ask why we miss ‘what we will become’? If the answer to all this is not love, than I do not know what is. Love, acceptance, just being human. Smith reminds us that we must confront and dismantle racism, homophobia and fear-mongering as they are racking up a savage body-count. i am a house swollen with the dead, but still a home. the bed where it happened is where i sleep. This is an incredibly moving collection by an incredible poet. Their work will bring you to tears and refresh your heart. While the collection is necessarily dark, there is a lightness to it as well that will fill you with such light that only the best of poetry can muster. Each poem dances on the page, the musicality of the words swinging along with various playful forms that help empathize meaning. This collection, a National Book Award Finalist, and this poet are an essential read in modern times. This is important, don’t look away. 5/5 Little Prayer let ruin end here let him find honey where there was once a slaughter let him enter the lion’s cage & find a field of lilacs let this be the healing & if not let it be ...more |
Notes are private!
|
1
|
not set
|
not set
|
Sep 19, 2018
|
Paperback
|
s.penkevich > Books: lgbt (21)
|
|
|
|
|
my rating |
|
|
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
3.57
|
liked it
|
Feb 2023
|
Feb 01, 2023
|
||||||
3.83
|
really liked it
|
not set
|
Sep 15, 2022
|
||||||
3.54
|
it was amazing
|
Aug 15, 2022
|
Aug 15, 2022
|
||||||
4.03
|
it was amazing
|
not set
|
Aug 07, 2022
|
||||||
3.86
|
it was amazing
|
Jul 29, 2022
|
Jul 20, 2022
|
||||||
3.73
|
it was amazing
|
Apr 22, 2022
|
Apr 17, 2022
|
||||||
3.93
|
really liked it
|
not set
|
Apr 05, 2022
|
||||||
3.87
|
really liked it
|
Apr 2022
|
Apr 01, 2022
|
||||||
3.51
|
liked it
|
not set
|
Jan 14, 2022
|
||||||
3.52
|
it was amazing
|
not set
|
Dec 31, 2021
|
||||||
4.05
|
really liked it
|
not set
|
Nov 27, 2021
|
||||||
4.23
|
really liked it
|
not set
|
Nov 26, 2021
|
||||||
3.67
|
really liked it
|
Apr 04, 2022
|
Oct 29, 2021
|
||||||
3.78
|
it was amazing
|
Sep 02, 2021
|
Jun 21, 2021
|
||||||
4.26
|
it was amazing
|
May 13, 2021
|
Apr 20, 2021
|
||||||
3.25
|
it was amazing
|
Apr 14, 2021
|
Jan 12, 2021
|
||||||
3.63
|
liked it
|
not set
|
Jul 14, 2020
|
||||||
3.05
|
really liked it
|
not set
|
Jun 13, 2020
|
||||||
4.14
|
really liked it
|
not set
|
Apr 26, 2019
|
||||||
4.47
|
it was amazing
|
not set
|
Sep 19, 2018
|